REVIEW 2 cited by
Equivariant non-linear maps for neural networks on homogeneous spaces
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This paper presents a novel framework for non-linear equivariant neural network layers on homogeneous spaces. The seminal work of Cohen et al. on equivariant $G$-CNNs on homogeneous spaces characterized the representation theory of such layers in the linear setting, finding that they are given by convolutions with kernels satisfying so-called steerability constraints. Motivated by the empirical success of non-linear layers, such as self-attention or input dependent kernels, we set out to generalize these insights to the non-linear setting. We derive generalized steerability constraints that any such layer needs to satisfy and prove the universality of our construction. The insights gained into the symmetry-constrained functional dependence of equivariant operators on feature maps and group elements informs the design of future equivariant neural network layers. We demonstrate how several common equivariant network architectures - $G$-CNNs, implicit steerable kernel networks, conventional and relative position embedded attention based transformers, and LieTransformers - may be derived from our framework.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Platonic Transformers: A Solid Choice For Equivariance
Platonic Transformers achieve exact equivariance to translations plus discrete Platonic-solid rotations by lifting features into multiple reference frames and sharing one RoPE attention across them, with a linear-time...
-
Conditional Clifford-Steerable CNNs for PDE Modeling
Conditional Clifford-Steerable CNNs, which condition the equivariant kernel on pooled input features, improve PDE forecasting accuracy but do not prove the claimed complete kernel basis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.