Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

WorldQA: Multimodal World Knowledge in Videos through Long-Chain Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.03272 v1 pith:KQB7S4RD submitted 2024-05-06 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords modelsmultimodalworldknowledgereasoningworldqadatasetworldretriever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal information, together with our knowledge, help us to understand the complex and dynamic world. Large language models (LLM) and large multimodal models (LMM), however, still struggle to emulate this capability. In this paper, we present WorldQA, a video understanding dataset designed to push the boundaries of multimodal world models with three appealing properties: (1) Multimodal Inputs: The dataset comprises 1007 question-answer pairs and 303 videos, necessitating the analysis of both auditory and visual data for successful interpretation. (2) World Knowledge: We identify five essential types of world knowledge for question formulation. This approach challenges models to extend their capabilities beyond mere perception. (3) Long-Chain Reasoning: Our dataset introduces an average reasoning step of 4.45, notably surpassing other videoQA datasets. Furthermore, we introduce WorldRetriever, an agent designed to synthesize expert knowledge into a coherent reasoning chain, thereby facilitating accurate responses to WorldQA queries. Extensive evaluations of 13 prominent LLMs and LMMs reveal that WorldRetriever, although being the most effective model, achieved only 70% of humanlevel performance in multiple-choice questions. This finding highlights the necessity for further advancement in the reasoning and comprehension abilities of models. Our experiments also yield several key insights. For instance, while humans tend to perform better with increased frames, current LMMs, including WorldRetriever, show diminished performance under similar conditions. We hope that WorldQA,our methodology, and these insights could contribute to the future development of multimodal world models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AVI-Bench: Toward Human-like Audio-Visual Intelligence of Omni-MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AVI-Bench is a cognitively inspired benchmark that evaluates Omni-MLLMs on joint audio-visual tasks and reveals substantial limitations in current models.

  2. Video-MMMU: Evaluating Knowledge Acquisition from Multi-Discipline Professional Videos

    cs.CV 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Video-MMMU benchmark shows large multimodal models exhibit steep performance drops on higher cognitive tasks when learning from professional videos and lag significantly behind humans in knowledge acquisition.

  3. HumanPCR: Probing MLLM Capabilities in Diverse Human-Centric Scenes

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical benchmark for multimodal models on human-centric visual understanding finds frontier models average under 60% and miss question-uncued visual evidence, with test-time scaling helping only marginally.

  4. Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper provides the first comprehensive survey of multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning, including foundational concepts, a taxonomy of methodologies, application analyses, challenges, and future directions.

Pith tools