Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Sliding Ferroelectrics Induced Hybrid-Order Topological Phase Transitions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that sliding ferroelectricity in a bilayer magnetic van der Waals material produces a spin-hybrid-order topological insulator, where one spin channel is a first-order Chern insulator and the other remains a second-order…

desk verdict Novel sliding-ferroelectric mechanism for spin-resolved hybrid-order topology, but the ScI2 material claim rests on an unquantified spin-conservation assumption that a referee should push on. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01402 v3 pith:KIP3Q2O3 submitted 2025-06-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ning-Jing Yang , Jian-Min Zhang , Xiao-Ping Li , Zeying Zhang , Zhi-Ming Yu , Zhigao Huang , Yugui Yao This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords slidingferroelectricityhigher-ordertopologicalinsulatorspin-hybrid-orderbilayerantiferromagnetanomalousNernsteffectScI2phasetransitionlayer-spinlocking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that sliding one layer of a bilayer magnetic van der Waals material, which creates a ferroelectric polarization, can drive the two spin-locked layers through topological phase transitions at different rates. As a result, a bilayer second-order topological insulator transforms into a spin-hybrid-order topological insulator (SHTI), in which the spin-up channel behaves as a first-order Chern insulator while the spin-down channel remains a second-order topological insulator with corner charge. The authors argue this is the first realization of hybrid-order topological states in a two-dimensional electronic material, and they predict that bilayer ScI2 can host the phase. They further show that the anomalous Nernst effect gives a distinct, experimentally accessible signal for each of the five phases along the sliding and strain-controlled transition path.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin-hybrid-order topological index I=(I↑,I↓) with I↑/↓=Q↑/↓⊕C↑/↓, combining a spin-resolved corner charge Q (quantized to e/3 by C3 rotation symmetry) with a spin-resolved Chern number C per spin channel. The argument runs on the assumption that weak spin interactions plus the ferroelectric polarization potential decouple the spin-up and spin-down sectors, so each channel can be assigned its own topological indices. The sliding ferroelectric potential Pαs=Pαsz enters the tight-binding Hamiltonian as a spin-dependent on-site term that breaks the {C2||mz} spin symmetry and produces spin splitting at the K/K' valleys; that splitting is what desynchronizes the band inversions in the two channels. The same machinery yields the five-phase sequence SOTI → SHTI → QSHI → QAHI → NI and the reversed indices for the BA stacking.

What would settle it

In slid bilayer ScI2 at the predicted 2.25% strain and AB stacking, spin-resolved spectroscopy should show a chiral edge state in the spin-up channel while the spin-down channel shows only gapped edges with corner states; observing gapless edge states in both spin channels, or spin-flip scattering that opens the spin-up edge gap, would rule out the SHTI phase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that sliding ferroelectricity acts as a layer-selective knob for topology: because the ferroelectric polarization potential shifts the energy levels of the two spin-locked layers differently, band inversion happens in one spin channel before the other. Starting from an AA-stacked bilayer antiferromagnetic SOTI with zero spin Chern number and nonzero spin corner charge, increasing the polarization potential p first inverts the spin-up band at the K valley, giving that channel Chern number +1 while spin-down keeps its corner charge; the system is then a spin-hybrid-order topological insulator with index I=(1,1/3). Further band inversions drive the system through QSHI, QAHI, and trivial phases, each identified by the hybrid-order index I=(Q,C) per spin. The authors substantiate the mechanism with a three-band tight-binding model and first-principles calculations on ScI2, where sliding to AB stacking at 2.25% strain produces the SHTI, and they propose the anomalous Nernst conductivity as the experimental fingerprint.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-up and spin-down channels stay decoupled under the ferroelectric polarization, so each channel can be assigned its own Chern number and corner charge; if spin mixing is not negligible in ScI2, the hybrid-order index and the SHTI phase would not be well defined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sliding is a switchable, non-volatile control knob: moving one layer from AA to AB stacking changes the topological phase, and the polarization can in principle be reversed by sliding back.
  • The SHTI is a 2D electronic phase in which first- and second-order topology coexist in different spin channels, extending hybrid-order topology from phononic and 3D electronic systems to 2D electronic materials.
  • The five phases can be distinguished experimentally by the anomalous Nernst effect, whose spin-resolved signal changes from a single peak to a double peak and shifts in energy across the transitions.
  • The mechanism is general for 2D antiferromagnetic higher-order topological bilayers with sliding ferroelectricity, not just ScI2, so other transition-metal halides and MA2Z4 families may show the same phase sequence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the decoupling assumption suggests a direct experimental test: spin-resolved measurements of edge and corner states in slid ScI2 should show chiral edge conduction in one spin channel coexisting with spin-filtered corner charges in the other.
  • The same index construction could be applied to other internal degrees of freedom beyond spin, such as layer or valley, whenever a symmetry-breaking potential acts asymmetrically, hinting at a broader family of hybrid-order phases in slid or gated bilayers.
  • Because the polarization potential is continuously tunable by sliding distance, one could map the entire SHTI-to-QSHI phase boundary in a single device by combining piezoelectric sliding with Nernst thermopower measurements, a test the paper does not spell out.
  • The staircase ANC phase diagram implies that thermoelectric readout could serve as a low-power probe of stacking order, which may be useful for non-volatile memory where the polarization state encodes the bit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes sliding ferroelectricity as a mechanism to drive layer/spin-resolved topological phase transitions in bilayer magnetic van der Waals materials. Starting from a spin-layer-locked bilayer antiferromagnetic second-order topological insulator, the authors introduce a tight-binding Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) with spin-conserving Ising SOC and a polarization potential, and map out a phase diagram in the (p, ε) plane. They identify a spin-hybrid-order topological insulator (SHTI) in which one spin channel is first-order (Chern) topological and the other is second-order (corner-charge) topological, along with QSHI, QAHI, SOTI and trivial phases. First-principles band-structure and edge-state calculations for bilayer ScI2 are used to argue that ScI2 realizes this sequence under strain and sliding, and anomalous Nernst conductivity calculations are proposed as an experimental fingerprint.

Significance. If correct, the SHTI is a genuinely new 2D electronic phase: spin-resolved mixed-order topology in a single material, driven by an intrinsic, switchable mechanism (interlayer sliding) rather than external fields. The paper's strengths are that the TB model is explicit, the topological indices are spelled out, the material-specific band structures and edge states are shown, and the ANE prediction is concrete and falsifiable. The central risk is that the spin-resolved invariants require Sz conservation, while the real material ScI2 is polar, contains heavy iodine, and therefore may have non-negligible spin-flip SOC; the paper does not quantify this. If the spin-flip terms are small relative to the topological gap, the proposal is solid and significant.

major comments (3)
  1. [Approach & Model, paragraph before Eq. (2)] The SHTI index in Eq. (2) is only meaningful while Sz is conserved, and every term in Eq. (1) is diagonal in spin, so the model enforces spin decoupling by construction. The assertion that 'spin interactions in this system are weak and the ferroelectric polarization potential decouples the spin components' is not quantitatively supported anywhere in the main text. For AB-stacked ScI2, the polar structure and the heavy iodine allow Rashba-type spin-flip SOC, so the spin-flip matrix elements between the inverting bands at K/K' must be estimated. If these matrix elements are comparable to the topological gap, the separate spin Chern numbers and spin corner charges are not gauge-invariant and the material-specific claim that ScI2 is an SHTI fails. Please provide a quantitative check, for example the spin expectation values of the inverting DFT bands, the magnitude of the spin-flip SOC terms, or a direct comparison of band structures with and without spin-flip SOC.
  2. [Approach & Model, Eq. (2) and phase-index list] The operation ⊕ in I↑/↓ = Q↑/↓ ⊕ C↑/↓ is never defined. The listed values I_SHTI = (1, 1/3), I_QSHI = (1, -1), and I_QAHI = (0, -1) mix a charge-like quantity (1/3) with integer Chern numbers, and it is unclear whether each I↑/↓ is a pair, a sum, a logical combination, or an ordered list. Since the central novelty is the hybrid-order index, the manuscript should define this operation precisely and state how the numerical entries (1, 1/3, 0, -1) are obtained from the spin Chern number and spin corner charge.
  3. [Material realization, Fig. 4] The identification of SHTI (and QSHI/QAHI) in ScI2 is inferred from orbital-projected band structures and edge-state counting, but the spin-resolved Chern numbers and corner charges for the DFT bands are not reported in the main text. Because the DFT calculation includes all SOC terms, the observed band inversions do not by themselves prove Sz-resolved topology; explicit spin-resolved invariant calculations, or a clear statement that the phase assignment relies on the TB model rather than on the DFT bands, are needed to support the claim that ScI2 realizes the proposed phases.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Approach & Model, Eq. (1)] Please define all symbols in Eq. (1), including the range of ⟨ij⟩, the meaning of the sum over αβs, and the role of the final h.c. term, since the first four terms already appear Hermitian.
  2. [Approach & Model, phase diagram] The main text should state the key TB parameters used for Figs. 2 and 3 (at least the on-site energies, hoppings, λ, and the conversion between p and sliding displacement), or cite a table in the supplemental material, so that the phase diagram can be reproduced without accessing the supplement.
  3. [Approach & Model, paragraph before Eq. (2)] The phrase 'spin interactions in this system are weak' should be replaced by a quantitative statement with a specific energy scale, since the validity of the spin-resolved index depends on this assumption.
  4. [Distinctive ANE, Fig. 5] The ANE is computed from the same TB model that generates the phase diagram, so it is a useful model-based prediction rather than an independent validation; the text should state this explicitly to avoid overstating the evidence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SHTI phase diagram is a direct model calculation and the ScI2 prediction is anchored in independent DFT band structure data.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The tight-binding Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) is specified with spin-diagonal hopping, on-site, Ising SOC, and sliding-polarization terms; the phase diagram in Fig. 2 is obtained by directly evaluating the spin Chern numbers and spin corner charges entering the index in Eq. (2), not by fitting the target SHTI phase. The material prediction for ScI2 is based on first-principles band structures (Fig. 4) in which the sequence of band inversions is read off from orbital-resolved bands and spin/valley splittings; the topological labels are applied to those DFT results rather than imposed by the model. The anomalous Nernst conductivity in Eq. (3) is computed from the same model, so Fig. 5 is a consequence of the model rather than an independent test, but the paper does not present ANE as evidence for the existence of the phases; it presents it as an experimentally accessible signature, which is not circular. Ref. [18] is a self-citation used only to motivate ANE as a sensitive probe; the ANC curves shown are computed in this paper, so the citation is not load-bearing. The passage before Eq. (2) asserting that 'spin interactions in this system are weak and the ferroelectric polarization potential decouples the spin components' is flagged as an unquantified physical assumption: if spin-flip SOC in ScI2 is sizeable, the spin-resolved indices and the material prediction would be invalidated. That is a correctness/verifiability risk, not a circular step, because the paper's equations do not define the SHTI outcome in terms of that assumption. Overall, no prediction in the paper reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central prediction rests on a model with several tunable knobs (strain, polarization potential, SOC) and on the assumption that spin channels are decoupled. The TB parameters are not given in the main text. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • strain epsilon = 2.25% and 2.75% for ScI2
    Used to tune nearest-neighbor hopping and drive band inversions in the TB and DFT calculations. The two values are chosen to place ScI2 into SOTI and QSHI regimes.
  • ferroelectric polarization potential p = p_v = 30 meV for ScI2; p = 0.15 eV in ANE figure
    Models the effect of sliding. The main text states the valence band splitting p_v=30 meV for ScI2 and uses p=0.15 eV in the ANE calculation (Fig. 5).
  • spin-orbit coupling strength lambda = 0.2 eV
    Set to 0.2 eV in the ANE computation (Fig. 5 caption); not derived from DFT in the main text.
  • TB model parameters (on-site energies, hoppings) = not given in main text
    Taken from the three-band MoS2 model of Liu et al. (ref. [56]) and adjusted for ScI2, but the values are deferred to the supplemental material.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The bilayer AA-stacked MX2 system possesses D3h point-group symmetry and is described by a MoS2-like three-band model (dz2, dxy, dx2-y2 orbitals).
    Invoked before Eq. (1) to justify the TB Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption Spin and layer degrees of freedom are intrinsically locked in the AA-stacked bilayer AFM structure.
    Used throughout to identify spin-up with top layer and spin-down with bottom layer.
  • domain assumption Spin interactions are weak and the ferroelectric polarization potential decouples the spin components, so spin-resolved topological indices are valid.
    Stated before Eq. (2); this is the weakest assumption behind the SHTI index.
  • standard math The spin corner charge Q_s is quantized by C3 rotational symmetry (ref. [58]).
    Used to define Q in the hybrid-order index.
  • domain assumption Sliding ferroelectric polarization is limited in magnitude according to the general theory of Ji et al. (ref. [55]).
    Invoked to justify the range of polarization potential considered in the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sliding Ferroelectrics Induced Hybrid-Order Topological Phase Transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KIP3Q2O3

@misc{pith2026250601402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sliding Ferroelectrics Induced Hybrid-Order Topological Phase Transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KIP3Q2O3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01402}
}
read the original abstract

We propose ferroelectric layer sliding as a new approach to realize and manipulate topological quantum states in two-dimensional (2D) bilayer magnetic van der Waals materials. We show that stacking monolayer ferromagnetic topological states into layer-spin-locked bilayer antiferromagnetic structures, and introducing sliding ferroelectricity leads to asynchronous topological evolution of different layers (spins) owing to existence of polarization potentials, thereby giving rise to rich layer-resolved topological phases. As a specific example, by means of a lattice model, we show that a bilayer magnetic 2D second order topological insulator (SOTI) reveals an unrecognized spin-hybrid-order topological insulator after undergoing ferroelectric sliding. Interestingly, in such phase, the spin-up (top layer) and spin-down (bottom layer) channels exhibit first-order and second-order topological properties, respectively. Moreover, other topological phases such as SOTI, quantum spin Hall insulator, quantum anomalous Hall insulator, and trivial insulator can also emerge through changes in the parameters of the system, and the relevant topological indices are also discussed. In terms of materials, based on first principles calculations, we predict material ScI2 can serve as an ideal platform to realize our proposal. Further, we predict that the anomalous Nernst effect of these several topological phases exhibits distinct differences, and therefore can be used as a signal for experimentally probing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01402 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Topological phase diagram in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The real-space distribution schematics of the four s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. (a) Schematic of the Nernst conductivity in a bilayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Under the modulation of tensile strain and sliding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    In the AA-stacked AFM bi- layer (with p = 0), tuning ε drives concurrent topologi- cal transitions of spin-up and spin-down channels across the SOTI–QSHI–NI phases

    In the TB model, bilayer sliding is simulated via a ferroelectric polarization potential p. In the AA-stacked AFM bi- layer (with p = 0), tuning ε drives concurrent topologi- cal transitions of spin-up and spin-down channels across the SOTI–QSHI–NI phases. However, in the AB-stacked configuration at the maximum polarization p, the sym- metry breaking induc...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Hasan and J. E. Moore, Three- dimensional topological insulators, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 55 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological insulators in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    Burkov, Topological semimetals, Nat

    A. Burkov, Topological semimetals, Nat. Mater. 15, 1145 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Experimental per- spective on three-dimensional topological semimetals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys

    L. Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 106802 (2011)

    2011

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Dziawa, B

    P. Dziawa, B. Kowalski, K. Dybko, et al. , Topo- logical crystalline insulator states in Pb 1−xSnxSe, Nat. Mater. 11, 1023 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Tokura, K

    Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic topo- logical insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Liu and T

    J. Liu and T. Hesjedal, Magnetic topolog- ical insulator heterostructures: A review, Adv. Mater. 35, 2102427 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Zhang, M

    D. Zhang, M. Shi, T. Zhu, et al. , Topolog- ical axion states in the magnetic insulator mnbi2te4 with the quantized magnetoelectric effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 206401 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Zhang, W

    J.-M. Zhang, W. Zhu, Y. Zhang, et al. , Tailoring magnetic doping in the topological insulator bi 2se3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 266405 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Schindler, Z

    F. Schindler, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, et al. , Higher- order topology in bismuth, Nat. phys. 14, 918 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, et al. , Higher-order topological insulators, Sci. Adv. 4, eaat0346 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    J. Lee, J. Kwon, E. Lee, et al. , Spinful hinge states in the higher-order topological insulators WTe 2, Nat. Commun. 14, 1801 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Chen, X.-T

    C. Chen, X.-T. Zeng, Z. Chen, et al. , Second-order real nodal-line semimetal in three-dimensional graphdiyne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 026405 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Z. Guo, J. Deng, Y. Xie, et al. , Quadrupole topo- logical insulators in Ta 2M3Te5(M = Ni , Pd) monolayers, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 87 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Yang and J.-M

    N.-J. Yang and J.-M. Zhang, Higher-order topological phase diagram revealed by anoma- lous nernst effect in a janus ScClI monolayer, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035423 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Costa, B

    M. Costa, B. Focassio, L. M. Canonico, et al. , Con- necting higher-order topology with the orbital hall ef- fect in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 116204 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Zhang, Z.-K

    X. Zhang, Z.-K. Lin, H.-X. Wang, et al. , Symmetry- protected hierarchy of anomalous multipole topo- logical band gaps in nonsymmorphic metacrystals, Nat. Commun. 11, 65 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Y. Yang, J. Lu, M. Yan, et al. , Hybrid-order 6 topological insulators in a phononic crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 156801 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    P. Lai, J. Wu, Z. Pu, et al. , Real-projective-plane hybrid- order topological insulator realized in phononic crystals , Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 044002 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    M. S. Hossain, F. Schindler, R. Islam, et al. , A hy- brid topological quantum state in an elemental solid, Nature 628, 527–533 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Zhang, C

    F. Zhang, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Surface states of topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 86, 081303 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Fl¨ ototto, Y

    D. Fl¨ ototto, Y. Ota, Y. Bai, et al. , Superconducting pair- ing of topological surface states in bismuth selenide films on niobium, Sci. Adv. 4, eaar7214 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Gooth, R

    J. Gooth, R. Zierold, P. Sergelius, et al. , Local mag- netic suppression of topological surface states in Bi 2Te3 nanowires, ACS nano 10, 7180 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Gr¨ oning, S

    O. Gr¨ oning, S. Wang, X. Yao, et al. , Engineering of ro- bust topological quantum phases in graphene nanorib- bons, Nature 560, 209 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    J. Liu, Q. Jiang, B. Huang, et al. , Realization of honeycomb tellurene with topological edge states, Nano Lett. (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Ezawa, Protected corners, Nat

    M. Ezawa, Protected corners, Nat. Mater. 18, 1266 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    R. Li, N. Mao, X. Wu, et al. , Robust second- order topological insulators with giant valley polar- ization in two-dimensional honeycomb ferromagnets, Nano Lett. 23, 91 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Ezawa, Valley-polarized metals and quantum anomalous hall effect in silicene, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Valley-polarized metals and quantum anomalous hall effect in silicene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 055502 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    H. Weng, R. Yu, X. Hu, et al. , Quantum anoma- lous hall effect and related topological electronic states, Adv. Phys. 64, 227 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Bampoulis, C

    P. Bampoulis, C. Castenmiller, D. J. Klaassen, et al. , Quantum spin hall states and topological phase transi- tion in germanene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 196401 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Wang and L

    J. Wang and L. H. Santos, Classification of topo- logical phase transitions and van hove singular- ity steering mechanism in graphene superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 236805 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Tajkov, D

    Z. Tajkov, D. Nagy, K. Kandrai, et al. , Re- vealing the topological phase diagram of ZrTe 5 using the complex strain fields of microbubbles, npj Computational Materials 8, 177 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, et al. , Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 33 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    J. Bai, T. Yang, Z. Guo, et al. , Controllable topologi- cal phase transition via ferroelectric-paraelectric swit ch- ing in ferromagnetic single-layer mim ii Ge 2X6 family, Materials Horizons (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    R. Li, N. Mao, L. Cai, et al. , Ferroelectric heterobilayer with tunable first- and higher-order topological states, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125302 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    X. Duan, Z. Zhu, X. Chen, et al. , Nonvolatile electric-field control of topological phase transition in a two-dimensional ferroelectric heterostructure, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 12, 6278 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    X. Liu, A. P. Pyatakov, and W. Ren, Mag- netoelectric coupling in multiferroic bilayer VS 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 247601 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Z. Fei, W. Zhao, T. A. Palomaki, et al. , Fer- roelectric switching of a two-dimensional metal, Nature 560, 336 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Tang and G

    P. Tang and G. E. W. Bauer, Sliding phase transition in ferroelectric van der waals bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 176801 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Z. Gui, H. Zhu, Z. Wang, et al. , Stoner instability- mediated large magnetoelectric effects in 2D stacking electrides, npj Computat. Mater. 10, 51 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Jafari, E

    H. Jafari, E. Barts, P. Przybysz, et al. , Robust zeeman-type band splitting in sliding ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 024005 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    N. Ding, H. Ye, and S. Dong, Quasi-one- dimensional sliding ferroelectricity in nbi 4, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024115 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    T. H. Yang, B.-W. Liang, H.-C. Hu, et al. , Fer- roelectric transistors based on shear-transformation- mediated rhombohedral-stacked molybdenum disulfide, Nat. Electronics 7, 29 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    K. Liu, X. Ma, Y. Li, et al. , Tailoring the quan- tum anomalous layer hall effect in multiferroic bilayers through sliding, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 118 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Wu and J

    M. Wu and J. Li, Sliding ferroelectricity in 2D van der waals materials: Related physics and future opportuni- ties, P. Nat. Acad. Sci. 118, e2115703118 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Y. Feng, Y. Dai, B. Huang, et al. , Layer hall ef- fect in multiferroic two-dimensional materials, Nano Lett. 23, 5367 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    P. Meng, Y. Wu, R. Bian, et al. , Sliding induced multi- ple polarization states in two-dimensional ferroelectric s, Nat. Commun. 13, 7696 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    F. Sui, H. Li, R. Qi, et al. , Atomic-level polariza- tion reversal in sliding ferroelectric semiconductors, Nat. Commun. 15, 3799 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Vizner Stern, Y

    M. Vizner Stern, Y. Waschitz, W. Cao, et al. , Interfacial ferroelectricity by van der waals sliding, Science 372, 1462 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Z. Gao, L. Chen, J. Chen, et al. , Ferroelectric control of layer-polarized anomalous hall effects in bilayer and trilayer rucl2, Mater. Today Phys. , 101473 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Tian, C.-B

    Y. Tian, C.-B. Wang, B.-Y. Zhang, et al. , Quantum layer spin hall effect in sliding antiferromagnetic bilay- ers, J. Mater. Chem. C (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    J. Ji, G. Yu, C. Xu, et al. , General the- ory for bilayer stacking ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 146801 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Liu, W.-Y

    G.-B. Liu, W.-Y. Shan, Y. Yao, et al. , Three-band tight- binding model for monolayers of group-vib transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085433 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    See supplemental material for (I) tight-binding model , (II) High-order topological corner states, (III) Computa- tional Details

  51. [59]

    W. A. Benalcazar, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Quantization of fractional corner charge in Cn- symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulato rs, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245151 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Y.-Q. Li, X. Zhang, X. Shang, et al. , Magnetic and fer- roelectric manipulation of valley physics in janus piezo- electric materials, Nano Lett. 23, 10013 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.