Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 61 references

Relative hybridization textures as local coordinates for band geometry and topology

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Relative hybridization coordinate Z=P_BA P_AA^{-1} reconstructs the occupied Bloch projector on each chart patch, and its rank-drop windings carry the first Chern number.

desk verdict A clean formalization of a known Grassmann coordinate as a band-geometry diagnostic, with honest scope limits; the multiband Chern-winding formula lacks a direct numerical test. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25673 v1 pith:KNVSOEMI submitted 2026-07-28 cond-mat.mes-hall

Caiyuan Ye , Zhong Fang , Hongming Weng , Quansheng Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords relativehybridizationcoordinateGrassmannchartoccupiedprojectorBerrycurvatureChernnumberquantummetricrank-dropdefectsBHZmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that the geometry and topology of an occupied Bloch subspace can be read from a single sector-resolved object, the relative hybridization coordinate Z, defined as the off-diagonal projector block divided by the reference-sector block. On any momentum patch where the chosen sector is valid, Z is the Grassmann graph coordinate of the occupied subspace: it reconstructs the full projector and retains the phase and matrix orientation that orbital weights and fat bands lose. The same texture yields the quantum metric and Berry curvature, and its singular rank-drop defects carry topological charge: in a balanced square chart, the winding of det Z around isolated defects sums to the first Chern number. The paper demonstrates this in the QWZ Chern insulator, where the defect inventory reproduces the Chern phase diagram, and in the lattice BHZ model, where the orbital E/H partition emerges as the robust carrier chart while the spin partition is rank deficient in the spin-conserving limit. The payoff is a microscopic attribution of band geometry: one can ask which orbital, spin, layer, or chemical sector actually carries the occupied-bundle structure.

What carries the argument

The central object is the relative hybridization coordinate Z=P_BA P_AA^{-1}, the Grassmann graph coordinate of the occupied subspace relative to a fixed reference sector A. It is built from the off-diagonal projector block and the inverse of the reference-sector block; its validity condition is invertibility of P_AA, equivalently that the occupied subspace projects isomorphically onto A. On valid patches Z reconstructs the projector via Ψ=(1_A, Z)^T and G=1_A+Z^†Z; the paper uses this to extract the quantum geometric tensor, Berry phases, and Wilson loops. Topological content comes from the failure locus S_A={k: rank P_AA<N_occ}: in a balanced square chart (dim A=dim B=N_occ), det Z winds a

What would settle it

Take a two-band Chern model and choose a reference sector A such that P_AA(k) vanishes along a one-dimensional curve rather than at isolated points; computing the det Z winding around a loop that encloses an arc of that curve should fail to give the first Chern number, as the paper itself notes. If it nevertheless matched C_1 in a generic case, the balanced isolated-point restriction would be called into question; conversely, confirming a mismatch would validate the stated limits.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the occupied Bloch subspace is locally coordinatized by Z(k)=P_BA(k)P_AA^{-1}(k) once a fixed sector decomposition H=A⊕B with dim A=N_occ is chosen. Wherever P_AA is invertible, the occupied subspace is the graph {(a, Z a)}, and Z encodes the whole projector through the graph frame. The momentum dependence of Z therefore carries the quantum geometric tensor, Berry phases, and Wilson loops; where the chart fails, rank P_AA < N_occ, the defect windings of det Z in a balanced square chart evaluate to the first Chern number. The QWZ benchmark shows that summing these chart-defect charges over the Brillouin zone reproduces the Chern phase diagram, and the B

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for the Chern formula, the chosen chart is a balanced square chart with isolated rank-drop points whose enclosing disks lie in overlap with a nonsingular complementary patch; if rank-drop loci are extended, charts are rectangular, or no nonsingular complementary patch exists on the loop, the det Z winding is not a valid Chern diagnostic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the QWZ model, the Chern number equals the net winding charge of the Z-chart defects; tuning the mass reorganizes the defect inventory, and moving defects without closing the gap leaves C unchanged.
  • In the lattice BHZ model, the orbital E|H partition is a stable matched carrier chart for the quantum-spin-Hall geometry; the spin partition is rank-deficient in the spin-conserving limit and is only diffusely repaired by Rashba coupling.
  • The trace quantum geometric tensor of the occupied bundle can be decomposed into stretch, rotation, and cross contributions in a balanced chart, allowing one to quantify how much geometry is carried by hybridization amplitude versus internal orientation twisting.
  • Wilson loops of the occupied bundle can be computed from the local Z graph frame through polar link variables, extending the chart construction to time-reversal-invariant Z_2 diagnostics.
  • The construction supplies a workflow for materials: for a given Hamiltonian and a set of candidate partitions, the chart-viability field, defect windings, and metric split identify which sector is the carrier and which parameters act as control knobs or dressing channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The rank-drop defect picture suggests a direct link to the geometry of the Grassmannian: different reference sectors A define different chart atlases, and a phase that is trivial in one chart can still harbor defects whose charges cancel; the invariant information is the patching, not any single chart's defect set. This is an editorial consequence of the paper's own caveat about rectangular charts
  • Because Z reconstructs the projector, the construction could be used as a diagnostic in interacting or disordered systems where the projector is still defined but Bloch eigenstates are not; the graph-coordinate formalism requires only the projector and a fixed sector decomposition.
  • A testable extension is to apply the defect-winding formula to a material with known orbital character, such as checking whether the rank-drop loci coincide with inversion momenta in a real topological insulator and whether their charges follow the experimentally tuned phase boundary.
  • The rotation/stretch split suggests a quantitative way to define 'dressing' in materials: a perturbation that increases the rotation-to-stretch ratio in the hot-spot region without moving the rank-drop inventory is a dressing channel, not a carrier changer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a sector-resolved coordinate Z = P_BA P_AA^{-1} for the occupied Bloch projector relative to a fixed microscopic partition H = A ⊕ B. On patches where P_AA is invertible, Z is the Grassmann graph coordinate of the occupied subspace and reconstructs the full projector; its momentum-space texture is shown to encode the quantum geometric tensor, Berry phases, and Wilson loops. Rank-drop singularities of Z are interpreted as chart obstructions, and under balanced square-chart assumptions the winding of det Z is derived to give the first Chern number. The framework is benchmarked on the QWZ Chern insulator, where the defect inventory reproduces the Chern phase diagram, and on the lattice BHZ model, where the orbital E|H partition is identified as a robust matched chart while the spin partition is rank deficient in the spin-conserving limit.

Significance. If the construction holds, it provides a local, basis-invariant diagnostic that connects global band geometry and topology to microscopic sector degrees of freedom, going beyond orbital weights by retaining phase and matrix orientation. The central derivations are clean and self-contained: Proposition 1, the trace quantum geometric tensor formula (Eq. (13)), and the determinant-winding formula (Eq. (17)) are derived explicitly in the main text and Appendix B with no fitted parameters. The QWZ defect charges reproduce the known Chern phases, and the BHZ analysis correctly exposes the different roles of the orbital and spin partitions. The paper is also careful to state the restrictions on the Chern-defect formula (balanced square chart, isolated rank-drop points, appropriate patching) and to present the carrier/dressing interpretation as a diagnostic framework rather than an unproved theorem.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (17), Appendix B] The boundary-orientation convention in Eq. (17) is easy to misread. In the punctured-Brillouin-zone Stokes argument of Appendix B, the boundary of each excised disk enters with the orientation opposite to the standard counterclockwise orientation of the removed disk. The minus sign in Eq. (17) already accounts for this, but an explicit sentence stating that ν_a is defined with the same hole-boundary convention would prevent sign errors.
  2. [Secs. IV and V, Eq. (17)] The multiband determinant-winding formula (det Z in Eq. (17)) is derived but never directly exercised numerically. The QWZ benchmark is scalar; the BHZ benchmark either has block-diagonal Z (λ_R = 0) or falls back on Wilson loops (λ_R ≠ 0). A short numerical demonstration on a two-occupied-band Chern insulator with a genuine 2×2 matrix Z would substantially strengthen the practical claim that the matrix defect inventory gives C1.
  3. [Appendix C.3, Fig. 4] The parameter-resolved planes use N_k = 12 and a 17×17 parameter grid. The bad-fraction f_A(ϵ) is a threshold-based count and may be sensitive to this resolution. A convergence check or a brief statement that the qualitative conclusions are stable at larger N_k would make the quantitative claims more robust.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central construction is a self-contained Grassmann-chart derivation, benchmarked against independent models.

full rationale

The paper derives Z = P_BA P_AA^{-1} as the Grassmann graph coordinate relative to a sector A, reconstructs the projector on the chart (Eq. 7), and derives geometry/topology formulas from this coordinate itself, not from fitted target quantities. The determinant-winding formula (Eq. 17) is derived in Appendix B from the transition function t_AB and the Berry-connection convention, with no input that presupposes the Chern number; the QWZ benchmark reproduces the known phase diagram by counting defect windings derived from Z, and the BHZ benchmark uses independent Wilson-loop flow and known QSH topology as checks, not as fitted parameters. No load-bearing self-citation appears; cited works are standard external references for Berry phases, QWZ, and BHZ models. The paper's own caveats (e.g., Eq. 17 requiring a balanced square chart, isolated rank-drop points, and a nonsingular complementary patch on the loop) restrict the scope of the claimed defect-winding diagnostic, but such stated limitations are not circularity. The central derivation is self-contained and no prediction reduces to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests only on standard linear algebra of projectors and Grassmann charts; no free parameters are fitted to enforce the results. Numerical thresholds (epsilon, epsilon_inv, grid sizes, hotspot fraction) are analysis choices for the illustrative figures and do not enter the theorem. The main domain assumptions are the matched-chart condition and the balanced-chart/isolated-defect conditions for the C1 formula. The carrier/dressing interpretation in Secs. V-VI is a proposed heuristic, not a theorem.

free parameters (6)
  • chart-viability threshold epsilon = 10^-3
    Used in f_A(epsilon) and valid-region averages; chosen by hand, not derived; affects the numerical 'bad fraction' plots but not the central theorem.
  • SVD inverse floor epsilon_inv = 10^-3
    Regularizes Z near chart defects in texture plots; not used for viability field; arbitrary but documented in Eq. (C18).
  • Brillouin-zone grid size N_k = 12
    Coarse uniform grid for Fig. 4; affects area fractions and derivative approximations.
  • parameter grid size = 17x17 over m in [-3,3], lambda_R in [0,1.2]
    Resolution of the (m, lambda_R) planes; chosen for plotting, not for fitting.
  • hotspot top fraction = 10%
    Defines the geometry-hotspot averaging mask in Eq. (C30); arbitrary but documented.
  • Wilson loop sampling N_W = 61
    Number of kx points for Wilson spectra; sufficient for convergence, arbitrary.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Hilbert space has a fixed k-independent decomposition H=A⊕B with dim A=N_occ (matched case).
    Introduced in Sec. II, Eq. (1)-(2); if dim A is not N_occ, the simple inverse formula Z=P_BA P_AA^{-1} is replaced by Plücker/Stiefel coordinates or projected subbundles (App. D).
  • standard math The occupied projector P(k) is smooth and of constant rank N_occ over the Brillouin zone.
    Needed for the Grassmannian graph construction; standard for insulating band subspaces, stated via Proposition 1.
  • domain assumption For the Chern winding formula, the chart is balanced (dim A=dim B=N_occ), defects are isolated, and disk boundaries lie in overlap with a nonsingular complementary chart.
    Assumed before Eq. (17) and in App. B; without it, det Z winding is not a valid C1 diagnostic.
  • standard math Berry connection convention A=-i V†dV and boundary orientation are fixed.
    Sign convention in Sec. III; a different convention flips the sign of the defect-winding formula.
  • ad hoc to paper Carrier/dressing interpretation is inferred from correlation between chart viability/defects and global topological or geometric reorganization.
    Operational workflow in Sec. VI is a heuristic criterion, not a proven theorem; the central mathematical results do not depend on it.
invented entities (1)
  • relative hybridization coordinate Z=P_BA P_AA^{-1} independent evidence
    purpose: Sector-resolved local coordinate/Grassmann graph coordinate of the occupied subspace.
    Although mathematically defined rather than a physical entity, it has a falsifiable handle: its rank-drop windings reproduce Chern numbers and Wilson loops in the QWZ/BHZ benchmarks, so it can be checked against projector-level computations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Relative hybridization textures as local coordinates for band geometry and topology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KNVSOEMI

@misc{pith2026260725673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Relative hybridization textures as local coordinates for band geometry and topology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KNVSOEMI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25673}
}
abstract

Global diagnostics such as Berry curvature and quantum metrics characterize the geometry and topology of an occupied Bloch subspace, leaving the microscopic sectors that carry this structure implicit. We introduce the relative hybridization coordinate $Z$ as a projector-level diagnostic connecting these global quantities to local degrees of freedom. As the Grassmann graph coordinate relative to a chosen sector, $Z$ reconstructs the local projector and retains the phase and matrix orientation absent from ordinary weight or fat-band descriptions. On valid chart patches, its momentum-space texture encodes Berry curvature, quantum metric, Berry phases, and Wilson loops, while chart obstructions appear as rank-drop defects whose balanced-chart winding of $\det Z$ gives the first Chern number. In the QWZ model this defect inventory reproduces the Chern phase diagram. In the lattice BHZ model, matrix $Z$ diagnoses the orbital $E|H$ partition as a robust matched chart for the QSH geometry, while the spin partition remains essential to the block and $\mathbb Z_2$ interpretation and shows rank deficiency as a matched chart in the spin-conserving limit. The relative hybridization coordinate thus provides a sector-resolved framework for relating band geometry and topology to microscopic structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25673 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Physical motivation for the relative hybridization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. QWZ benchmark in the relative hybridization chart. Panels (a)-(d) show the phase texture of the scalar coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Representative BHZ cuts and sector viability. Panels (a) and (b) show the Wilson phases for the spin-conserving model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Parameter-resolved BHZ diagnosis in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    when ˆdz = 1

    QWZ scalar chart For the QWZ Hamiltonian of Eq.(20), write H = d·σ with d= (sink x +δ,−sink y, m+ coskx + cosk y).(C1) The lower-band projector is P− = 1 2 (⊮− ˆd·σ), ˆd=d/|d|.(C2) Choosing the first orbital asA, one obtains PAA = 1− ˆdz 2 , P BA =− ˆdx + i ˆdy 2 ,(C3) and therefore Z=− ˆdx + i ˆdy 1− ˆdz =− sink x +δ−i sink y |d| −dz .(C4) The A chart fa...

  2. [2]

    For the orbital partition Aorb = span{|E,↑⟩,|E,↓⟩}, Borb = span{|H,↑⟩,|H,↓⟩}, (C9) the occupied projector has vanishing spin off-diagonal blocks

    BHZ matrix chart For the BHZ Hamiltonian of Eq.(24), the chosen basis is (|E,↑⟩,|E,↓⟩,|H,↑⟩,|H,↓⟩).(C8) At λR = 0, spin is conserved and the Hamiltonian sep- arates into two time-reversed two-band blocks. For the orbital partition Aorb = span{|E,↑⟩,|E,↓⟩}, Borb = span{|H,↑⟩,|H,↓⟩}, (C9) the occupied projector has vanishing spin off-diagonal blocks. Hence ...

  3. [3]

    Numerical details for the BHZ scans This subsection specifies the numerical choices used in Fig. 4. The parameter plane uses m∈[−3,3], λ R ∈[0,1.2], h z = 0,(C13) with17equally spaced samples along each parameter direction. For every point in this(m, λR)grid, Brillouin- zone fields are evaluated on the periodic endpoint-free mesh kx, ky ∈ −π+ 2πn Nk Nk−1 ...

  4. [4]

    Compute the occupied projectorP (k)and a con- ventional global diagnostic, such as a gap, Chern number, Wilson spectrum, or trace quantum geo- metric tensor

  5. [5]

    Choose fixed candidate partitionsAα ⊕B α from orbital, sublattice, spin, layer, atomic, orchemical- fragment labels

  6. [6]

    For each partition, computesα(k) = σmin(PAαAα ) and identify healthy regions, localized rank-drop defects, and broadly ill-conditioned charts

  7. [7]

    On the valid region, computeZα(k)and, when useful, its polar split into amplitude and orienta- tion components

  8. [8]

    As a control parameter is varied, compare viability minima, defect windings, Wilson-flow changes, and geometric hot spots

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    In a Wannier-based workflow, the relevant low-energy bands are first represented by a tight-binding Hamilto- nian

    Interpret a sector as a carrier chart only when its well-conditioned region and near-singular struc- ture correlate with the geometric or topological reorganization; interpret a sector as dressing when it changes the texture while another structure or- ganizes the phase bounda...

  2. [10]

    M. V. Berry, Proceedings of the Royal Society A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  3. [11]

    Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure The- 15 ory(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure The- 15 ory(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Provost and G

    J. Provost and G. Vallee, Communications in Mathemati- cal Physics76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  5. [13]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  6. [14]

    Kohmoto, Annals of Physics160, 343 (1985)

    M. Kohmoto, Annals of Physics160, 343 (1985)

    1985

  7. [15]

    M. V. Berry, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  8. [16]

    Simon, Phys

    B. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2167 (1983)

    1983

  9. [17]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    2015

  10. [18]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Brouder, G

    C. Brouder, G. Panati, M. Calandra, C. Mourougane, and N. Marzari, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 046402 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    Panati, Annales Henri Poincaré8, 995 (2007)

    G. Panati, Annales Henri Poincaré8, 995 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B85, 115415 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Resta and S

    R. Resta and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 370 (1999)

    1999

  18. [26]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  19. [27]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  20. [28]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Z. Du, C. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Nature communications12, 5038 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Science advances2, e1501524 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. X10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Q. Ma, A. G. Grushin, and K. S. Burch, Nature materials 20, 1601 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. Törmä, Nature communications6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. Törmä, Phys. Rev. B95, 024515 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    S. R. Park, C. H. Kim, J. Yu, J. H. Han, and C. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 156803 (2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    Z. Xie, S. He, C. Chen, Y. Feng, H. Yi, A. Liang, L. Zhao, D. Mou, J. He, Y. Peng,et al., Nature communications 5, 3382 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. Liu, J.-W. Luo, A. J. Freeman, and A. Zunger, Nature Physics10, 387 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    J. H. Ryoo and C.-H. Park, NPG Asia Materials9, e382 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Han, H.-W

    S. Han, H.-W. Lee, and K.-W. Kim, Current Applied Physics50, 13 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Lesne, Y

    E. Lesne, Y. G. Saˇ glam, R. Battilomo, M. T. Mercaldo, T. C. van Thiel, U. Filippozzi, C. Noce, M. Cuoco, G. A. Steele, C. Ortix,et al., Nature Materials22, 576 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Nature communications8, 50 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Elcoro, B

    L. Elcoro, B. J. Wieder, Z. Song, Y. Xu, B. Bradlyn, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature communications12, 5965 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Z. Wang, A. Alexandradinata, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature532, 189 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Vergniory, L

    M. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and Z. Wang, Nature566, 480 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    J. F. Khoury and L. M. Schoop, Trends in Chemistry3, 700 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Q. Wu, A. A. Soluyanov, and T. Bzdušek, Science365, 1273 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    C. D. Brown, S.-W. Chang, M. N. Schwarz, T.-H. Leung, V. Kozii, A. Avdoshkin, J. E. Moore, and D. Stamper- Kurn, Science377, 1319 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Simon and C

    F. Simon and C. Morice, Phys. Rev. B112, 195117 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Local basis for interacting topological bands (2025), arXiv:2503.24344 [cond-mat.str- el]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    C.-g. Oh, D. Cho, S. Y. Park, and J.-W. Rhim, Commu- nications Physics5, 320 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    M. A. Oancea, T. B. Mieling, and G. Palumbo, Quantum 10, 1965 (2026)

    1965

  47. [55]

    Qi, Y.-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B74, 085308 (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, science 314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 195312 (2006)

    2006

  50. [58]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. B76, 045302 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    J. E. Moore and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. B75, 121306(R) (2007)

    2007

  52. [60]

    Roy, Phys

    R. Roy, Phys. Rev. B79, 195321 (2009)

    2009

  53. [61]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Computer Physics Communications224, 405 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.