Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A comparative study of cosmological constraints from weak lensing using Convolutional Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.03490 v1 pith:KGBJ3EDX submitted 2024-03-06 astro-ph.CO physics.data-an

classification astro-ph.COphysics.data-an
keywords constraintsstatisticsstrongercosmologicalmodelspowersummaryachieve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Weak Lensing (WL) surveys are reaching unprecedented depths, enabling the investigation of very small angular scales. At these scales, nonlinear gravitational effects lead to higher-order correlations making the matter distribution highly non-Gaussian. Extracting this information using traditional statistics has proven difficult, and Machine Learning based summary statistics have emerged as a powerful alternative. We explore the capabilities of a discriminative, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) based approach, focusing on parameter constraints in the ($\Omega_m$, $\sigma_8$) cosmological parameter space. Leveraging novel training loss functions and network representations on WL mock datasets without baryons, we show that our models achieve $\sim 5$ times stronger constraints than the power spectrum, $\sim 3$ stronger constraints than peak counts, and $\sim 2$ stronger constraints than previous CNN-learned summary statistics and scattering transforms, for noise levels relevant to Rubin or Euclid. For WL convergence maps with baryonic physics, our models achieve $\sim 2.3$ times stronger constraining power than the power spectrum at these noise levels, also outperforming previous summary statistics. To further explore the possibilities of CNNs for this task, we also discuss transfer learning where we adapt pre-trained models, trained on different tasks or datasets, for cosmological inference, finding that these do not improve the performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Field-Level Comparison and Robustness Analysis of Cosmological N-body Simulations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A CNN trained on one N-body code transfers well to other non-AMR codes but fails on AMR simulations and mismatched resolutions; Gaussian smoothing of about six grid cells makes the simulations statistically consistent.

  2. Detecting Modeling Bias with Continuous Time Flow Models on Weak Lensing Maps

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Continuous time flow models estimating full-field probability densities detect out-of-distribution weak lensing maps from baryonic effects with AUROC up to 0.95, outperforming feature-level normalizing flow baselines.

  3. Diffusion-based mass map reconstruction from weak lensing data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single unconditioned diffusion model plus a rescaled Diffusion Posterior Sampling step reconstructs weak lensing mass maps whose power spectra and non-Gaussian statistics match the simulations.

  4. Learning Optimal and Interpretable Summary Statistics of Galaxy Catalogs with SBI

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Jointly training a graph neural network with a normalizing flow yields low-dimensional summary statistics from simulated galaxy catalogs that support likelihood-free inference of Omega_m, and can be interpreted via co...

Pith tools