REVIEW 2 cited by
Comparative Analysis of CPU and GPU Profiling for Deep Learning Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Deep Learning(DL) and Machine Learning(ML) applications are rapidly increasing in recent days. Massive amounts of data are being generated over the internet which can derive meaningful results by the use of ML and DL algorithms. Hardware resources and open-source libraries have made it easy to implement these algorithms. Tensorflow and Pytorch are one of the leading frameworks for implementing ML projects. By using those frameworks, we can trace the operations executed on both GPU and CPU to analyze the resource allocations and consumption. This paper presents the time and memory allocation of CPU and GPU while training deep neural networks using Pytorch. This paper analysis shows that GPU has a lower running time as compared to CPU for deep neural networks. For a simpler network, there are not many significant improvements in GPU over the CPU.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ProfilingAgent: Profiling-Guided Agentic Reasoning for Adaptive Model Optimization
An LLM-driven multi-agent system picks layer-wise pruning and dynamic quantization decisions from profiling traces, achieving large memory savings on transformer models but only modest, weakly benchmarked pruning gains.
-
FPGA-based Acceleration for Convolutional Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Review
A comprehensive review of FPGA-based CNN accelerators that consolidates evaluation metrics, acceleration methods, parallel computing strategies, and toolflows, concluding that dynamic parallelism is the most promising...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.