REVIEW 1 cited by
Clickbait Spoiling via Question Answering and Passage Retrieval
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce and study the task of clickbait spoiling: generating a short text that satisfies the curiosity induced by a clickbait post. Clickbait links to a web page and advertises its contents by arousing curiosity instead of providing an informative summary. Our contributions are approaches to classify the type of spoiler needed (i.e., a phrase or a passage), and to generate appropriate spoilers. A large-scale evaluation and error analysis on a new corpus of 5,000 manually spoiled clickbait posts -- the Webis Clickbait Spoiling Corpus 2022 -- shows that our spoiler type classifier achieves an accuracy of 80%, while the question answering model DeBERTa-large outperforms all others in generating spoilers for both types.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ClickGuard: Detecting and Spoiling Clickbait News with Informativeness Measures and Large Language Models
An XGBoost clickbait detector combining 1000-dimensional OpenAI embeddings with 15 linguistic informativeness features (including a custom 'baitness' score) achieves 0.909 F1 on a balanced combined dataset and ships i...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.