General structure factor and dynamic effects of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in S = 1/2 clusters

Evan M. Wilson; Jason T. Haraldsen; Joseph A. Prescott

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

General structure factor and dynamic effects of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in S = 1/2 clusters

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction leaves a single-peak fingerprint in the neutron structure factor of an S=1/2 dimer, coupling the |0,0>→|1,0> gap and intensity to heat-capacity anomalies.

desk verdict The dimer intensity claim is internally inconsistent (non-Hermitian for generic phi, S^z structure factor independent of D_z), but the cluster bookkeeping may be salvageable. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02505 v1 pith:KIUCCEAV submitted 2025-09-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.othercond-mat.str-el

Evan M. Wilson , Joseph A. Prescott , Jason T. Haraldsen This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.othercond-mat.str-el

keywords Dzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionspin-1/2dimerspinclustersdynamicstructurefactorneutronscatteringheatcapacityexactdiagonalizationanisotropicexchange

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a complete, analytically transparent model of the simplest magnet with antisymmetric exchange: two coupled spin-1/2 sites with Heisenberg and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions. It derives the general neutron-scattering structure factor for that dimer and shows that the DM strength $D_z/|J|$ and phase $\phi$ enter only the $|0,0\rangle \to |1,0\rangle$ transition, shifting its energy and suppressing its intensity while the $|1,\pm1\rangle$ transitions stay put. The paper connects that spectrum to the partition function, so every Schottky anomaly in heat capacity is matched to a spin-resolved selection rule in the neutron response. If the model holds, measuring one shifted, weakened neutron peak and its thermal counterpart would give a direct experimental estimate of both the magnitude and phase of the DM interaction.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $4\times4$ Hamiltonian of Eq. (2), with off-diagonal DM entries $J/2 \pm iD_z e^{i\phi}/2$ coupling the $\uparrow\downarrow$ and $\downarrow\uparrow$ basis states. Exact diagonalization produces the two DM-mixed states of Table 1, and those eigenvectors feed the site-resolved overlap coefficients $A_j = \sum_{u:s_j=0} a^{(f)*}_{u\oplus\hat j}\, a_u$, whose magnitudes and phases build the structure factor $S_n(q) = \sum_j |A_j|^2 + 2\sum_{k<j}|A_jA_k|\cos((j-k)qa + \phi_j - \phi_k)$. The same spectrum, via the partition function, gives heat capacity, so the gap $\sqrt{J^2+D_z^2}$ and the interference phase $\phi$ are the two quantities that connect neutron intensity, thermal anomalies, and field-driven ground-state changes.

What would settle it

Take a known DMI dimer, e.g., Cu2(C5H12N2)2Cl4, and measure the three triplet transitions from the singlet by inelastic neutron scattering in a magnetic field: the model predicts that only the central $|0,0\rangle\to|1,0\rangle$ peak moves by $\sqrt{J^2+D_z^2}-J$ and loses intensity by the factor $|J|/\sqrt{J^2+D_z^2}$ while the outer peaks shift at most quadratically; a spectrum without this one-peak pattern would refute the claimed signature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the S=1/2 Heisenberg–DM dimer with D parallel to z, exact diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) gives mixed singlet/triplet eigenstates $|0,0\rangle$ and $|1,0\rangle$ with energy $E_\pm = -J/4 \pm \tfrac{1}{2}\sqrt{J^2+D_z^2}$, while $|1,+1\rangle$ and $|1,-1\rangle$ remain pure with energy $J/4 \mp E_B$. The paper's central claim is that the resulting structure-factor formula, $S^\mu_{fi}(q) = \eta_f^2 \eta_i^2 [|\alpha^\mu|^2 + |\beta^\mu|^2 + 2|\alpha^\mu||\beta^\mu|\cos(qa + \phi^\mu)]$, has a unique signature: only the non-spin-flip $|0,0\rangle \to |1,0\rangle$ channel carries a DM-modified prefactor $|J|/(2\sqrt{J^2+D_z^2})$ and a phase-dependent interference shift, so in a neutron spectrum one central peak moves up in energy and loses intensity while the two outer peaks stay essentially fixed. This is the analogue, for a finite cluster, of the incomplete Paschen–Back regime, and it is the microscopic reason the heat-capacity landscape—first-order crossings versus avoided level repulsions under magnetic or electric fields—maps one-to-one onto the neutron selection rules.

Load-bearing premise

The model treats the complex phase $\phi$ of the DM term as freely variable, but for most $\phi$ the Hamiltonian matrix is not self-adjoint (physically real), so the phase-dependent predictions rest on an unstated restriction, usually $\phi=0$ or $\pi$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A neutron experiment on a DMI dimer with moderate $D_z/|J|$ should see exactly one displaced, weaker peak (the $|0,0\rangle \to |1,0\rangle$ transition) while the $|1,\pm1\rangle$ peaks remain at their Heisenberg positions; the size of the shift fixes $D_z/|J|$.
Heat-capacity measurements should show a Schottky anomaly whose temperature maximum tracks the same $\sqrt{J^2+D_z^2}$ gap, and whose sharp-versus-broad shape distinguishes first-order (field along $D_z$) from second-order (field in-plane) ground-state crossings.
An electric field applied perpendicular to the bond should linearly tune $D_z$ through the gap-closing point, letting single dimers act as electrically controlled thermal or magnetic switches.
For longer chains and rings, the same overlap algebra predicts that a uniform DM phase simply displaces all structure-factor maxima in momentum, so powder or single-crystal neutron data can read off the DM phase shift.
The derived singlet–triplet hybridization provides a mechanism for transitions that a pure Heisenberg model forbids, i.e., a finite-cluster analogue of incomplete Paschen–Back behaviour.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's own Eq. (2) keeps $\phi$ arbitrary, but Hermiticity pins $e^{i\phi}$ to real values; if arbitrary phase is intended, the structure-factor and heat-capacity curves need to be re-derived from a self-adjoint version of the Hamiltonian before they can be tested against experiment.
The $q$-space displacement of constructive interference in the derived $S_n(q)$ suggests that in longer chains the DM phase should act like a momentum shift of the whole diffraction envelope; measuring that displacement may be a cleaner route to the sign of DMI than single-peak intensities.
Because the electric-field route tunes $D_z$ continuously, a molecular dimer with strong magnetoelectric coupling could show a purely electric-field-driven crossing; testing whether that crossing remains first-order in zero disorder would distinguish this model from disorder-broadened pictures.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my take on the DMI dimer paper. The headline claim—that D_z and the phase phi control the intensity of the |0,0>→|1,0> neutron transition—does not hold up. The Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) is not Hermitian for generic phi: the off-diagonal terms J/2 ± i D e^{i phi}/2 are not conjugate pairs unless e^{i phi} is real. So Table 1's eigenvalues and eigenstates are only valid for phi = 0 or pi. And even then, using the paper's own Table 1 vectors and Table 3 overlap coefficients, the longitudinal structure factor for that transition comes out to 1/2(1 − cos qa), independent of D_z. That contradicts Table 4's prefactor |J|/(2√(J^2+D_z^2)) and the intensity reduction shown in Figure 6. The issue is that the DMI only changes the relative phase of the |↑↓> and |↓↑> amplitudes, not their magnitudes, so the S^z matrix element is unchanged.

That is a load-bearing flaw. The abstract and conclusions rest on this intensity signature. If the intensity is not actually D_z-dependent, the central experimental prediction collapses.

To give credit where it's due: the combinatorial structure factor expressions for trimer, tetramer, and pentamer (Tables 5 and 6) are clearly worked out. They are a straightforward extension of Haraldsen's 2005 formalism, but they are explicit and could be useful to someone doing cluster neutron-scattering calculations. The heat capacity maps for field- and electric-field-tuned DMI are standard but competently presented.

The paper does not compare to any data, so there's no fitting-to-prediction circularity. The problem is purely internal: the dimer calculation doesn't support its own claims. I'd flag the non-Hermiticity and the S^z structure factor error as the main points for a referee to check. If those are corrected, what's left is a modest extension of the structure factor formalism with an electric-field knob, which might be publishable in a specialized venue. As it stands, the central result is wrong.

My recommendation: send it to peer review, because the error is specific and checkable and the cluster formulas deserve a look. But I'd expect a qualified reject or a major-revision request. I wouldn't cite it in its current form.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies an S = 1/2 Heisenberg dimer with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI). The authors derive a 'general structure factor equation' for the dimer, claim that the anisotropy ratio D_z/|J| and a complex phase φ control both the gap and the intensity of the |0,0> → |1,0> transition, and analyze heat capacity under magnetic and electric fields. They also extend the structure-factor formalism to trimers, tetramers, and pentamers, providing explicit overlap coefficients and momentum-dependent expressions.

Significance. If the main claim were correct, the paper would provide a direct neutron-scattering signature of DMI in spin dimers and a correspondence with heat-capacity anomalies. The manuscript does contain potentially useful material: the explicit overlap-coefficient tables for larger clusters (Tables 5 and 6) and the heat-capacity analysis for the Hermitian D_z case (φ = 0 or π) are straightforwardly extendable. However, the central result is undermined by two internal inconsistencies: the Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) is non-Hermitian for generic φ, and the structure-factor intensity for the |0,0> → |1,0> transition is actually independent of D_z when computed from the paper's own eigenstates. These errors are load-bearing for the abstract and the main conclusions, and they cannot be fixed by minor revisions.

major comments (3)

[Section 2, Eq. (2)] The Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) is not Hermitian for generic φ. The off-diagonal elements are H_12 = J/2 − iD_z e^{iφ}/2 and H_21 = J/2 + iD_z e^{iφ}/2; Hermiticity requires H_12 = H_21^*, which gives e^{iφ} = e^{−iφ} and hence φ = 0 or π. For any other φ, the matrix is non-Hermitian, so the eigenvalues and eigenstates in Table 1 are not solutions of a valid quantum Hamiltonian. Because the complex phase φ is presented as a tunable parameter controlling the structure factor (Table 4, Figure 6), all φ-dependent predictions lack a valid quantum-mechanical basis.
[Section 4.1, Table 4 and Eq. (17)] Even in the Hermitian cases φ = 0 or π, the claimed D_z-dependence of the |0,0> → |1,0> intensity is inconsistent with the paper's own eigenstates. Using the normalized eigenstates from Table 1 (which have equal-magnitude amplitudes on |↑↓> and |↓↑>) and the overlap definitions in Table 3, the longitudinal structure factor evaluates to S^z_{fi}(q) = 1/2(1 − cos qa), independent of D_z and φ. The phase between α_z and β_z is always π, so the q-shift described in the text does not occur. Equation (17), which states |α||β| = |J|/(2√(J² + D_z²)), does not follow from the Table 1 vectors; those vectors give |α_z| = |β_z| = 1/2 for all D_z. Thus the central claim that DMI suppresses the central-peak intensity via unequal overlap coefficients is incorrect.
[Section 3.1 and Figure 2(b)] The text discusses a DM vector in the xy plane (labeled 'D_x/y') that mixes all four states, but the main-text Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) contains only D_z. The appendix Eq. (18) includes D_x and D_y, but the main text does not define which Hamiltonian is used for the transverse-field results. This makes the heat-capacity analysis for in-plane DMI difficult to reproduce and inconsistent with the model presented in Section 2.

minor comments (5)

[Table 1] The eigenstates in Table 1 are not written in normalized form; the η factors in Eq. (10) are introduced later but the table itself does not state the normalization convention, so the reader cannot directly verify the overlap calculations.
[Section 3.1] The word 'dependance' should be 'dependence'.
[Section 4.2] The phrase 'table table 5 and 6' should be 'Tables 5 and 6'.
[Section 5] The sentence 'the DM induces singlet–triplet hybridization, which partially decouples spin–orbit coupling' is unclear and is not supported by the formalism presented earlier in the paper.
[Abstract and Introduction] The text repeatedly claims 'exact diagonalization' as a method, but no numerical diagonalization is described; the analytical diagonalization leading to Table 1 is sufficient, and the wording should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's derivation chain is self-contained algebra from the stated H-DM Hamiltonian, and the issues raised by the skeptic are correctness concerns rather than circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's chain is: write the H-DM Hamiltonian (Eq. 2), diagonalize it to obtain Table 1, compute thermodynamic quantities from the partition function (Eqs. 3-4), and evaluate the neutron scattering intensity with the overlap-coefficient formula (Eqs. 9-10 and Table 3). No observable is fitted to produce a prediction: the D_z/|J| and phi dependences enter through the Hamiltonian and are then propagated through exact diagonalization, so the claimed control of the gap is a direct consequence of the stated model. The structure-factor formalism is attributed to Haraldsen et al. [28], a self-citation, but that citation supplies a published, parameter-free, externally checkable expression for |<Psi_f|O|Psi_i>|^2 and is not used as an unexamined uniqueness theorem or to exclude alternatives; hence it does not make the derivation circular. The potentially serious problems in the paper--the non-Hermiticity of Eq. (2) for phi not 0 or pi, and the inconsistency between Table 4/Eq. (17) and the normalized eigenstates of Table 1, which makes the longitudinal |0,0>->|1,0> intensity independent of D_z and phi--are internal mathematical and physical correctness issues, not cases where a prediction reduces by construction to its own inputs. No circular step satisfying the required standard (Eq. X equal to Eq. Y by construction, or fitted parameter renamed as prediction) is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Heisenberg-DMI model and the neutron scattering formalism from the authors' own earlier work. The key additional load-bearing element is the complex phase phi in Eq. (2), which is not a standard property of the DMI and makes the Hamiltonian non-Hermitian for generic values. The electric-field coupling lambda is a secondary model parameter.

free parameters (3)

phi (DMI complex phase)
Introduced in the off-diagonal DMI matrix element in Eq. (2). The paper treats it as a continuous parameter controlling structure factor intensity. For a real DMI vector, no such phase exists; the Hamiltonian is Hermitian only for phi = 0 or pi, so this parameter is ad hoc to the paper's claims.
lambda (electric-field coupling to DMI)
Introduced in Eq. (6) as the coupling strength between the applied electric field and the DM vector. It is a model parameter used in the electric-field section, not fitted to data.
D_z/|J| (anisotropy ratio)
Scanned across a range in Figures 2-6. It controls the singlet-triplet gap and is a standard model parameter, not fitted.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The spin dimer is described by the Heisenberg-DMI Hamiltonian H = J S1.S2 + D.(S1 x S2) plus Zeeman and electric-field terms.
Standard model for anisotropic exchange in spin clusters, used throughout Section 2.
standard math The neutron scattering structure factor is given by the overlap formula S(q) = |<Psi_f| sum_j sigma_j e^{iq r_j}|Psi_i>|^2 from Haraldsen et al. 2005.
Adopted in Eq. (9) as the starting point for the derivation; cites Ref. [28].
ad hoc to paper The DMI off-diagonal matrix element may carry an arbitrary complex phase e^{i phi}, and the resulting matrix is Hermitian.
This is the false premise identified in Eq. (2). It is not a standard result and is not flagged as restricted to phi = 0 or pi.
domain assumption The electric field modifies the DM vector as D_eff = D0 + lambda (E x e12) following the KNB mechanism.
Used in Section 3.2, Eq. (6), citing the Katsura-Nagaosa-Balatsky mechanism.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of General structure factor and dynamic effects of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in S = 1/2 clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KIUCCEAV

@misc{pith2026250902505,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: General structure factor and dynamic effects of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in S = 1/2 clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KIUCCEAV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02505}
}

abstract

Understanding the effects of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) has become increasingly important in the context of nanoscale magnetism and spintronics. In this study, we derive a general structure factor equation for an S = 1/2 dimer and show that the anisotropic ratio $D_z/|J|$ and complex phase $\phi$ of the DMI control the gap energy and intensity of the $|0,0\rangle \to |1,0\rangle$ transition. {Using exact diagonalization of the Heisenberg spin-spin Hamiltonian that incorporates both isotropic and anisotropic interactions,} as well as the effects of an external magnetic field and an electric field. Our results show that the DM interaction splits energy eigenstates, induces level repulsion, and significantly modifies the spin dimer structure factor. These effects reveal a direct correspondence between thermodynamic anomalies in the heat capacity and spin-resolved selection rules.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02505 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Illustration of the 𝑆 = 1 2 Heisenberg–Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (HDM) quantum spin dimer. The general wavefunction |𝜓⟩ is a superposition of all spin configurations with real and complex amplitudes 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐, and 𝑑. The Heisenberg exchange interaction 𝐽 couples the spins isotropically (shown along the bond), while the antisymmetric Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction 𝐃 (green arc) introduces spin canting via a vector prod… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The energy levels from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Energy levels and heat-capacity contours for a spin- 1 2 dimer as an in-plane electric field 𝐸𝑦 tunes the DM component 𝐷𝑧 = 𝐷0 − 𝜆𝐸𝑦 . On the left |𝐽|= 0 and |𝐷| = 1 (a), so pure DM levels cross linearly at 𝐸𝑦∕|𝐷𝑧 | = 1, giving a sharp fan-like peak centered at a first order quantum phase transition from |0, 0⟩(blue) → |1, 0⟩(violet). On the right (b), |𝐽| = |𝐷|, the HDM crossing becomes avoided, and the heat-capaci… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Energy levels (top) and reduced heat capacity 𝐶∕(𝑘𝐵 ) (bottom) of an 𝑆 = 1 2 Heisenberg–DM dimer as functions of |𝐷𝑧 |∕|𝐽|, shown for three cases: no external field (left), a longitudinal magnetic field (center), and a longitudinal electric field coupling to the DM vec…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Simulated neutron scattering intensity for a spin1 2 Heisenberg–Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (HDM) dimer under an external magnetic field, with 𝐸𝐵 = 0.5 and |𝐽| = |𝐷|. (a) Intensity versus energy transfer 𝐸∕|𝐽|, where the leftmost peak corresponds to the transition Δ𝐸−1 = |1…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Conventional and inverse magne- tocaloricandelectrocaloriceffectsofamixedspin-(1/2,1)heisenberg dimer

Hana Vargová and Jozef Strečka. Conventional and inverse magne- tocaloricandelectrocaloriceffectsofamixedspin-(1/2,1)heisenberg dimer. The European Physical Journal Plus, 137(4):490, Apr 2022. ISSN 2190-5444. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02694-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02694-8

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02694-8 2022
[2]

Spin-related quantum materials and devices.APL Materials, 12(12):120402, 12

Guang Yang, Weisheng Zhao, and Shouguo Wang. Spin-related quantum materials and devices.APL Materials, 12(12):120402, 12

work page
[3]

I. E. Dzyaloshinskii. A thermodynamic theory of ’weak’ ferromag- netism of antiferromagnets. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids,4:241–255,1958. doi:10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3

doi:10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3 1958
[4]

Anisotropicsuperexchangeinteractionandweakferro- magnetism

TôruMoriya. Anisotropicsuperexchangeinteractionandweakferro- magnetism. Phys.Rev.,120:91–98,Oct1960. doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 120.91. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.120.91

doi:10.1103/physrev
[5]

A. N. Bogdanov and D. A. Yablonskii. Thermodynamically stable ‘vortices’ in magnetically ordered crystals. the mixed state of mag- nets. Soviet Physics JETP, 68:101–103, 1989

work page 1989
[6]

Rhim, Kohji Nakamura, Yoichi Shiota, Sanghoon Kim, and Teruo Ono

Woo Seung Ham, Abdul-Muizz Pradipto, Kay Yakushiji, Kwangsu Kim, Sonny H. Rhim, Kohji Nakamura, Yoichi Shiota, Sanghoon Kim, and Teruo Ono. Dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction in noncen- trosymmetric superlattices. npj Computational Materials, 7(1):129,

work page
[7]

NatureReviewsPhysics , 5:43–61, 2023

HongxinYang,JinghuaLiang,andQiruiCui.First-principlescalcula- tionsfordzyaloshinskii–moriyainteraction. NatureReviewsPhysics , 5:43–61, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s42254-022-00529-0. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00529-0

doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00529-0 2023
[8]

Vedmedenko

Tim Matthies, Levente Rózsa, László Szunyogh, Roland Wiesen- danger, and Elena Y. Vedmedenko. Interlayer and interfa- cial dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction in magnetic trilayers: First- principles calculations. Phys. Rev. Res., 6:043158, Nov 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043158. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043158

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043158 2024

Show all 48 references

[9]

Spincur- rent and magnetoelectric effect in noncollinear magnets.Phys

HoshoKatsura,NaotoNagaosa,andAlexanderV.Balatsky. Spincur- rent and magnetoelectric effect in noncollinear magnets.Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:057205, Jul 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.057205. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.057205

2005 doi
[10]

Mühlbauer, B

S. Mühlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. Böni. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science, 323(5916):915–919, 2009. doi: 10.1126/science. 1166767. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science. 1166767

2009 doi
[11]

Dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions, néel skyrmions and v4 magnetic clusters in multiferroic lacunar spinel gav4s8

Vladislav Borisov, Nastaran Salehi, Manuel Pereiro, Anna Delin, and Olle Eriksson. Dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions, néel skyrmions and v4 magnetic clusters in multiferroic lacunar spinel gav4s8. npj Computational Materials, 10(1):53, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41524-024-01232-7. U...

2024 doi
[12]

Chiral magnetism in lithium- decoratedmonolayer crte2:Interplaybetweendzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction and higher-order interactions.Phys

Weiyi Pan, Changsong Xu, Xueyang Li, Zhiming Xu, Boyu Liu, Bing-Lin Gu, and Wenhui Duan. Chiral magnetism in lithium- decoratedmonolayer crte2:Interplaybetweendzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction and higher-order interactions.Phys. Rev. B, 109:214405, Jun 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysR...

2024 doi
[13]

Muratov, and Thilo M

Anne Bernand-Mantel, Cyrill B. Muratov, and Thilo M. Simon. Un- raveling the role of dipolar versus dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions in stabilizing compact magnetic skyrmions. Phys. Rev. B, 101: 045416,Jan 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.045416. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/...

2020 doi
[14]

Spin waves in ferromagnetic nanorings with interfacial dzyaloshinskii–moriya interactions: Ii

Bushra Hussain and Michael Cottam. Spin waves in ferromagnetic nanorings with interfacial dzyaloshinskii–moriya interactions: Ii. di- rectional effects.Nanomaterials, 14(3), 2024. ISSN 2079-4991. doi: 10.3390/nano14030286.URL https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/14/3/ 286

2024 doi
[15]

Mahdavifar, M

S. Mahdavifar, M. Salehpour, H. Cheraghi, M. Hashemi, and R. Ja- fari. Resilience of quantum spin fluctuations against dzyaloshin- skii–moriya interaction. Scientific Reports, 14:10034, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60502-y. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-024-60502-y

2024 doi
[16]

A. Fert, V. Cros, and J. Sampaio. Skyrmions on the track.Nature Nanotechnology, 8:152–156, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.29. Wilson, Prescott & Haraldsen:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 10 of 11 Structure Factor and Dynamics of DMI URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.29

2013 doi
[17]

O. G. Udalov, I. S. Beloborodov, and M. V. Sapozhnikov. Mag- netic skyrmions and bimerons in films with anisotropic interfacial dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B, 103:174416, May
[18]

Anatomy of dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction at Co∕Pt interfaces

Hongxin Yang, André Thiaville, Stanislas Rohart, Albert Fert, and Mairbek Chshiev. Anatomy of dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction at Co∕Pt interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:267210, Dec 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.267210. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.1...

2015 doi
[19]

Tian-ChengYi,Wen-LongYou,NingWu,andAndrzejM.Oleś.Crit- icality and factorization in the heisenberg chain with dzyaloshinskii- moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B, 100:024423, Jul 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.024423. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.100.024423

2019 doi
[20]

URLhttps://link.aps

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.174416. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.174416

doi
[21]

Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications

Giovanni Finocchio, Felix Büttner, Riccardo Tomasello, Mario Car- pentieri, and Mathias Kläui. Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 49(42): 423001, sep 2016. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/42/423001. URL https://doi.org/10.108...

2016 doi
[22]

Heisenbergand dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions controlled by molecular packing in trinuclear organometallic clusters.Phys

B.J.Powell,J.Merino,A.L.Khosla,andA.C.Jacko. Heisenbergand dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions controlled by molecular packing in trinuclear organometallic clusters.Phys. Rev. B, 95:094432, Mar
[23]

Chizhikov and V.E

V.A. Chizhikov and V.E. Dmitrienko. Microscopic description of twisted magnet cu2oseo3. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 382:142–151, 2015. ISSN 0304-8853. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.01.032. URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S030...

2015 doi
[24]

Sheikin, C

S.Miyahara,J.-B.Fouet,S.R.Manmana,R.M.Noack,H.Mayaffre, I. Sheikin, C. Berthier, and F. Mila. Uniform and staggered mag- netizations induced by dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions in isolated and coupled spin-1∕2 dimers in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B, 75:184402, May 2007. do...

2007 doi
[25]

Quantum computing with spin cluster qubits.Phys

Florian Meier, Jeremy Levy, and Daniel Loss. Quantum computing with spin cluster qubits.Phys. Rev. Lett., 90:047901, Jan 2003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.047901. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.047901

2003 doi
[26]

Complexquantumnetwork modelsfromspinclusters

RaviT.C.ChepuriandIstvánA.Kovács. Complexquantumnetwork modelsfromspinclusters. CommunicationsPhysics,6(1):271,2023. doi: 10.1038/s42005-023-01394-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s42005-023-01394-8

2023 doi
[27]

K. Iida, Y. Qiu, and T. J. Sato. Dzyaloshinsky-moriya interaction and long lifetime of the spin state in the cu3 triangular spin cluster by inelastic neutron scattering measurements. Phys. Rev. B, 84: 094449, Sep 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.094449. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/...

2011 doi
[28]

Neutronscatteringand magnetic observables for𝑠 = 1∕2spin clusters and molecular mag- nets

J.T.Haraldsen,T.Barnes,andJ.L.Musfeldt. Neutronscatteringand magnetic observables for𝑠 = 1∕2spin clusters and molecular mag- nets. Phys. Rev. B, 71:064403, Feb 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB. 71.064403. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.71. 064403

2005 doi
[29]

Neutron scattering studies of magnetic molecular spin clus- ters

G Chaboussant, R Basler, A Sieber, S.T Ochsenbein, and H.-U Güdel. Neutron scattering studies of magnetic molecular spin clus- ters. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 350(1, Supplement):E51–E54,
[30]

Thermodynamical aspects of the spin crossover phenomenon.Comptes Rendus Chimie, 21(12):1060–1074, 2018

William Nicolazzi and Azzedine Bousseksou. Thermodynamical aspects of the spin crossover phenomenon.Comptes Rendus Chimie, 21(12):1060–1074, 2018. ISSN 1631-0748. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.crci.2018.10.003. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S16310748...

2018 doi
[31]

van de Stolpe, D.P

G.L. van de Stolpe, D.P. Kwiatkowski, C.E. Bradley, J. Randall, M.H. Abobeih, S.A. Breitweiser, L.C. Bassett, M. Markham, D.J. Twitchen, and T.H. Taminiau. Mapping a 50-spin-qubit network through correlated sensing.Nature Communications, 15:2006, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-...

2006 doi
[32]

S. L. Bayliss, D. W. Laorenza, P. J. Mintun, B. D. Kovos, D. E. Freedman, and D. D. Awschalom. Optically addressable molecular spinsforquantuminformationprocessing. Science,370(6522):1309– 1312, 2020. doi: 10.1126/science.abb9352. URL https://www. science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/s...

2020 doi
[33]

Mohamad Niknam, Md. Fahim F. Chowdhury, Md Mahadi Rajib, Walid Al Misba, Robert N. Schwartz, Kang L. Wang, Jayasimha Atulasimha, and Louis-S. Bouchard. Quantum control of spin qubits using nanomagnets. Communications Physics, 5:284, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s42005-022-01041-8. URL h...

2022 doi
[34]

Affronte, A

M. Affronte, A. Caneschi, C. Cucci, D. Gatteschi, J. C. Lasjaunias, C. Paulsen, M. G. Pini, A. Rettori, and R. Sessoli. Low-temperature thermodynamic properties of molecular magnetic chains.Phys. Rev. B, 59:6282–6293, Mar 1999. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.6282. URL https://link.a...

1999 doi
[35]

J. T. Haraldsen. Heisenberg pentamer: Insights into inelastic neutron scattering on magnetic clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:037205, Jul
[36]

Nicholas F. Chilton. Molecular magnetism. Annual Review of MaterialsResearch,52(Volume52,2022):79–101,2022. ISSN1545-

2022
[37]

Transverse spectral functions and dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions in𝑥𝑥𝑧 spin chains

Hamed Karimi and Ian Affleck. Transverse spectral functions and dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions in𝑥𝑥𝑧 spin chains. Phys. Rev. B, 84:174420, Nov 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174420. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174420

2011 doi
[38]

Field-induced gap in𝑆 = 1∕2 antiferromagnetic chains.Phys

Masaki Oshikawa and Ian Affleck. Field-induced gap in𝑆 = 1∕2 antiferromagnetic chains.Phys. Rev. Lett., 79:2883–2886, Oct 1997. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2883. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2883

1997 doi
[39]

Field-induced gap in cu benzoate and other𝑠 = 1 2 antiferromagnetic chains

Ian Affleck and Masaki Oshikawa. Field-induced gap in cu benzoate and other𝑠 = 1 2 antiferromagnetic chains. Phys. Rev. B, 60:1038– 1056,Jul1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1038. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1038

doi
[40]

Hitoshi Ohta. Experimental studies of dzyaloshinskii–moriya inter- action in quantum spin systems: High-frequency high-field electron spin resonance (esr) measurements.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 92(8):081003, 2023. doi: 10.7566/JPSJ.92.081003. URL https://doi.or...

2023 doi
[41]

Plumb, Kyung Seo Hwang, Yiming Qiu, Alexander L

Kevin W. Plumb, Kyung Seo Hwang, Yiming Qiu, Alexander L. Chernyshev, Alexander I. Kolesnikov, and Stephen E. Nagler. Quasi- particle–Continuum Level Repulsion in a Quantum Magnet.Nature Physics,12(3):224–229,2016. doi:10.1038/nphys3566. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphys3566....

2016 doi
[43]

An electron spin resonance selection rule for spin-gapped systems

Tôru Sakai, Olivier Cépas, and Timothy Ziman. An electron spin resonance selection rule for spin-gapped systems. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 69(11):3521–3524, 2000. doi: 10.1143/ JPSJ.69.3521. URL https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.69.3521

doi
[2004]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2004

ISSN 0921-4526. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2004. 03.015. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0921452604002650. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Neutron Scattering

2004 doi
[2011]

URL https://link

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.037205. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.037205

doi
[2017]

URL https://link.aps

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094432. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094432

doi
[2021]

doi: 10.1038/s41524-021-00592-8

ISSN 2057-3960. doi: 10.1038/s41524-021-00592-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00592-8

doi
[2024]

doi: 10.1063/5.0250784

ISSN 2166-532X. doi: 10.1063/5.0250784. URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0250784

doi
[4118]

URL https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/ annurev-matsci-081420-042553

doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-081420-042553. URL https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/ annurev-matsci-081420-042553

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Conventional and inverse magne- tocaloricandelectrocaloriceffectsofamixedspin-(1/2,1)heisenberg dimer

Hana Vargová and Jozef Strečka. Conventional and inverse magne- tocaloricandelectrocaloriceffectsofamixedspin-(1/2,1)heisenberg dimer. The European Physical Journal Plus, 137(4):490, Apr 2022. ISSN 2190-5444. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02694-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02694-8

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02694-8 2022

[2] [2]

Spin-related quantum materials and devices.APL Materials, 12(12):120402, 12

Guang Yang, Weisheng Zhao, and Shouguo Wang. Spin-related quantum materials and devices.APL Materials, 12(12):120402, 12

work page

[3] [3]

I. E. Dzyaloshinskii. A thermodynamic theory of ’weak’ ferromag- netism of antiferromagnets. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids,4:241–255,1958. doi:10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3

doi:10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3 1958

[4] [4]

Anisotropicsuperexchangeinteractionandweakferro- magnetism

TôruMoriya. Anisotropicsuperexchangeinteractionandweakferro- magnetism. Phys.Rev.,120:91–98,Oct1960. doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 120.91. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.120.91

doi:10.1103/physrev

[5] [5]

A. N. Bogdanov and D. A. Yablonskii. Thermodynamically stable ‘vortices’ in magnetically ordered crystals. the mixed state of mag- nets. Soviet Physics JETP, 68:101–103, 1989

work page 1989

[6] [6]

Rhim, Kohji Nakamura, Yoichi Shiota, Sanghoon Kim, and Teruo Ono

Woo Seung Ham, Abdul-Muizz Pradipto, Kay Yakushiji, Kwangsu Kim, Sonny H. Rhim, Kohji Nakamura, Yoichi Shiota, Sanghoon Kim, and Teruo Ono. Dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction in noncen- trosymmetric superlattices. npj Computational Materials, 7(1):129,

work page

[7] [7]

NatureReviewsPhysics , 5:43–61, 2023

HongxinYang,JinghuaLiang,andQiruiCui.First-principlescalcula- tionsfordzyaloshinskii–moriyainteraction. NatureReviewsPhysics , 5:43–61, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s42254-022-00529-0. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00529-0

doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00529-0 2023

[8] [8]

Vedmedenko

Tim Matthies, Levente Rózsa, László Szunyogh, Roland Wiesen- danger, and Elena Y. Vedmedenko. Interlayer and interfa- cial dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction in magnetic trilayers: First- principles calculations. Phys. Rev. Res., 6:043158, Nov 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043158. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043158

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043158 2024