REVIEW 2 cited by
What Does the Bot Say? Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Social Media Bot Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Social media bot detection has always been an arms race between advancements in machine learning bot detectors and adversarial bot strategies to evade detection. In this work, we bring the arms race to the next level by investigating the opportunities and risks of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) in social bot detection. To investigate the opportunities, we design novel LLM-based bot detectors by proposing a mixture-of-heterogeneous-experts framework to divide and conquer diverse user information modalities. To illuminate the risks, we explore the possibility of LLM-guided manipulation of user textual and structured information to evade detection. Extensive experiments with three LLMs on two datasets demonstrate that instruction tuning on merely 1,000 annotated examples produces specialized LLMs that outperform state-of-the-art baselines by up to 9.1% on both datasets, while LLM-guided manipulation strategies could significantly bring down the performance of existing bot detectors by up to 29.6% and harm the calibration and reliability of bot detection systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
BotHash: Efficient and Training-Free Bot Detection Through Approximate Nearest Neighbor
Approximate nearest-neighbor search over MinHash-encoded behavior sequences detects social bots without training, outperforming several ML baselines on public X/Twitter datasets.
-
How Large Language Models play humans in online conversations: a simulated study of the 2016 US politics on Reddit
GPT-4 impersonating Reddit users in 2016 election threads produces comments that lean toward consensus and are semantically separable from real human comments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.