Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

The complete trans-series for conserved charges in integrable field theories

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that every vacuum expectation value of a conserved charge in a wide class of two-dimensional integrable field theories is exactly given by the lateral Borel resummation of a universal dressed trans-series built from…

desk verdict A highly complete formal trans-series machinery for conserved charges, but the physical completion step (88) is explicitly unproven and the one real-Stokes check degrades at moderate coupling. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16435 v2 pith:KKD6IA4L submitted 2025-01-27 hep-th

Zoltán Bajnok , János Balog , István Vona This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords trans-seriesresurgenceintegrablefieldtheoriesBetheansatzWiener-HopfmethodBorelresummationconservedchargesnon-perturbativecorrections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in a wide family of two-dimensional integrable theories — bosonic and fermionic sigma models, Gross-Neveu models, principal chiral models, Lieb-Liniger and Gaudin-Yang gases, and the disk-capacitor problem — every conserved-charge observable is exactly given by a single 'dressed' trans-series, whose non-perturbative sectors are generated from perturbative building blocks. The authors derive explicit formulas for all sectors, show that they are interrelated by specific resurgence relations (alien derivatives acting on the building blocks), and demonstrate numerically that the laterally Borel-resummed trans-series converges and reproduces the physical solution of the underlying integral equation. The load-bearing statement, which they label as an assumption they cannot prove, is that the lateral Borel resummation equals the physical value. If correct, this turns the weak-coupling expansion of these observables into a fully explicit, complete trans-series, connecting perturbative and instanton/renormalon sectors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dressed perturbative basis $\hat{A}_{\alpha,\beta}$, defined by summing chains of perturbative building blocks $A_{\alpha,\beta}$ connected by non-perturbative factors $d_{\kappa_l}$ through the matrix $\mathcal{A}=(I-DA)^{-1}D$. This matrix is represented graphically as a sum over lattice paths whose vertices are the pole positions $\kappa_l$; it satisfies the differential equations (67)-(69), so that every building block follows from a single perturbative series (for instance, $A_{1,1}$ from the recursive perturbative algorithm). The lateral Borel resummation $S_+$ is the mechanism that converts the formal trans-series into the physical value, and the alien derivatives $\dot{\Delta}_\kappa$ are the operators that relate different non-perturbative sectors by acting as $-2iS_\kappa\partial_{\sigma_\kappa}$ on the trans-series parameters.

What would settle it

For the supersymmetric O(7) sigma model, the authors observe a discrepancy between their resummed trans-series and the numerical TBA solution for couplings $v > 0.15$, which they attribute to the numerical solver; a high-precision independent solution of the integral equation in that region, or an improved solver with a rigorous error estimate, would settle whether the trans-series reproduces the physical value order by order.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the observable $O_{\alpha,\beta}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-B}^{B}\chi_\alpha(\theta)r_\beta(\theta)d\theta$ is computed from the dressed trans-series (72) $W_{\alpha,\beta}=\hat{A}_{\alpha,\beta}+d_\alpha\hat{A}_{-\alpha,\beta}+d_\beta\hat{A}_{\alpha,-\beta}+d_\alpha d_\beta\hat{A}_{-\alpha,-\beta}$ through the lateral Borel resummation (88) $O_{\alpha,\beta}=\frac{e^{(\alpha+\beta)B}}{4\pi}G_+(i\alpha)G_+(i\beta)\,S_+(W_{\alpha,\beta})$. Here $\hat{A}$ is the perturbatively-defined dressed building block, $G_+$ is the upper-half-plane Wiener-Hopf factor, and $d_\alpha$, $d_{\kappa_l}$ are non-perturbative coefficients carrying Stokes constants and powers of $e^{-2B}$. The same structure computes boundary rapidity densities $w_\alpha$, the $\alpha=0$ and coinciding-index cases, and the free-energy density in the running coupling. The paper further establishes the alien-derivative relations (90)-(91), showing that all non-perturbative sectors are determined by the perturbative series, and expresses the full trans-series as a median resummation of a multi-parameter trans-series (96)-(99). The authors state that (88) is their main assumption, which they cannot prove; their evidence is high-order asymptotic and direct numerical checks, including the supersymmetric O(7) model where Stokes constants have non-zero real parts.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central claim rests on the assumption that the lateral Borel resummation $S_+$ in equation (88) equals the physical solution of the integral equation; the authors state that they cannot prove this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every model in the class, the complete weak-coupling expansion of any conserved-charge expectation value is explicitly calculable once the running coupling, the pole positions $\kappa_l$, and the Stokes constants are specified.
  • The alien-derivative relations (90)-(91) imply that the perturbative series determines all non-perturbative sectors; in models with purely imaginary Stokes constants, the full trans-series is simply the median resummation of the perturbative building block.
  • The Stokes automorphism acts by shifts of the trans-series parameters, so the physical resummation is the median resummation of a multi-parameter trans-series with Stokes constants set to their real parts.
  • The resummed trans-series converges with radius 1 in $e^{-2B}$, hence for all physical $B$, as demonstrated numerically in the O(4) model.
  • The free-energy density in the running coupling makes direct contact with standard perturbative field theory, yielding mass-gap relations of the form (193)-(199).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the main assumption is correct, the same dressed-trans-series machinery should extend to two-point functions and condensates, where renormalons have a more direct operator-product interpretation; the paper only lists these as future work.
  • The numerically observed convergence radius 1 in $e^{-2B}$ implies the resummed trans-series is the reliable object to compare with non-perturbative lattice or cold-atom data, even in the strong-coupling region.
  • The unified treatment of the disk capacitor suggests that analogous Wiener-Hopf/resurgence derivations could produce exact asymptotic expansions for other classical potential-theory problems governed by Love's equation, a connection the paper leaves implicit.
  • A route to turn the main assumption into a theorem would be to prove that the lateral Borel resummation satisfies the same differential equations and boundary conditions as the physical solution; the paper does not attempt this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic Wiener-Hopf solution of the single integral equation that describes the thermodynamic ground state of a wide class of two-dimensional integrable models, and organizes the expectation values of conserved charges into an explicit trans-series in the perturbative coupling and the non-perturbative scale. The central structural result is that every observable W_{α,β} can be written in terms of perturbative building blocks A_{α,β} and Stokes data d_{κ_l}, with the universal dressed form of Eq. (72), and that the physical value is obtained by the lateral Borel resummation S_+ stated in Eq. (88). The paper derives differential equations for the building blocks, alien-derivative relations (90)--(91), the median-resummation representations (96)--(99), explicit formulas for bosonic and fermionic models, a trans-series for the free-energy density, and numerical checks against direct solutions of the integral equation, including a case with non-vanishing real Stokes constants.

Significance. If the main identification (88) is correct, the paper provides a remarkably complete and compact description of all perturbative and non-perturbative sectors of conserved-charge observables in a broad family of integrable field theories, going substantially beyond earlier per-model analyses. The explicit building-block formulas, the universal dressed-trans-series form, the alien-derivative relations, and the free-energy trans-series are valuable and internally consistent, and the numerical evidence in the purely imaginary Stokes-constant cases is strong. The paper is also commendably transparent about its central limitation: Eq. (88) is labeled an unprovable assumption, and the numerical verification in the one real-Stokes example degrades at larger coupling. These features make the work significant and promising, but they also mean that the advertised completeness of the physical trans-series is not yet established at the same level as the formal construction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (88)] The identification S_+(W_{α,β}) = physical O_{α,β} is the load-bearing step for the paper's central claim that the trans-series is complete and reproduces the physical result. The authors explicitly state that this is their main assumption, which they cannot prove. The subsequent relations (90)--(91) and (96)--(99) are consequences of the assumed reality of S_+(W_{α,β}) and of the trans-series structure, rather than independent evidence for (88). The manuscript therefore does not establish that the laterally resummed formal trans-series is the actual solution of the integral equation as opposed to an asymptotic solution whose ambiguities cancel. To support the word "complete" in the title and abstract, either a proof or a substantially sharper argument for (88) is needed, or the claim should be explicitly qualified.
  2. [Section 6.2, Eqs. (128)--(133) and Fig. 2] The only numerical test involving a non-vanishing real Stokes constant is the supersymmetric O(7) model, and this is exactly the case needed to check Eq. (88) beyond the purely imaginary sectors. The comparison shows a discrepancy for v > 0.15, which the authors attribute to the limited reliability of the TBA solver, without an independent quantitative error estimate. The numerical kernel itself is obtained from an inverse Fourier transform sampled at 5000 points, which further limits the achievable precision. As presented, the real-Stokes case is therefore not verified at the precision of the O(3)/O(4) checks, and the discrepancy weakens the evidence for the main assumption precisely in the regime where that assumption is most nontrivial.
  3. [Section 7, Eqs. (141)--(142)] The convergence analysis at B = 0.1 is presented as evidence that the summed trans-series approaches the physical value, but the final relative deviation is about 8.8 × 10^{-5}, far larger than the 10^{-78} precision quoted for the numerical solution of the integral equation. The tail estimate in Eq. (142) relies on fitting the complex parameters p and q from the n ≥ 7 behavior, which is a reasonable heuristic but not a controlled error bound. This section should be framed as strong numerical evidence for convergence, not as a verification of Eq. (88) at the precision achieved elsewhere in the paper.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 6.2, before Eq. (127)] The sentence "we used Volin's algorithm to generate Nmax = 200 perturbative coefficients up to ? 2200 digits of precision" contains a stray "?" and should read "up to 2200 digits" or else specify the intended precision.
  2. [Section 7, first sentence] There is a punctuation error in "In this section we study the trans-asymptotics of the trans-series., i.e."; the period before "i.e." should be removed or the sentence restructured.
  3. [Section 2 and Eq. (46)] The symbol L is used both for the system volume in Section 2 and for the arbitrary constant in the running-coupling definition (46); this notational clash is confusing and should be resolved, for example by renaming one of them.
  4. [Eq. (59)] In the definition of A_{α,β} for β = -α, the first and second lines are written as alternatives but it would be clearer to state explicitly that the second line is the pole-removed value, since this quantity is used repeatedly in the dressed trans-series.
  5. [Section 5 and Appendix C] The presentation would be easier to use if the model-by-model values of a, b, z_{2k+1}, L, and the pole positions κ_l were collected in a single table, since the current text scatters these definitions across Sections 5.1, 5.2, and Appendix C.
  6. [Section 8, Eq. (144)] The free-energy trans-series is derived under the same main assumption (88), but this dependence is only implicit at the start of Section 8; the text should remind the reader that the formula inherits the unproven identification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: equation (88) is an explicitly unproven bridge, not a definitional reduction; the trans-series building blocks and Stokes constants are independently computed and checked against external TBA numerics.

full rationale

The paper's central trans-series formula (72), W_{α,β} = Â_{α,β} + d_α Â_{−α,β} + d_β Â_{α,−β} + d_α d_β Â_{−α,−β}, is derived algebraically from the Wiener–Hopf integral equation (47) through the Neumann-series solution q_α = s_α (I − DA)^{-1}. The building blocks A_{α,β} are defined by the perturbative integral equation (57), and the non-perturbative data d_{κ_l}, κ_l, and the Stokes constants are read off from the kernel residues, not fitted to the target observables. The potentially load-bearing statement is equation (88), which identifies the lateral Borel resummation S_+(W_{α,β}) with the physical value of O_{α,β}. The paper explicitly labels this as an assumption: Section 4.2 states "This is our main assumption, which we cannot prove but in what follows we study its consequences," and the Conclusion repeats that "we cannot analytically prove" the identification. This is an unproven bridge, hence a correctness risk, but it is not circular: the physical observable is independently defined by the original integral equation (8), and the paper tests (88) against high-precision numerical solutions of that integral equation, including the independent Chebyshev/TBA checks in Section 7 and the SUSY O(7) analysis of Section 6.2. The resurgence relations (90) and (91) are derived from the reality of S_+(W), which is only the first half of the main assumption, but they are subsequently checked against the asymptotic behavior of perturbative coefficients rather than being used to define the physical value. The SUSY O(7) comparison degrades for v > 0.15, with the discrepancy attributed to TBA numerics without an independent error budget; that is a precision limitation, not a circular reduction. Self-citations, e.g., [59,61,62,74], supply prior perturbative results, the α = 0 treatment, and some numerical benchmarks, but these are reproducible, parameter-free inputs or external checks, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained modulo the explicitly admitted assumption, and no equation reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central trans-series construction rests on standard integrability input, an imported perturbative algorithm, and one explicit unproven assumption, equation (88). No new physical particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The running-coupling gauge L and the scale Λ are conventional parameters that cancel in physical results. The nonperturbative coefficients are derived from the kernels rather than fitted to numerics.

free parameters (2)
  • Running-coupling gauge L = model-dependent constant, e.g. L = -b - 4 Δ ln 2 for bosonic O(N) models
    Introduced in equation (46) to make the rescaled kernel A(y) free of ln v terms. It is a convention and a gauge choice, not fitted to the TBA solution; final physical trans-series are independent of L.
  • Auxiliary scale Λ and derived y1 in the free-energy trans-series = arbitrary; y1 = -z1 - a(γE + (1+2δ) ln 2) - 2 ln(Cδ m / Λ)
    In Section 8 and Appendix B, Λ defines the running coupling α through equation (168). The free energy is independent of Λ up to reparametrization, and the mass-gap relation is derived, not fitted, so this is a bookkeeping scale rather than a fitted parameter.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The ground state of each listed model is described by the linear integral equation (2) with a single finite interval [-B, B] and known kernel K(θ), as the thermodynamic limit of the Bethe ansatz.
    Section 2 takes this as the starting point, citing [30,35,64] for the standard derivation. It is established for the listed models but not rederived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Wiener-Hopf factorization 1 - K~(ω) = G+(ω)G-(ω) exists, and its logarithm has the assumed analytic structure: cuts and simple poles on the positive imaginary κ axis, with the running coupling removing all ln v terms.
    Section 3.1, equations (39)-(47). The paper asserts 'In all the cases we analyze here, this can be achieved' but does not prove it in full generality.
  • ad hoc to paper Lateral Borel resummation S+ maps the formal trans-series to the physical solution of the integral equation.
    Section 4.2, equation (88): 'This is our main assumption, which we cannot prove'. This is the load-bearing unproven premise of the paper.
  • domain assumption The perturbative series A_{α,β} are asymptotic in the sense of equation (82), and diagonal Padé approximants of the Borel transform capture the relevant analytic structure.
    This is the standard resurgence working assumption used in Sections 6 and 7; it is not proven here, only supported numerically.
  • domain assumption Volin's algorithm computes the perturbative building block A_{1,1} to arbitrary order, and the differential equations (67)-(69) determine all A_{α,β} and a_α from it.
    The algorithm is imported from [38,39] and previous works; the paper uses the coefficients and differential equations but does not re-derive the convergence of the algorithm.
  • standard math The solutions of the integral equation are sufficiently smooth to justify the differentiations leading to equations (7), (10)-(13).
    Section 2.1 implicitly assumes enough regularity to differentiate under the integral and derive the differential equations for the observables.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The complete trans-series for conserved charges in integrable field theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KKD6IA4L

@misc{pith2026250116435,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The complete trans-series for conserved charges in integrable field theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KKD6IA4L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16435}
}
abstract

We analyze the vacuum expectation values of conserved charges in two dimensional integrable theories. We study the situations when the ground-state can be described by a single integral equation with a finite support: the thermodynamic limit of the Bethe ansatz equation. We solve this integral equation by expanding around the infinite support limit and write the expectation values in terms of an explicitly calculable trans-series, which includes both perturbative and all non-perturbative corrections. These different types of corrections are interrelated via resurgence relations, which we all reveal. We provide explicit formulas for a wide class of bosonic and fermionic models including the $O(N)$ (super) symmetric nonlinear sigma and Gross-Neveu, the $SU(N)$ invariant principal chiral and chiral Gross-Neveu models along with the Lieb-Liniger and Gaudin-Yang models and the case of the disk capacitor. With numerical analyses we demonstrate that the laterally Borel resummed trans-series is convergent and reproduces the physical result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16435 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphical representation of a path appearing in the matrix element [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the difference between precision numerics of the TBA and the lateral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Trans-asymptotics of the leading and higher order perturbative coefficients in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot to estimate the convergence radius. The ratios of consecutive coefficients plotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The absolute value and complex argument of the coefficients as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Fredholm Determinants to AdS/CFT Observables: A Universal Strong-Coupling Framework

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The O(6) mass gap's strong-coupling trans-series is generated from Fredholm-determinant data via a conjectured alien calculus, yielding an all-orders relation to the cusp anomalous dimension.

  2. Strong coupling structure of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM observables with matrix Bessel kernel

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The strong-coupling transseries for matrix Bessel determinant observables is generated from its perturbative part by shifting a→a−Δ and replacing moments I_n, with all Stokes constants fixed by two recurrences.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Divergence of perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics,

    F. J. Dyson, “Divergence of perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics,”Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 631–632

    1952

  2. [2]

    The enumeration of graphs in the Feynman-Dyson technique,

    C. A. Hurst, “The enumeration of graphs in the Feynman-Dyson technique,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 214 (1952) 44

    1952

  3. [3]

    Divergence of the perturbation theory series and the quasiclassical theory,

    L. Lipatov, “Divergence of the perturbation theory series and the quasiclassical theory,” Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 216–223

    1977

  4. [4]

    Coleman, The Uses of Instantons , pp

    S. Coleman, The Uses of Instantons , pp. 805–941. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1979

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    Perturbation theory at large order. 2. Role of the vacuum instability,

    E. Brezin, J.-C. Le Guillou, and J. Zinn-Justin, “Perturbation theory at large order. 2. Role of the vacuum instability,”Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1558–1564

    work page 1977

  6. [6]

    Renormalons,

    M. Beneke, “Renormalons,” Phys. Rept. 317 (1999) 1–142, arXiv:hep-ph/9807443

    arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Compelling evidence of renormalons in QCD from high order perturbative expansions,

    C. Bauer, G. S. Bali, and A. Pineda, “Compelling evidence of renormalons in QCD from high order perturbative expansions,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 242002, arXiv:1111.3946 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Resurgence and Dynamics of O(N) and Grassmannian Sigma Models

    G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal, “Resurgence and Dynamics of O(N ) and Grassmannian Sigma Models,” JHEP 09 (2015) 199, arXiv:1505.07803 [hep-th] . 47

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Bion non-perturbative contributions versus infrared renormalons in two-dimensionalCPN −1 models,

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Bion non-perturbative contributions versus infrared renormalons in two-dimensionalCPN −1 models,” JHEP 02 (2019) 190, arXiv:1810.03768 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Renormalons as Saddle Points,

    A. Bhattacharya, J. Cotler, A. Dersy, and M. D. Schwartz, “Renormalons as Saddle Points,” arXiv:2410.07351 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Resurgence and1/N expansion in integrable field theories,

    L. Di Pietro, M. Mariño, G. Sberveglieri, and M. Serone, “Resurgence and1/N expansion in integrable field theories,”JHEP 10 (2021) 166, arXiv:2108.02647 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Resurgence and semiclassical expansion in two-dimensional large-N sigma models,

    H. Nishimura, T. Fujimori, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Resurgence and semiclassical expansion in two-dimensional large-N sigma models,”JHEP 06 (2022) 151, arXiv:2112.13999 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Testing the Bethe ansatz with largeN renormalons,

    M. Marino, R. Miravitllas, and T. Reis, “Testing the Bethe ansatz with largeN renormalons,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 no. 12-13, (2021) 2641–2666,arXiv:2102.03078 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Asymptotically Free Field Theories,

    D. J. Gross and A. Neveu, “Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Asymptotically Free Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 3235

    1974

  7. [15]

    Interaction of Goldstone Particles in Two-Dimensions. Applications to Ferromagnets and Massive Yang-Mills Fields,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Interaction of Goldstone Particles in Two-Dimensions. Applications to Ferromagnets and Massive Yang-Mills Fields,”Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 79–81

    1975

  8. [16]

    Theory of nonabelian Goldstone bosons,

    A. M. Polyakov and P. Wiegmann, “Theory of nonabelian Goldstone bosons,”Phys. Lett. B 131 (1983) 121–126

    1983

  9. [17]

    The Exact mass gap of the O(3) and O(4) nonlinear sigma models ind = 2,

    P. Hasenfratz, M. Maggiore, and F. Niedermayer, “The Exact mass gap of the O(3) and O(4) nonlinear sigma models ind = 2,” Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 522–528

    1990

  10. [18]

    The exact mass gap of the O(N ) sigma model for arbitrary N ≥ 3 in d = 2 ,

    P. Hasenfratz and F. Niedermayer, “The exact mass gap of the O(N ) sigma model for arbitrary N ≥ 3 in d = 2 ,” Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 529–532

    1990

  11. [19]

    The Exact mass gap of the Gross-Neveu model. 1. The Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,

    P. Forgacs, F. Niedermayer, and P. Weisz, “The Exact mass gap of the Gross-Neveu model. 1. The Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,”Nucl. Phys. B 367 (1991) 123–143

    1991

  12. [20]

    The Exact mass gap of the Gross-Neveu model. 2. The1/N expansion,

    P. Forgacs, F. Niedermayer, and P. Weisz, “The Exact mass gap of the Gross-Neveu model. 2. The1/N expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B 367 (1991) 144–157

    1991

  13. [21]

    The Exact mass gap of the chiral Gross-Neveu model,

    P. Forgacs, S. Naik, and F. Niedermayer, “The Exact mass gap of the chiral Gross-Neveu model,” Phys. Lett. B 283 (1992) 282–286

    1992

  14. [22]

    Exact mass gap of the chiral SU(n) ×SU(n) model,

    J. Balog, S. Naik, F. Niedermayer, and P. Weisz, “Exact mass gap of the chiral SU(n) ×SU(n) model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 873–876

    1992

  15. [23]

    The Exact mass gaps of the principal chiral models,

    T. J. Hollowood, “The Exact mass gaps of the principal chiral models,”Phys. Lett. B 329 (1994) 450–456, arXiv:hep-th/9402084

    1994 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Exact scattering in the SU(n) supersymmetric principal chiral model,

    J. M. Evans and T. J. Hollowood, “Exact scattering in the SU(n) supersymmetric principal chiral model,”Nucl. Phys. B 493 (1997) 517–540, arXiv:hep-th/9603190

    1997 arXiv

  17. [25]

    LargeN chiral field in two-dimensions,

    V. A. Fateev, P. B. Wiegmann, and V. A. Kazakov, “LargeN chiral field in two-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 1750–1753

    1994

  18. [26]

    Principal chiral field at largeN,

    V. A. Fateev, V. A. Kazakov, and P. B. Wiegmann, “Principal chiral field at largeN,” Nucl. Phys. B 424 (1994) 505–520, arXiv:hep-th/9403099. 48

    1994 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Integrable sigma models withθ = π ,

    P. Fendley, “Integrable sigma models withθ = π ,” Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 104429, arXiv:cond-mat/0008372

    2001 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Integrable sigma models and perturbed coset models,

    P. Fendley, “Integrable sigma models and perturbed coset models,”JHEP 05 (2001) 050, arXiv:hep-th/0101034

    2001 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Exact results for integrable asymptotically - free field theories,

    J. M. Evans and T. J. Hollowood, “Exact results for integrable asymptotically - free field theories,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 45 no. 1, (1996) 130–139,arXiv:hep-th/9508141

    1996 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Exact analysis of an interacting Bose gas. 1. The General solution and the ground state,

    E. H. Lieb and W. Liniger, “Exact analysis of an interacting Bose gas. 1. The General solution and the ground state,”Phys. Rev. 130 (1963) 1605–1616

    1963

  23. [31]

    Un systeme a une dimension de fermions en interaction,

    M. Gaudin, “Un systeme a une dimension de fermions en interaction,”Physics Letters A 24 no. 1, (1967) 55–56

    1967

  24. [32]

    Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction,

    C.-N. Yang, “Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction,”Physical Review Letters 19 no. 23, (1967) 1312

    1967

  25. [33]

    Thermodynamic bethe ansatz in relativistic models: Scaling 3-state Potts and Lee-Yang models,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Thermodynamic bethe ansatz in relativistic models: Scaling 3-state Potts and Lee-Yang models,”Nuclear Physics B 342 no. 3, (1990) 695–720

    1990

  26. [34]

    Relativistic factorized S-matrix in two-dimensions having O(N ) isotopic symmetry,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Relativistic factorized S-matrix in two-dimensions having O(N ) isotopic symmetry,” JETP Lett. 26 (1977) 457

    1977

  27. [35]

    Samaj and Z

    L. Samaj and Z. Bajnok,Introduction to the statistical physics of integrable many-body systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013

    2013

  28. [36]

    The Exact mass gap of the supersymmetricCP(n−1) sigma model,

    J. M. Evans and T. J. Hollowood, “The Exact mass gap of the supersymmetricCP(n−1) sigma model,” Phys. Lett. B 343 (1995) 198–206, arXiv:hep-th/9409142

    1995 arXiv

  29. [37]

    The Exact mass gap of the supersymmetric O(N ) sigma model,

    J. M. Evans and T. J. Hollowood, “The Exact mass gap of the supersymmetric O(N ) sigma model,” Phys. Lett. B 343 (1995) 189–197, arXiv:hep-th/9409141

    1995 arXiv

  30. [38]

    From the mass gap in O(N ) to the non-Borel-summability in O(3) and O(4) sigma-models,

    D. Volin, “From the mass gap in O(N ) to the non-Borel-summability in O(3) and O(4) sigma-models,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 105008, arXiv:0904.2744 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Quantum integrability and functional equations: Applications to the spectral problem of AdS/CFT and two-dimensional sigma models,

    D. Volin, “Quantum integrability and functional equations: Applications to the spectral problem of AdS/CFT and two-dimensional sigma models,”J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 124003, arXiv:1003.4725 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Exact perturbative results for the Lieb-Liniger and Gaudin-Yang models,

    M. Marino and T. Reis, “Exact perturbative results for the Lieb-Liniger and Gaudin-Yang models,” Journal of Statistical Physics (5, 2019) ,arXiv:1905.09575 [math-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Analytical results for the capacitance of a circular plate capacitor,

    B. Reichert and Z. Ristivojevic, “Analytical results for the capacitance of a circular plate capacitor,” Phys. Rev. Research. 2 (2020) 013289, arXiv:2001.01142 [math-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Renormalons in integrable field theories,

    M. Mariño and T. Reis, “Renormalons in integrable field theories,”JHEP 04 (2020) 160, arXiv:1909.12134 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    R. B. Dingle,Asymptotic expansions: their derivation and interpretation . Academic Press, 1973

    1973

  36. [44]

    Écalle, Les fonctions résurgentes (en trois parties)

    J. Écalle, Les fonctions résurgentes (en trois parties) . Université de Paris-Sud, 1981. Vol 1, 2, 3. 49

    1981

  37. [45]

    Lectures on non-perturbative effects in largeN gauge theories, matrix models and strings,

    M. Mariño, “Lectures on non-perturbative effects in largeN gauge theories, matrix models and strings,” Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 455–540, arXiv:1206.6272 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,

    D. Dorigoni, “An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,”Annals Phys. 409 (2019) 167914, arXiv:1411.3585 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    What is QFT? Resurgent trans-series, Lefschetz thimbles, and new exact saddles,

    G. V. Dunne and M. Ünsal, “What is QFT? Resurgent trans-series, Lefschetz thimbles, and new exact saddles,”PoS LATTICE2015(2016) 010, arXiv:1511.05977 [hep-lat]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    A Primer on Resurgent Transseries and Their Asymptotics,

    I. Aniceto, G. Basar, and R. Schiappa, “A Primer on Resurgent Transseries and Their Asymptotics,” Phys. Rept. 809 (2019) 1–135, arXiv:1802.10441 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Lectures on Resurgence in Integrable Field Theories,

    M. Serone, “Lectures on Resurgence in Integrable Field Theories,”arXiv:2405.02224 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Resurgence for superconductors,

    M. Mariño and T. Reis, “Resurgence for superconductors,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment (5, 2019) ,arXiv:1905.09569 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Resurgence and renormalons in the one-dimensional Hubbard model,

    M. Marino and T. Reis, “Resurgence and renormalons in the one-dimensional Hubbard model,” SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 113, arXiv:2006.05131 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Attractive multicomponent Gaudin-Yang model: Three roads to the energy gap,

    M. Marino and T. Reis, “Attractive multicomponent Gaudin-Yang model: Three roads to the energy gap,”Phys. Rev. B 106 no. 12, (2022) 125142,arXiv:2010.16174 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Method of difference-differential equations for some bethe-ansatz-solvable models,

    Z. Ristivojevic, “Method of difference-differential equations for some bethe-ansatz-solvable models,” Phys. Rev. A 106 (2022) 062216

    2022

  46. [54]

    Exact results for the moments of the rapidity distribution in galilean-invariant integrable models,

    Z. Ristivojevic, “Exact results for the moments of the rapidity distribution in galilean-invariant integrable models,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 020401

    2023

  47. [55]

    From perturbative to non-perturbative in the O(4) sigma model,

    M. C. Abbott, Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, and A. Hegedűs, “From perturbative to non-perturbative in the O(4) sigma model,”Phys. Lett. B 818 (2021) 136369, arXiv:2011.09897 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Resurgence in the O(4) sigma model,

    M. C. Abbott, Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, A. Hegedűs, and S. Sadeghian, “Resurgence in the O(4) sigma model,” JHEP 05 (2021) 253, arXiv:2011.12254 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Analytic resurgence in the O(4) model,

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, and I. Vona, “Analytic resurgence in the O(4) model,”JHEP 04 (2022) 043, arXiv:2111.15390 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Instanton effects vs resurgence in the O(3) sigma model,

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, A. Hegedus, and I. Vona, “Instanton effects vs resurgence in the O(3) sigma model,” Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022) 137073, arXiv:2112.11741 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Running coupling and non-perturbative corrections for O(N ) free energy and for disk capacitor,

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, A. Hegedus, and I. Vona, “Running coupling and non-perturbative corrections for O(N ) free energy and for disk capacitor,”JHEP 09 (2022) 001, arXiv:2204.13365 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Instantons, renormalons and the theta angle in integrable sigma models,

    M. Marino, R. Miravitllas, and T. Reis, “Instantons, renormalons and the theta angle in integrable sigma models,”SciPost Phys. 15 no. 5, (2023) 184,arXiv:2205.04495 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    New renormalons from analytic trans-series,

    M. Marino, R. Miravitllas, and T. Reis, “New renormalons from analytic trans-series,” JHEP 08 (2022) 279, arXiv:2111.11951 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    The full analytic trans-series in integrable field theories,

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, and I. Vona, “The full analytic trans-series in integrable field theories,” Phys. Lett. B 844 (2023) 138075, arXiv:2212.09416 [hep-th] . 50

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    On the structure of trans-series in quantum field theory,

    M. Marino, R. Miravitllas, and T. Reis, “On the structure of trans-series in quantum field theory,” arXiv:2302.08363 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Reis, On the resurgence of renormalons in integrable theories

    T. Reis, On the resurgence of renormalons in integrable theories . PhD thesis, U. Geneva (main), 2022. arXiv:2209.15386 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Exact results in the two-dimensional U (1)-symmetric thirring model,

    G. Japaridze, A. Nersesyan, and P. Wiegmann, “Exact results in the two-dimensional U (1)-symmetric thirring model,” Nuclear Physics B 230 no. 4, (1984) 511–547

    1984

  58. [66]

    Exact solution of the O(3) nonlinear σ-model,

    P. Wiegmann, “Exact solution of the O(3) nonlinear σ-model,” Physics Letters B 152 no. 3-4, (1985) 209–214

    1985

  59. [67]

    Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium,

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura, “Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium,”Phys. Rev. X 6 no. 4, (2016) 041065, arXiv:1605.07331 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2016 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Exact finite volume expectation values of conserved currents,

    Z. Bajnok and I. Vona, “Exact finite volume expectation values of conserved currents,” Phys. Lett. B 805 (2020) 135446, arXiv:1911.08525 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    The electrostatic field of two equal circular co-axial conducting disks,

    E. R. LOVE, “The electrostatic field of two equal circular co-axial conducting disks,”The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 2 no. 4, (1949) 428–451

    1949

  62. [70]

    Supersymmetric form of the nonlinearσ model in two dimensions,

    E. Witten, “Supersymmetric form of the nonlinearσ model in two dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 2991–2994

    1977

  63. [71]

    Exact factorized s-matrix of the chiral field in two dimensions,

    P. Wiegmann, “Exact factorized s-matrix of the chiral field in two dimensions,”Physics Letters B 142 no. 3, (1984) 173–176

    1984

  64. [72]

    Factorized U(n) symmetric S-matrices in two dimensions,

    B. Berg, M. Karowski, P. Weisz, and V. Kurak, “Factorized U(n) symmetric S-matrices in two dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B 134 no. 1, (1978) 125–132

    1978

  65. [73]

    Antiparticles as bound states of particles in the factorized S-matrix framework,

    V. Kurak and J. Swieca, “Antiparticles as bound states of particles in the factorized S-matrix framework,” Physics Letters B 82 no. 2, (1979) 289–291

    1979

  66. [74]

    Wiener-Hopf solution of the free energy TBA problem and instanton sectors in the O(3) sigma model,

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, and I. Vona, “Wiener-Hopf solution of the free energy TBA problem and instanton sectors in the O(3) sigma model,”JHEP 11 (2024) 093, arXiv:2404.07621 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Trans-series from condensates,

    M. Marino and R. Miravitllas, “Trans-series from condensates,”arXiv:2402.19356 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Bjorken and threshold asymptotics of a space-like structure function in the 2D U(N ) Gross-Neveu model,

    Y. Liu, “Bjorken and threshold asymptotics of a space-like structure function in the 2D U(N ) Gross-Neveu model,” JHEP 09 (2024) 093, arXiv:2403.06787 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Asymptotics in the bi-Yang-Baxter Sigma Model,

    M. Ashwinkumar, D. Orlando, S. Reffert, and G. Sberveglieri, “Asymptotics in the bi-Yang-Baxter Sigma Model,”arXiv:2501.18458 [hep-th]

  70. [78]

    Scaling function in AdS/CFT from the O(6) sigma model,

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, B. Basso, G. Korchemsky, and L. Palla, “Scaling function in AdS/CFT from the O(6) sigma model,”Nucl. Phys. B 811 (2009) 438–462, arXiv:0809.4952 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  71. [79]

    The Resurgence of the Cusp Anomalous Dimension,

    I. Aniceto, “The Resurgence of the Cusp Anomalous Dimension,”J. Phys. A 49 (2016) 065403, arXiv:1506.03388 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Resurgence of the Cusp Anomalous Dimension,

    D. Dorigoni and Y. Hatsuda, “Resurgence of the Cusp Anomalous Dimension,”JHEP 09 (2015) 138, arXiv:1506.03763 [hep-th] . 51

    2015 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Exploring superconformal Yang-Mills theories through matrix Bessel kernels,

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis, and G. P. Korchemsky, “Exploring superconformal Yang-Mills theories through matrix Bessel kernels,”arXiv:2412.08732 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Tracy-Widom Distribution in Four-Dimensional Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis, and G. P. Korchemsky, “Tracy-Widom Distribution in Four-Dimensional Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 3, (2024) 031601, arXiv:2403.13050 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Solving four-dimensional superconformal Yang-Mills theories with Tracy-Widom distribution,

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis, and G. P. Korchemsky, “Solving four-dimensional superconformal Yang-Mills theories with Tracy-Widom distribution,”arXiv:2409.17227 [hep-th] . 52

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.