Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Low-complexity Samples versus Symbols-based Neural Network Receiver for Channel Equalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.14426 v1 pith:KGIDS3FF submitted 2023-08-28 eess.SP

Low-complexity Samples versus Symbols-based Neural Network Receiver for Channel Equalization

classification eess.SP
keywords equalizationcomplexityapproachcomputationalfilteringlow-complexitynn-basedperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Low-complexity neural networks (NNs) have successfully been applied for digital signal processing (DSP) in short-reach intensity-modulated directly detected optical links, where chromatic dispersion-induced impairments significantly limit the transmission distance. The NN-based equalizers are usually optimized independently from other DSP components, such as matched filtering. This approach may result in lower equalization performance. Alternatively, optimizing a NN equalizer to perform functionalities of multiple DSP blocks may increase transmission reach while keeping the complexity low. In this work, we propose a low-complexity NN that performs samples-to-symbol equalization, meaning that the NN-based equalizer includes match filtering and downsampling. We compare it to a samples-to-sample equalization approach followed by match filtering and downsampling in terms of performance and computational complexity. Both approaches are evaluated using three different types of NNs combined with optical preprocessing. We numerically and experimentally show that the proposed samples-to-symbol equalization approach applied for 32 GBd on-off keying (OOK) signals outperforms the samples-domain alternative keeping the computational complexity low. Additionally, the different types of NN-based equalizers are compared in terms of performance with respect to computational complexity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.