REVIEW 2 cited by
Some Languages are More Equal than Others: Probing Deeper into the Linguistic Disparity in the NLP World
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Linguistic disparity in the NLP world is a problem that has been widely acknowledged recently. However, different facets of this problem, or the reasons behind this disparity are seldom discussed within the NLP community. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the disparity that exists within the languages of the world. We show that simply categorising languages considering data availability may not be always correct. Using an existing language categorisation based on speaker population and vitality, we analyse the distribution of language data resources, amount of NLP/CL research, inclusion in multilingual web-based platforms and the inclusion in pre-trained multilingual models. We show that many languages do not get covered in these resources or platforms, and even within the languages belonging to the same language group, there is wide disparity. We analyse the impact of family, geographical location, GDP and the speaker population of languages and provide possible reasons for this disparity, along with some suggestions to overcome the same.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Zero-shot Performance of Generative AI in Brazilian Portuguese Medical Exam
On an authentic Brazilian Portuguese residency exam, top general-purpose AI models scored near the human average on text-only questions but dropped when questions included medical images.
-
"You Cannot Sound Like GPT": Signs of language discrimination and resistance in computer science publishing
Reviewers at ICLR critique writing clarity more for authors from non-English-dominant countries, and after ChatGPT they use AI style as a new cue to infer language background, linking it to perceived science quality.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.