REVIEW 1 cited by
Mitigating Temporal Misalignment by Discarding Outdated Facts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While large language models are able to retain vast amounts of world knowledge seen during pretraining, such knowledge is prone to going out of date and is nontrivial to update. Furthermore, these models are often used under temporal misalignment, tasked with answering questions about the present, despite having only been trained on data collected in the past. To mitigate the effects of temporal misalignment, we propose fact duration prediction: the task of predicting how long a given fact will remain true. In our experiments, we demonstrate that identifying which facts are prone to rapid change can help models avoid reciting outdated information and determine which predictions require seeking out up-to-date knowledge sources. We also show how modeling fact duration improves calibration for knowledge-intensive tasks, such as open-retrieval question answering, under temporal misalignment, by discarding volatile facts. Our data and code are released publicly at https://github.com/mikejqzhang/mitigating_misalignment.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
KnowShiftQA: How Robust are RAG Systems when Textbook Knowledge Shifts in K-12 Education?
A new benchmark, KnowShiftQA, shows that retrieval-augmented LLMs drop 22 to 27 points in accuracy when textbook facts are hypothetically updated to conflict with the model's parametric knowledge.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.