Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Tensorial Spin-Phonon Relaxation Reveals Mode-Selective Relaxation Pathways in a Single-Molecule Magnet

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A first-principles relaxation tensor reproduces measured spin-phonon relaxation times in a molecular qubit without adjustable parameters.

desk verdict A promising tensorial spin-phonon framework with a clean mode-selectivity result, undermined by comparing VOPc(OH)8 theory to VOPc experiments and by parameters chosen after the fact. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17910 v1 pith:KGOZILA2 submitted 2025-07-23 quant-ph

Roman Dmitriev , Nosheen Younas , Yu Zhang , Andrei Piryatinski , Eric R. Bittner This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords spin-phononcouplingsingle-moleculemagnetmolecularqubitspinrelaxationLindbladmasterequationg-tensorderivativesvanadylphthalocyaninedecoherence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the spin relaxation and decoherence times of the single-molecule magnet VOPc(OH)8 can be computed entirely from density functional theory, with no empirical fitting, by expanding the g-tensor in molecular vibrational modes and feeding the resulting couplings into a Lindblad master equation. The computed longitudinal relaxation time T1 matches experimental measurements across the temperature range, and the transverse time T2 matches at high temperature. The calculation reveals that only a handful of low-frequency vibrational modes actually matter: three modes dominate T1 relaxation and one mode dominates T2. If true, this would give chemists a predictive tool for designing molecular qubits by targeting the specific vibrations that destroy spin coherence.

What carries the argument

The central object is the relaxation tensor $\Lambda_{\alpha\alpha'} = \sum_q \Gamma_q g_{\alpha q} g_{\alpha' q}$, a real symmetric positive semi-definite matrix built from mode-resolved derivatives of the $g$-tensor along mass-weighted normal coordinates, together with its second-order Raman analogue. It enters a Lindblad-type master equation whose jump operators are weighted spin operators; diagonalizing it yields the principal relaxation axes and rates, and the trace gives $T_1$ and $T_2$.

What would settle it

Measure T1 and T2 on the actual VOPc(OH)8 compound, not VOPc, and compare with the computed curves; if the agreement is not reproduced, the claimed parameter-free accuracy is coincidental. Alternatively, selectively deuterate the four modes identified as dominant (modes 2 and 7-9) and look for the predicted shift in relaxation times.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a mode-resolved, fully ab initio relaxation tensor reproduces the measured spin relaxation times of a vanadyl phthalocyanine derivative without adjustable parameters. Second derivatives of the g-tensor with respect to normal coordinates provide the dominant relaxation pathways, outweighing first-order couplings by about two orders of magnitude, and the Raman-like two-phonon processes they generate explain the ~$T^2$ temperature scaling of $1/T_1$ at high temperature. The authors further find that the relaxation tensor is highly anisotropic and mode-selective, so that the entire decoherence landscape of a 192-mode molecule is effectively controlled by four modes.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that experimental relaxation data measured on VOPc can stand in for the computed VOPc(OH)8, even though the paper never shows that the eight hydroxyl groups leave the relevant vibrations and spin couplings unchanged.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For VOPc(OH)8, second-order two-phonon (Raman) processes dominate relaxation, so any future first-principles prediction for this class must include quadratic g-tensor derivatives.
  • Only four of 192 vibrational modes effectively control decoherence, which means chemically stiffening or shifting those modes is a concrete design route to longer coherence.
  • The computed T1 agrees with experiment over the whole temperature range and T2 at high temperature without adjustable parameters, so the method could transfer to other molecular magnets without recalibration.
  • The relaxation tensor is anisotropic, so the decay rate depends on the orientation of the applied field relative to the molecule.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the agreement survives a direct test on the exact molecule, the same finite-difference g-tensor machinery could be applied to other open-shell molecular qubits, turning coherence engineering into a routine vibrational calculation.
  • The paper notes that its model predicts a strong $B^2$ field dependence while the experimental data are nearly field-independent; adding a field-dependent pure-dephasing term might extend the model to low temperatures, where T2 currently deviates.
  • The identification of specific oxygen-dominated modes suggests an untested chemical handle: replacing those peripheral groups should suppress the dominant Raman pathway and lengthen T1.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a first-principles framework for computing the spin relaxation tensor of a single-molecule magnet, VOPc(OH)8, from DFT-based g-tensor derivatives expanded in vibrational normal modes. The authors derive Lindblad and Redfield master equations that include linear and quadratic spin-phonon couplings, identify a small subset of modes that dominate longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation, and compare calculated relaxation times with experimental data for VOPc. They report 'excellent agreement' without empirical fitting and conclude that the tensorial approach provides predictive guidance for molecular qubit design.

Significance. If the quantitative agreement were robust, the work would be significant: it provides a mode-resolved tensorial relaxation formalism that includes both direct and resonant-Raman processes from DFT data, with a transparent and reproducible protocol (GitHub repository). The paper also correctly emphasizes that only a few vibrational modes are responsible for relaxation, which is a useful design insight. However, the central quantitative claim is currently not supported because the computed molecule (VOPc(OH)8) differs from the measured molecule (VOPc), the model's field dependence conflicts with the data and a field value is chosen post hoc, and the 'parameter-free' assertion is contradicted by adjustable parameters gamma_q and lambda_q.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 3 and surrounding text] The computed relaxation times are for VOPc(OH)8, but the experimental data from refs. 12 and 40 are for unsubstituted VOPc. The manuscript never states that the measurements were made on VOPc(OH)8, nor does it analyze whether the eight peripheral OH groups alter the low-frequency vibrational modes and g-tensor derivatives that drive relaxation. In fact, the mode analysis in Fig. 2 identifies modes 7-9 as dominated by perimeter oxygen motions; in VOPc(OH)8 these oxygens are part of the OH substituents, which are absent in unsubstituted VOPc. The dominant computed relaxation channels may therefore not exist in the measured molecule, so the reported 'excellent agreement' could be coincidental rather than predictive.
  2. [Section III, paragraph on magnetic field dependence] The model predicts that T1 and T2 scale as B_z^2 (Eqs. 1 and 25) across the full temperature range, yet the experimental data of Follmer et al. show nearly identical relaxation times for fields between 300-400 mT and 1200-1300 mT. The authors state that 'our theoretical model is capable to correctly predict the experimental data in only one of the aforementioned ranges' and choose B=1266 mT for all calculations. This is a post hoc selection of the applied field to match one dataset, which undermines the claim of parameter-free quantitative agreement and exposes a genuine discrepancy between the model and the observed field independence.
  3. [Section II.A (Eq. 6) and Section III (linewidth choice)] The claim of a 'fully first-principles' treatment 'without any empirical fitting' is contradicted by the presence of adjustable parameters in the model. Equation (6) contains gamma_q, which the text explicitly calls 'the sole adjustable parameters of our model,' and Section III sets the Lorentzian linewidth lambda_q to 2 cm^-1 based on a literature range for comparable molecular modes. These parameters control the magnitude and temperature dependence of T1 and T2, so the agreement displayed in Fig. 3 is not achieved without fitting. At minimum, the abstract and conclusion must be revised to remove the 'without any empirical fitting' phrasing.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.A, after Eq. (6)] The phrase 'Lindbald-like' should be 'Lindblad-like'; the same typo appears in Section III.
  2. [Figure 3, left panel legend] The legend lists 'Exp. ref. [13]' for the T1 panel, but the caption and text refer only to refs. 12 and 40; ref. 13 is a different paper not used for relaxation data.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The word 'ivestigated' should be 'investigated'.
  4. [Section II.C, last paragraph] The phrase 'readably accessible' should be 'readily accessible'.
  5. [Section II.C, discussion of g-tensor derivatives] The notation 'g^(2)' is used without a formal definition; it should be explicitly defined as the Hessian matrix of the g-tensor components with respect to normal-mode coordinates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the relaxation times are computed from DFT g-tensor derivatives and are not regression-fitted to experiment; the post-hoc field and linewidth choices and the VOPc(OH)8-vs-VOPc comparison are limitations, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The spin-phonon couplings g_alpha k and g^(2)_alpha kk' are obtained from DFT finite differences (Eqs. 29-33), the relaxation tensor Lambda is assembled from these couplings with Bose populations and Lorentzian filters (Eqs. 8, 19, 27), and T1 and T2 are read off from projections of Lambda (Eqs. 9-12). No equation in the paper contains experimental T1 or T2 values, and the reported curves are not obtained by regressing any parameter onto the measured relaxation data. The Redfield comparison adopts the Lunghi-Sanvito extension, which is an external framework and not a self-citation chain. The paper does contain an internal tension between the abstract's claim of agreement 'without any empirical fitting' and the text's statement that 'the gamma_q's are sole adjustable parameters of our model', as well as the chosen linewidth lambda_q = 2 cm^-1 and the magnetic field set to 1266 mT after noting that the model can match only one of the experimental field ranges. These are post-hoc choices and overstatements, but they do not make the computed T1 and T2 equal to the experimental values by construction. The additional mismatch that the cited experiments (refs. 12 and 40) concern VOPc while the calculation is for VOPc(OH)8 is a comparability flaw rather than a circularity. Overall, the central quantitative result is not forced by its inputs, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All parameters are either standard (B field, temperature) or chosen (lambda_q, gamma_q), and the derivations rest on standard open-quantum-system assumptions. No new particles or mediators are introduced. The most fragile input is the unstated assumption that experimental VOPc data can stand in for VOPc(OH)8.

free parameters (3)
  • lambda_q (vibrational linewidth) = 2 cm^-1 (set constant for all modes)
    Used to regularize the Lorentzian in Raman rates (Eqs 15, 19, 27). The paper says a range of 1-10 cm^-1 is typical and that results are robust for 1-100 cm^-1, but the specific value is chosen, not predicted.
  • gamma_q (mode relaxation rates) = not specified in text
    Called 'the sole adjustable parameters of our model' (Section II A, Eq 6). These enter the direct one-phonon rates; the authors later say first-order contributions are marginal, but the first-order curves in Fig 3 still depend on them.
  • External magnetic field B_z = 1266 mT
    The model predicts T1 and T2 scale as B^2 (via g_alpha ~ B). The experimental data show little field dependence between 300 and 1300 mT. The authors set B to 1266 mT, the value where the model matches the high-field dataset.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The spin Hamiltonian contains only the Zeeman interaction; hyperfine and dipolar couplings are neglected.
    Section II A states 'Neglecting hyperfine and dipole-dipole contributions', which is standard for diluted SMMs but unverified for this compound.
  • domain assumption Vibrations are harmonic and the bath is Gaussian and stationary, so Wick's theorem applies.
    Used in Section II B to evaluate four-point correlation functions (Eqs 13, 18, 24).
  • domain assumption Born-Markov adiabatic elimination of the vibrational modes is valid.
    Invoked in Section II A with weak coupling, off-resonance, and rapid bath relaxation; the linewidth parameters lambda_q and gamma_q carry this assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The experimental data for VOPc are representative of VOPc(OH)8 relaxation.
    Section III compares computed VOPc(OH)8 rates to experimental VOPc data (refs 12, 40) without stating that the molecules differ; this is an unvalidated matching assumption.
  • domain assumption The g-tensor and its derivatives computed with PBE DFT are accurate enough for rate predictions.
    The entire pipeline uses PBE with mixed basis sets in vacuum; no functional benchmarking or solvent effects are discussed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tensorial Spin-Phonon Relaxation Reveals Mode-Selective Relaxation Pathways in a Single-Molecule Magnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KGOZILA2

@misc{pith2026250717910,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tensorial Spin-Phonon Relaxation Reveals Mode-Selective Relaxation Pathways in a Single-Molecule Magnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KGOZILA2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17910}
}
abstract

Understanding and controlling spin relaxation in molecular qubits is essential for developing chemically tunable quantum information platforms. We present a fully first-principles framework for computing the spin relaxation tensor in a single-molecule magnet, \ce{VOPc(OH)8}, by combining density functional theory with a mode-resolved open-system formalism. By expanding the spin Hamiltonian in vibrational normal modes and evaluating both linear and quadratic spin-phonon coupling tensors via finite differences of the $g$-tensor, we construct a relaxation tensor that enters a Lindblad-type quantum master equation. Our formalism captures both direct (one-phonon) and resonant-Raman (two-phonon) relaxation processes. Numerical analysis reveals a highly mode-selective structure: only three vibrational modes dominate longitudinal ($T_1$) decoherence, while a single mode accounts for the majority of transverse ($T_2$) relaxation. The computed relaxation times show excellent agreement with experimental measurements, without any empirical fitting. These results demonstrate that first-principles spin-phonon tensors can provide predictive insight into decoherence pathways and guide the rational design of molecular qubits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17910 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Molecular structure of VOPc(OH) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Normal modes that define the relaxation tensor. (Top) Heat maps that show the normalized contribution from the first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The inverse of spin population relaxation time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2019 A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits

    Krantz P, Kjaergaard M, Yan F, Orlando TP, Gustavsson S, Oliver WD. 2019 A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits. Applied Physics Reviews 6. (10.1063/1.5089550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550)

    doi:10.1063/1.5089550 2019

  2. [2]

    2000 Quantum simulations with trapped ions

    Cirac JI, Zoller P. 2000 Quantum simulations with trapped ions. Nature 404, 579--586. (10.1038/35007038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35007038)

    work page doi:10.1038/35007038 2000

  3. [3]

    2015 A two-qubit logic gate in silicon

    Veldhorst M, Yang CH, Hwang JCC, Huang W, Dehollain JP, Muhonen JT, Simmons S, Laucht A, Hudson FE, Itoh KM, Morello A, Dzurak AS. 2015 A two-qubit logic gate in silicon. Nature 526, 410--414. (10.1038/nature15263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature15263)

    doi:10.1038/nature15263 2015

  4. [4]

    2008 Quantum oscillations in a molecular magnet

    Bertaina S, Gambarelli S, Mitra T, Tsukerblat B, Müller A, Barbara B. 2008 Quantum oscillations in a molecular magnet. Nature 453, 203—206. (10.1038/nature06962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06962)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature06962 2008

  5. [5]

    2001 Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic Atomic Ensembles

    Lukin MD, Fleischhauer M, Cote R, Duan LM, Jaksch D, Cirac JI, Zoller P. 2001 Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic Atomic Ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037901)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.037901 2001

  6. [6]

    2019 Molecular spins for quantum computation

    Gaita-Ari \ n o A, Luis F, Hill S, Coronado E. 2019 Molecular spins for quantum computation. Nat. Chem. 11, 301--309

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    2021 Exploiting chemistry and molecular systems for quantum information science

    Wasielewski MR, Forbes MDE, Frank NL, Kowalski K, Scholes GD, Yuen-Zhou J, Baldo MA, Freedman DE, Goldsmith RH, Goodson III T, Kirk ML, McCusker JK, Ogilvie JP, Shultz DA, Stoll S, Whaley KB. 2021 Exploiting chemistry and molecular systems for quantum information science. Nature Chemistry 13, 352--359. (10.1038/s41557-021-00675-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41557-021-00675-3 2021

  8. [8]

    2024 Non-Abelian topological order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor

    Iqbal M, Tantivasadakarn N, Verresen R, Campbell SL, Dreiling JM, Figgatt C, Gaebler JP, Johansen J, Mills M, Moses SA, Pino JM, Ransford A, Rowe M, Siegfried P, Stutz RP, Foss-Feig M, Vishwanath A, Dreyer H. 2024 Non-Abelian topological order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor. Nature 626, 505--511. (10.1038/s41586-023-06934-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.103...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06934-4 2024

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    2020 Spin and Phonon Design in Modular Arrays of Molecular Qubits

    Yu CJ, von Kugelgen S, Krzyaniak MD, Ji W, Dichtel WR, Wasielewski MR, Freedman DE. 2020 Spin and Phonon Design in Modular Arrays of Molecular Qubits. Chemistry of Materials 32, 10200--10206. (10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03718)

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    2018 Scaling Up Electronic Spin Qubits into a Three-Dimensional Metal-Organic Framework

    Yamabayashi T, Atzori M, Tesi L, Cosquer G, Santanni F, Boulon ME, Morra E, Benci S, Torre R, Chiesa M, Sorace L, Sessoli R, Yamashita M. 2018 Scaling Up Electronic Spin Qubits into a Three-Dimensional Metal-Organic Framework. J Am Chem Soc 140, 12090--12101. (10.1021/jacs.8b0...

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    2021 Recent Innovations in Solid-State and Molecular Qubits for Quantum Information Applications

    Lavroff RH, Pennington DL, Hua AS, Li BY, Williams JA, Alexandrova AN. 2021 Recent Innovations in Solid-State and Molecular Qubits for Quantum Information Applications. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 12, 10742--10745. PMID: 34758627 (10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03269 http...

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    2016 Room-Temperature Quantum Coherence and Rabi Oscillations in Vanadyl Phthalocyanine: Toward Multifunctional Molecular Spin Qubits

    Atzori M, Tesi L, Morra E, Chiesa M, Sorace L, Sessoli R. 2016 Room-Temperature Quantum Coherence and Rabi Oscillations in Vanadyl Phthalocyanine: Toward Multifunctional Molecular Spin Qubits. J Am Chem Soc 138, 2154--2157. (10.1021/jacs.5b13408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b13408)

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    2017 Coherent coupling between Vanadyl Phthalocyanine spin ensemble and microwave photons: towards integration of molecular spin qubits into quantum circuits

    Bonizzoni C, Ghirri A, Atzori M, Sorace L, Sessoli R, Affronte M. 2017 Coherent coupling between Vanadyl Phthalocyanine spin ensemble and microwave photons: towards integration of molecular spin qubits into quantum circuits. Scientific Reports 7, 13096. (10.1038/s41598-017-132...

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    2018 Tunable Spin-Superconductor Coupling of Spin 1/2 Vanadyl Phthalocyanine Molecules

    Malavolti L, Briganti M, H \"a nze M, Serrano G, Cimatti I, McMurtrie G, Otero E, Ohresser P, Totti F, Mannini M, Sessoli R, Loth S. 2018 Tunable Spin-Superconductor Coupling of Spin 1/2 Vanadyl Phthalocyanine Molecules. Nano Lett. 18, 7955--7961. (10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03921...

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    2019 Mathematical analysis of bio-convective micropolar nanofluid

    Nadeem S, Khan MN, Muhammad N, Ahmad S. 2019 Mathematical analysis of bio-convective micropolar nanofluid . Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 6, 233--242. (10.1016/j.jcde.2019.04.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2019.04.001)

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    2006 Importance of direct spin spin coupling and spin-flip excitations for the zero-field splittings of transition metal complexes: a case study

    Neese F. 2006 Importance of direct spin spin coupling and spin-flip excitations for the zero-field splittings of transition metal complexes: a case study. J Am Chem Soc 128, 10213--10222. (10.1021/ja061798a http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja061798a)

    2006 doi

  9. [17]

    2009 Engineering the coupling between molecular spin qubits by coordination chemistry

    Timco GA, Carretta S, Troiani F, Tuna F, Pritchard RJ, Muryn CA, McInnes EJL, Ghirri A, Candini A, Santini P, Amoretti G, Affronte M, Winpenny REP. 2009 Engineering the coupling between molecular spin qubits by coordination chemistry. Nature Nanotechnology 4, 173--178. (10.103...

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    2013 PHI: A powerful new program for the analysis of anisotropic monomeric and exchange-coupled polynuclear d- and f-block complexes

    Chilton NF, Anderson RP, Turner LD, Soncini A, Murray KS. 2013 PHI: A powerful new program for the analysis of anisotropic monomeric and exchange-coupled polynuclear d- and f-block complexes. Journal of Computational Chemistry 34, 1164--1175. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23234...

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    2015 An electrostatic model for the determination of magnetic anisotropy in dysprosium complexes

    Chilton NF, Goodwin CA, Mills DP, Winpenny RE. 2015 An electrostatic model for the determination of magnetic anisotropy in dysprosium complexes. Chem. Sci. 6, 3949--3955

    2015

  12. [20]

    2021 Ab Initio Prediction of High-Temperature Magnetic Relaxation Rates in Single-Molecule Magnets

    Reta D, Kragskow JGC, Chilton NF. 2021 Ab Initio Prediction of High-Temperature Magnetic Relaxation Rates in Single-Molecule Magnets. Journal of the American Chemical Society 143, 5943--5950. (10.1021/jacs.1c01410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c01410)

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    2015 Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials

    Thompson A, Swiler L, Trott C, Foiles S, Tucker G. 2015 Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials. Journal of Computational Physics 285, 316--330. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 http://dx.doi.org/https://d...

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    2020 Multiple spin--phonon relaxation pathways in a Kramer single-ion magnet

    Lunghi A, Sanvito S. 2020 Multiple spin--phonon relaxation pathways in a Kramer single-ion magnet. The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, 174113. (10.1063/5.0017118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0017118)

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    2017 The role of anharmonic phonons in under-barrier spin relaxation of single-molecule magnets

    Lunghi A, Totti F, Sessoli R, Sanvito S. 2017 The role of anharmonic phonons in under-barrier spin relaxation of single-molecule magnets. Nat. Commun. 8, 14620

    2017

  16. [24]

    2022 Toward exact predictions of spin-phonon relaxation times: An ab initio implementation of open quantum systems theory

    Lunghi A. 2022 Toward exact predictions of spin-phonon relaxation times: An ab initio implementation of open quantum systems theory. Science Advances 8, eabn7880. (10.1126/sciadv.abn7880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn7880)

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    2019 How do phonons relax molecular spins?

    Lunghi A, Sanvito S. 2019 How do phonons relax molecular spins?. Science Advances 5, eaax7163. (10.1126/sciadv.aax7163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax7163)

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    2020 The Limit of Spin Lifetime in Solid-State Electronic Spins

    Lunghi A, Sanvito S. 2020 The Limit of Spin Lifetime in Solid-State Electronic Spins. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, 6273--6278. PMID: 32667205 (10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01681)

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    2016 Quantum Coherence Times Enhancement in Vanadium(IV)-based Potential Molecular Qubits: the Key Role of the Vanadyl Moiety

    Atzori M, Morra E, Tesi L, Albino A, Chiesa M, Sorace L, Sessoli R. 2016 Quantum Coherence Times Enhancement in Vanadium(IV)-based Potential Molecular Qubits: the Key Role of the Vanadyl Moiety. Journal of the American Chemical Society 138, 11234--11244. PMID: 27517709 (10.102...

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    2021 Probing Vibrational Symmetry Effects and Nuclear Spin Economy Principles in Molecular Spin Qubits

    Santanni F, Albino A, Atzori M, Ranieri D, Salvadori E, Chiesa M, Lunghi A, Bencini A, Sorace L, Totti F, Sessoli R. 2021 Probing Vibrational Symmetry Effects and Nuclear Spin Economy Principles in Molecular Spin Qubits. Inorg Chem 60, 140--151. (10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02573 ...

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    2021 The Impact of Ligand Field Symmetry on Molecular Qubit Coherence

    Kazmierczak NP, Mirzoyan R, Hadt RG. 2021 The Impact of Ligand Field Symmetry on Molecular Qubit Coherence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 17305--17315. (10.1021/jacs.1c04605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c04605)

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    2023 Semi-empirical Haken–Strobl model for molecular spin qubits

    Aruachan K, Colón YJ, Aravena D, Herrera F. 2023 Semi-empirical Haken–Strobl model for molecular spin qubits. New Journal of Physics 25, 093031. (10.1088/1367-2630/acf2bd http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acf2bd)

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    1985 Generalized H aken- S trobl- R eineker model of excitation transfer

    C \'a pek V. 1985 Generalized H aken- S trobl- R eineker model of excitation transfer. Zeitschrift f \"u r Physik B Condensed Matter 60, 101--105. (10.1007/BF01312648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01312648)

    1985 doi

  24. [32]

    2020 The ORCA quantum chemistry program package

    Neese F, Wennmohs F, Becker U, Riplinger C. 2020 The ORCA quantum chemistry program package . The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 224108. (10.1063/5.0004608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0004608)

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    1996 Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple

    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. 1996 Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865--3868. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865)

    1996 doi

  26. [34]

    2005 Balanced basis sets of split valence , triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy

    Weigend F, Ahlrichs R. 2005 Balanced basis sets of split valence , triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297--3305. (10.1039/B508541A http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B508541A)

    2005 doi

  27. [35]

    2006 Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn

    Weigend F. 2006 Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1057--1065. (10.1039/B515623H http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B515623H)

    2006 doi

  28. [36]

    1957 On the Theory of Relaxation Processes

    Redfield AG. 1957 On the Theory of Relaxation Processes. IBM Journal of Research and Development 1, 19--31. (10.1147/rd.11.0019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1147/rd.11.0019)

    1957 doi

  29. [37]

    2012 QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems

    Johansson J, Nation P, Nori F. 2012 QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760--1772. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.02.021 http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.02.021)

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    a ggstr \

    Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, Burovski E, Peterson P, Weckesser W, Bright J, van der Walt SJ, Brett M, Wilson J, Millman KJ, Mayorov N, Nelson ARJ, Jones E, Kern R, Larson E, Carey CJ, Polat \.I , Feng Y, Moore EW, VanderPlas J, Laxald...

    2020

  31. [39]

    2023 Accurate and Efficient Spin--Phonon Coupling and Spin Dynamics Calculations for Molecular Solids

    Nabi R, Staab JK, Mattioni A, Kragskow JGC, Reta D, Skelton JM, Chilton NF. 2023 Accurate and Efficient Spin--Phonon Coupling and Spin Dynamics Calculations for Molecular Solids. Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, 24558--24567. PMID: 37917936 (10.1021/jacs.3c06015 h...

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    2020 Understanding Covalent versus Spin--Orbit Coupling Contributions to Temperature-Dependent Electron Spin Relaxation in Cupric and Vanadyl Phthalocyanines

    Follmer AH, Ribson RD, Oyala PH, Chen GY, Hadt RG. 2020 Understanding Covalent versus Spin--Orbit Coupling Contributions to Temperature-Dependent Electron Spin Relaxation in Cupric and Vanadyl Phthalocyanines. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 124, 9252--9260. (10.1021/acs.j...

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    2013 Principles of Magnetic Resonance

    Slichter C. 2013 Principles of Magnetic Resonance . Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.