Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

For KdV-type bilinear equations, a single test—the existence of a three-soliton solution whose parameters obey only the dispersion relation—is conjectured to be equivalent to full bilinear integrability.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 11:11 UTC pith:KK4NRM5M

load-bearing objection A competent, clearly-written review of the bilinear method with no new research result; the main explanatory claim about elastic scattering forcing Hirota's 3SS form is asserted rather than proved, and the typos should be fixed before publication. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.16205 v2 pith:KK4NRM5M submitted 2026-06-15 nlin.SI

Integrability and transformations in the bilinear method: An introduction

Da-jun Zhang This is my paper
classification nlin.SI MSC 35Q5135Q5337K1037K40
keywords bilinear methodKdV-type bilinear equationsthree-soliton conditionbilinear integrabilityelastic scatteringBäcklund transformationsvertex operatorstau functions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Many KdV-type bilinear equations automatically admit one- and two-soliton solutions regardless of integrability, so the paper explains why the existence of a three-soliton solution should be the meaningful test. Its central claim is that for equations of the form P(D_t) f·f = 0 with P even and P(0)=0, the three-soliton condition (a 3-soliton solution whose wave vectors obey only the dispersion relation) is conjectured to be equivalent to bilinear integrability—having N-soliton solutions of the standard form for every N with no further conditions. The paper reviews how elastic scattering of solitons determines the unique three-soliton shape, and how the same idea would force the N-soliton form. It also surveys the two companion mechanisms that move between tau functions—bilinear Bäcklund transformations and vertex operators—showing they generate and transform the same multisoliton solutions. The paper is a review, and its sharpest assertion is a conjecture, not a proven theorem.

Core claim

The paper works with equations of the form P(D_t)f·f=0, where P is an even polynomial with P(0)=0. Such equations always possess one- and two-soliton solutions: substitution of f=1+e^{η1}+e^{η2}+A_{12}e^{η1+η2} succeeds for any wave vectors satisfying P(p_i)=0, with A_{ij}=-P(p_i−p_j)/P(p_i+p_j). The paper's central claim is that the next level—a three-soliton solution of the same kind with no further constraints—is the true indicator of integrability in the bilinear sense. It argues that elastic scattering (removing one soliton from an N-soliton state leaves the remaining N−1 with the same elastic scattering structure) forces the three-soliton solution into the standard form, and iterating

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the bilinear D-operator and the KdV-type bilinear equation P(D_t)f·f=0 with P even and P(0)=0. The 3-soliton form f=1+sum e^{η_i}+sum A_{ij}e^{η_i+η_j}+A_{12}A_{13}A_{23}e^{η1+η2+η3} is built from the dispersion relation P(p_i)=0 and the pairwise coefficients A_{ij}=-P(p_i−p_j)/P(p_i+p_j); an algebraic identity, condition (3.11), states when this form actually solves the equation for N waves. Elastic scattering is the selection principle that fixes this form uniquely. Bilinear Bäcklund transformations (pairs of bilinear equations that carry one tau function to another) and vertex operators (exponential/differential operators that generate tau functions from 1) are th

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the unproved uniqueness step in the text ('after analysis'): that elastic scattering—removing one soliton from an N-soliton solution leaves the remaining ones with the exact elastic scattering structure of an (N−1)-soliton solution—forces the 3SS to have the standard form with no extra parameter conditions; the paper explicitly labels the resulting equivalence between 3SS and integrability as a conjecture.

What would settle it

Compute the algebraic condition (3.11) at N=3 and then N=4 for even polynomials P with P(0)=0 that pass the 3-soliton test. A single polynomial that passes N=3 but has no four-soliton solution of the standard form would disprove the equivalence; conversely, a proof that every N=3 pass survives all N would confirm it. The finite classification lists in the literature are the natural search space.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For any even P with P(0)=0, a 1SS and a 2SS require only the dispersion relation; a 2SS alone never tests integrability.
  • When the 3SS condition holds, the paper argues that the N-soliton ansatz of the same type solves the equation for all N, making the equation bilinear-integrable.
  • The (2+1)-dimensional sine-Gordon bilinear system illustrates the caveat: it has a 3SS, but only under an extra determinant condition on wave vectors, so a 3SS without the 'no extra conditions' requirement is not enough.
  • Bilinear Bäcklund transformations and Lax pairs are two presentations of the same compatibility condition, and a deformed bilinear BT can produce rational, double-pole, and higher-order solutions.
  • Vertex operators give a direct algebraic transformation tau_N to tau_{N+1} and generate the KdV and KP tau functions from the vacuum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjecture is right, integrability testing for KdV-type bilinear equations reduces to one finite algebraic check at N=3, with all higher N-soliton solutions guaranteed automatically.
  • The same elastic-scattering logic applied to other bilinear types suggests a graded hierarchy of tests: for mKdV- and sine-Gordon-type systems, where 2SSs are automatic, 3SS may play the same role; for complex types where only 1SS is automatic, even a 2SS would be the meaningful signal.
  • The vertex-operator relations (nilpotence and normal-ordering identities) indicate that tau functions come from a single vacuum by algebraic operators; if the 3SS conjecture holds, it would tie this algebraic orbit structure to the analytic soliton test.
  • A formal asymptotic proof of the 'removing a soliton' step would upgrade the conjectured equivalence to a theorem and provide a general template for when a low-soliton condition implies all higher soliton conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper is a partial review of Hirota's bilinear method, organized in six sections. It defines bilinear operators, derives N-soliton solutions for the KdV and KP(II) equations, and gives asymptotic analyses of two-soliton interactions, including resonance. It then introduces Hirota's integrability for KdV-type bilinear equations, discusses the 3-soliton-solution (3SS) condition and its conjectured equivalence to Hirota integrability, presents bilinear Bäcklund transformations and their connections to Lax pairs and superposition formulae, and closes with vertex operators generating tau functions for the KdV and KP(II) hierarchies. The main expository claim is that elastic scattering forces the Hirota form of the 3SS, but the paper itself labels the equivalence with Hirota integrability as a conjecture.

Significance. As a pedagogical review, the paper is useful: standard derivations are reproduced carefully, the conjectural status of the 3SS/integrability equivalence is explicitly marked, and the vertex-operator lemmas (Lemmas 5.1–5.5) provide concrete proofs. There are no fitted parameters or falsifiable predictions, so the value is organizational and expository. The central interpretative claim—that elastic scattering determines Hirota's NSS form—is plausible but not proved; since the equivalence is explicitly a conjecture, the review remains informative, but the strength of the explanatory claim must be calibrated to what is actually demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3.17)] The load-bearing step is the sentence 'after analysis ... we can find the 3SS ... can only be the following form'. No derivation is displayed. To justify the claim one must show that the general 3SS ansatz with coefficients A_ij and a three-body coefficient B, subject to deletion limits η_k→±∞ reducing to the 2SS (3.16) with no extra parameter conditions, forces B = A_12 A_13 A_23. The text does not provide this, and the concluding remarks repeat 'it turns out' as if established. Since the paper itself labels the equivalence with condition (3.11) a conjecture, this is not an internal inconsistency, but the claimed derivation should either be supplied or explicitly demoted to a plausibility argument.
  2. [§3.2, pp. 16–17] The induction step from the 3SS to the 4SS and higher ('Continuing such a procedure ... one can obtain 5SS, 6SS') is also asserted without proof or reference. This is the same 'after analysis' gap: elastic scattering alone has not been shown to force the full Hirota form (3.10) for all N. Because the paper's stated purpose is to explain why the 3SS condition 'means something' for integrability, this missing support is central and should be addressed by either a proof, a precise reference, or a clear statement that the induction is part of the conjecture's heuristic.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.17)] The term 'A_23 e^{η3+η3}' should read 'A_23 e^{η2+η3}'. The typo appears in the central formula and should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (2.32a)] The linearized operator is written '3∂3_y'; from the bilinear KP(II) equation (2.30) and the corresponding perturbative expansion it should be '3∂2_y' (i.e., three times the second derivative in y).
  3. [§4.1] The example labels 'Example2.1.1' and 'Example2.1.2' appear to be leftovers from lecture notes; they should be renumbered as Example 4.1 and Example 4.2, or simply removed.
  4. [§3.2 and §6] The concluding claims about recent progress [49,77] cite the author's own work without independent verification. Since this is a review, please add a sentence indicating the status of those works (peer-reviewed or preprint) or give enough detail for the reader to assess the claims.
  5. [Lemma 5.2] The proof of Lemma 5.2 assumes p>q>0, but the lemma is then used in formal calculations for arbitrary real parameters. This is standard in the vertex-operator literature, but the reader would benefit from a remark that the identity is formal in the sense of power series.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the 3SS narrative rests on an omitted 'after analysis' calculation and a labeled conjecture, not on a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs.

full rationale

The review's derivations are either explicit calculations from the stated bilinear equations or are attributed to independent external sources. Section 2 derives KdV and KP(II) NSS by direct perturbation calculus. Section 3.1 derives A_{ij} = -P(p_i-p_j)/P(p_i+p_j) by substitution into the 2SS. Section 3.2's claim that elastic scattering forces the 3SS to be Hirota's form is compressed into 'after analysis (considering a general form for 3SS and assuming the 2SS (3.16a) is a result of a 3SS after removing one soliton under the elastic scattering property) we can find the 3SS ... can only be the following form'. That is an omitted calculation, not a circular reduction: the elastic-scattering deletion condition is stated as a structural requirement, and the conclusion (3.17) does not follow by definition; nor is it imported from a self-citation. The paper explicitly labels the link to integrability as a conjecture ('In general, it is conjectured that for KdV-type bilinear equation (3.1) the 3SS-condition is equivalent to Hirota's integrability'), and the sentence 'if (3.10) provides a solution to (3.1), then (3.1) is Hirota's integrable' is a restatement of definition (3.8)-(3.9), not a circular derivation. Vertex-operator identities in Section 5 are proved in the text via Lemmas 5.1-5.5 and also cite the external works [11,56]. The self-citations (e.g., [24,49,77]) appear as review pointers or reports of recent progress and are not load-bearing premises of the central argument. The typo in (3.17) is a typographical error, not evidence of circularity. No step is exhibited where a prediction reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the review reproduces known solutions with arbitrary soliton parameters k_i, p_i, q_i and spectral parameter lambda, which are standard. No new entities are introduced: the vertex operator X(k) is standard from Date-Kashiwara-Miwa and the Kyoto school, cited as [11,56].

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Elastic scattering property: 'removing a soliton from NSS, the left (N-1) solitons keep the elastic scattering structure of (N-1)SS' forces Hirota's form (3.10) for NSS.
    Used in Sec. 3.2 to argue that 2SS plus elastic scattering determines the 3SS form (3.17) and, by iteration, the NSS form; the paper labels the underlying 3SS/integrability equivalence as a conjecture.
  • domain assumption 3SS-condition is equivalent to Hirota integrability for KdV-type bilinear equations.
    Explicitly stated as a conjecture in Sec. 3.2; not proven, and the explanation is heuristic.
  • standard math Formal exponential-series manipulations for vertex operators are valid for the relevant parameter ranges (e.g., Lemma 5.2 expansion ln((p-q)/(p+q)) = -2zeta(epsilon(p),q)).
    Used in Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3 under p>q>0; the text does not discuss extension to all real parameters, but such formal identities are standard in vertex-operator calculus.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28539 in / 9881 out tokens · 95279 ms · 2026-08-02T11:11:21.667579+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This is a partial review of the bilinear method, focusing on the integrability based on the 3-soliton-solution condition and the transformations between $\tau$ functions. \textit{Dedicated to Jarmo Hietarinta's 80th birthday}.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.16205 by Da-jun Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) 1SS of the KdV equation. (b) trajectory of the vortex of 1SS: η1 = 0, where k1 = 1, η (0) 1 = 0. amplitude, which is k 2 1 2 , occurs when η1 = 0. When η1 = 0, i.e. x(t) = k 2 1 t − η (0) 1 k1 , (2.42) we have a straight line as depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 2SS (2.43) of the KdV equation (k1 = 0.6, k2 = 1.1, η (0) 1 = η (0) 2 = 0). (a) t = −12, (b) t = −5, (c) t = 1, (d) t = 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The 2SS is u = 2(ln f)xx, (2.43a) f = 1 + e η1 + e η2 + A12 e η1+η2 , (2.43b) where ηi = kix − k 3 i t + η (0) i , A12 = k1 − k2 k1 + k2 2 . (2.43c) -20 -10 0 10 20 x 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 u (a) -20 -10 0 10 20 x 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 u (b) -20 -10 0 10 20 x 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 u (c) -20 -10 0 10 20 x 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 u (d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) 1SS of the KP(II). It is given by (2.37) with (p1, q1, η (0) 1 ) = (0.5, 1, 0), t = 0. (b) Trajectory of the line soliton in (a): red line is for t = −4 and blue for t = 4. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 2SS of the KP(II) equation. It is given by (2.29) with (2.39): (a) (p1, q1, η (0) 1 ) = (0.8, 0.2, 0), (p2, q2, η (0) 2 ) = (−0.5, 0.9, 0), t = 0; (b) (p1, q1, η (0) 1 ) = (−0.4, 0.7, 0), (p2, q2, η (0) 2 ) = (0.8, 0.4, 0), t = 0. Let us consider the case of A12 = 0. Recalling in Sec.2.3.1 for the KdV equation, its 1SS (2.41) is completely determined by the k1; in 2SS (2.43) if k1 = k2 then A12 = 0 and the… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: 2SS resonance of the KP(II) equation. It is given by (2.29) with (2.39), where p1 = 1.0, p2 = −0.2, q1 = q2 = 0.5, η (0) 1 = η (0) 2 = 0, t = 0. We rewrite η2 in the coordinate (η1, y): η2 = k2 k1 η1 + 1 k1 (k1h2 − k2h1)y. Using the data in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Permutability property of solutions based on B¨acklund transformation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Permutability property of bilinear B¨acklund transformations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Asymptotic Equivalence Between Quasi-Grammian and Quasi-Wronskian $N$-Soliton Solutions of the Anti-Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equation

    nlin.SI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Quasi-Grammian and quasi-Wronskian N-soliton solutions of the ASDYM/Yang equation are asymptotically equivalent up to a constant matrix factor, with explicit N-soliton phase shifts.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Ablowitz, J

    M.J. Ablowitz, J. Satsuma, Solitons and rational solutions of nonlinear evolution equa- tions, J. Math. Phys., 19 (1978) 2180-2187

    1978

  2. [2]

    Ablowitz, H

    M.J. Ablowitz, H. Segur, Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform, SIAM, Philadel- phia, 1981

    1981

  3. [3]

    J.B. Bi, Z.Y. Chen, D.Y. Chen, Novel solutions to sine-Gordon equation from modified B¨ acklund transformation, Commun. Theore. Phys., 41 (2004) 805-806

    2004

  4. [4]

    Bianchi, Vorlesungen ¨ uber Differentialgeometrie, Leipzig: B.G

    L. Bianchi, Vorlesungen ¨ uber Differentialgeometrie, Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1899, pp432- 438

  5. [5]

    Chen, Introduction to Soliton Theory, Science Press, Beijing, 2006

    D.Y. Chen, Introduction to Soliton Theory, Science Press, Beijing, 2006

    2006

  6. [6]

    Chen, D.J

    D.Y. Chen, D.J. Zhang, S.F. Deng, The novel multi-soliton solutions of the mKdV-sine Gordon equations, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 71 (2002) 658-659

    2002

  7. [7]

    Chen, General derivation of B¨ acklund transformation from inverse scattering prob- lems, Phys

    H.H. Chen, General derivation of B¨ acklund transformation from inverse scattering prob- lems, Phys. Rev. Lett., 33 (1974) 925-928

    1974

  8. [8]

    Chen, J.B

    Z.Y. Chen, J.B. Bi, D.Y. Chen, Novel solutions of KdV equation, Commun. Theore. Phys., 41 (2004) 397-399. 32

    2004

  9. [9]

    A.A. Cho, M. Mesfun, D.J. Zhang, A revisit to the ABS H2 equation, SIGMA, 17 (2021) 093 (19pp)

    2021

  10. [10]

    A.A. Cho, J. Wang, D.J. Zhang, Discretization of the modified Korteweg-de Vries-sine Gordon equation, Theore. Math. Phys., 217 (2023) 1700-1716

    2023

  11. [11]

    E. Date, M. Kashiwara, T. Miwa, Vertex operators and tau functions. Transformation groups for soliton equations. II, Proc. Japan Acad., 57A (1981) 387-393

    1981

  12. [12]

    Deng, D.Y

    S.F. Deng, D.Y. Chen, The novel multi-soliton solutions of KP equation, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 70 (2001) 3174-3175

    2001

  13. [13]

    Gardner, J.M

    C.S. Gardner, J.M. Greene, M.D. Kruskal, R.M. Miura, Method for solving the Korteweg- de Vries equation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 19 (1967) 1095-1097

    1967

  14. [14]

    Gel’fand, B.M

    I.M. Gel’fand, B.M. Levitan, On the determination of a differential equation by its spectral function, Tzv. Akad. Nauk. SSR ser. Math. 15 (1951) 309-360, translated in Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, Vol.1 (1955) 253-304

    1951

  15. [15]

    Gilson, F

    C. Gilson, F. Lambert, J.J.C. Nimmo, R. Willox, On the combinatorics of the Hirota D-operators, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 452 (1996) 223-234

    1996

  16. [16]

    Hietarinta, A search for bilinear equations passing Hirota’s three-soliton condition

    J. Hietarinta, A search for bilinear equations passing Hirota’s three-soliton condition. I. KdV-type bilinear equations, J. Math. Phys., 28 (1987) 1732-1742

    1987

  17. [17]

    Hietarinta, A search of bilinear equations passing Hirota’s three-soliton condition: II

    J. Hietarinta, A search of bilinear equations passing Hirota’s three-soliton condition: II. mKdV-type bilinear equations, J. Math. Phys., 28 (1987) 2094-2101

    1987

  18. [18]

    Hietarinta, A search of bilinear equations passing Hirota’s three-soliton condition: III

    J. Hietarinta, A search of bilinear equations passing Hirota’s three-soliton condition: III. sine-Gordon-type bilinear equations, J. Math. Phys., 28 (1987) 2586-2592

    1987

  19. [19]

    Hietarinta, A search of bilinear equations passing Hirota’s three-soliton condition: IV

    J. Hietarinta, A search of bilinear equations passing Hirota’s three-soliton condition: IV. Complex bilinear equations, J. Math. Phys., 29 (1988) 628-635

    1988

  20. [20]

    Hietarinta, Hirota’s bilinear method and partial integrability, In: Partially Intergrable Evolution Equations in Physics, eds

    J. Hietarinta, Hirota’s bilinear method and partial integrability, In: Partially Intergrable Evolution Equations in Physics, eds. R. Conte, N. Boccara, (NATO ASI Series, Vol. 310), Springer, Dordrecht, 1990, pp459-478

    1990

  21. [21]

    Hietarinta, Scattering of solitons and dromions, In: Scattering: Scattering and In- verse Scattering in Pure and Applied Science, eds

    J. Hietarinta, Scattering of solitons and dromions, In: Scattering: Scattering and In- verse Scattering in Pure and Applied Science, eds. R. Pike, P. Sabatier, Academic Press, London, 2002, pp1773-1791

    2002

  22. [22]

    Hietarinta, Hirota’s bilinear method and its connection with integrability, In: Inte- grablity, ed

    J. Hietarinta, Hirota’s bilinear method and its connection with integrability, In: Inte- grablity, ed. A.V. Mikhailov, (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol.767), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp279-314

    2009

  23. [23]

    Hietarinta, N

    J. Hietarinta, N. Joshi, F.W. Nijhoff, Discrete Systems and Integrablity, Camb. Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2016

    2016

  24. [24]

    Hietarinta, D.J

    J. Hietarinta, D.J. Zhang, Hirota’s method and the search for integrable partial difference equations. 1. Equations on a 3×3 stencil, J. Difference Equa. Appl., 19 (2013) 1292-1316

    2013

  25. [25]

    Hirota, Exact solution of the Korteweg-de Vries equation for multiple collisions of solitons, Phys

    R. Hirota, Exact solution of the Korteweg-de Vries equation for multiple collisions of solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 27 (1971) 1192-1194. 33

    1971

  26. [26]

    Hirota, Exact three-soliton solution of the two-dimensional sine-Gordon equation, J

    R. Hirota, Exact three-soliton solution of the two-dimensional sine-Gordon equation, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 35 (1973) 1566-1566

    1973

  27. [27]

    Hirota, A new form of B¨ acklund transformations and its relation to the inverse scat- tering problem, Prog

    R. Hirota, A new form of B¨ acklund transformations and its relation to the inverse scat- tering problem, Prog. Theo. Phys., 52 (1974) 1498-1512

    1974

  28. [28]

    Hirota, Nonlinear partial difference equations

    R. Hirota, Nonlinear partial difference equations. I. A difference analogue of the Korteweg- de Vries equation. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 43 (1977) 1424-1433

    1977

  29. [29]

    Hirota, Direct methods in soliton theory, In: Solitons, eds

    R. Hirota, Direct methods in soliton theory, In: Solitons, eds. R.K. Bullough, P.J. Cau- drey, (Topics in Current Prystcs, Vol. 17), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980, pp157-176

    1980

  30. [30]

    Hirota, J

    R. Hirota, J. Satsuma, A simple structure of superposition formula of the B¨ acklund trans- formation, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 45 (1978) 1741-1750

    1978

  31. [31]

    Hirota, The Direct Method in Soliton Theory, Camb

    R. Hirota, The Direct Method in Soliton Theory, Camb. Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004

    2004

  32. [32]

    Hirota, History of the bilinear method, 2004, preprint

    R. Hirota, History of the bilinear method, 2004, preprint

    2004

  33. [33]

    Kakei, Solutions to the KP hierarchy with an elliptic background, arxiv: 2310.11679

    S. Kakei, Solutions to the KP hierarchy with an elliptic background, arxiv: 2310.11679

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Kay, H.E

    I. Kay, H.E. Moses, Reflectionless transmission through dielectrics and scattering poten- tials, J. Appl. Phys., 27 (1956) 1503-1508

    1956

  35. [35]

    Kodama, KP solitons in shallow water, J

    Y. Kodama, KP solitons in shallow water, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43 (2010) 434004 (54pp)

    2010

  36. [36]

    Kodama, L

    Y. Kodama, L. Williams, KP solitons and total positivity for the Grassmannian, Invent. Math., 198 (2014) 637-699

    2014

  37. [37]

    Kodama, L

    Y. Kodama, L. Williams, KP solitons, total positivity, and cluster algebras, Proc. Nat. Acad. Soc., 108 (2011) 8984-8989

    2011

  38. [38]

    Kodama, Private communication, 2023

    Y. Kodama, Private communication, 2023

    2023

  39. [39]

    Konno, H

    K. Konno, H. Sanuki, B¨ acklund transformation for equation of motion for nonlinear lattice under weak dislocation potential, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 39 (1975) 22-24

    1975

  40. [40]

    Konopelchenko, Elementary B¨ acklund transformations, nonlinear superposition principle and solutions of the integrable equations, Phys

    B.G. Konopelchenko, Elementary B¨ acklund transformations, nonlinear superposition principle and solutions of the integrable equations, Phys. Lett. A, 87 (1982) 445-448

    1982

  41. [41]

    Lamb, JR., Analytical descriptions of ultrashort optical pulse propagation in a res- onant medium, Rev

    G.L. Lamb, JR., Analytical descriptions of ultrashort optical pulse propagation in a res- onant medium, Rev. Mod. Phys., 43 (1971) 99-124

    1971

  42. [42]

    Lamb, JR., B¨ acklund transformations for certain nonlinear evolution equations, J

    G.L. Lamb, JR., B¨ acklund transformations for certain nonlinear evolution equations, J. Math. Phys., 15 (1974) 2157-2165

    1974

  43. [43]

    Lambert, I

    F. Lambert, I. Loris, J. Springael, R. Willox, On a direct bilinearization method: Kaup’s higher-order water wave equation as a modified nonlocal Boussinesq equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 27 (1994) 5325-5334

    1994

  44. [44]

    Lambert, J

    F. Lambert, J. Springael, From soliton equations to their zero curvature formulation, In: Bilinear Integrable Systems: From Classical to Quatum, Continuous to Discrete, eds. L. Faddeev, P. Van Moerbeke, F. Lambert, (NATO Science Series II-Mathematics Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 201), Springer, Dordrecht, 2006, pp147-160. 34

    2006

  45. [45]

    Lepowsky, R.L

    J. Lepowsky, R.L. Wilson, Construction of the affine Lie algebraA (1) 1 , Commun. Math. Phys., 62 (1978) 43-53

    1978

  46. [46]

    D. Levi, R. Benguria, B¨ acklund transformations and nonlinear differential difference equa- tions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77 (1980) 5025-5027

    1980

  47. [47]

    X. Li, D.J. Zhang, Elliptic soliton solutions:τfunctions, vertex operators and bilinear identities, J. Nonlinear Sci., 32 (2022) 70 (53pp)

    2022

  48. [48]

    X. Li, D.J. Zhang, The Lam´ e functions and elliptic soliton solutions: Bilinear approach, In: Recent Progress in Special Functions, ed. G. Filipuk, (Contemporary Mathematics of AMS, Vol.807), AMS, 2024, pp171-195

    2024

  49. [49]

    Liu, D.J

    J. Liu, D.J. Zhang, X. Zhang, X.H. Zhao, Nonlinearization of bilinear equations of the sine-Gordon type, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type and Benjamin-Ono type, arxiv:2606.10396

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Marchenko, The construction of the potential energy from the phases of the scattered waves, Dokl

    V.A. Marchenko, The construction of the potential energy from the phases of the scattered waves, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 104 (1955) 695-698

    1955

  51. [51]

    Matveev, Generalized Wronskian formula for solutions of the KdV equations: First applications, Phys

    V.B. Matveev, Generalized Wronskian formula for solutions of the KdV equations: First applications, Phys. Lett. A, 166 (1992) 205-208

    1992

  52. [52]

    Matveev, Positon-positon and soliton-positon collisions: KdV case, Phys

    V.B. Matveev, Positon-positon and soliton-positon collisions: KdV case, Phys. Lett. A, 166 (1992) 209-212

    1992

  53. [53]

    Matveev, M.A

    V.B. Matveev, M.A. Salle, Darboux Transformations and Solitons, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991

    1991

  54. [54]

    Miles, Resonantly interacting solitary waves, J

    J.W. Miles, Resonantly interacting solitary waves, J. Fluid Mech., 79 (1977) 171-179

    1977

  55. [55]

    R.M. Miura, (ed.), B¨ acklund Transformations, the Inverse Scattering Method, Solitons, and Their Applications, (NSF Research Workshop on Contact Transformations), Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1976

    1976

  56. [56]

    T. Miwa, M. Jimbo, E. Date, Solitons: Differential Equations, Symmetries and Infinite Dimensional Algebras, Camb. Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000

    2000

  57. [57]

    Nakayashiki, Vertex operators of the KP hierarchy and singular algebraic curves, Lett

    A. Nakayashiki, Vertex operators of the KP hierarchy and singular algebraic curves, Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 82 (36pp)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Nakayashiki, Degenerate addition formulas of the KP hierarchy and applications, arxiv: 2511.22876

    A. Nakayashiki, Degenerate addition formulas of the KP hierarchy and applications, arxiv: 2511.22876

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Nijhoff, H.W

    F.W. Nijhoff, H.W. Capel, The discrete Korteweg-de Vries equation, Acta Appl. Math., 39 (1995) 133-158

    1995

  60. [60]

    Nijhoff, H.W

    F.W. Nijhoff, H.W. Capel, G.L. Wiersma, Integrable lattice systems in two and three dimensions, In: Geometric Aspects of the Einstein Equations and Integrable Systems, ed. R. Martini, (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol.239), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, pp263-302

    1985

  61. [61]

    Nimmo, N.C

    J.J.C. Nimmo, N.C. Freeman, The use of B¨ acklund transformations in obtaining N-soliton solutions in Wronskian form, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 17 (1984) 1415-1424. 35

    1984

  62. [62]

    R. Prus, A. Sym, Rectilinear congruences and B¨ acklund transformations: roots of the soliton theory, In: Nonlinearity & Geometry, Luigi Bianchi Days Proc. 1st Non-Orthodox School, eds. D. W¨ ojcik, J. Cie´ sli´ nski, Polish Scientific, Warsaw, 1998, pp25-36

    1998

  63. [63]

    Rogers, W.K

    C. Rogers, W.K. Schief, B¨ acklund and Darboux Transformations, Camb. Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  64. [64]

    Sato, Soliton equations as dynamical systems on an infinite dimensional Grassmann manifolds, RIMS Kokyuroku Kyoto Univ., 439 (1981) 30-46

    M. Sato, Soliton equations as dynamical systems on an infinite dimensional Grassmann manifolds, RIMS Kokyuroku Kyoto Univ., 439 (1981) 30-46

    1981

  65. [65]

    Satsuma, N-soliton solution of the two-dimeiton Korteweg-de Vries equation, J

    J. Satsuma, N-soliton solution of the two-dimeiton Korteweg-de Vries equation, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 40 (1976) 286-290

    1976

  66. [66]

    Sirianunpiboon, S.D

    S. Sirianunpiboon, S.D. Howard, S.K. Roy, A note on the Wronskian form of solutions of the KdV equation, Phys. Lett. A, 134 (1988) 31-33

    1988

  67. [67]

    Takahashi, On the birth of Hirota’s direct method, report on the 3rd China-Japan Joint Workshop on Integrable Systems, Xi’an, China, 2016

    D. Takahashi, On the birth of Hirota’s direct method, report on the 3rd China-Japan Joint Workshop on Integrable Systems, Xi’an, China, 2016

    2016

  68. [68]

    Wadati, B¨ acklund transformation for solutions of the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation, J

    M. Wadati, B¨ acklund transformation for solutions of the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 36 (1974) 1498-1498

    1974

  69. [69]

    Wadati, K

    M. Wadati, K. Ohkuma, Multiple-pole solutions of the modified Korteweg de Vries equa- tion, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 51 (1982) 2029-2035

    1982

  70. [70]

    Wadati, H

    M. Wadati, H. Sanuki, K. Konno, Relationships among inverse method, B¨ acklund trans- formation and an infinite number of conservation laws, Prog. Theore. Phys., 53 (1975) 419-436

    1975

  71. [71]

    Wadati, M

    M. Wadati, M. Toda, The exact N-soliton solution of the Korteweg-de Vries equation, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 32 (1972) 1403-1411

    1972

  72. [72]

    Wahlquist, F.B

    H.D. Wahlquist, F.B. Estabrook, B¨ acklund transformation for solutions of the Korteweg- de Vries equation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 31 (1973) 1386-1390

    1973

  73. [73]

    D.D. Xu, D.J. Zhang, S.L. Zhao, The Sylvester equation and integrable equations: I. The Korteweg-de Vries system and sine-Gordon equation, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 21 (2014) 382-406

    2014

  74. [74]

    Zakharov, A.B

    V.E. Zakharov, A.B. Shabat, Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one- dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media, Sov. Phys. JETP, 34 (1972) 62-69

    1972

  75. [75]

    Zhang, Notes on solutions in Wronskian form to soliton equations: KdV-type, arXiv: nlin.SI/0603008

    D.J. Zhang, Notes on solutions in Wronskian form to soliton equations: KdV-type, arXiv: nlin.SI/0603008

    arXiv

  76. [76]

    Zhang, S.L

    D.J. Zhang, S.L. Zhao, Solutions to ABS lattice equations via generalized Cauchy matrix approach, Stud. Appl. Math., 131 (2013) 72-103

    2013

  77. [77]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Liu, D.J. Zhang, Nonlinearization of the KdV-type and mKdV-type bilinear equations, Commun. Theor. Phys., 77 (2025) 115006 (9pp). 36

    2025