pith. sign in

arxiv: 1606.00160 · v1 · pith:KLURNIY3new · submitted 2016-06-01 · 🧮 math.HO · cs.IT· math.IT· math.LO

The Mathematical Intelligencer flunks the Olympics

classification 🧮 math.HO cs.ITmath.ITmath.LO
keywords grossonesergeyevsystemcomputerinfinityintelligencermathematicalpublished
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The Mathematical Intelligencer recently published a note by Y. Sergeyev that challenges both mathematics and intelligence. We examine Sergeyev's claims concerning his purported Infinity computer. We compare his grossone system with the classical Levi-Civita fields and with the hyperreal framework of A. Robinson, and analyze the related algorithmic issues inevitably arising in any genuine computer implementation. We show that Sergeyev's grossone system is unnecessary and vague, and that whatever consistent subsystem could be salvaged is subsumed entirely within a stronger and clearer system (IST). Lou Kauffman, who published an article on a grossone, places it squarely outside the historical panorama of ideas dealing with infinity and infinitesimals.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.