Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bits of Grass: Does GPT already know how to write like Whitman?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.11064 v1 pith:KO7NLUOS submitted 2023-05-10 cs.CL

Piotr Sawicki , Marek Grzes , Fabricio Goes , Dan Brown , Max Peeperkorn , Aisha Khatun This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords modelsstyleauthorsgenerategpt-3maximumpoetryspecific
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study examines the ability of GPT-3.5, GPT-3.5-turbo (ChatGPT) and GPT-4 models to generate poems in the style of specific authors using zero-shot and many-shot prompts (which use the maximum context length of 8192 tokens). We assess the performance of models that are not fine-tuned for generating poetry in the style of specific authors, via automated evaluation. Our findings indicate that without fine-tuning, even when provided with the maximum number of 17 poem examples (8192 tokens) in the prompt, these models do not generate poetry in the desired style.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BIPro: Zero-shot Chinese Poem Generation via Block Inverse Prompting Constrained Generation Framework

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A block-inverse-prompting loop with revise and rewrite lets GLM-10B-Chinese produce traditional-form poems that human raters scored above GPT-4 and domain-specific systems.

Pith tools