pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22135 · v1 · pith:KOXVVLPKnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Gyromagnetic Quantum Friction in Rayleigh Vorticity Baths

Mamoru Matsuo , Ryotaro Sano , Ai Yamakage , Hiroshi Funaki , Tatsuhiko N. Ikeda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords spin relaxationRayleigh wavesquantum frictionsurface acoustic wavesgyromagnetic couplingzero-temperature relaxationvorticity bathacoustic friction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Near-surface spins relax at zero temperature through gyromagnetic coupling to Rayleigh-wave vorticity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies an intrinsic relaxation channel for spins located near solid surfaces that functions even at absolute zero. This channel stems from the gyromagnetic interaction between the spins and the vorticity generated by Rayleigh waves traveling along the surface. Unlike conventional Raman relaxation, which depends on thermal phonons, this process is fixed by the properties of the Rayleigh vorticity itself rather than material-specific details like g-factor modulation. The vorticity bath behaves as super-Ohmic and decays evanescently with depth, which directly determines how the relaxation rate scales with magnetic field strength and spin depth. If the claim holds, shallow spin sensors and hybrid surface-acoustic-wave devices become practical detectors for acoustic quantum friction in solids.

Core claim

We identify an intrinsic zero-temperature relaxation channel for near-surface spins gyromagnetically coupled to Rayleigh-wave vorticity. This surface-mode contribution requires no thermal phonons, unlike Raman relaxation, and is fixed by Rayleigh vorticity rather than material-specific g-factor modulation. The Rayleigh-vorticity bath is super-Ohmic and evanescent with depth, producing field and depth scalings of spin relaxation. These scalings establish shallow spin sensors and hybrid surface-acoustic-wave spin interfaces as detectors of Rayleigh-wave acoustic quantum friction in solids.

What carries the argument

The Rayleigh-vorticity bath: the super-Ohmic, depth-evanescent vorticity field of Rayleigh surface waves that couples gyromagnetically to near-surface spins and fixes their zero-temperature relaxation rates.

Load-bearing premise

The Rayleigh-vorticity bath is super-Ohmic and evanescent with depth, which directly produces the claimed field and depth scalings of spin relaxation.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of spin relaxation rates that shows no dependence on magnetic field strength or spin depth, or that requires thermal phonons to match observations even at zero temperature, would falsify the proposed channel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22135 by Ai Yamakage, Hiroshi Funaki, Mamoru Matsuo, Ryotaro Sano, Tatsuhiko N. Ikeda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A near-surface spin-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We identify an intrinsic zero-temperature relaxation channel for near-surface spins gyromagnetically coupled to Rayleigh-wave vorticity. This surface-mode contribution requires no thermal phonons, unlike Raman relaxation, and is fixed by Rayleigh vorticity rather than material-specific $g$-factor modulation. The Rayleigh-vorticity bath is super-Ohmic and evanescent with depth, producing field and depth scalings of spin relaxation. These scalings establish shallow spin sensors and hybrid surface-acoustic-wave spin interfaces as detectors of Rayleigh-wave acoustic quantum friction in solids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper identifies an intrinsic zero-temperature relaxation channel for near-surface spins gyromagnetically coupled to Rayleigh-wave vorticity. This surface-mode contribution requires no thermal phonons (unlike Raman processes) and is fixed by Rayleigh vorticity rather than material-specific g-factor modulation. The Rayleigh-vorticity bath is asserted to be super-Ohmic and evanescent with depth, directly producing field (B) and depth (z) scalings of the spin relaxation rate. These scalings are used to position shallow spin sensors and hybrid SAW-spin interfaces as detectors of Rayleigh-wave acoustic quantum friction.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result would establish a parameter-free, phonon-independent relaxation channel whose scalings are fixed by surface-wave kinematics. This could be relevant for interpreting decoherence in near-surface spin qubits and for designing acoustic interfaces that probe quantum friction in solids. The manuscript supplies no machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, but the claim is falsifiable via depth- and field-dependent relaxation measurements.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2 and abstract] The abstract and §2 claim that the Rayleigh-vorticity bath is super-Ohmic (s>1) and directly yields the stated B and z scalings. However, for linear dispersion ω=v_R k the mode density contributes a factor ∝ω while the vorticity coupling at depth d carries an evanescent factor exp(−2α k d)=exp(−c ω d). The resulting spectral density therefore contains an exponential cutoff rather than a pure power law; the claimed scalings require an explicit low-frequency or shallow-depth approximation that is not justified in the provided derivation.
  2. [§4, Eq. (12)] §4, Eq. (12): the relaxation rate Γ is written as proportional to B^α z^β with specific exponents. These exponents are not recovered from the full spectral density containing the exponential cutoff; the mapping from J(ω) to the quoted power laws is therefore load-bearing and needs to be shown explicitly rather than asserted.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] Notation for the vorticity coupling strength is introduced without a clear definition of its units or relation to the gyromagnetic ratio; a short appendix deriving the prefactor would improve clarity.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption does not state the numerical values of depth d and field B used for the plotted curves; adding these values would allow direct comparison with the analytic scalings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We respond to each major comment in detail below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2 and abstract] The abstract and §2 claim that the Rayleigh-vorticity bath is super-Ohmic (s>1) and directly yields the stated B and z scalings. However, for linear dispersion ω=v_R k the mode density contributes a factor ∝ω while the vorticity coupling at depth d carries an evanescent factor exp(−2α k d)=exp(−c ω d). The resulting spectral density therefore contains an exponential cutoff rather than a pure power law; the claimed scalings require an explicit low-frequency or shallow-depth approximation that is not justified in the provided derivation.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's careful analysis of the spectral density. The full expression for the Rayleigh-vorticity spectral density does include the evanescent factor exp(−c ω d). In the regime of interest for near-surface spins, corresponding to shallow depths where the product ω d is small, this exponential can be approximated as unity to leading order, yielding an effective super-Ohmic spectral density J(ω) ∝ ω^s with s>1 determined by the vorticity coupling. We will add an explicit statement of this approximation and the validity condition (kd ≪ 1) to §2. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4, Eq. (12)] §4, Eq. (12): the relaxation rate Γ is written as proportional to B^α z^β with specific exponents. These exponents are not recovered from the full spectral density containing the exponential cutoff; the mapping from J(ω) to the quoted power laws is therefore load-bearing and needs to be shown explicitly rather than asserted.

    Authors: We agree that the connection between the approximated spectral density and the power-law scalings in Eq. (12) requires explicit demonstration. In the revised manuscript, we will expand §4 to include the intermediate steps showing how Γ(B, z) follows the quoted exponents from J(ω) under the shallow-depth approximation. This will make the derivation self-contained. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation derives spectral properties from Rayleigh-wave dispersion and evanescence without reducing to self-definition or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper states that the Rayleigh-vorticity bath is super-Ohmic and evanescent with depth and thereby produces specific field and depth scalings for spin relaxation. This is presented as a first-principles consequence of the linear dispersion ω = v_R k together with the depth-dependent vorticity coupling, rather than an input assumption or a parameter fit that is then relabeled as a prediction. No self-citation is invoked as the sole justification for a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the central claim does not reduce by construction to a redefinition of the input bath. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the known properties of Rayleigh waves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The central claim rests on the domain assumption that gyromagnetic coupling to Rayleigh vorticity forms an independent relaxation channel whose properties are fixed by the wave bath rather than material details.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Rayleigh-vorticity bath is super-Ohmic and evanescent with depth.
    Invoked in the abstract to produce field and depth scalings of spin relaxation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5623 in / 1256 out tokens · 67078 ms · 2026-05-22T04:55:35.032968+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Wolfowicz, F

    G. Wolfowicz, F. J. Heremans, C. P. Anderson, S. Kanai, H. Seo, A. Gali, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Nature Reviews Materials6, 906 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Jelezko and J

    F. Jelezko and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Status Solidi A203, 3207 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    B. A. Myers, A. Ariyaratne, and A. C. B. Jayich, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 027602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Romach, C

    Y. Romach, C. M¨ uller, T. Unden, L. J. Rogers, T. Isoda, K. M. Itoh, M. Markham, A. Stacey, J. Meijer, S. Pezza- gna, B. Naydenov, L. P. McGuinness, N. Bar-Gill, and F. Jelezko, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 017601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    A. M. Tyryshkin, S. Tojo, J. J. L. Morton, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, T. Schenkel, M. L. W. Thewalt, K. M. Itoh, and S. A. Lyon, Nat. Mater.11, 143 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    L. M. K. Vandersypen, H. Bluhm, J. S. Clarke, A. S. Dzurak, R. Ishihara, A. Morello, D. J. Reilly, L. R. Schreiber, and M. Veldhorst, npj Quantum Information 3, 34 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    A. V. Khaetskii and Y. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B64, 125316 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    Vaidya, X

    S. Vaidya, X. Gao, S. Dikshit, I. Aharonovich, and T. Li, Advances in Physics: X8, 2206049 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    X. Nie, X. Wu, Y. Wang, S. Ban, Z. Lei, J. Yi, Y. Liu, and Y. Liu, Nanoscale Horizons8, 158 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    C. H. W. Barnes, J. M. Shilton, and A. M. Robinson, Phys. Rev. B62, 8410 (2000)

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    M. V. Gustafsson, P. V. Santos, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Nature Physics8, 338 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ek- str¨ om, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Science346, 207 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    M. J. A. Schuetz, E. M. Kessler, G. Giedke, L. M. K. Vandersypen, M. D. Lukin, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. X5, 031031 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Riedinger, A

    R. Riedinger, A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi´ c, C. L¨ oschnauer, M. Aspelmeyer, S. Hong, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Nature556, 473 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Delsing, A

    P. Delsing, A. N. Cleland, M. J. A. Schuetz, J. Kn¨ orzer, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, K. Srinivasan, M. Wu, K. C. Balram, C. B¨ auerle, T. Meunier, C. J. B. Ford, P. V. Santos, E. Cerda-M´ endez, H. Wang, H. J. Krenner, E. D. S. Nysten, M. Weiß, G. R. Nash, L. Theve- nard, C. Gourdon, P. Rovillain, M. Marangolo, J.- Y. Duquesne, G. Fischerauer, W. Ruile, A. ...

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Qiao, ´E

    H. Qiao, ´E. Dumur, G. Andersson, H. Yan, M.-H. Chou, J. Grebel, C. R. Conner, Y. J. Joshi, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey, X. Wu, and A. N. Cleland, Science380, 1030 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    D. A. Golter, T. Oo, M. Amezcua, K. A. Stewart, and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 143602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    D. A. Golter, T. Oo, M. Amezcua, I. Lekavicius, K. A. Stewart, and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. X6, 041060 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    S. J. Whiteley, G. Wolfowicz, C. P. Anderson, A. Bourassa, H. Ma, M. Ye, G. Koolstra, K. J. Satzinger, M. V. Holt, F. J. Heremans, A. N. Cleland, D. I. Schuster, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Nature Physics15, 490 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    M. Xu, K. Yamamoto, J. Puebla, K. Baumgaertl, B. Rana, K. Miura, H. Takahashi, D. Grundler, S. Maekawa, and Y. Otani, Science Advances6, eabb1724 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Maity, L

    S. Maity, L. Shao, S. Bogdanovi´ c, S. Meesala, Y.-I. Sohn, N. Sinclair, B. Pingault, M. Chalupnik, C. Chia, L. Zheng, K. Lai, and M. Lonˇ car, Nature Communica- tions11, 193 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Hwang, J

    Y. Hwang, J. Puebla, K. Kondou, C. Gonzalez- Ballestero, H. Isshiki, C. S. Mu˜ noz, L. Liao, F. Chen, W. Luo, S. Maekawa, and Y. Otani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056704 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Matsumoto, I

    H. Matsumoto, I. Yasuda, M. Asano, Y. To- daka, T. Kawada, M. Kawaguchi, D. Hatanaka, and M. Hayashi, Nano Letters24, 5683 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    L. Liao, J. Puebla, K. Yamamoto, J. Kim, S. Maekawa, Y. Hwang, Y. Ba, and Y. Otani, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 176701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    F. Chen, L. Liao, J. Chen, Q. Fu, Y. Zhang, W. Luo, and Y. Otani, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 246702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    W. J. M. Naber, T. Fujisawa, H. W. Liu, and W. G. van der Wiel, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 136807 (2006)

    work page 2006

  28. [28]

    R. P. G. McNeil, M. Kataoka, C. J. B. Ford, C. H. W. Barnes, D. Anderson, G. A. C. Jones, I. Farrer, and D. A. Ritchie, Nature477, 439 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Hermelin, S

    S. Hermelin, S. Takada, M. Yamamoto, S. Tarucha, A. D. Wieck, L. Saminadayar, C. B¨ auerle, and T. Meu- nier, Nature477, 435 (2011). 6

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Yamamoto, S

    M. Yamamoto, S. Takada, C. B¨ auerle, K. Watanabe, A. D. Wieck, and S. Tarucha, Nature Nanotechnology 7, 247 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Takada, H

    S. Takada, H. Edlbauer, H. V. Lepage, J. Wang, P.-A. Mortemousque, G. Georgiou, C. H. W. Barnes, C. J. B. Ford, M. Yuan, P. V. Santos, X. Waintal, A. Lud- wig, A. D. Wieck, M. Urdampilleta, T. Meunier, and C. B¨ auerle, Nature Communications10, 4557 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    J. C. H. Chen, Y. Sato, R. Kosaka, M. Hashisaka, K. Muraki, and T. Fujisawa, Scientific Reports5, 15176 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Bertrand, S

    B. Bertrand, S. Hermelin, S. Takada, M. Yamamoto, S. Tarucha, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, C. B¨ auerle, and T. Meunier, Nature Nanotechnology11, 672 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    R. Ito, S. Takada, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, S. Tarucha, and M. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 070501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Edlbauer, J

    H. Edlbauer, J. Wang, S. Ota, A. Richard, B. Jadot, P.-A. Mortemousque, Y. Okazaki, S. Nakamura, T. Kodera, N.-H. Kaneko, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, M. Urdampilleta, T. Meunier, C. B¨ auerle, and S. Takada, Applied Physics Letters119, 114004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Jadot, P.-A

    B. Jadot, P.-A. Mortemousque, E. Chanrion, V. Thiney, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, M. Urdampilleta, C. B¨ auerle, and T. Meunier, Nature Nanotechnology16, 570 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    J. Wang, S. Ota, H. Edlbauer, B. Jadot, P.-A. Morte- mousque, A. Richard, Y. Okazaki, S. Nakamura, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, M. Urdampilleta, T. Meunier, T. Kodera, N.-H. Kaneko, S. Takada, and C. B¨ auerle, Phys. Rev. X12, 031035 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    J. Wang, H. Edlbauer, A. Richard, S. Ota, W. Park, J. Shim, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, H.-S. Sim, M. Ur- dampilleta, T. Meunier, T. Kodera, N.-H. Kaneko, H. Sellier, X. Waintal, S. Takada, and C. B¨ auerle, Na- ture Nanotechnology18, 721 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Shaju, E

    J. Shaju, E. Pavlovska, R. Suba, J. Wang, S. Oua- cel, T. Vasselon, M. Aluffi, L. Mazzella, C. Geffroy, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, M. Urdampilleta, C. B¨ auerle, V. Kashcheyevs, and H. Sellier, Nature642, 928 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    J. Wang, H. Edlbauer, B. Jadot, T. Meunier, S. Takada, C. B¨ auerle, and H. Sellier, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics58, 023002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Manenti, A

    R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, Na- ture Communications8, 975 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Science 358, 199 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, G. A. Peairs, A. Bienfait, M.-H. Chou, A. Y. Cleland, C. R. Conner, ´E. Dumur, J. Grebel, I. Gutierrez, B. H. November, R. G. Povey, S. J. Whiteley, D. D. Awschalom, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, Nature563, 661 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Bienfait, K

    A. Bienfait, K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, ´E’. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, and A. N. Cleland, Science364, 368 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Bienfait, Y

    A. Bienfait, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, ´E. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, K. J. Satzinger, and A. N. Cleland, Phys. Rev. X10, 021055 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    J. M. Kitzman, J. R. Lane, C. Undershute, P. M. Har- rington, N. R. Beysengulov, C. A. Mikolas, K. W. Murch, and J. Pollanen, Nature Communications14, 3910 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Rugar, R

    D. Rugar, R. Budakian, H. J. Mamin, and B. W. Chui, Nature430, 329 (2004)

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    J. E. Losby, F. F. Sani, D. T. Grandmont, Z. Diao, M. Belov, J. A. J. Burgess, S. R. Compton, W. K. Hiebert, D. Vick, K. Mohammad, E. Salimi, G. E. Bridges, D. J. Thomson, and M. R. Freeman, Science 350, 798 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    J. A. J. Burgess, A. E. Fraser, F. F. Sani, D. Vick, B. D. Hauer, J. P. Davis, and M. R. Freeman, Science 339, 1051 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    P. H. Kim, B. D. Hauer, C. Doolin, F. Souris, and J. P. Davis, Nature Communications7, 13165 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Baumann, W

    S. Baumann, W. Paul, T. Choi, C. P. Lutz, A. Ardavan, and A. J. Heinrich, Science350, 417 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Oestreich, M

    M. Oestreich, M. R¨ omer, R. J. Haug, and D. H¨ agele, Physical Review Letters95, 216603 (2005)

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Atat¨ ure, J

    M. Atat¨ ure, J. Dreiser, A. Badolato, and A. Imamoglu, Nature Physics3, 101 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Gund´ ın, P

    M. Gund´ ın, P. Hilaire, C. Millet, E. Mehdi, C. Ant´ on, A. Harouri, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, I. Sagnes, N. Somaschi, O. Krebs, P. Senellart, and L. Lanco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 036902 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    T. M. Wallis, J. Moreland, and P. Kabos, Appl. Phys. Lett.89, 122502 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    Zolfagharkhani, A

    G. Zolfagharkhani, A. Gaidarzhy, P. Degiovanni, S. Ket- temann, P. Fulde, and P. Mohanty, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 720 (2008)

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    Harii, Y.-J

    K. Harii, Y.-J. Seo, Y. Tsutsumi, H. Chudo, K. Oy- anagi, M. Matsuo, Y. Shiomi, T. Ono, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Nat. Commun.10, 2616 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    K. Mori, M. G. Dunsmore, J. E. Losby, D. M. Jenson, M. Belov, and M. R. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B102, 054415 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    S. J. Barnett, Phys. Rev.6, 239 (1915)

    work page 1915

  60. [60]

    Einstein and W

    A. Einstein and W. J. de Haas, Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 17, 152 (1915)

    work page 1915

  61. [61]

    S. J. Barnett, Rev. Mod. Phys.7, 129 (1935)

    work page 1935

  62. [62]

    Scott, Reviews of Modern Physics34, 102 (1962)

    G. Scott, Reviews of Modern Physics34, 102 (1962)

    work page 1962

  63. [63]

    Matsuo, J

    M. Matsuo, J. Ieda, K. Harii, E. Saitoh, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B87, 180402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Kobayashi, T

    D. Kobayashi, T. Yoshikawa, M. Matsuo, R. Iguchi, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, and Y. Nozaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 077202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    Kurimune, M

    Y. Kurimune, M. Matsuo, S. Maekawa, and Y. Nozaki, Phys. Rev. B102, 174413 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Tateno, G

    S. Tateno, G. Okano, M. Matsuo, and Y. Nozaki, Phys. Rev. B102, 104406 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Kurimune, M

    Y. Kurimune, M. Matsuo, and Y. Nozaki, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 217205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Tateno, Y

    S. Tateno, Y. Kurimune, M. Matsuo, K. Yamanoi, and Y. Nozaki, Phys. Rev. B104, L020404 (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    Takahashi, M

    R. Takahashi, M. Matsuo, M. Ono, K. Harii, H. Chudo, S. Okayasu, J. Ieda, S. Takahashi, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Nature Phys12, 52 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Takahashi, H

    R. Takahashi, H. Chudo, M. Matsuo, K. Harii, Y. Ohnuma, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Nat Commun 11, 3009 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Tabaei Kazerooni, A

    H. Tabaei Kazerooni, A. Thieme, J. Schumacher, and C. Cierpka, Phys. Rev. Applied14, 014002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Tabaei Kazerooni, G

    H. Tabaei Kazerooni, G. Zinchenko, J. Schumacher, and C. Cierpka, Phys. Rev. Fluids6, 043703 (2021). 7

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Tokoro and R

    M. Tokoro and R. Takahashi, Physical Review Applied 17, L061003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Chudo, M

    H. Chudo, M. Ono, K. Harii, M. Matsuo, J. Ieda, R. Haruki, S. Okayasu, S. Maekawa, H. Yasuoka, and E. Saitoh, Appl. Phys. Express7, 063004 (2014)

    work page 2014

  75. [75]

    Chudo, K

    H. Chudo, K. Harii, M. Matsuo, J. Ieda, M. Ono, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.84, 043601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  76. [76]

    Harii, H

    K. Harii, H. Chudo, M. Ono, M. Matsuo, J. Ieda, S. Okayasu, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.54, 050302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  77. [77]

    Chudo, M

    H. Chudo, M. Matsuo, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Phys. Rev. B103, 174308 (2021)

    work page 2021

  78. [78]

    Chudo, N

    H. Chudo, N. Yokoi, M. Matsuo, K. Harii, J. Suzuki, M. Imai, M. Sato, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Physical Review Letters134, 130603 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    M. Ono, H. Chudo, K. Harii, S. Okayasu, M. Matsuo, J. Ieda, R. Takahashi, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Phys. Rev. B92, 174424 (2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    Ogata, H

    Y. Ogata, H. Chudo, M. Ono, K. Harii, M. Matsuo, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Appl. Phys. Lett.110, 072409 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.