Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Evidence for incommensurate antiferromagnetism in nonsymmorphic UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues, from susceptibility, resistivity, and heat capacity, that the 161 K antiferromagnetic order in nonsymmorphic UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$ is incommensurate rather than the A-type (++ --) pattern of this material family.

desk verdict Solid new-compound characterization with carefully supported AFM transitions, but the title's 'incommensurate' claim outruns the evidence: the data exclude simple collinear A-type order without uniquely establishing incommensurability, and the paper itself leaves canted order open. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10998 v1 pith:KFFIES63 submitted 2024-12-14 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other

Sanu Mishra , Caitlin S. Kengle , Joe D. Thompson , Allen O. Scheie , Sean. M. Thomas , Filip Ronning , Priscila F. S. Rosa This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other PACS 75.50.Ee75.30.Kz
keywords antiferromagnetismincommensuratemagneticordernonsymmorphicspacegroupuraniumintermetallicHfCuSi2-typestructuresuperzonegapHalleffectlocalized5felectrons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish the magnetic ground state of a newly synthesized uranium compound, UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$, which crystallizes in the nonsymmorphic space group $P4/nmm$ (No. 129). The central claim is that the antiferromagnetic order below $T_N\simeq 161$ K is incommensurate, rather than the conventional A-type (++ --) stacking of ferromagnetic uranium layers along the $c$ axis that is typical for this family. The evidence is indirect but coherent: the perpendicular susceptibility drops below $T_N$ where a simple two-sublattice A-type magnet would stay flat, the resistivity rises through the transition in the way a superzone gap would produce, and a first-order feature near 30 K suggests a small rearrangement of the magnetic structure. If the claim holds, UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$ is a localized-$5f$ antiferromagnet with weak correlations, a sharp Fermi-surface reconstruction at $T_N$, and a field-stable spin texture that neutron diffraction could directly verify. The broader stakes are the search for topological Kondo semimetals in nonsymmorphic f-electron materials; this compound would sit on the localized side of that search.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three measured signatures. First, the temperature dependence of the perpendicular susceptibility below $T_N$: the paper relies on the rule that A-type alignment produces a flat perpendicular susceptibility, so the observed drop is the main evidence that a simple collinear structure is wrong. Second, the resistivity upturn at $T_N$, interpreted through the superzone-gap mechanism, ties the incommensurate claim to transport. Third, the first-order anomaly at $T_1 \simeq 30$ K, visible in susceptibility and heat capacity but absent in resistivity and Hall effect, indicates a magnetic-structure change that leaves the electronic structure intact. The Hall sign change across $T_N$ completes the picture by showing that the Fermi surface reconstructs when the magnetic order sets in.

What would settle it

A neutron diffraction measurement on these crystals would settle it: if all magnetic Bragg peaks index to a commensurate propagation vector such as $q=(0,0,1)$ and no incommensurate satellites appear, the incommensurate claim is falsified; equivalently, showing that a known A-type member of the same family also has a falling perpendicular susceptibility below $T_N$ would invalidate the baseline assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, in UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$, the ordered state below 161 K does not fit the A-type picture. The authors show that a conventional two-sublattice antiferromagnet with moments along the $c$ axis should have a nearly temperature-independent perpendicular susceptibility below $T_N$; the observed decrease therefore indicates either a canted or an incommensurate structure. They interpret the simultaneous upturn in resistivity at $T_N$ as the opening of a superzone gap, the characteristic transport signature of magnetic periodicity that does not match the lattice periodicity. Hall measurements show a sharp switch from electron- to hole-dominated transport at $T_N$, and specific heat gives a small Sommerfeld coefficient ($\gamma \simeq 13$ mJ mol$^{-1}$ K$^{-2}$), locating the $5f$ electrons in the localized limit. Magnetization stays linear and unsaturated to 160 kOe, and the paper identifies neutron diffraction as the decisive experiment to pin down the propagation vector.

Load-bearing premise

The incommensurate conclusion stands on the assumption that a conventional A-type antiferromagnet would keep its perpendicular susceptibility flat below the transition; if the observed drop could come from domain effects, anisotropy, crystal-field admixtures, or a canted commensurate structure, the central evidence loses its force.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Neutron diffraction on these crystals should reveal a magnetic propagation vector that is incommensurate with the lattice, and the 30 K transition should appear as a change in that vector or in the moment canting.
  • The 30 K transition is a magnetic reordering that does not alter transport, so the electronic structure is essentially fixed by the high-temperature antiferromagnetic state.
  • The small Sommerfeld coefficient and the enhanced ratio of the $T^2$ resistivity term to the square of the Sommerfeld coefficient place UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$ in the localized-$5f$, weakly correlated regime, making a Weyl-Kondo semimetal state in this compound unlikely.
  • The absence of metamagnetic transitions up to 160 kOe indicates that the antiferromagnetic exchange dominates competing crystal-field and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, so any unconventional spin texture would be static rather than field-induced.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if neutron diffraction confirms an incommensurate wave vector, the 30 K transition would be a clean lock-in transition in a nonsymmorphic uranium antiferromagnet, a useful testing ground for theories of incommensurate order in locally noncentrosymmetric crystals.
  • A testable extension of the paper's own c-axis hypothesis is uniaxial pressure: compressing $c$ toward the UNiBi$_2$ value should push $T_1$ down and eventually restore A-type order, while stretching the lattice should strengthen the incommensurate character.
  • The paper's observation that the perpendicular susceptibility falls below $T_N$ could also be checked on a known A-type member of the same family; a similar drop there would mean the flat-perpendicular-susceptibility baseline itself needs revision.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the synthesis of single crystals of the nonsymmorphic compound UPd0.65Bi2 and a comprehensive characterization by x-ray diffraction, magnetization, specific heat, electrical resistivity, and Hall effect. The authors identify an antiferromagnetic transition at TN ≈ 161 K, supported by a sharp susceptibility cusp, a lambda-shaped heat-capacity anomaly, and a resistivity upturn, followed by a first-order transition at T1 ≈ 30 K. They interpret the drop of χ⊥ below TN and the resistivity upturn at TN as evidence for an incommensurate antiferromagnetic structure that deviates from the conventional A-type (++−−) order expected in this family. Hall effect data show a sign change in the Hall coefficient across TN, indicating a Fermi-surface reconstruction. The specific heat gives a small Sommerfeld coefficient γ ≈ 13 mJ mol−1 K−2, consistent with localized 5f electrons. The paper concludes that UPd0.65Bi2 is a weakly correlated, localized-moment antiferromagnet and that neutron diffraction is needed to confirm the proposed incommensurate structure.

Significance. If the incommensurate interpretation is correct, UPd0.65Bi2 would be a new nonsymmorphic uranium compound with a high antiferromagnetic ordering temperature, localized 5f electrons, and a magnetic structure that goes beyond the A-type order typical of this family, making it relevant to the study of symmetry and magnetism in correlated electron systems. The experimental data are of good quality: the ordering transition is established by three independent probes, the Hall measurements are carefully analyzed, and the authors are transparent about the limitations of their data, explicitly calling for neutron diffraction. However, the central claim of incommensurability is not uniquely established by the presented measurements; the susceptibility and resistivity data are suggestive but also consistent with other scenarios, such as a commensurate canted structure. The paper's significance therefore depends on whether the incommensurate hypothesis can be strengthened or appropriately qualified.

major comments (3)
  1. [§C.2] The argument that the decrease of χ⊥ below TN evidences an incommensurate or canted component relies on the assumption that a simple collinear A-type antiferromagnet has temperature-independent χ⊥. This is a mean-field expectation that can be violated by crystalline-electric-field effects, domain reorientation, or anisotropy. The authors themselves state in this section that CEF fits are underconstrained and that CEF effects alone can reproduce the Curie-Weiss temperatures. Therefore, the observed χ⊥ drop does not uniquely distinguish incommensurate order from a commensurate canted structure, and this load-bearing inference needs to be quantified or revisited.
  2. [§C.4] The resistivity upturn at TN is attributed to a superzone gap that is characteristic of incommensurate order, but the presented data do not rule out alternative origins. The same section shows a drastic sign change in the Hall coefficient and a sharp drop in carrier density across TN (Figs. 4d–e), indicating a large Fermi-surface reconstruction. Any antiferromagnetic order that opens a gap on electron pockets would produce a resistivity upturn; the Fisher-Langer argument is a tendency, not a no-go theorem for commensurate order. Thus the resistivity data alone cannot uniquely select the incommensurate scenario.
  3. [§D] The title and the Summary claim that the measurements provide 'evidence for an incommensurate magnetic structure.' Given that no neutron diffraction determines the propagation vector and that the authors themselves call for neutron diffraction to confirm the structure, this claim is stronger than the data support. The paper would be more accurate if it stated that the data rule out simple collinear A-type order and are consistent with, but do not uniquely establish, an incommensurate (or canted) structure.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§C.3] The coefficient γ is referred to as the 'Sommerfield coefficient' in the text; the standard spelling is 'Sommerfeld'.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 captions] The word 'dependance' in the captions should be 'dependence'.
  3. [§C.1] The statement that 'the absence of superstructure modulations implies that the vacancies are not ordered' is an inference from x-ray diffraction, which is insensitive to short-range order; the text could acknowledge this limitation.
  4. [References [19] and [24]] References [19] and [24] are cited as 'unpublished'; if preprints or arXiv identifiers are available, they should be provided to help readers access the data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the incommensurate-AFM inference is an interpretation of measured data, not a quantity derived from fitted parameters or from self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that UPd0.65Bi2 exhibits evidence for incommensurate antiferromagnetism—is an interpretation of independently measured bulk properties (magnetic susceptibility, specific heat, resistivity, and Hall effect). No equation in the paper defines the incommensurability in terms of the measured signals; rather, the authors argue that the observed reduction in chi_perp below T_N is inconsistent with a simple collinear A-type structure, and that the resistivity upturn may reflect a superzone gap. These are physical inferences with stated assumptions, not circular reductions. The CEF fit mentioned in Sec. C.2 is explicitly described as underconstrained and is not used to produce the central claim. Self-citations (e.g., refs. 20, 23, 24, 47, 48) are used for familial context and prior observations, not as the load-bearing justification for incommensurability. The paper also explicitly notes the absence of neutron diffraction and calls for it in the Summary, honestly acknowledging that the incommensurate structure is not directly determined. Underdetermination between canting and incommensurability is a correctness/evidence concern, not circularity. Therefore no circular step is present, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper is experimental; the ledger captures the fitted parameters used in analysis and the model assumptions behind the incommensurate-AFM inference. The main burden is the A-type baseline model and the single-band Hall model; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Pd site occupancy = 0.651(9)
    Refined from single-crystal XRD; defines the actual composition UPd0.65Bi2 used for all measurements.
  • Curie-Weiss effective moments and Weiss temperatures = mu_eff_perp=3.58 muB, mu_eff_parallel=3.38 muB, theta_perp=-233 K, theta_parallel=+10 K
    Fits to inverse susceptibility; used to infer anisotropy and local-moment character.
  • Sommerfeld coefficient gamma and beta = gamma=13 mJ/mol K^2
    Fit of C/T versus T^2; used to argue weak correlations and localized 5f states. No phonon subtraction because a non-f analog is unavailable.
  • Fermi-liquid resistivity parameters = rho0=110 uOhm cm, A=0.01 uOhm cm/K^2
    Fit of rho(T)=rho0+AT^2 below 75 K; used for the Kadowaki-Woods ratio estimate.
  • Hall carrier density n=1/eRH = varies with temperature; sign changes across TN
    Obtained from the slope of rho_yx(H) assuming a single-band model; used to claim electron-to-hole reconstruction at TN.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption In a simple two-sublattice A-type antiferromagnet with moments along c, chi_perp is temperature-independent below TN.
    Used in Sec C.2 to infer that the observed chi_perp decrease implies a non-A-type component. This is the load-bearing assumption behind the incommensurate claim.
  • standard math Curie-Weiss law chi=C/(T-theta) holds in the paramagnetic state down to TN.
    Used in Sec C.2 to extract effective moments and Weiss temperatures; the authors note the CEF fits are underconstrained.
  • domain assumption Resistivity upturn at TN indicates a superzone gap due to incommensurate periodicity.
    Used in Sec C.4 to support incommensurate magnetism; other gap-opening mechanisms in commensurate order could also produce an upturn.
  • domain assumption Hall effect can be described by a single-band model with n=1/eRH.
    Used in Sec C.4 to convert Hall slope into carrier density; semimetals typically have multiple bands, so the quantitative carrier density is approximate.
  • domain assumption Low-temperature heat capacity follows C/T = gamma + beta T^2 with no magnetic or non-f background subtraction.
    Used in Sec C.3; absence of a non-f analog means gamma may include magnetic or other contributions.
invented entities (1)
  • Incommensurate (or canted) antiferromagnetic component
    purpose: Explains the decrease of chi_perp below TN and the resistivity upturn at TN.
    No neutron diffraction was performed; the same observations could be explained by commensurate spin canting or other effects. The authors acknowledge neutron diffraction is needed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evidence for incommensurate antiferromagnetism in nonsymmorphic UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KFFIES63

@misc{pith2026241210998,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evidence for incommensurate antiferromagnetism in nonsymmorphic UPd$_0.65$Bi$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KFFIES63}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10998}
}
abstract

The intersection between nonsymmorphic symmetry and electronic correlations has emerged as a platform for topological Kondo semimetallic states and unconventional spin textures. Here we report the synthesis of nonsymmorphic UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$ single crystals and their structural, electronic, magnetic, and thermodynamic properties. UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$ orders antiferromagnetically (AFM) below $T_N\simeq$ 161 K as evidenced by a sharp cusp in magnetic susceptibility, a second-order phase transition in specific heat, and an upturn in electrical resistivity, which suggests an incommensurate AFM structure that deviates from the A-type magnetism typically observed in this class of materials. Across $T_N$, Hall effect measurements reveal a change from electron-dominated to hole-dominated transport, which points to a sharp reconstruction in the electronic structure at $T_N$. Upon further cooling, a first-order transition is observed at $T_1 \simeq 30 $K in magnetic susceptibility and heat capacity but not in electrical resistivity or Hall measurements, which indicates a small change in the AFM structure that does not affect the electronic structure. Our specific heat data reveal a small Sommerfeld coefficient ($\gamma \simeq$13 mJmol$^{-1}$K$^{-2}$), consistent with localized 5$f$ electrons. Our results indicate that UPd$_{0.65}$Bi$_2$ hosts weak electronic correlations and is likely away from a Kondo semimetallic state. Low-temperature magnetization measurements show that the AFM structure is remarkably stable to 160 kOe and does not undergo any field-induced transitions. Neutron diffraction and magnetization experiments at higher fields would be valuable to probe the presence of unconventional spin textures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10998 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b). As discussed before, the P4/nmm struc￾ture displays a nonsymmorphic symmetry operation: a glide mirror {Mz| 1 2 , 1 2 , 0} that corresponds to a reflection about a plane perpendicular to c axis at z = 1 2 and a translation along the ab diagonal by 1 2 , 1 2 , as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) shows the temperature-dependent mag￾netic susceptibilities, χk(T ) and χ⊥(T ), of a UPd0.65Bi2 single crystal for a small magnetic field H = 1 kOe ap￾plied parallel (H k c) and perpendicular (H ⊥ c) to the tetragonal c axis, respectively. It is evident from the sharp cusp observed in χ(T ) that UPd0.65Bi2 undergoes an antiferromagnetic transition at TN ≃164 K. Below TN, a reduction in magnetic susceptibility is … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temperature dependance of heat capacity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Electrical transport properties of UPd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unconventional anomalous Hall effect in hexagonal polar magnet Y_3Co_8Sn_4

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Y3Co8Sn4 shows a sign-changing unconventional anomalous Hall effect, but the proposed Weyl-point mechanism is undercut by the paper's own inconsistent nonmagnetic-phase analysis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    65Bi2 crystallizes in the HfCuSi 2-type tetragonal crystal struc- ture within space group P 4/nmm (No

    Crystal Structure Determination X-ray diffraction analysis confirms that UPd 0. 65Bi2 crystallizes in the HfCuSi 2-type tetragonal crystal struc- ture within space group P 4/nmm (No. 129). Figure 1(a) shows the crystal structure of UPd 0. 65Bi2, which displays two inequivalent Bismuth sites. Bi(2) sites occupy the Wyckoff position 2 c (0.25 0.25 0.66751(11))...

    work page

  2. [2]

    65Bi2 single crystal for a small magnetic field H = 1 kOe ap- plied parallel ( H ‖ c) and perpendicular ( H ⊥ c) to the tetragonal c axis, respectively

    Susceptibility and Magnetization Figure 2(a) shows the temperature-dependent mag- netic susceptibilities, χ ‖ (T ) and χ ⊥(T ), of a UPd 0. 65Bi2 single crystal for a small magnetic field H = 1 kOe ap- plied parallel ( H ‖ c) and perpendicular ( H ⊥ c) to the tetragonal c axis, respectively. It is evident from the sharp cusp observed in χ (T ) that UPd 0. ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    65Bi2 single crystal is shown in Fig

    Heat Capacity The temperature-dependent specific heat, C/T , of a UPd0. 65Bi2 single crystal is shown in Fig

    work page

  4. [4]

    The feature at TN has a prototypical lambda-like shape of a second-order phase transition and corresponds to the paramagnetic to antiferromagnetic phase transi- tion in UPd 0

    C/T ex- hibits two distinct features at TN ≃ 161 K and T1 ≃ 30 K. The feature at TN has a prototypical lambda-like shape of a second-order phase transition and corresponds to the paramagnetic to antiferromagnetic phase transi- tion in UPd 0. 65Bi2. Further, this transition is noticeably mean-field like suggesting negligible fluctuations above the transition...

    work page

  5. [5]

    On cooling, ρab(T ) decreases monotonically down to the antiferromagnetic transition at T N

    Electrical Resistivity The temperature-dependent in-plane resistivity, ρab(T ), is shown in Figure 4(a). On cooling, ρab(T ) decreases monotonically down to the antiferromagnetic transition at T N . The room-temperature resistivity ρ300K ≃ 370 µ Ωcm is comparable to other uranium antimonides [ 20] and bismuthides [ 23]. The electrical 5 /s45 /s50 /s45 /s4...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    Lian, X.-Q

    B. Lian, X.-Q. Sun, A. Vaezi, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quantum com- putation based on chiral majorana fermions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 10938 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    M. J. Gilbert, Topological electronics, Commun Phys 4, 70 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Q. L. He, T. L. Hughes, N. P. Armitage, Y. Tokura, and K. L. Wang, Topological spintronics and magnetoelec- tronics, Nat. Mater. 21, 15 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    ˇSmejkal, Y

    L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, B. Yan, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nature Phys 14, 242–251 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    L. M. Schoop, M. N. Ali, C. Straßer, A. Topp, A. Varykhalov, D. Marchenko, V. Duppel, S. S. P. Parkin, B. V. Lotsch, and C. R. Ast, Dirac cone protected by non-symmorphic symmetry and three-dimensional dirac line node in ZrSiS, Nature Commun 7, 11696 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    L. M. Schoop, A. Topp, J. Lippmann, F. Orlandi, L. M¨ uchler, M. G. Vergniory, Y. Sun, A. W. Rost, V. Duppel, M. Krivenkov, S. Sheoran, P. Manuel, A. Varykhalov, B. Yan, R. K. Kremer, C. R. Ast, and B. V. Lotsch, Tunable weyl and dirac states in the nonsymmorphic compound CeSb...

    2018

  5. [13]

    Watanabe, H

    H. Watanabe, H. C. Po, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Vishwanath, Filling-enforced gaplessness in band structures of the 230 space groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 096404 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry- based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups, Nature Commun 8, 50 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Bian, T.-R

    G. Bian, T.-R. Chang, R. Sankar, S.-Y. Xu, H. Zheng, T. Neupert, C.-K. Chiu, S.-M. Huang, G. Chang, I. Be- lopolski, D. S. Sanchez, M. Neupane, N. Alidoust, C. Liu, B. Wang, C.-C. Lee, H.-T. Jeng, C. Zhang, Z. Yuan, S. Jia, A. Bansil, F. Chou, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Topologi...

    2016

  8. [16]

    Bian, T.-R

    G. Bian, T.-R. Chang, H. Zheng, S. Velury, S.-Y. Xu, T. Neupert, C.-K. Chiu, S.-M. Huang, D. S. Sanchez, I. Belopolski, N. Alidoust, P.-J. Chen, G. Chang, A. Ban- sil, H.-T. Jeng, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Drumhead surface states and topological nodal-line fermions in TlTaSe2, ...

    2016

  9. [17]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature 547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Cano and B

    J. Cano and B. Bradlyn, Band represen- tations and topological quantum chemistry, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 12, 225 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Dzsaber, D

    S. Dzsaber, D. A. Zocco, A. McCollam, F. Weick- ert, R. McDonald, M. Taupin, G. Eguchi, X. Yan, A. Prokofiev, L. M. K. Tang, B. Vlaar, L. E. Win- ter, M. Jaime, Q. Si, and S. Paschen, Control of elec- tronic topology in a strongly correlated electron system, Nature Commun 13, 5...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Asaba, Y

    T. Asaba, Y. Su, M. Janoschek, J. D. Thompson, S. M. Thomas, E. D. Bauer, S.-Z. Lin, and F. Ronning, Large tunable anomalous hall effect in the kagome antiferro- magnet U 3Ru4Al12, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035127 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    ¯Onuki, K

    Y. ¯Onuki, K. Nakaima, W. Iha, S. Matsuda, M. Hedo, T. Nakama, D. Aoki, A. Nakamura, M. Nakashima, Y. Amako, T. Takeuchi, and T. D. Matsuda, Anomalous hall effect in rare earth antiferromagnets with the hexag- onal structures, New Phys.: Sae Mulli 73, 1054 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    M. Kang, L. Ye, S. Fang, J.-S. You, A. Levitan, M. Han, J. I. Facio, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, M. K. Chan, R. D. McDonald, D. Graf, K. Kaznatcheev, E. Vescovo, D. C. Bell, E. Kaxiras, J. van den Brink, M. Richter, M. Prasad Ghimire, J. G. Checkelsky, and R. Comin,...

    2020

  15. [23]

    L. Chen, C. Setty, H. Hu, M. G. Vergniory, S. E. Grefe, L. Fischer, X. Yan, G. Eguchi, A. Prokofiev, S. Paschen, J. Cano, and Q. Si, Topological semimetal driven by strong correlations and crystalline symmetry, Nature Phys 18, 1341 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Simeth, S

    W. Simeth, S. Hayami, S. Flury, O. Zaharko, J. S. White, Y. Su, C. Girod, S. Francoual, C. Franz, V. Petricek, K. Beauvois, M. Bartkowiak, S. M. Thomas, P. F. S. Rosa, S.-Z. Lin, and M. Janoschek, Skyrmion lattice or- der with alternating topological charges mediated by lo- ca...

  17. [25]

    Kaczorowski, R

    D. Kaczorowski, R. Kruk, J. P. Sanchez, B. Mala- man, and F. Wastin, Magnetic and electronic properties of ternary uranium antimonides UTSb 2 (T=3d -, 4d-, 5d- electron transition metal), Phys. Rev. B 58, 9227 (1998)

    1998

  18. [26]

    Kaczorowski, Structural and magnetic properties of some new uranium ternary pnictides: UTX 2 (T Fe, Co, Ni, Cu; X P, As, Sb, Bi), Journal of Alloys and Compounds 186, 333 (1992)

    D. Kaczorowski, Structural and magnetic properties of some new uranium ternary pnictides: UTX 2 (T Fe, Co, Ni, Cu; X P, As, Sb, Bi), Journal of Alloys and Compounds 186, 333 (1992) . 8

    1992

  19. [27]

    Ikeda, T

    S. Ikeda, T. Matsuda, A. Galatanu, E. Ya- mamoto, Y. Haga, and Y. ¯Onuki, Single crys- tal growth and magnetic property of UNiSb 2, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 272-276, 62 (2004) , proceedings of the International Conference on Mag- netism (ICM 2003)

    2004

  20. [28]

    P. F. S. Rosa, Y. Luo, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, P. G. Pagliuso, and Z. Fisk, Ferromagnetic kondo behavior in UAuBi2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 92, 104425 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    G. S. Freitas, C. Girod, D. R. Yahne, W. Simeth, C. S. Kengle, F. B. Carneiro, P. G. Pagliuso, J. D. Thomp- son, M. Janoschek, S. M. Thomas, and P. F. S. Rosa, Magnetic devil’s staircase in UAgBi 2, unpublished

  22. [30]

    P. F. S. Rosa and Z. Fisk, Flux methods for growth of intermetallic single crystals, in Crystal Growth of Intermetallics , edited by P. Gille and Y. Grin (De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2019) pp. 49–60

    2019

  23. [31]

    G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxt–integrated space- group and crystal-structure determination, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advance s 71, 3 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    A. V. Tkachuk and A. Mar, Cerium cadmium diantimonide, CeCd 0. 660Sb2, Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Onlin e 60, i82 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Sharma and A

    V. Sharma and A. Thamizhavel, Anisotropic magnetic properties of RCd 1− δ Sb2 (R = Ce −Nd) single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214403 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    P. F. S. Rosa, R. J. Bourg, C. B. R. Jesus, P. G. Pagliuso, and Z. Fisk, Role of dimensionality in the Kondo CeTX 2 family: The case of CeCd 0. 7Sb2, Phys. Rev. B 92, 134421 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    M. M. Piva, M. C. Rahn, S. M. Thomas, B. L. Scott, P. G. Pagliuso, J. D. Thompson, L. M. Schoop, F. Ronning, and P. F. Rosa, Robust narrow- gap semiconducting behavior in square-net La 3Cd2As6, Chemistry of Materials 33, 4122 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    S. Lei, V. Duppel, J. M. Lippmann, J. Nuss, B. V. Lotsch, and L. M. Schoop, Charge density waves and magnetism in topological semimetal candidates GdSb xTe2− x− δ , Advanced Quantum Technologies 2, 1900045 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Patschke and M

    R. Patschke and M. G. Kanatzidis, Polytelluride compounds containing distorted nets of tellurium, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 3266 (2002)

    2002

  30. [38]

    DiMasi, B

    E. DiMasi, B. Foran, M. C. Aronson, and S. Lee, Stability of charge-density waves under continuous variation of band filling in LaTe 2− xSbx (0<x<1), Phys. Rev. B 54, 13587 (1996)

    1996

  31. [39]

    Tro´ c, Structural and magnetic proper- ties of the tetragonal actinide compounds, Inorganica Chimica Acta 140, 67 (1987)

    R. Tro´ c, Structural and magnetic proper- ties of the tetragonal actinide compounds, Inorganica Chimica Acta 140, 67 (1987)

    1987

  32. [40]

    Bukowski, V

    Z. Bukowski, V. Tran, J. Stepie´ n-Damm, and R. Tro´ c, Single crystal growth, crystal structure charac- terization and magnetic properties of UCo 0. 5Sb2, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 177, 3934 (2004)

    2004

  33. [41]

    Hayami, R

    S. Hayami, R. Ozawa, and Y. Motome, Effective bilinear- biquadratic model for noncoplanar ordering in itinerant magnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 224424 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    S. Seo, S. Hayami, Y. Su, S. M. Thomas, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, S.-Z. Thompson, Joe D.and Lin, and P. F. S. Rosa, Spin-texture-driven electrical transport in multi- Q antiferromagnets, Commun Phys 4, 58 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    M. E. Fisher and J. S. Langer, Resis- tive anomalies at magnetic critical points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 665 (1968)

    1968

  36. [44]

    F. C. Zumsteg and R. D. Parks, Electrical Resistivity of Nickel Near the Curie Point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 520 (1970)

    1970

  37. [45]

    Jeong, S

    Y.-H. Jeong, S. Park, T. Koo, and K.-B. Lee, Fisher–langer relation and scaling in the spe- cific heat and resistivity of La 0. 7Ca0. 3MnO3, Solid State Ionics 108, 249 (1998)

    1998

  38. [46]

    A. R. Mackintosh, Magnetic ordering and the electronic structure of rare-earth metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 90 (1962)

    1962

  39. [47]

    R. J. Elliott and F. A. Wedgwood, Theory of the resistance of the rare earth metals, Proceedings of the Physical Society 81, 846 (1963)

    1963

  40. [48]

    Becker, S

    B. Becker, S. Ramakrishnan, A. A. Menovsky, G. J. Nieuwenhuys, and J. A. Mydosh, Un- usual ordering behavior in single-crystal U 2Rh3Si5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1347 (1997)

    1997

  41. [49]

    Onimaru, Y

    T. Onimaru, Y. F. Inoue, K. Shigetoh, K. Umeo, H. Kubo, R. A. Ribeiro, A. Ishida, M. A. Avila, K. Ohoyama, M. Sera, and T. Tak- abatake, Giant uniaxial anisotropy in the mag- netic and transport properties of CePd 5Al2, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 77, 074708 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Y. Feng, J. Wang, D. M. Silevitch, B. Mihaila, J. W. Kim, J.-Q. Yan, R. K. Schulze, N. Woo, A. Palmer, Y. Ren, J. van Wezel, P. B. Little- wood, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Incommensurate antiferromagnetism in a pure spin system via coop- erative organization of local and itinerant m...

    2013

  43. [51]

    Ru, J.-H

    N. Ru, J.-H. Chu, and I. R. Fisher, Magnetic proper- ties of the charge density wave compounds RTe 3 (R=Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, and Tm), Phys. Rev. B 78, 012410 (2008)

    2008

  44. [52]

    M. O. Ajeesh, S. M. Thomas, S. K. Kushwaha, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, J. D. Thompson, N. Harrison, and P. F. S. Rosa, Ground state of Ce 3Bi4Pd3 unraveled by hydrostatic pressure, Phys. Rev. B 106, L161105 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Mishra, Y

    S. Mishra, Y. Liu, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, and S. M. Thomas, Anisotropic magnetotransport proper- ties of the heavy-fermion superconductor CeRh 2As2, Phys. Rev. B 106, L140502 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Kadowaki and S

    K. Kadowaki and S. Woods, Universal relationship of the resistivity and specific heat in heavy-fermion compounds, Solid State Communications 58, 507 (1986)

    1986

  47. [55]

    Tsujii, H

    N. Tsujii, H. Kontani, and K. Yoshimura, Universal- ity in heavy fermion systems with general degeneracy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 057201 (2005)

    2005

  48. [56]

    Jacko, J

    A. Jacko, J. Fjærestad, and B. Powell, A unified explana- tion of the kadowaki–woods ratio in strongly correlated metals, Nature Phys 5, 422–425 (2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.