Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Tree-Based Leakage Inspection and Control in Concept Bottleneck Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.06352 v1 pith:KESYPJHS submitted 2024-10-08 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords cbmsleakageconceptdecisionmodelsbottleneckconceptscontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As AI models grow larger, the demand for accountability and interpretability has become increasingly critical for understanding their decision-making processes. Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have gained attention for enhancing interpretability by mapping inputs to intermediate concepts before making final predictions. However, CBMs often suffer from information leakage, where additional input data, not captured by the concepts, is used to improve task performance, complicating the interpretation of downstream predictions. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for training both joint and sequential CBMs that allows us to identify and control leakage using decision trees. Our method quantifies leakage by comparing the decision paths of hard CBMs with their soft, leaky counterparts. Specifically, we show that soft leaky CBMs extend the decision paths of hard CBMs, particularly in cases where concept information is incomplete. Using this insight, we develop a technique to better inspect and manage leakage, isolating the subsets of data most affected by this. Through synthetic and real-world experiments, we demonstrate that controlling leakage in this way not only improves task accuracy but also yields more informative and transparent explanations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Human-AI Co-design for Clinical Prediction Models

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HACHI, an iterative human-AI loop that turns clinical notes into small interpretable yes/no-concept risk scores, outperforms standard instruments in two retrospective UCSF case studies.

  2. DeCoDe: Defer-and-Complement Decision-Making via Decoupled Concept Bottleneck Models

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DeCoDe combines concept bottleneck models with learning to defer to select per-instance among AI-only, human-only, and AI+human strategies, reporting accuracy gains over binary deferral baselines on three image datasets.

  3. A Comprehensive Survey on the Risks and Limitations of Concept-based Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey cataloging the main vulnerabilities of supervised and unsupervised concept-based models, including concept leakage, spurious correlations, and intervention failures.

Pith tools