REVIEW 3 cited by
From Sparse to Dense: GPT-4 Summarization with Chain of Density Prompting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Selecting the ``right'' amount of information to include in a summary is a difficult task. A good summary should be detailed and entity-centric without being overly dense and hard to follow. To better understand this tradeoff, we solicit increasingly dense GPT-4 summaries with what we refer to as a ``Chain of Density'' (CoD) prompt. Specifically, GPT-4 generates an initial entity-sparse summary before iteratively incorporating missing salient entities without increasing the length. Summaries generated by CoD are more abstractive, exhibit more fusion, and have less of a lead bias than GPT-4 summaries generated by a vanilla prompt. We conduct a human preference study on 100 CNN DailyMail articles and find that that humans prefer GPT-4 summaries that are more dense than those generated by a vanilla prompt and almost as dense as human written summaries. Qualitative analysis supports the notion that there exists a tradeoff between informativeness and readability. 500 annotated CoD summaries, as well as an extra 5,000 unannotated summaries, are freely available on HuggingFace (https://huggingface.co/datasets/griffin/chain_of_density).
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Designing Human and Generative AI Collaboration
In creative writing, collaboration designs that preserve human input into ideation and outlining yield higher story quality, writer satisfaction, and diversity than designs where humans only confirm AI output.
-
Comparing Learning Paradigms for Egocentric Video Summarization
A prompt-engineered GPT-4o (quality score 64.95) outperformed Shotluck Holmes (61.19) and TAC-SUM (58.43) on a 21-video egocentric summary evaluation, though all scores were modest.
-
Multi-LLM Text Summarization
Using multiple LLMs to generate and select summaries raises ROUGE and BLEU scores on ArXiv and GovReport compared with single-LLM chunk-and-concatenate baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.