Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 51 references

A finite-population SIR epidemic with Markovian regime switching has an exact level-wise recursion for the joint distribution of extinction time and infection count.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:58 UTC pith:KCXXCFDF

load-bearing objection The central recursion is correct and genuinely useful; the mpox application is honestly framed as conditional and the math core deserves serious referee time.

arxiv 2607.18364 v2 pith:KCXXCFDF submitted 2026-07-20 q-bio.PE math.PRstat.ME

Evaluating the Impact of Epidemic Control via State-Dependent Markovian Switching Modeling

Vasileios E. Papageorgiou , Irene Votsi , Samis Trevezas This is my paper
classification q-bio.PE math.PRstat.ME MSC 60J2760J2892D30
keywords finite-population SIRMarkovian regime switchingintervention phasesextinction timefinal epidemic sizejoint Laplace-Stieltjes transformstate-dependent policympox modeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a finite-population SIR epidemic model in which infection, recovery, and vaccination rates depend on an intervention phase that switches over time, and the switching rates may themselves depend on the current numbers of susceptible and infectious individuals. The central claim is that the joint distribution of extinction time and infection burden is governed by level-wise linear recursions indexed by the susceptible count, so exact infection-count probabilities, extinction-time moments, and their correlations can be computed by solving many small phase-level linear systems instead of one large global system. If correct, this provides a way to compare control mechanisms—intensity, timing, vaccination support, state-dependent escalation—on full outbreak distributions rather than only mean trajectories. The method is illustrated on weekly mpox data from Luxembourg, where a one-phase baseline is calibrated and alternative regimes are compared conditionally on the fitted parameters. The authors are careful that these are conditional model-based comparisons, not causal estimates of historical intervention effects.

Core claim

The joint Laplace–Stieltjes transform–probability generating function of extinction time and the number of infections satisfies a linear system whose block-bidiagonal structure splits into small phase-level recursions. For each susceptible level s and infectious count i, the transform vector is obtained by solving a P×P system with matrix A_{s,i}(z) = zI + (si/N)B + iΓ + sΨ − Q_P(s,i); the right-hand side couples to already computed levels s−1 and i−1. This yields exact finite-population quantities—infection-count distribution, conditional extinction-time transforms, mixed moments, and duration–burden correlation—with only the continuous time densities requiring numerical Laplace inversion.

What carries the argument

The level-wise block structure of the generator, built on the fact that the susceptible population never increases and decreases by at most one at a jump. The phase-block matrices A_{s,i}(z) couple the P intervention phases at each epidemic state, and the recursions advance in s then i. The load-bearing identity is the unique-solution equation (zI − Q_{T,T}(u))Φ(z,u) = Q_{T,a}1, whose diagonal dominance on Re(z) > −η0 guarantees nonsingularity and a well-defined recursion.

Load-bearing premise

Every intervention phase must have a strictly positive recovery rate; if a phase could have zero recovery, extinction might not be almost sure and the exponential-moment domain used in the recursions could fail.

What would settle it

Set all recovery rates to zero in the recursion (6)–(7) and check whether the computed extinction-time moments stay finite; Lemma 1 predicts they cannot, because paths that never recover make T infinite with positive probability.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Exact distributional comparison, not just mean comparison, of interventions in finite populations: full outbreak-size distributions, duration densities, and their dispersion.
  • Interventions that look similar in expectation can be distinguished by their tails and by the correlation between duration and infection burden.
  • State-dependent switching intensities let policy escalation react to the current infectious count while keeping the process Markovian.
  • Computational cost drops from solving one dense global system to solving O(P^3 N^2) phase-level systems, with all infection-count coefficient transforms at additional O(P^2 N^3).
  • The Luxembourg scenarios illustrate how control intensity, timing, vaccination, and state-dependent escalation each shift infection burden and duration in different ways.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the same level-wise recursion should apply to any epidemic model with a monotonically decreasing compartment, such as an exposed class in an SEIR-type model, provided the monotone coordinate is the level index.
  • Extension: state-dependent switching rates could be reparameterised as functions of noisy surveillance data or posterior beliefs, turning the framework into a building block for real-time policy evaluation under uncertainty.
  • Extension: because the exact small-population distributions are computable, they could serve as gold-standard test cases for moment-closure or diffusion approximations used at larger population sizes.
  • Extension: a full empirical comparison would need to estimate phase-transition intensities from intervention histories and propagate that uncertainty, since the paper's switching parameters are specified rather than estimated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper develops a finite-population SIR epidemic model modulated by an intervention-phase CTMC, where phase transitions can depend on the current epidemic state. The central result is a level-wise recursion (Theorems 2–4 and Corollary 3) for the joint Laplace–Stieltjes transform/probability generating function of the extinction time T and the number of post-initial infections N_I, and hence for infection-count distributions, conditional transforms, and mixed moments. The authors prove a.s. extinction and exponential tails under the explicit condition γ*>0 (Lemma 1). They then calibrate a baseline one-phase deterministic SIR model to Luxembourg mpox weekly incidence and use the fitted parameters in four groups of conditional switching scenarios, emphasizing that the comparisons are model-based and not causal estimates.

Significance. The theoretical contribution is substantial and, as far as I can verify, correct: the recursion exploits the monotone decay of the susceptible class to replace a large global linear system by small P×P solves, and the Appendix A proofs (first-jump conditioning, block recursions, strict diagonal dominance under γ*>0, and domination arguments for moment differentiation) are coherent. The explicit statement of Condition (2) and the transparent caveats about the conditional nature of the empirical comparisons strengthen the paper. The main limitations are the deterministic-ODE-based calibration feeding a stochastic scenario analysis, the hand-specified switching parameters, and the unarchived code; these are acknowledged in the text and do not undermine the central mathematical claim.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1 / Data and code availability] The code is said to be 'available from the authors upon reasonable request.' For a methods paper with an empirical illustration, public deposition of the code and processed data would substantially improve reproducibility; please provide a repository link or a detailed pseudo-code appendix.
  2. [Section 3.1] The first and last calendar weeks are partial but are retained without weighting. Since the Poisson calibration uses these weeks as full counts, please add a sensitivity check (e.g., dropping them or using a reporting-offset) or justify that the edge effect is negligible.
  3. [Section 2.1, Condition (2)] The assumption γ*>0 is essential for Lemma 1 and for nonsingularity of A_{s,i}(z). The paper states it explicitly, which is fine, but it would help to add a remark that a phase with γ_p=0 can make T infinite with positive probability (or lack exponential moments), and to indicate whether the recursion could be extended in that direction.
  4. [Section 3.5, Eq. (19)] The state-dependent escalation function is illustrative and its coefficients/threshold are arbitrary. A brief sensitivity analysis over these parameters (e.g., varying the threshold 6 or the maximum rate) would show how robust the Scenario 4 qualitative conclusions are.
  5. [Title / Abstract] The title and abstract may overstate the empirical component: the analysis compares specified mechanisms conditionally on calibrated parameters rather than estimating historical intervention effects. The abstract already qualifies this, but consider adding 'conditional' or 'model-based' to the title to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the joint-transform recursion is derived from the CTMC generator by first-jump conditioning, and the numerical scenarios are explicitly conditional counterfactuals rather than fit-then-predict claims.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Theorem 2's system (5) and level-wise recursions (6)-(7) are obtained by conditioning on the first jump of the continuous-time Markov chain, as shown in Eq. (20) of Appendix A; the matrices A_{s,i}(z) are read directly from the generator (1). The outputs—infection-count distributions, extinction-time transforms, and mixed moments—are computed from these recursions, not fitted to those outputs. Nonsingularity of A_{s,i}(z) is proved by strict diagonal dominance using the explicit hypothesis gamma* > 0, so uniqueness is not imported from any external or self-cited theorem. The numerical study calibrates only a one-phase baseline SIR model to weekly incidence data, and the intervention scenarios are then specified conditionally: the paper states that 'the switching intensities and intervention effects are specified rather than estimated from the historical policy process' and that 'only the baseline epidemiological parameters are informed by the observed incidence data.' Thus, the scenario distributions are model-based conditional comparisons, not predictions of the same fitted quantities. The self-citations in the introduction are contextual (placing the work in a literature) and carry no mathematical assumption needed for the proof. The acknowledged limitations—fixed gamma, rounded integer initial state, Poisson observation model, and unarchived code—are empirical or practical caveats, not instances of a derived quantity being equivalent to an input by construction. No circular step satisfying the required evidence standard was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The theoretical recursion is self-contained given the CTMC assumptions; the main imported inputs are the finite-state Markovian modeling framework and, for the illustration, fitted or hand-chosen parameters. No new physical entities are introduced; the phase process is a latent modeling construct. The central derivation does not use fitted outputs as inputs, so circularity burden is low.

free parameters (8)
  • Effective transmission coefficient b = 0.99 (95% Wald CI [0.80, 1.21])
    MLE under deterministic one-phase SIR plus Poisson observation model on 14 weekly mpox counts; all switching scenarios are conditional on this value.
  • Initial susceptibles S(0) = 62 (fitted 61.88, CI [55.54, 120.87], rounded)
    Effective at-risk subpopulation estimated jointly with b; rounded to integer for the finite-state Markov chain.
  • Initial infectious I(0) = 1 (fitted 0.28, CI [0.06, 1.12], rounded with lower bound 1)
    Rounded to integer; the lower bound of 1 avoids initializing the chain in the absorbing disease-free state.
  • Recovery rate gamma = 1/3 per week
    Fixed from the WHO-reported two-to-four-week symptomatic duration of mpox; the authors call it a pragmatic calibration assumption rather than an estimate from Luxembourg data.
  • Early switching intensity q_E = 0.35 per week
    Hand-specified illustrative value corresponding to a nominal 2.86-week mean waiting time before strict measures; not estimated.
  • Delayed switching intensity q_D = 0.05 per week
    Hand-specified illustrative value corresponding to a nominal 20-week mean waiting time; not estimated.
  • Vaccination-supported removal rate psi = 0.05 per week
    Hand-specified direct immunity-acquisition rate used in Scenario 3; illustrative only.
  • State-dependent escalation coefficients = 0.01, 0.40, threshold 6 in lambda = 0.01 + 0.40 i^2/(i^2 + 6^2)
    Hand-chosen to make escalation unlikely at small i and increasing with infectious count; drives Scenario 4 results and is not estimated from intervention history.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Condition (2): gamma* = min_p gamma_p > 0
    Used to prove T < infinity almost surely, exponential moments in Lemma 1, and to choose eta0 < gamma* so the transform recursions are well-defined on Re(z) > -eta0.
  • standard math The joint process X = (S, I, J) is a finite-state CTMC with finite total transition intensities
    Uniformization in Lemma 1 relies on this; standard CTMC machinery.
  • domain assumption Closed finite population of size N with homogeneous mixing; S + I + R = N; R includes recovered and vaccinated immune individuals; no demography or waning immunity
    Model definition in Section 2.1; limits applicability to small closed outbreaks and immediate, lifelong vaccine protection.
  • domain assumption Baseline calibration: weekly counts are independent Poisson with means from a deterministic one-phase SIR ODE; gamma fixed at 1/3; S(0) and I(0) treated as effective unknown parameters
    Used to obtain b = 0.99 and the integer initial state for the scenarios. The authors note the negative-binomial fit hits its kappa bound and report Pearson dispersion 0.79, but the Poisson/ODE approximation remains an assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The state-dependent escalation functional form lambda_sd = 0.01 + 0.40 i^2/(i^2 + 6^2) is a reasonable illustration of policy responsiveness
    Chosen by hand with no independent evidence; Scenario 4 conclusions rest on this specification.
  • domain assumption Abate-Whitt numerical Laplace inversion with A = 18.4, 15 initial terms, and 11 Euler averaging terms yields accurate extinction-time densities
    Used to plot density curves; the paper clips non-finite or negative inversion artifacts, indicating numerical error is present but treated as cosmetic.
invented entities (1)
  • Intervention phase process J(t) no independent evidence
    purpose: Latent regime coordinate that modulates transmission, recovery, and direct immunity-acquisition intensities, with transition rates that may depend on the current epidemic state (S, I).
    The phase is not observed or estimated directly; switching intensities and regime effects are specified by the analyst. It is a standard latent-state modeling device rather than a validated observable.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18665 in / 16265 out tokens · 170116 ms · 2026-08-01T15:58:11.162595+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop an exact finite-population stochastic framework for SIR epidemics evolving under Markovian switching between intervention regimes. The epidemic state is augmented by a finite phase component, allowing transmission, recovery, and direct immunity-acquisition rates to depend on the active regime. Phase-transition intensities may depend on the current epidemic state, so that policy escalation can react to the number of infectious individuals. Exploiting the monotonicity of the susceptible compartment, we derive level-wise recursions for the joint Laplace--Stieltjes transform and probability generating function of the extinction time and the number of infections generated before extinction. These recursions yield the infection-count distribution, conditional extinction-time transforms, and mixed moments linking epidemic duration and infection burden, while replacing a large global linear system with small phase-level solves. The framework is illustrated using weekly mpox incidence data from Luxembourg. A baseline one-phase SIR model is calibrated by maximum likelihood under a Poisson observation model. The calibrated baseline is then used for conditional comparisons of fixed control regimes, early versus delayed strict intervention, vaccination-supported control, and state-dependent escalation. The results show how switching mechanisms affect both the total number of infected individuals and the extinction time, including their dispersion. Since the switching mechanisms are specified rather than estimated from the intervention history, the results are conditional model-based comparisons rather than estimates of the historical effects of interventions in Luxembourg.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18364 by Irene Votsi, Samis Trevezas, Vasileios E. Papageorgiou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Regime-switching SIR model with three intervention phases. In the general formula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Observed weekly mpox incidence yt and fitted Poisson means µbt under the one-phase baseline calibration. Bars represent the observations, and the solid line represents the fitted means. Specification of scenario parameters. The intervention-specific values used in Scenarios 1– 4 are illustrative and are chosen to separate the effects of intervention intensity, intervention timing, direct immunity acquisiti… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: PMF of the total number of infected individuals under the one-phase control settings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Density of the extinction time under the one-phase control settings considered in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PMF of the total number of infected individuals under the early and delayed strict [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Density of the extinction time under the early and delayed strict-intervention regimes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: PMF of the total number of infected individuals under the strict-control-only and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Density of the extinction time under the strict-control-only and vaccination-supported [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: State-dependent escalation rate λ sd 1,2 (s, i) used in Scenario 4. Rates are expressed in week−1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: PMF of the total number of infected individuals under constant delayed escalation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Density of the extinction time under constant delayed escalation and state-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms of Probability Distributions , volume =

    Joseph Abate and Ward Whitt , doi =. Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms of Probability Distributions , volume =. ORSA Journal on Computing , month =

  2. [2]

    and Olaniyi, Samson , title =

    Adepoju, Okunloye A. and Olaniyi, Samson , title =. Scientific African , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  3. [3]

    Allen , doi =

    Linda J.S. Allen , doi =. A primer on stochastic epidemic models: Formulation, numerical simulation, and analysis , volume =. Infectious Disease Modelling , keywords =

  4. [4]

    Almaraz, Elena and G. On. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems -- B , year =

  5. [5]

    Number of infections suffered by a focal individual in a two-strain

    Elena Almaraz and Antonio Gómez-Corral , doi =. Number of infections suffered by a focal individual in a two-strain. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences , keywords =

  6. [6]

    Analysis of a

    Seda İğret Araz , doi =. Analysis of a. Alexandria Engineering Journal , keywords =

  7. [7]

    A state-dependent

    Artalejo, Jes. A state-dependent. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences , year =

  8. [8]

    J. R. Artalejo and A. Economou and M. J. Lopez-Herrero , doi =. The maximum number of infected individuals in. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , keywords =

  9. [9]

    J. R. Artalejo and M. J. Lopez-Herrero , doi =. On the Exact Measure of Disease Spread in Stochastic Epidemic Models , volume =. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology , keywords =

  10. [10]

    J. R. Artalejo and A. Economou and M. J. Lopez-Herrero , doi =. Stochastic epidemic models with random environment: Quasi-stationarity, extinction and final size , volume =. Journal of Mathematical Biology , keywords =

  11. [11]

    Luís M. A. Bettencourt , editor =. An Ensemble Trajectory Method for Real-Time Modeling and Prediction of Unfolding Epidemics: Analysis of the 2005 Marburg Fever Outbreak in Angola , year =. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2313-1_7 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2313-1_7 2005

  12. [12]

    Mathematical Models in Epidemiology , series =

    Brauer, Fred and Castillo-Chavez, Carlos and Feng, Zhilan , title =. Mathematical Models in Epidemiology , series =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  13. [13]

    Stochastic epidemic models: A survey , volume =

    Tom Britton , doi =. Stochastic epidemic models: A survey , volume =. Mathematical Biosciences , month =

  14. [14]

    Byrd and Peihuang Lu and Jorge Nocedal and Ciyou Zhu , doi =

    Richard H. Byrd and Peihuang Lu and Jorge Nocedal and Ciyou Zhu , doi =. A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , volume =. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , month =

  15. [15]

    Bayesian particle filter algorithm for learning epidemic dynamics , volume =

    D Calvetti and A Hoover and J Rose and E Somersalo , doi =. Bayesian particle filter algorithm for learning epidemic dynamics , volume =. Inverse Problems , month =

  16. [16]

    Cao and L

    H. Cao and L. Cao and S. Jin , doi =. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics , title =

  17. [17]

    Carcione and Juan E

    José M. Carcione and Juan E. Santos and Claudio Bagaini and Jing Ba , doi =. A Simulation of a. Frontiers in Public Health , month =

  18. [18]

    Antonopoulos , doi =

    Ian Cooper and Argha Mondal and Chris G. Antonopoulos , doi =. A. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , month =

  19. [19]

    Diagne and Folashade B

    Mamadou L. Diagne and Folashade B. Agusto and Herieth Rwezaura and Jean M. Tchuenche and Suzanne Lenhart , doi =. Optimal control of an epidemic model with treatment in the presence of media coverage , volume =. Scientific African , keywords =

  20. [20]

    Economou and A

    A. Economou and A. Gómez-Corral and M. López-García , doi =. A stochastic. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

  21. [21]

    Lim and Peter Vickerman and Dimitrios Paraskevis and Mina Psichogiou and Angelos Hatzakis and Vana Sypsa , doi =

    Eleni Flountzi and Aaron G. Lim and Peter Vickerman and Dimitrios Paraskevis and Mina Psichogiou and Angelos Hatzakis and Vana Sypsa , doi =. Modeling the impact of interventions during an outbreak of. Drug and Alcohol Dependence , keywords =

  22. [22]

    Gómez-Corral and M

    A. Gómez-Corral and M. López-García and M. T. Rodríguez-Bernal , doi =. On time-discretized versions of the stochastic. Journal of Mathematical Biology , keywords =

  23. [23]

    On the exact reproduction number in

    G. On the exact reproduction number in. Computational and Applied Mathematics , year =

  24. [24]

    On the number of periodic inspections during outbreaks of discrete-time stochastic

    Maria Gamboa and Maria Jesus Lopez-Herrero , doi =. On the number of periodic inspections during outbreaks of discrete-time stochastic. Mathematics , keywords =

  25. [25]

    Gamboa and M

    M. Gamboa and M. J. Lopez-Herrero , doi =. Measuring Infection Transmission in a Stochastic. Acta Biotheoretica , month =

  26. [26]

    Quantitative Biology , volume =

    Kiss, Gabor and Moutari, Salissou and Mctaggart, Cara and Patterson, Lynsey and Kee, Frank and Lamrock, Felicity , title =. Quantitative Biology , volume =. doi:10.1002/qub2.50 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/qub2.50

  27. [27]

    A note on maximum likelihood estimation of the initial number of susceptibles in the general stochastic epidemic model , volume =

    Theodore Kypraios , doi =. A note on maximum likelihood estimation of the initial number of susceptibles in the general stochastic epidemic model , volume =. Statistics & Probability Letters , month =

  28. [28]

    European Journal of Operational Research , volume =

    Lu, Xuefei and Borgonovo, Emanuele , title =. European Journal of Operational Research , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  29. [29]

    Simulation of coronavirus disease 2019 (

    Egor Malkov , doi =. Simulation of coronavirus disease 2019 (. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals , keywords =

    2019

  30. [30]

    2022 , howpublished =

    Mathieu, Edouard and Spooner, Fiona and Dattani, Saloni and Ritchie, Hannah and Roser, Max , title =. 2022 , howpublished =

    2022

  31. [31]

    A bare-bones mathematical model of radicalization , volume =

    C Connell McCluskey and Manuele Santoprete , doi =. A bare-bones mathematical model of radicalization , volume =. Journal of Dynamics and Games , keywords =

  32. [32]

    Papageorgiou and George Tsaklidis , doi =

    Vasileios E. Papageorgiou and George Tsaklidis , doi =. A stochastic. Applied Mathematical Modelling , keywords =

  33. [33]

    Papageorgiou and George Tsaklidis , doi =

    Vasileios E. Papageorgiou and George Tsaklidis , doi =. An improved epidemiological-unscented Kalman filter (hybrid. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals , keywords =

  34. [34]

    Papageorgiou and George Tsaklidis , doi =

    Vasileios E. Papageorgiou and George Tsaklidis , doi =. A stochastic particle extended. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences , month =

  35. [35]

    , title =

    Papageorgiou, Vasileios E. , title =. Journal of the Franklin Institute , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  36. [36]

    Papageorgiou and Georgios Vasiliadis and George Tsaklidis , doi =

    Vasileios E. Papageorgiou and Georgios Vasiliadis and George Tsaklidis , doi =. A new method for the estimation of stochastic epidemic descriptors reinforced by. Mathematical Biosciences , month =

  37. [37]

    Papageorgiou , doi =

    Vasileios E. Papageorgiou , doi =. Boosting epidemic forecasting performance with enhanced. Operational Research , month =

  38. [38]

    Papageorgiou , doi =

    Vasileios E. Papageorgiou , doi =. Estimating the prevalence of terrorism under control policies. A statistical modelling approach , volume =. Applied Mathematical Modelling , month =

  39. [39]

    Papageorgiou , doi =

    Vasileios E. Papageorgiou , doi =. A stochastic Markov-based modeling framework with demography , volume =. Journal of Mathematical Biology , month =

  40. [40]

    New insights into terrorism radicalization: Uncertainty quantification through stochastic modelling , year =

    Vasileios E Papageorgiou , doi =. New insights into terrorism radicalization: Uncertainty quantification through stochastic modelling , year =. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society , month =

  41. [41]

    and Votsi, Irene and Tsaklidis, George , title =

    Papageorgiou, Vasileios E. and Votsi, Irene and Tsaklidis, George , title =. Applied Mathematical Modelling , year =

  42. [42]

    Global stability in a mathematical model of de-radicalization , volume =

    Manuele Santoprete and Fei Xu , doi =. Global stability in a mathematical model of de-radicalization , volume =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

  43. [43]

    Countering violent extremism: A mathematical model , volume =

    Manuele Santoprete , doi =. Countering violent extremism: A mathematical model , volume =. Applied Mathematics and Computation , keywords =

  44. [44]

    Scientific Reports , month =

    Abdennour Sebbagh and Sihem Kechida , doi =. Scientific Reports , month =

  45. [45]

    Joanna Sooknanan and Terence A. R. Seemungal , doi =. Criminals and their models - a review of epidemiological models describing criminal behaviour , volume =. Applied Mathematics and Computation , keywords =

  46. [46]

    Chikodili Helen Ugwuishiwu and D. S. Sarki and G. C.E. Mbah , doi =. Nonlinear Analysis of the Dynamics of Criminality and Victimisation: A Mathematical Model with Case Generation and Forwarding , volume =. Journal of Applied Mathematics , publisher =

  47. [47]

    C. M. Wachira and G. O. Lawi and L. O. Omondi , doi =. Sensitivity and Optimal Control Analysis of an Extended. Journal of Mathematics , publisher =

  48. [48]

    Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health , volume =

    Modelling the impact of perfect and imperfect vaccination strategy against SARS. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health , volume =. 2022 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101052 , author =

    arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    2014 , issn =

    A new epidemic model of computer viruses , journal =. 2014 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.09.038 , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.09.038 2014

  50. [50]

    An optimal control analysis of a

    Muhammad Zamir and Thabet Abdeljawad and Fawad Nadeem and Abdul Wahid and Ali Yousef , doi =. An optimal control analysis of a. Alexandria Engineering Journal , keywords =

  51. [51]

    PLOS ONE , year =

    Hem, Sopheak and Ly, Sowath and Votsi, Irene and Vogt, Florian and Asgari, Nima and Buchy, Philippe and Heng, Seiha and Picardeau, Mathieu and Sok, Touch and Ly, Sovann and Huy, Rekol and Guillard, Bertrand and Cauchemez, Simon and Tarantola, Arnaud , title =. PLOS ONE , year =