Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Time-bin encoding quantum key distribution in free-space horizontal links during nighttime and daytime

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Time-bin encoded QKD in the C-band works over turbulent horizontal free-space links of 50 m and 500 m.

desk verdict The time-bin C-band free-space demonstration looks genuine, but the headline secure-key-rate numbers rest on a phase-randomization assumption the paper never states. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08891 v1 pith:KKK6GCGX submitted 2025-01-15 quant-ph

Sebastiano Cocchi , Domenico Ribezzo , Giulia Guarda , Pietro Centorrino , Tommaso Occhipinti , Alessandro Zavatta , Davide Bacco This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81P94 PACS 03.67.Dd42.79.Sz
keywords quantumkeydistributiontime-binencodingfree-spaceopticsC-bandturbulentatmospherefiniteratesBB84photonicintegratedcircuit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports field demonstrations of quantum key distribution that use time-bin-encoded qubits in the C-band (1558.98 nm) across horizontal free-space links of 50 m and 500 m in Florence. Average secure key rates reached 793 kbps and 40 kbps, with interferometric visibility of 94% and 85%, over several hours and in both daytime and nighttime conditions. The central claim is that this combination, time-bin encoding plus telecom C-band, is viable in turbulent air, making fiber-based and free-space QKD interoperable. If true, hybrid networks connecting fiber users, ground stations, and satellites could run on a single protocol and wavelength band instead of requiring conversion devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time-bin qubit pair, with early and late pulses separated by 800 ps, generated at a 595 MHz rate by an intensity modulator carving a continuous-wave C-band laser. At the receiver, a 50:50 beam splitter implements Bob's random basis choice: one output goes directly to a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector for the Z basis, and the other goes into a photonic integrated circuit imbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer with an 800 ps delay for the X basis, from whose interference visibility the X-basis error rate is derived. The system also uses a 1310 nm beacon laser, a four-quadrant detector, and a PID-controlled deformable mirror to cancel beam wandering, plus a clock-over-air channel for time synchronization. Secure key lengths are extracted with the finite-key decoy-state formula for a three-state efficient BB84 protocol.

What would settle it

Measure the relative phase of successive carved pulses at Alice's output with a fast unbalanced interferometer or heterodyne detection; if the phase differences are not uniformly random over $0$ to $2\pi$, the source is not phase-randomized and the finite-key rates from Eq. (3) cannot be claimed as proven secure rates for this transmitter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that a time-bin encoded QKD protocol operating in the C-band can survive turbulent horizontal free-space channels. On a 50 m link with roughly 7 dB loss and a 500 m link with 16–17 dB loss, both in the weak-turbulence regime, the setup sustained average secure key rates of 793 kbps and 40 kbps, respectively. The authors attribute the improved performance to a 595 MHz qubit generation rate, coupling into single-mode fiber to reject background light, and a photonic integrated imbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer that keeps visibility stable at 94% and 85% over two-hour stretches. The paper frames this as evidence that time-bin encoding, normally considered fragile in free space because of phase instabilities, can be made practical with active tip-tilt beam correction and a telecom-wavelength link design.

Load-bearing premise

The secure-key-rate calculation assumes the laser source emits pulses with random phases, as the decoy-state security proof requires, but the paper does not report checking this phase-randomization condition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single transmitter and receiver design can serve both fiber and free-space legs of a hybrid quantum network without wavelength or encoding conversion.
  • At the measured 16 dB loss the 500 m link delivered 40 kbps, and the paper estimates roughly 400 bps at 38 dB loss and 4 kbps at 25 dB loss with optimized optics, indicating where the approach can operate as losses grow.
  • Active tip-tilt correction lowers the mean position error of the received beam, which stabilizes fiber coupling and interferometric visibility over multi-hour sessions.
  • Closing windows to suppress convective turbulence added about 3 dB of loss, so the reported rates include an extra attenuation that would not be present in a purpose-built outdoor terminal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If phase randomization of the emitted pulses were explicitly verified, this trial would be the first decoy-state-secure demonstration of time-bin C-band free-space QKD; the paper does not claim such verification.
  • The 500 m link's loss is dominated by undersized receiving optics rather than atmospheric attenuation, so scaling to kilometer-scale or slant-path links appears plausible with larger apertures, though the paper only proposes such upgrades.
  • The clock-over-air scheme with a reduced 145 kHz synchronization frequency for the longer link suggests a practical path to free-running alignment, at the cost of lower event-rate capacity that a full system design would need to budget.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of time-bin encoding quantum key distribution in the C-band over 50 m and 500 m horizontal free-space links. The transmitter uses a continuous-wave laser carved by an intensity modulator at 595 MHz together with a free-space receiver that applies tip-tilt correction and a photonic integrated imbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer for the X basis. The authors report average visibilities of 94% and 85% and average secure key rates of 793 kbps and 40 kbps, computed with a finite-key formula for a three-state one-decoy BB84 protocol.

Significance. If the security claims were fully supported, the experiment would be a valuable step toward interoperable fiber/free-space QKD in the C-band, with the advantages of reduced solar background and turbulence compared with shorter wavelengths. The paper also provides useful engineering data: active beam compensation, measured scintillation indices, and channel losses for the two links. However, the headline secure-key-rate numbers depend on source and decoy-state assumptions that are not documented or implemented, and the manuscript does not report the QBER values or error bars needed to verify the finite-key calculation. The physical demonstration of time-bin interference over turbulent horizontal links is interesting, but the central claim of 'secure key rate' is not presently justified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2 and Supplementary 7.3, Eq. (3)] The finite-key formula in Eq. (3) is a decoy-state bound that assumes the source emits phase-randomized weak coherent pulses, i.e., a Poisson mixture of Fock states. The described source, a <100 kHz linewidth CW laser carved by an intensity modulator, emits phase-coherent pulses when the coherence time is far longer than the 1.68 ns pulse spacing. No phase modulator, gain-switched laser, or equivalent randomization element appears in Figure 1 or Supplementary 7.3. Without phase randomization, the decoy-state estimates for s_l_Z,0, s_l_Z,1, and the phase error rate entering Eq. (3) are not valid, and the values labeled 'secure key rate' are not established as secure. The authors must either implement and characterize phase randomization or withdraw the security interpretation of the reported rates.
  2. [Section 2 and Supplementary 7.1, Eq. (3)] The protocol is described as 'one-decoy' but the manuscript never explains how decoy states are generated or measured. The transmitter includes one intensity modulator, a VOA, and fixed attenuators; no random intensity modulation for signal and decoy states is mentioned. The secure key rate is computed solely from QBER_Z and QBER_X, but the bounds s_l_Z,0 and s_l_Z,1 in Eq. (3) require observed counts from at least two intensities. Without these decoy-state statistics, the SKR calculation is not reproducible and the use of the decoy-state formula is unsupported. Please provide the decoy implementation details and the measured signal/decoy yields, or remove the decoy-state-based finite-key formula.
  3. [Section 3, Figure 2 and Supplementary 7.3] The paper reports average SKR values but no measured QBER_Z, QBER_X, or error bars for any trial; visibility values also lack standard deviations or confidence intervals. Since the SKR is a nonlinear function of QBER_X and the visibility fluctuates over time (Fig. 2c), the reader cannot assess the statistical reliability of the quoted numbers or reproduce the finite-key calculation. A table listing per-trial parameters (nZ, QBER_Z, QBER_X, visibility, channel loss, integration time) is needed. In addition, Eq. (10) derives QBER_X directly from the raw interference visibility; for a multi-photon source the single-photon phase error rate used in Eq. (3) is not automatically equal to (1-V)/2. The manuscript should justify this substitution or use a proper phase-error estimation method.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3] The open-loop versus closed-loop position errors (92 um vs 65 um) are cited as an improvement, but the standard deviations (53 um and 36 um) are large; a statistical confidence interval or test would strengthen the claim.
  2. [Title and Section 3] The title mentions 'nighttime and daytime,' but the results do not explicitly separate day and night trials nor analyze the effect of ambient light on the measured rates; please clarify what the daytime and nighttime measurements show.
  3. [Supplementary 7.2, Eq. (5)] In Eq. (5), the symbol sigma is used both for the standard deviation and in expressions for the log-intensity variance, and the notation 'sigma^2/mu^2' is inconsistent with the definition of the scintillation index in Eq. (4); a notation cleanup would avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Introduction] The statement that solar spectral irradiance at 1550 nm is about five times lower than at 800 nm lacks a specific citation or calculation; please add a reference or a brief derivation.
  5. [Section 4] The extrapolation 'up to 400 bps' for a 38 dB loss channel and '4 kbps in a 25 dB channel' is not backed by any model; please describe the assumptions used for these estimates.
  6. [Figure 2d] The SKR bar chart shows no error bars, yet the text quotes average SKRs with a range; adding error bars or a table of individual runs would make the variation explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: SKR values are computed from measured channel data using an external finite-key security bound; self-citations are ancillary.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that time-bin C-band QKD is viable over horizontal free-space links, supported by measured visibility and secure key rates. The secure key rate is computed via Eq. (3), the finite-key bound for the three-state one-decoy BB84 protocol, which is taken from external references [20, 29, 34]. The inputs to this formula are measured quantities: the Z-basis QBER, the X-basis QBER derived from measured interferometric visibility via Eq. (10), and the block size nZ = 10^7. These are raw experimental data, not parameters fitted so as to reproduce the claimed SKR. The paper's self-citations ([18], [28], [33]) are used for component provenance, protocol context, and future improvements, but none of them supplies the central numerical result or the security formula. No ansatz is smuggled in through self-citation, and no known result is merely renamed. The phase-randomization issue raised in the skeptic note concerns whether the source satisfies the assumptions of the decoy-state security proof; that is a correctness or validity concern, not a circularity, because it does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The central result is an experimental measurement; the SKR is computed from a published finite-key formula. The main axioms are the security proof and the weak-turbulence model. One implicit assumption (phase randomization) is not stated and is flagged.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math The finite-key security formula (Eq. 3) for the three-state efficient BB84 with one decoy is valid for this setup.
    The paper uses Eq. (3) from Refs [34,20,29] without rederivation. The formula's assumptions (decoy state, finite key) are treated as satisfied by the implementation.
  • domain assumption The measured scintillation index sigma_I^2 < 1 implies weak turbulence and justifies the turbulence characterization.
    Section 3 and Supplementary 7.2 use sigma_I^2 values to conclude weak turbulence. The formulas (4)-(8) assume a horizontal path and log-normal intensity statistics.
  • domain assumption The source emits phase-randomized coherent states, as required by the decoy-state security proof.
    Supplementary 7.3 describes a CW laser carved by an intensity modulator but does not mention phase randomization. The security proof in Eq. (3) requires it, so this is an unstated assumption the paper relies on.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time-bin encoding quantum key distribution in free-space horizontal links during nighttime and daytime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KKK6GCGX

@misc{pith2026250108891,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time-bin encoding quantum key distribution in free-space horizontal links during nighttime and daytime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KKK6GCGX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08891}
}
read the original abstract

Free-space quantum key distribution (QKD) represents a groundbreaking advancement in secure communication, enabling secure key exchange over vast distances and offering robust encryption for the future quantum internet. However, the compatibility between fiber and free-space infrastructures continues to pose challenges for QKD protocols. Indeed, free-space and fiber-based networks commonly use different wavelengths and qubits encoding schemes. On the one hand, free-space QKD typically exploits visible light for its beneficial beam divergence compared to longer wavelengths, and polarization encoding for its robustness against turbulence. On the other hand, fiber-based QKD employs infrared light, particularly the C-band, because it shows the minimum losses with silica fibers, and time-bin encoding, due to polarization instability in optical fibers. In our study, we demonstrate the viability of a time-bin encoded QKD protocol operating in the C-band through horizontal turbulent free-space channels. We test the setup into a 50 m and a 500 m long links, achieving an average secure key rate of, respectively, 793 kbps and 40 kbps over several hours of measurements. The results encourage further exploration of the interoperability between free-space and fiber-based infrastructures, opening new possibilities for connecting terminal users with satellites in hybrid infrastructures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08891 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup scheme. The map shows the two links (photo credits: Google Maps). The map’s point of view is facing the southwest direction. The red arrow displays the 50 m long link between the Garbasso and the CNR-INO. The blue arrow represents the 500 m long link between Villa Galileo and the CNR-INO. The bottom of the figure shows the setup design. FPGA: field programmable gate array; IM: intensity modulator;… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental results. a) Comparison between the open-loop and closed-loop configurations of the fine-adjustment loop. The position errors are taken from the FQD in the open-loop (red line), that is without fine-adjustment, and with the closed-loop configuration (blue line). Data come from the 500 m link. b) Weather conditions during the QKD communications. The first triangular cyan measurements refer to the 50 m lin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Detailed setup scheme. FPGA: field programmable gate array; IM: intensity modulator; VOA: variable optical attenuator; FA: fixed attenuation; DWDM: dense wavelength division multiplexer; HFWDM: high-frequency wavelength division multiplexer; SMF: single-mode fiber; PMF: polarization maintaining fiber; DFM: deformable mirror; FQD: four-quadrant detector; DM: dichroic mirror; CW: continuous wave; PD: photodiode; FPC: … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Post-selection free time-bin entanglement on a thin-film lithium niobate photonic chip

    quant-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A thin-film lithium niobate receiver with a 5 GHz optical switch certifies post-selection-free time-bin entanglement, yielding a Bell violation exceeding 24 standard deviations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Towards a global quantum net- work

    Christoph Simon. “Towards a global quantum net- work”. In: Nature Photonics 11.11 (Nov. 2017), pp. 678–680. issn: 1749-4893. doi: 10 . 1038 / s41566 - 017 - 0032 - 0. url: https : / / doi . org / 10.1038/s41566-017-0032-0 . 5

    doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0032-0 2017

  2. [2]

    Satellite-Terrestrial Quantum Networks and the Global Quantum Internet

    Andrea Conti, Robert A. Malaney, and Moe Z. Win. “Satellite-Terrestrial Quantum Networks and the Global Quantum Internet”. In: IEEE Com- munications Magazine 62 (2024), pp. 34–39. url: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 273226758

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin toss- ing

    Charles H. Bennett and Gilles Brassard. “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin toss- ing”. In: Theoretical Computer Science 560 (Dec. 2014), pp. 7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05 2014

  4. [4]

    Quantum Cryptography and Bell’s Theorem

    Artur K. Ekert. “Quantum Cryptography and Bell’s Theorem”. In: Quantum Measurements in Optics. Ed. by Paolo Tombesi and Daniel F. Walls. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1992, pp. 413–418. isbn: 978-1-4615-3386-3. doi: 10 . 1007 / 978 - 1 - 4615 - 3386 - 3 _ 34. url: https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1007 / 978-1-4615-3386-3_34

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    The security of practical quantum key distribution

    Valerio Scarani et al. “The security of practical quantum key distribution”. In: Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 81.3 (Sept. 2009), pp. 1301–1350. issn: 1539-0756. doi: 10 . 1103 / revmodphys . 81 . 1301. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 81.1301

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2009

  6. [6]

    Advances in quantum cryptography

    Stefano Pirandola et al. “Advances in quantum cryptography”. In: Advances in optics and photon- ics 12.4 (2020), pp. 1012–1236

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    High-performance 1560 nm entangled photon source for high secure key rates QKD satellite-based communications

    Jean-Marc Merolla et al. “High-performance 1560 nm entangled photon source for high secure key rates QKD satellite-based communications”. In: In- ternational Conference on Space Optics — ICSO

    work page

  8. [8]

    Entanglement-based secure quan- tum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres

    Juan Yin et al. “Entanglement-based secure quan- tum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres”. In: Na- ture 582.7813 (June 2020), pp. 501–505. issn: 1476-

    work page 2020

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Large - Scale LEO Satel- lite Constellation to Ground QKD links: Feasibil- ity Analysis

    Argiris Ntanos et al. “Large - Scale LEO Satel- lite Constellation to Ground QKD links: Feasibil- ity Analysis”. In: 2022 IEEE International Con- ference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS) (2022), pp. 288–295. url: https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248115756

    2022

  2. [10]

    Funda- mentals of photonics; 2nd ed.Wiley series in pure and applied optics

    Bahaa E A Saleh and Malvin Carl Teich. Funda- mentals of photonics; 2nd ed.Wiley series in pure and applied optics. New York, NY: Wiley, 2007. url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1084451

    2007

  3. [11]

    Free-space quantum key dis- tribution during daylight and at night

    Wen-Qi Cai et al. “Free-space quantum key dis- tribution during daylight and at night”. In: Op- tica 11.5 (May 2024), pp. 647–652. doi: 10.1364/ OPTICA.511000. url: https://opg.optica.org/ optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-11-5-647

    2024

  4. [12]

    Satellite-to-ground quan- tum key distribution

    Sheng-Kai Liao et al. “Satellite-to-ground quan- tum key distribution”. In: Nature 549.7670 (Sept. 2017), pp. 43–47. issn: 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/ nature23655. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature23655

    2017

  5. [13]

    Practical free-space quan- tum key distribution over 10 km in daylight and at night

    Richard J Hughes et al. “Practical free-space quan- tum key distribution over 10 km in daylight and at night”. In: New journal of physics4.1 (2002), p. 43

    2002

  6. [14]

    Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key dis- tribution

    Yuan Cao et al. “Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key dis- tribution”. In: Physical Review Letters 125.26 (2020), p. 260503

    2020

  7. [15]

    Modular source for near- infrared quantum communication

    Federico Berra et al. “Modular source for near- infrared quantum communication”. In: EPJ Quan- tum Technology10.1 (July 2023), p. 27. issn: 2196-

    2023

  8. [16]

    Deploying an inter-European quan- tum network

    D Ribezzo et al. Deploying an inter-European quan- tum network. Adv. Quant. Technol. 6 (2), 2200061 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Cambridge quantum network

    J. F. Dynes et al. “Cambridge quantum network”. In: npj Quantum Information 5.1 (Nov. 2019), p. 101. issn: 2056-6387. doi: 10 . 1038 / s41534 - 019- 0221- 4. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-019-0221-4

    2019

  10. [18]

    Field trial of a three-state quantum key distribution scheme in the Florence metropolitan area

    Bacco, Davide et al. “Field trial of a three-state quantum key distribution scheme in the Florence metropolitan area”. In: EPJ Quantum Technol.6.1 (2019), p. 5. doi: 10.1140/epjqt/s40507- 019- 0075-x. url: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/ s40507-019-0075-x

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Continuous en- tanglement distribution over a transnational 248 km fiber link

    Sebastian Philipp Neumann et al. “Continuous en- tanglement distribution over a transnational 248 km fiber link”. In: Nature Communications 13.1 (Oct. 2022), p. 6134. issn: 2041-1723. doi: 10 . 1038/s41467- 022- 33919- 0. url: https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-022-33919-0

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    Security proof for a simplified Bennett-Brassard 1984 quantum-key-distribution protocol

    Davide Rusca et al. “Security proof for a simplified Bennett-Brassard 1984 quantum-key-distribution protocol”. In: Phys. Rev. A 98 (5 Nov. 2018), p. 052336. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevA . 98 . 052336. url: https : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevA.98.052336. 6

    1984

  13. [21]

    Optical Resolution Through a Ran- domly Inhomogeneous Medium for Very Long and Very Short Exposures

    D. L. Fried. “Optical Resolution Through a Ran- domly Inhomogeneous Medium for Very Long and Very Short Exposures”. In: J. Opt. Soc. Am.56.10 (Oct. 1966), pp. 1372–1379. doi: 10.1364/JOSA. 56.001372. url: %5Curl%7Bhttps://opg.optica. org/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-56-10-1372%7D

    1966 doi

  14. [22]

    Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared

    Philip E. Ciddor. “Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared”. In: Appl. Opt. 35.9 (Mar. 1996), pp. 1566–1573. doi: 10 . 1364 / AO . 35 . 001566. url: https : / / opg . optica . org / ao / abstract . cfm? URI = ao - 35 - 9 - 1566

    1996

  15. [23]

    Long-distance free-space quantum key distribution in daylight towards inter- satellite communication

    Shengkai Liao et al. “Long-distance free-space quantum key distribution in daylight towards inter- satellite communication”. In: Nature Photonics 11 (2017), pp. 509–513. url: https : / / api . semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:125537472

    2017

  16. [24]

    Demonstration of analyzers for multimode photonic time-bin qubits

    Jeongwan Jin et al. “Demonstration of analyzers for multimode photonic time-bin qubits”. In: Phys. Rev. A97 (4 Apr. 2018), p. 043847. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevA.97.043847 . url: https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.043847

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    2014.05.025

    url: https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.tcs. 2014.05.025

    2014

  18. [27]

    Experimental verification of fiber- coupling efficiency for satellite-to-ground atmo- spheric laser downlinks

    Hideki Takenaka, Morio Toyoshima, and Yoshi- hisa Takayama. “Experimental verification of fiber- coupling efficiency for satellite-to-ground atmo- spheric laser downlinks”. In: Opt. Express 20.14 (July 2012), pp. 15301–15308. doi: 10.1364/OE. 20.015301 . url: https://opg.optic...

    2012 doi

  19. [28]

    Quantum key distribution with a borosilicate-glass-matrix integrated photonic receiver

    Giulia Guarda et al. “Quantum key distribution with a borosilicate-glass-matrix integrated photonic receiver”. In: Phys. Rev. A 110 (4 Oct. 2024), p. 042605. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.042605 . url: https : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevA.110.042605

    2024 doi

  20. [29]

    Time-bin Encoded Pho- tons over Multi-mode Channels: Advances on Quantum Communications and Sensing Over Free- space Channels

    Thomas Jennewein et al. “Time-bin Encoded Pho- tons over Multi-mode Channels: Advances on Quantum Communications and Sensing Over Free- space Channels”. In: Optica Quantum 2.0 Con- ference and Exhibition. Optica Publishing Group, QW3A.2. doi: 10 . 1364 / QUANTUM . 2023 . QW3A ...

    2023

  21. [30]

    De- coy state quantum key distribution

    Hoi-Kwong Lo, Xiongfeng Ma, and Kai Chen. “De- coy state quantum key distribution”. In: Physical review letters 94.23 (2005), p. 230504

    2005

  22. [31]

    Nonlocal Temporal Interferome- try for Highly Resilient Free-Space Quantum Com- munication

    Lukas Bulla et al. “Nonlocal Temporal Interferome- try for Highly Resilient Free-Space Quantum Com- munication”. In: Physical Review X (2022). url: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 248218747

    2022

  23. [32]

    Consorzio LaMMA

    LaMMA. Consorzio LaMMA. 2024. url: https : //www.lamma.toscana.it/meteo/osservazioni- e-dati/dati-stazioni

    2024

  24. [33]

    Simple 2.5 GHz time-bin quantum key distribution

    Alberto Boaron et al. “Simple 2.5 GHz time-bin quantum key distribution”. In: Applied Physics Let- ters 112.17 (2018)

    2018

  25. [34]

    Secure Quantum Key Dis- tribution over 421 km of Optical Fiber

    Alberto Boaron et al. “Secure Quantum Key Dis- tribution over 421 km of Optical Fiber.” In: Phys- ical review letters 121 19 (2018), p. 190502. url: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 53734137

    2018

  26. [35]

    The Refractive Index of Air

    Bengt Edlen. “The Refractive Index of Air”. In: Metrologia 2.2 (Apr. 1966), p. 71. doi: 10.1088/ 0026-1394/2/2/002 . url: https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/0026-1394/2/2/002

    1966 doi

  27. [36]

    An Updated Edlen Equation for the Refractive Index of Air

    K. P. Birch and M. J. Downs. “An Updated Edlen Equation for the Refractive Index of Air”. In: Metrologia 30.3 (Jan. 1993), p. 155. doi: 10.1088/ 0026 - 1394 / 30 / 3 / 004. url: https : / / dx . doi . org/10.1088/0026-1394/30/3/004

    1993 doi

  28. [37]

    AI-driven free space quan- tum communications in the third telecom win- dow

    Sebastiano Cocchi et al. “AI-driven free space quan- tum communications in the third telecom win- dow”. In: Machine Learning in Photonics . Ed. by Francesco Ferranti, Mehdi Keshavarz Heday- ati, and Andrea Fratalocchi. Vol. 13017. Interna- tional Society for Optics and Photoni...

    2024 doi

  29. [38]

    Atmo- spheric turbulence characterization with simul- taneous measurement of phase, angle of arrival, and intensity in a retroreflected optical link

    Benjamin P. Dix-Matthews, Skevos F. E. Karpathakis, and Sascha W. Schediwy. “Atmo- spheric turbulence characterization with simul- taneous measurement of phase, angle of arrival, and intensity in a retroreflected optical link”. In: Opt. Lett. 48.21 (Nov. 2023), pp. 5519–5522. ...

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    Integrated photonics on glass: A review of the ion-exchange technology achievements

    Jean-Emmanuel Broquin and Seppo Honkanen. “Integrated photonics on glass: A review of the ion-exchange technology achievements”. In:Applied Sciences 11.10 (2021), p. 4472. 7 7 Supplementary materials 7.1 The QKD protocol In the prepare and measurement QKD scheme, the trans- mi...

    2021

  31. [41]

    Dissipation of en- ergy in the locally isotropic turbulence

    Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov. “Dissipation of en- ergy in the locally isotropic turbulence”. In: Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 434.1890 (1991), pp. 15–17

    1991

  32. [763]

    url: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507- 023-00185-y

    doi: 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-023-00185-y . url: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507- 023-00185-y

    doi

  33. [2022]

    by Kyriaki Minoglou, Nikos Karafolas, and Bruno Cugny

    Ed. by Kyriaki Minoglou, Nikos Karafolas, and Bruno Cugny. Vol. 12777. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2023, p. 1277725. doi: 10 . 1117 / 12 . 2689969. url: https : / / doi . org/10.1117/12.2689969

    2023 doi

  34. [4687]

    1038 / s41586 - 020 - 2401 - y

    doi: 10 . 1038 / s41586 - 020 - 2401 - y. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2401-y

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.