pith. sign in

arxiv: 1510.00436 · v1 · pith:KNHJUYOOnew · submitted 2015-10-01 · 💻 cs.CL

Response to Liu, Xu, and Liang (2015) and Ferrer-i-Cancho and G\'omez-Rodr\'iguez (2015) on Dependency Length Minimization

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords workdependencylanguageslengthminimizationacknowledgearguebaselines
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We address recent criticisms (Liu et al., 2015; Ferrer-i-Cancho and G\'omez-Rodr\'iguez, 2015) of our work on empirical evidence of dependency length minimization across languages (Futrell et al., 2015). First, we acknowledge error in failing to acknowledge Liu (2008)'s previous work on corpora of 20 languages with similar aims. A correction will appear in PNAS. Nevertheless, we argue that our work provides novel, strong evidence for dependency length minimization as a universal quantitative property of languages, beyond this previous work, because it provides baselines which focus on word order preferences. Second, we argue that our choices of baselines were appropriate because they control for alternative theories.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.