Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mitigating Temporal Misalignment by Discarding Outdated Facts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14824 v3 pith:KKDFYUZV submitted 2023-05-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords misalignmenttemporalfactfactsknowledgemodelsansweringdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While large language models are able to retain vast amounts of world knowledge seen during pretraining, such knowledge is prone to going out of date and is nontrivial to update. Furthermore, these models are often used under temporal misalignment, tasked with answering questions about the present, despite having only been trained on data collected in the past. To mitigate the effects of temporal misalignment, we propose fact duration prediction: the task of predicting how long a given fact will remain true. In our experiments, we demonstrate that identifying which facts are prone to rapid change can help models avoid reciting outdated information and determine which predictions require seeking out up-to-date knowledge sources. We also show how modeling fact duration improves calibration for knowledge-intensive tasks, such as open-retrieval question answering, under temporal misalignment, by discarding volatile facts. Our data and code are released publicly at https://github.com/mikejqzhang/mitigating_misalignment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KnowShiftQA: How Robust are RAG Systems when Textbook Knowledge Shifts in K-12 Education?

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark, KnowShiftQA, shows that retrieval-augmented LLMs drop 22 to 27 points in accuracy when textbook facts are hypothetically updated to conflict with the model's parametric knowledge.

Pith tools