Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Event Temporal Relation Extraction based on Retrieval-Augmented on LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.15273 v1 pith:KGP7XEI3 submitted 2024-03-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords eventextractionknowledgellmsrelationtemporaldesignmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Event temporal relation (TempRel) is a primary subject of the event relation extraction task. However, the inherent ambiguity of TempRel increases the difficulty of the task. With the rise of prompt engineering, it is important to design effective prompt templates and verbalizers to extract relevant knowledge. The traditional manually designed templates struggle to extract precise temporal knowledge. This paper introduces a novel retrieval-augmented TempRel extraction approach, leveraging knowledge retrieved from large language models (LLMs) to enhance prompt templates and verbalizers. Our method capitalizes on the diverse capabilities of various LLMs to generate a wide array of ideas for template and verbalizer design. Our proposed method fully exploits the potential of LLMs for generation tasks and contributes more knowledge to our design. Empirical evaluations across three widely recognized datasets demonstrate the efficacy of our method in improving the performance of event temporal relation extraction tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reasoning with RAGged events: RAG-Enhanced Event Knowledge Base Construction and reasoning with proof-assistants

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a single Thucydides corpus, strong LLMs extract more events without RAG, weak LLMs benefit from simple RAG but collapse under complex RAG, and a Coq translation is proposed to justify RAG-discovered event types.

Pith tools