Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

From Sparse to Dense: GPT-4 Summarization with Chain of Density Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.04269 v1 pith:KCXIZ7IJ submitted 2023-09-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords summariesdensegpt-4chaindensitygeneratedpromptsummary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Selecting the ``right'' amount of information to include in a summary is a difficult task. A good summary should be detailed and entity-centric without being overly dense and hard to follow. To better understand this tradeoff, we solicit increasingly dense GPT-4 summaries with what we refer to as a ``Chain of Density'' (CoD) prompt. Specifically, GPT-4 generates an initial entity-sparse summary before iteratively incorporating missing salient entities without increasing the length. Summaries generated by CoD are more abstractive, exhibit more fusion, and have less of a lead bias than GPT-4 summaries generated by a vanilla prompt. We conduct a human preference study on 100 CNN DailyMail articles and find that that humans prefer GPT-4 summaries that are more dense than those generated by a vanilla prompt and almost as dense as human written summaries. Qualitative analysis supports the notion that there exists a tradeoff between informativeness and readability. 500 annotated CoD summaries, as well as an extra 5,000 unannotated summaries, are freely available on HuggingFace (https://huggingface.co/datasets/griffin/chain_of_density).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Designing Human and Generative AI Collaboration

    cs.HC 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In creative writing, collaboration designs that preserve human input into ideation and outlining yield higher story quality, writer satisfaction, and diversity than designs where humans only confirm AI output.

  2. Comparing Learning Paradigms for Egocentric Video Summarization

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A prompt-engineered GPT-4o (quality score 64.95) outperformed Shotluck Holmes (61.19) and TAC-SUM (58.43) on a 21-video egocentric summary evaluation, though all scores were modest.

  3. Multi-LLM Text Summarization

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using multiple LLMs to generate and select summaries raises ROUGE and BLEU scores on ArXiv and GovReport compared with single-LLM chunk-and-concatenate baselines.

Pith tools