Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 251 references

Reducing Label Dependency for Underwater Scene Understanding: A Survey of Datasets, Techniques and Applications

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The label bottleneck, not the model zoo, is what limits automated underwater monitoring.

desk verdict A genuinely useful survey of weakly supervised underwater scene understanding, but its data-scarcity claim is contradicted by its own appendix and needs a qualification before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11287 v1 pith:KR3VLOYC submitted 2024-11-18 cs.CV

Scarlett Raine , Frederic Maire , Niko Suenderhauf , Tobias Fischer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords underwatersceneunderstandingweaklysupervisedlearningself-supervisedsemanticsegmentationcoralreefmonitoringseagrasspointlabelpropagationdatasetsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that the bottleneck for automated analysis of underwater imagery is not model architecture but labelled data: the scenes are complex, species boundaries are fuzzy, and only marine ecologists can label pixels reliably, which crowdsourcing cannot fix. Its central claim is that weakly supervised and self-supervised deep learning can reduce this dependency, using coarser labels such as image-level classes, sparse points, or self-supervised features in place of dense expert masks. The survey positions these methods inside a taxonomy that joins underwater monitoring, computer vision, and deep learning, and reviews the available datasets to show where the gaps are. If the claim is right, marine surveys by robots and vehicles could be scaled to monitor reef health and blue carbon stocks without an unsustainable labelling burden.

What carries the argument

The organising device is a taxonomy that places weakly supervised underwater image analysis at the intersection of underwater environmental monitoring, computer vision, and deep learning, with 'reducing label dependency' as the explicit goal. The main algorithmic mechanisms reviewed are point label propagation via superpixels (turning sparse Coral Point Count labels into pseudo ground truth masks), image-level labels as supervision for coarse segmentation, self-supervised and vision-language foundation models used as feature extractors or supervisory signals, and human-in-the-loop selection of the most informative sparse points. These mechanisms are evaluated against a dataset survey that classifies annotations into image-level, patch-level, sparse point, and dense pixel-wise labels.

What would settle it

Compile a complete registry of all underwater datasets released before November 2024 and check whether any contains multi-species seagrass labels beyond DeepSeagrass or dense multi-species coral masks beyond UCSD Mosaics; if such a dataset exists, the survey's central data-gap claim is overstated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is that the field of weakly supervised underwater scene understanding is small and data-limited: only DeepSeagrass provides multi-species seagrass labels (66,946 patches, four morphotypes), and only UCSD Mosaics provides fine-grained multi-species coral ground truth masks. The survey argues that existing weakly supervised methods—point label propagation, image-level label training, self-supervised foundation models, and human-in-the-loop sparse annotation—can productively reduce expert label dependency, and that the main barrier to progress is the absence of temporal, realistic, densely annotated multi-species image sequences rather than a lack of algorithmic ideas. It further contends that mainstream weakly supervised techniques designed for images with clear object boundaries do not transfer directly to underwater imagery, where foreground and background blur together.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's conclusions rest on the assumption that its search of the literature and datasets is complete and that the qualitative failures of Segment Anything and CoralSCOP shown on a few underwater images are representative of those models' general behaviour.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Image-level labels can replace patch-level labels for training coarse multi-species seagrass segmentation, while still yielding a segmentation output at inference.
  • Point label propagation can turn the abundant Coral Point Count photo-quadrat data into pseudo ground truth for training coral segmentation models.
  • Foundation models trained on general imagery do not segment underwater scenes meaningfully without adaptation or a weak supervision signal, so domain-specific modelling remains necessary.
  • Human-in-the-loop selection of sparse points (5–25 per image) can reduce annotation effort for coral segmentation compared to the usual 100–300 points.
  • Progress in this area depends on new temporal, densely annotated multi-species datasets rather than on further algorithmic tweaks alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the survey's data-gap map is correct, the single highest-value release for the field would be a temporal, multi-species underwater video dataset with dense pixel-wise masks and GPS, repeated along the same transects over seasons; no current dataset provides this.
  • The extremely sparse label results for coral suggest an analogous human-in-the-loop protocol for seagrass—choosing the most informative 5–25 image-level or point labels—could make multi-species seagrass segmentation practical, since only patch-level labels exist today.
  • Mainstream weak supervision assumes central points and hard object boundaries; a direct transfer from remote-sensing or medical point-label methods to underwater imagery should be tested quantitatively on UCSD Mosaics, since the survey only demonstrates mismatch qualitatively.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys weakly supervised and self-supervised deep learning for underwater scene understanding, with a focus on two ecological tasks: multi-species seagrass meadow mapping and multi-species coral reef analysis. It reviews coastal ecosystem background, the visual challenges of underwater imagery, computer vision tasks and deep learning architectures, prior fully supervised and weakly supervised approaches in seagrass and coral domains, and relevant weakly supervised and self-supervised methods from the broader computer vision literature. The survey's principal novel contribution is its dataset availability analysis, which argues that expert label dependency is a central bottleneck and that suitable multi-species datasets are extremely scarce. Specifically, it claims that DeepSeagrass is the only dataset providing multiple seagrass morphotypes and that UCSD Mosaics is the only publicly available fine-grained multi-species coral dataset with dense ground truth masks. The paper also proposes a taxonomy, discusses transferability of generic weakly supervised methods to underwater imagery, and outlines future directions including temporal information, large language models, hierarchical labels, and human-robot collaboration.

Significance. If the data-scarcity claims are correctly scoped, this survey fills a real gap in the literature by synthesizing scattered work on reducing label dependency for underwater monitoring. The paper is timely, covers literature through late 2024, and provides useful background material in the taxonomy, the glossary, and the extensive dataset tables. It is also commendable for being explicit about scope choices, such as restricting attention to RGB imagery and to seagrass and coral ecosystems. The qualitative demonstrations in Figs. 19 and 20 are illustrative and appropriately framed as showing a failure to 'group pixels in a meaningful way' rather than as a quantitative benchmark. The main weakness is that the headline dataset-scarcity conclusions are stated more strongly than the survey's own appendix supports, and the absence of a documented search protocol makes these claims hard to verify. These issues are load-bearing because data scarcity is the motivating and organizing thesis of the paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3 and Section 10.1.2] The claim that only DeepSeagrass provides multiple seagrass taxa is contradicted by the survey's own Table A1, which lists Roelfsema et al. (2015) as an image-level-label dataset with 41 classes including 5 seagrass classes and 24,000 images. As written, the sentence 'with only one dataset providing multiple taxonomic morphotypes of seagrasses' is false without a qualifier such as 'with patch-level labels' or 'designed for computer vision training.' Section 10.1.2 similarly states that 'the only available multi-species seagrass datasets are labelled with patches,' which is also inconsistent with Table A1. Because the data-scarcity conclusion is the paper's main novel contribution, this inconsistency must be fixed by clarifying the annotation-type scope and explicitly discussing why Roelfsema et al. is excluded.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Table A2] The statement that 'the only publicly available dataset containing fine-grained multi-species coral images accompanied by dense ground truth masks is the UCSD Mosaics dataset' appears to conflict with Table A2, which lists #DeOlhoNosCorais under the 'Pixel-wise Labels' category with 21 classes and 1,411 images. If the authors regard #DeOlhoNosCorais as not fine-grained, not multi-species, or not comparable because of its social-media imagery, that judgment should be stated explicitly and defended. Otherwise the 'only publicly available' claim is not supported by the paper's own dataset survey and needs to be revised or qualified.
  3. [Appendix A and Section 3.3] The survey provides no search protocol, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, or date range for the literature and dataset search, so the reader cannot determine whether the 'only one dataset' claims reflect a deliberate scope decision or an omission. A reproducible methodology paragraph stating the databases searched, search terms, screening rules, and how annotation types (image-level, patch-level, point-level, pixel-wise) were assigned would substantially strengthen the central data-availability analysis and allow independent verification of the headline gaps.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table A1] The DeepSeagrass row lists '5 classes' while the text in Section 3.3 and Section 10.2.3 describes the four morphotypes Strappy, Ferny, Rounded, and Background; this numerical discrepancy should be reconciled.
  2. [Section 3.3] The phrase '66,946 single-species patch images' is confusing because DeepSeagrass labels are described elsewhere as morphotypes rather than species; clarifing whether each patch contains one taxon or one morphotype would improve precision.
  3. [Table A2] Several datasets under the heading 'Survey of Publicly Available Datasets of Coral Reef Imagery' are not coral-focused (e.g., DUO is an underwater object detection dataset for robot picking, and MAS3K is a marine animal segmentation dataset); a brief sentence on why these datasets are included would help avoid the appearance of scope inconsistency.
  4. [Section 10.1.3] The 'Desktop to Reality' subsection discusses an important problem but lacks citations to prior work on domain shift, sim-to-real transfer, or dataset bias in underwater robotics; adding a few references would strengthen this discussion.
  5. [Figures 19 and 20] The qualitative failure demonstrations for Segment Anything and CoralSCOP are useful, but it would be clearer to state explicitly that these are illustrative examples rather than systematic evaluations, since the text currently implies more generality than the evidence supports.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the survey's data-scarcity claim has an internal scope inconsistency but is not circular.

full rationale

This paper is a survey and does not derive or fit any quantity, so the main circularity patterns (self-definitional claims, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or uniqueness imported from the authors' own theorems) do not apply. The central assertions—that weakly supervised and self-supervised methods can reduce expert-label dependency and that multi-species annotated underwater datasets are scarce—are literature claims supported by external datasets and papers. The authors do cite their own prior works (e.g., DeepSeagrass, Raine et al. 2020; SeaCLIP, Raine et al. 2024a; point-label superpixels, Raine et al. 2022; UCSD Mosaics cleaning, Raine et al. 2024b), but these are primary sources with independent data and experimental results, not an unverified premise smuggled in to force a conclusion. The internal tension between Section 3.3's statement that DeepSeagrass is the only multi-species seagrass dataset and Table A1's listing of Roelfsema et al. (2015) with 41 classes including 5 seagrass classes is a real consistency and scope problem: the claim would need to be qualified as 'only patch-level dataset designed for training' or similar. However, this is an accuracy/omission issue in a survey claim, not circular reasoning, because the conclusion is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. No circular step could be exhibited with a specific reduction, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with a score of 1 reflecting the presence of self-citations that are not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey makes no derived predictions and introduces no free parameters, axioms, or entities. Its claims rest on the cited literature and dataset availability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reducing Label Dependency for Underwater Scene Understanding: A Survey of Datasets, Techniques and Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KR3VLOYC

@misc{pith2026241111287,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reducing Label Dependency for Underwater Scene Understanding: A Survey of Datasets, Techniques and Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KR3VLOYC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11287}
}
read the original abstract

Underwater surveys provide long-term data for informing management strategies, monitoring coral reef health, and estimating blue carbon stocks. Advances in broad-scale survey methods, such as robotic underwater vehicles, have increased the range of marine surveys but generate large volumes of imagery requiring analysis. Computer vision methods such as semantic segmentation aid automated image analysis, but typically rely on fully supervised training with extensive labelled data. While ground truth label masks for tasks like street scene segmentation can be quickly and affordably generated by non-experts through crowdsourcing services like Amazon Mechanical Turk, ecology presents greater challenges. The complexity of underwater images, coupled with the specialist expertise needed to accurately identify species at the pixel level, makes this process costly, time-consuming, and heavily dependent on domain experts. In recent years, some works have performed automated analysis of underwater imagery, and a smaller number of studies have focused on weakly supervised approaches which aim to reduce the expert-provided labelled data required. This survey focuses on approaches which reduce dependency on human expert input, while reviewing the prior and related approaches to position these works in the wider field of underwater perception. Further, we offer an overview of coastal ecosystems and the challenges of underwater imagery. We provide background on weakly and self-supervised deep learning and integrate these elements into a taxonomy that centres on the intersection of underwater monitoring, computer vision, and deep learning, while motivating approaches for weakly supervised deep learning with reduced dependency on domain expert data annotations. Lastly, the survey examines available datasets and platforms, and identifies gaps, barriers, and opportunities for automating underwater surveys.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

251 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ecological Informatics 83

    Abid N, Noman MK, Kov \'a cs G, et al (2024) Seagrass classification using unsupervised curriculum learning (ucl). Ecological Informatics 83

    2024

  2. [2]

    Frontiers in Marine Science 6

    Aeby GS, Ushijima B, Campbell JE, et al (2019) Pathogenesis of a tissue loss disease affecting multiple species of corals along the florida reef tract. Frontiers in Marine Science 6

    2019

  3. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Technology

    Albawi S, Mohammed TA, Al-Zawi S (2017) Understanding of a convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Technology

    2017

  4. [4]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    Alonso I, Murillo AC (2018) Semantic segmentation from sparse labeling using multi-level superpixels. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    2018

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops

    Alonso I, Cambra A, Munoz A, et al (2017) Coral-segmentation: Training dense labeling models with sparse ground truth. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops

    2017

  6. [6]

    Journal of Field Robotics 36(8)

    Alonso I, Yuval M, Eyal G, et al (2019) CoralSeg : Learning coral segmentation from sparse annotations. Journal of Field Robotics 36(8)

    2019

  7. [7]

    PLOS One 10(10)

    Althaus F, Hill N, Ferrari R, et al (2015) A standardised vocabulary for identifying benthic biota and substrata from underwater imagery: the CATAMI classification scheme. PLOS One 10(10)

    2015

  8. [8]

    PLOS One 15(8)

    Anthony KR, Helmstedt KJ, Bay LK, et al (2020) Interventions to help coral reefs under global change—a complex decision challenge. PLOS One 15(8)

    2020

Show all 251 references
  1. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Arain B, McCool C, Rigby P, et al (2019) Improving underwater obstacle detection using semantic image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    2019

  2. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Assran M, Duval Q, Misra I, et al (2023) Self-supervised learning from images with a joint-embedding predictive architecture. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2023

  3. [11]

    Fishery Bulletin 113(1)

    Bacheler NM, Shertzer KW (2015) Estimating relative abundance and species richness from video surveys of reef fishes. Fishery Bulletin 113(1)

    2015

  4. [12]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 39(12)

    Badrinarayanan V, Kendall A, Cipolla R (2017) Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 39(12)

    2017

  5. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision

    Bae W, Noh J, Kim G (2020) Rethinking class activation mapping for weakly supervised object localization. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision

    2020

  6. [14]

    International Journal of Remote Sensing 42(5)

    Balado J, Olabarria C, Mart \' nez-S \'a nchez J, et al (2021) Semantic segmentation of major macroalgae in coastal environments using high-resolution ground imagery and deep learning. International Journal of Remote Sensing 42(5)

    2021

  7. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision

    Bearman A, Russakovsky O, Ferrari V, et al (2016) What’s the point: Semantic segmentation with point supervision. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision

    2016

  8. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Beijbom O, Edmunds PJ, Kline DI, et al (2012) Automated annotation of coral reef survey images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2012

  9. [17]

    PLOS One 10(7)

    Beijbom O, Edmunds PJ, Roelfsema C, et al (2015) Towards automated annotation of benthic survey images: Variability of human experts and operational modes of automation. PLOS One 10(7)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Scientific Reports 6(1)

    Beijbom O, Treibitz T, Kline DI, et al (2016) Improving automated annotation of benthic survey images using wide-band fluorescence. Scientific Reports 6(1)

    2016

  11. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Bewley M, Douillard B, Nourani-Vatani N, et al (2012) Automated species detection: An experimental approach to kelp detection from sea-floor AUV images. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation

    2012

  12. [20]

    Scientific Data 2(1)

    Bewley M, Friedman A, Ferrari R, et al (2015 a ) Australian sea-floor survey data, with images and expert annotations. Scientific Data 2(1)

    2015

  13. [21]

    In: Field and Service Robotics

    Bewley M, Nourani-Vatani N, Rao D, et al (2015 b ) Hierarchical classification in AUV imagery. In: Field and Service Robotics

    2015

  14. [22]

    Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14(8)

    Bicknell AW, Godley BJ, Sheehan EV, et al (2016) Camera technology for monitoring marine biodiversity and human impact. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14(8)

    2016

  15. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:230604834

    Bijjahalli S, Pizarro O, Williams SB (2023) A semi-supervised object detection algorithm for underwater imagery. arXiv preprint arXiv:230604834

    2023

  16. [24]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 42(9)

    Boittiaux C, Dune C, Ferrera M, et al (2023) Eiffel Tower: A deep-sea underwater dataset for long-term visual localization. The International Journal of Robotics Research 42(9)

    2023

  17. [25]

    International Federation of Automatic Control 49(23)

    Bonin-Font F, Campos MM, Codina GO (2016) Towards visual detection, mapping and quantification of Posidonia oceanica using a lightweight AUV . International Federation of Automatic Control 49(23)

    2016

  18. [26]

    IEEE Access 5

    Bonin-Font F, Burguera A, Lisani JL (2017) Visual discrimination and large area mapping of P osidonia oceanica using a lightweight AUV . IEEE Access 5

    2017

  19. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition

    Boom BJ, Huang PX, He J, et al (2012) Supporting ground-truth annotation of image datasets using clustering. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition

    2012

  20. [28]

    Ecological Informatics 23

    Boom BJ, He J, Palazzo S, et al (2014) A research tool for long-term and continuous analysis of fish assemblage in coral-reefs using underwater camera footage. Ecological Informatics 23

    2014

  21. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference

    Braylan A, Alonso O, Lease M (2022) Measuring annotator agreement generally across complex structured, multi-object, and free-text annotation tasks. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference

    2022

  22. [30]

    Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science 9(2)

    Brooks K, Rowat D, Pierce SJ, et al (2010) Seeing spots: photo-identification as a regional tool for whale shark identification. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science 9(2)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Ecosphere 8(10)

    Bryant D, Rodriguez-Ramirez A, Phinn S, et al (2017) Comparison of two photographic methodologies for collecting and analyzing the condition of coral reef ecosystems. Ecosphere 8(10)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Ecological Informatics 56

    Burguera A (2020) Segmentation through patch classification: A neural network approach to detect Posidonia oceanica in underwater images. Ecological Informatics 56

    2020

  25. [33]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation

    Burguera A, Bonin-Font F, Lisani JL, et al (2016) Towards automatic visual seagrass detection in underwater areas of ecological interest. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation

    2016

  26. [34]

    Marine Pollution Bulletin 97(1-2)

    Campagne CS, Salles JM, Boissery P, et al (2015) The seagrass Posidonia oceanica: ecosystem services identification and economic evaluation of goods and benefits. Marine Pollution Bulletin 97(1-2)

    2015

  27. [35]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Cao Z, Principe JC, Ouyang B, et al (2015) Marine animal classification using combined CNN and hand-designed image features. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2015

  28. [36]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Caron M, Touvron H, Misra I, et al (2021) Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    2021

  29. [37]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Caron M, Houlsby N, Schmid C (2024) Location-aware self-supervised transformers for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    2024

  30. [38]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Chen Q, Beijbom O, Chan S, et al (2021) A new deep learning engine for CoralNet . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    2021

  31. [39]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning

    Chen T, Kornblith S, Norouzi M, et al (2020) A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning

    2020

  32. [40]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Cheng B, Parkhi O, Kirillov A (2022) Pointly-supervised instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2022

  33. [41]

    PLOS One 16(6)

    Combs IR, Studivan MS, Eckert RJ, et al (2021) Quantifying impacts of stony coral tissue loss disease on corals in southeast florida through surveys and 3D photogrammetry. PLOS One 16(6)

    2021

  34. [42]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Cordts M, Omran M, Ramos S, et al (2016) The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2016

  35. [43]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(21)

    Cornwall CE, Comeau S, Kornder NA, et al (2021) Global declines in coral reef calcium carbonate production under ocean acidification and warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(21)

    2021

  36. [44]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    Dayoub F, Dunbabin M, Corke P (2015) Robotic detection and tracking of crown-of-thorns starfish. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    2015

  37. [45]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, et al (2009) Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2009

  38. [46]

    In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Denuelle A, Dunbabin M (2010) Kelp detection in highly dynamic environments using texture recognition. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation

    2010

  39. [47]

    Nature Ecology and Evolution 5(5)

    Dietzel A, Bode M, Connolly SR, et al (2021) The population sizes and global extinction risk of reef-building coral species at biogeographic scales. Nature Ecology and Evolution 5(5)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Frontiers in Marine Science 8

    Ditria EM, Connolly RM, Jinks EL, et al (2021) Annotated video footage for automated identification and counting of fish in unconstrained seagrass habitats. Frontiers in Marine Science 8

    2021

  41. [49]

    Frontiers in Marine Science 9

    Ditria EM, Buelow CA, Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al (2022) Artificial intelligence and automated monitoring for assisting conservation of marine ecosystems: A perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science 9

    2022

  42. [50]

    Restoration Ecology 27(4)

    Doropoulos C, Elzinga J, ter Hofstede R, et al (2019) Optimizing industrial-scale coral reef restoration: Comparing harvesting wild coral spawn slicks and transplanting gravid adult colonies. Restoration Ecology 27(4)

    2019

  43. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:201011929

    Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, et al (2020) An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:201011929

    2020

  44. [52]

    Nature Climate Change 3(11)

    Duarte CM, Losada IJ, Hendriks IE, et al (2013) The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nature Climate Change 3(11)

    2013

  45. [53]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Dunbabin M, Manley J, Harrison PL (2020) Uncrewed maritime systems for coral reef conservation. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2020

  46. [54]

    Coral Reefs 36(4)

    Edwards CB, Eynaud Y, Williams GJ, et al (2017) Large-area imaging reveals biologically driven non-random spatial patterns of corals at a remote reef. Coral Reefs 36(4)

    2017

  47. [55]

    English S, Wilkinson C, Baker V, et al (1997) Survey manual for tropical marine resources. Tech. rep., Townsville (Australia) AIMS

    1997

  48. [56]

    International Journal of Computer Vision 88

    Everingham M, Van Gool L, Williams CK, et al (2010) The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision 88

    2010

  49. [57]

    Coral Reefs 29

    Fabricius K, Okaji K, De’Ath G (2010) Three lines of evidence to link outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns seastar Acanthaster planci to the release of larval food limitation. Coral Reefs 29

    2010

  50. [58]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision

    Fan J, Zhang Z, Tan T (2022) Pointly-supervised panoptic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision

    2022

  51. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Feng Z, Zhang S (2023) Evolved part masking for self-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2023

  52. [60]

    Aquatic Botany 58(3-4)

    Ferguson RL, Korfmacher K (1997) Remote sensing and GIS analysis of seagrass meadows in North Carolina, USA . Aquatic Botany 58(3-4)

    1997

  53. [61]

    PLOS One 13(3)

    Ferrari R, Marzinelli EM, Ayroza CR, et al (2018) Large-scale assessment of benthic communities across multiple marine protected areas using an autonomous underwater vehicle. PLOS One 13(3)

    2018

  54. [62]

    International Federation of Automatic Control 50(1)

    Ferretti R, Bibuli M, Caccia M, et al (2017) Towards Posidonia meadows detection, mapping and automatic recognition using unmanned marine vehicles. International Federation of Automatic Control 50(1)

    2017

  55. [63]

    PhD thesis, University of Sydney

    Friedman AL (2013) Automated interpretation of benthic stereo imagery. PhD thesis, University of Sydney

    2013

  56. [64]

    IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering

    Fu Z, Chen R, Huang Y, et al (2023) Masnet: A robust deep marine animal segmentation network. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering

    2023

  57. [65]

    PeerJ 11

    Furtado DP, Vieira EA, Nascimento WF, et al (2023) \# DeOlhoNosCorais: A polygonal annotated dataset to optimize coral monitoring. PeerJ 11

    2023

  58. [66]

    Ecological Informatics 68

    Ganesan A, Santhanam SM (2022) A novel feature descriptor based coral image classification using extreme learning machine with ameliorated chimp optimization algorithm. Ecological Informatics 68

    2022

  59. [67]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 15

    Gao L, Li X, Kong F, et al (2022) Algaenet: A deep-learning framework to detect floating green algae from optical and SAR imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 15

    2022

  60. [68]

    Remote Sensing 15(9)

    Giles AB, Ren K, Davies JE, et al (2023) Combining drones and deep learning to automate coral reef assessment with rgb imagery. Remote Sensing 15(9)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Knowledge-Based Systems 184

    G \'o mez-R \' os A, Tabik S, Luengo J, et al (2019 a ) Coral species identification with texture or structure images using a two-level classifier based on convolutional neural networks. Knowledge-Based Systems 184

    2019

  62. [70]

    Expert Systems with Applications 118

    G \'o mez-R \' os A, Tabik S, Luengo J, et al (2019 b ) Towards highly accurate coral texture images classification using deep convolutional neural networks and data augmentation. Expert Systems with Applications 118

    2019

  63. [71]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Gonzalez-Cid Y, Burguera A, Bonin-Font F, et al (2017) Machine learning and deep learning strategies to identify Posidonia meadows in underwater images. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2017

  64. [72]

    Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 24

    Gonz \'a lez-Rivero M, Bongaerts P, Beijbom O, et al (2014) The Catlin seaview survey--kilometre-scale seascape assessment, and monitoring of coral reef ecosystems. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 24

    2014

  65. [73]

    Remote Sensing 8(1)

    Gonz \'a lez-Rivero M, Beijbom O, Rodriguez-Ramirez A, et al (2016) Scaling up ecological measurements of coral reefs using semi-automated field image collection and analysis. Remote Sensing 8(1)

    2016

  66. [74]

    ://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2019.930

    Gonz \'a lez-Rivero M, Rodriguez-Ramirez A, Beijbom O, et al (2019) Seaview survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. ://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2019.930

    2019 doi

  67. [75]

    Remote Sensing 12(3)

    Gonz \'a lez-Rivero M, Beijbom O, Rodriguez-Ramirez A, et al (2020) Monitoring of coral reefs using artificial intelligence: A feasible and cost-effective approach. Remote Sensing 12(3)

    2020

  68. [76]

    ACM Computing Surveys 55

    Gonz \'a lez-Sabbagh SP, Robles-Kelly A (2023) A survey on underwater computer vision. ACM Computing Surveys 55

    2023

  69. [77]

    MIT press

    Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT press

    2016

  70. [78]

    Scientific American 241(2)

    Goreau TF, Goreau NI, Goreau TJ (1979) Corals and coral reefs. Scientific American 241(2)

    1979

  71. [79]

    International Journal of Computer Vision 129(6)

    Gou J, Yu B, Maybank SJ, et al (2021) Knowledge distillation: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision 129(6)

    2021

  72. [80]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    Gregorek D, Tibebu A, Caudet E, et al (2023) Long-endurance optical seafloor imaging using underwater gliders: Concept, development and initial trials. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    2023

  73. [81]

    International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval 7

    Guo Y, Liu Y, Georgiou T, et al (2018) A review of semantic segmentation using deep neural networks. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval 7

    2018

  74. [82]

    International Journal of Computer Vision 112

    Gupta S, Arbel \'a ez P, Girshick R, et al (2015) Indoor scene understanding with rgb-d images: Bottom-up segmentation, object detection and semantic segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision 112

    2015

  75. [83]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:231001931

    Haixin L, Ziqiang Z, Zeyu M, et al (2023) MarineDet: T owards open-marine object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:231001931

    2023

  76. [84]

    Mathematical Problems in Engineering

    Han F, Yao J, Zhu H, et al (2020) Marine organism detection and classification from underwater vision based on the deep CNN method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering

    2020

  77. [85]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:150302531

    Hinton G, Vinyals O, Dean J (2015) Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:150302531

    2015

  78. [86]

    Remote Sensing 13(9)

    Hobley B, Arosio R, French G, et al (2021) Semi-supervised segmentation for coastal monitoring seagrass using RPA imagery. Remote Sensing 13(9)

    2021

  79. [87]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 19

    Hua Y, Marcos D, Mou L, et al (2021) Semantic segmentation of remote sensing images with sparse annotations. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 19

    2021

  80. [88]

    Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology 10(02)

    Igbinenikaro OP, Adekoya OO, Etukudoh EA (2024) Emerging underwater survey technologies: A review and future outlook. Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology 10(02)

    2024

  81. [89]

    ://catalogue-imos.aodn.org.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/ae70eb18-b1f0-4012-8d62-b03daf99f7f2

    Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) (2011) IMOS - AUV S irius, campaign: Great B arrier R eef, F ebruary 2011. ://catalogue-imos.aodn.org.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/ae70eb18-b1f0-4012-8d62-b03daf99f7f2

    2011

  82. [90]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE

    Islam MJ, Edge C, Xiao Y, et al (2020 a ) Semantic segmentation of underwater imagery: Dataset and benchmark. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE

    2020

  83. [91]

    In: Proceedings of the Robotics: Science and Systems

    Islam MJ, Luo P, Sattar J (2020 b ) Simultaneous enhancement and super-resolution of underwater imagery for improved visual perception. In: Proceedings of the Robotics: Science and Systems

    2020

  84. [92]

    Journal of Applied Ecology 60(7)

    Jackett C, Althaus F, Maguire K, et al (2023 a ) A benthic substrate classification method for seabed images using deep learning: Application to management of deep-sea coral reefs. Journal of Applied Ecology 60(7)

    2023

  85. [93]

    Jackett C, Maguire K, Untiedt C, et al (2023 b ) Benthic substrate classification ML training image snips. v2. ://doi.org/10.25919/jfsp-zd42

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    Jell JS, Flood PG (1978) Guide to the geology of reefs of the C apricorn and Bunker Groups, Great Barrier Reef Province, with special reference to Heron Reef . Tech. rep., University of Queensland Press

    1978

  87. [95]

    Ecological Informatics 66

    Jeon Ei, Kim S, Park S, et al (2021) Semantic segmentation of seagrass habitat from drone imagery based on deep learning: A comparative study. Ecological Informatics 66

    2021

  88. [96]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning

    Jia C, Yang Y, Xia Y, et al (2021) Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning

    2021

  89. [97]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Jin L, Liang H (2017) Deep learning for underwater image recognition in small sample size situations. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2017

  90. [98]

    Australian Institute of Marine Science

    Jonker MJ, Bray PE, Johns KA, et al (2020) Surveys of benthic reef communities using underwater digital photography and counts of juvenile corals: Long term monitoring of the Great Barrier Reef standard operational procedure number 10. Australian Institute of Marine Science

    2020

  91. [99]

    Scientific Reports 12(1)

    Katija K, Orenstein E, Schlining B, et al (2022) Fathomnet: A global image database for enabling artificial intelligence in the ocean. Scientific Reports 12(1)

    2022

  92. [100]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

    Keetha N, Mishra A, Karhade J, et al (2023) AnyLoc: T owards universal visual place recognition. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

    2023

  93. [101]

    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 145

    Kemker R, Salvaggio C, Kanan C (2018) Algorithms for semantic segmentation of multispectral remote sensing imagery using deep learning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 145

    2018

  94. [102]

    ACM Computing Surveys 54(10s)

    Khan S, Naseer M, Hayat M, et al (2022) Transformers in vision: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 54(10s)

    2022

  95. [103]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    King A, M Bhandarkar S, Hopkinson BM (2019) Deep learning for semantic segmentation of coral reef images using multi-view information. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    2019

  96. [104]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Kirillov A, Mintun E, Ravi N, et al (2023) Segment anything. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    2023

  97. [105]

    Computers and Geosciences 32(9)

    Kohler KE, Gill SM (2006) Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe): A Visual Basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Computers and Geosciences 32(9)

    2006

  98. [106]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Kwak S, Hong S, Han B, et al (2017) Weakly supervised semantic segmentation using superpixel pooling network. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    2017

  99. [107]

    Neurocomputing 338

    Lateef F, Ruichek Y (2019) Survey on semantic segmentation using deep learning techniques. Neurocomputing 338

    2019

  100. [108]

    PLOS One 8(9)

    Lavery PS, Mateo M \'A , Serrano O, et al (2013) Variability in the carbon storage of seagrass habitats and its implications for global estimates of blue carbon ecosystem service. PLOS One 8(9)

    2013

  101. [109]

    In: Proceedings of the Multispectral Image Acquisition, Processing, and Analysis Conference

    Li B, Liu S, Xu W, et al (2018) Real-time object detection and semantic segmentation for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the Multispectral Image Acquisition, Processing, and Analysis Conference

    2018

  102. [110]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Li J, Eustice RM, Johnson-Roberson M (2015 a ) High-level visual features for underwater place recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    2015

  103. [111]

    In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Benchmarking, Measuring and Optimization

    Li L, Rigall E, Dong J, et al (2020) MAS3K: An open dataset for marine animal segmentation. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Benchmarking, Measuring and Optimization

    2020

  104. [112]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 32(4)

    Li L, Dong B, Rigall E, et al (2021) Marine animal segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 32(4)

    2021

  105. [113]

    Geo-spatial Information Science

    Li M, Zhang H, Gruen A, et al (2024) A survey on underwater coral image segmentation based on deep learning. Geo-spatial Information Science

    2024

  106. [114]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Li W, Yuan Y, Wang S, et al (2023) Point2Mask: P oint-supervised panoptic segmentation via optimal transport. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    2023

  107. [115]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Li X, Shang M, Qin H, et al (2015 b ) Fast accurate fish detection and recognition of underwater images with Fast R-CNN . In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2015

  108. [116]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking

    Li Y, Liu J, Kusy B, et al (2022) A real-time edge- AI system for reef surveys. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking

    2022

  109. [117]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control

    Liang B, Liu Y, He L, et al (2020) Weakly supervised semantic segmentation based on deep learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control

    2020

  110. [118]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision

    Lin TY, Maire M, Belongie S, et al (2014) Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context . In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision

    2014

  111. [119]

    Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24(9)

    Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE (2009) Adaptive monitoring: A new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24(9)

    2009

  112. [120]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops

    Liu C, Li H, Wang S, et al (2021 a ) A dataset and benchmark of underwater object detection for robot picking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops

    2021

  113. [121]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:211114311

    Liu J, Kusy B, Marchant R, et al (2021 b ) The CSIRO Crown-of-Thorn Starfish detection dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:211114311

    2021

  114. [122]

    ://doi.org/10.25919/nf6m-2k87

    Liu J, Li Y, Crosswell J, et al (2022) Underwater Crown-of-Thorn Starfish (COTS) imagery sample dataset, v2. ://doi.org/10.25919/nf6m-2k87

    2022 doi

  115. [123]

    In: Coral Health and Disease

    Loya Y (2004) The coral reefs of Eilat —past, present and future: three decades of coral community structure studies. In: Coral Health and Disease. Springer

    2004

  116. [124]

    Applied Computing and Informatics 19(3-4)

    Lumini A, Nanni L, Maguolo G (2020) Deep learning for plankton and coral classification. Applied Computing and Informatics 19(3-4)

    2020

  117. [125]

    Coral Reefs

    Lutzenkirchen LL, Duce SJ, Bellwood DR (2024) Exploring benthic habitat assessments on coral reefs: a comparison of direct field measurements versus remote sensing. Coral Reefs

    2024

  118. [126]

    Marine Pollution Bulletin 83(2)

    Macreadie P, Baird M, Trevathan-Tackett S, et al (2014) Quantifying and modelling the carbon sequestration capacity of seagrass meadows--a critical assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 83(2)

    2014

  119. [127]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Mahmood A, Bennamoun M, An S, et al (2016 a ) Automatic annotation of coral reefs using deep learning. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2016

  120. [128]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

    Mahmood A, Bennamoun M, An S, et al (2016 b ) Coral classification with hybrid feature representations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

    2016

  121. [129]

    In: Handbook of Neural Computation

    Mahmood A, Bennamoun M, An S, et al (2017) Deep learning for coral classification. In: Handbook of Neural Computation. Elsevier

    2017

  122. [130]

    Image and Vision Computing 93

    Mahmood A, Bennamoun M, An S, et al (2020 a ) ResFeats: R esidual network based features for underwater image classification. Image and Vision Computing 93

    2020

  123. [131]

    Sensors 20(2)

    Mahmood A, Ospina AG, Bennamoun M, et al (2020 b ) Automatic hierarchical classification of kelps using deep residual features. Sensors 20(2)

    2020

  124. [132]

    Marine Ecology Progress Series 643

    Marre G, Deter J, Holon F, et al (2020) Fine-scale automatic mapping of living Posidonia oceanica seagrass beds with underwater photogrammetry. Marine Ecology Progress Series 643

    2020

  125. [133]

    IEEE Access 6

    Martin-Abadal M, Guerrero-Font E, Bonin-Font F, et al (2018) Deep semantic segmentation in an AUV for online Posidonia oceanica meadows identification. IEEE Access 6

    2018

  126. [134]

    Wireless Personal Communications 98(3)

    Mary NAB, Dejey D (2018) Classification of coral reef submarine images and videos using a novel Z with tilted Z local binary pattern. Wireless Personal Communications 98(3)

    2018

  127. [135]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Massot-Campos M, Oliver-Codina G, Ruano-Amengual L, et al (2013) Texture analysis of seabed images: Quantifying the presence of Posidonia oceanica at Palma Bay . In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2013

  128. [136]

    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 291

    Massot-Campos M, Bonin-Font F, Guerrero-Font E, et al (2023) Assessing benthic marine habitats colonized with Posidonia oceanica using autonomous marine robots and deep learning: A Eurofleets campaign. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 291

    2023

  129. [137]

    Marine Pollution Bulletin 134

    Mazarrasa I, Samper-Villarreal J, Serrano O, et al (2018) Habitat characteristics provide insights of carbon storage in seagrass meadows. Marine Pollution Bulletin 134

    2018

  130. [138]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:200705615

    McEver RA, Manjunath B (2020) PCAMs : Weakly supervised semantic segmentation using point supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:200705615

    2020

  131. [139]

    Remote Sensing 14(11)

    McKenzie LJ, Langlois LA, Roelfsema CM (2022) Improving approaches to mapping seagrass within the Great Barrier Reef : From field to spaceborne Earth observation. Remote Sensing 14(11)

    2022

  132. [140]

    PLOS One 17(11)

    McLeod IM, Hein MY, Babcock R, et al (2022) Coral restoration and adaptation in Australia : The first five years. PLOS One 17(11)

    2022

  133. [141]

    In: Real-time Image Processing and Deep Learning

    Mehrubeoglu M, Vargas I, Huang C, et al (2021) Segmentation of seagrass blade images using deep learning. In: Real-time Image Processing and Deep Learning

    2021

  134. [142]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Milioto A, Lottes P, Stachniss C (2018) Real-time semantic segmentation of crop and weed for precision agriculture robots leveraging background knowledge in CNN s. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    2018

  135. [143]

    Australian Institute of Marine Science

    Miller IR, Jonker MJ, Coleman G (2018) Crown-of-thorns starfish and coral surveys using the manta tow technique: Long-term monitoring of the Great Barrier Reef standard operational procedure number 9. Australian Institute of Marine Science

    2018

  136. [144]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 34

    Mittal S, Srivastava S, Jayanth JP (2022) A survey of deep learning techniques for underwater image classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 34

    2022

  137. [145]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Modasshir M, Rekleitis I (2020) Augmenting coral reef monitoring with an enhanced detection system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    2020

  138. [146]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Modasshir M, Li AQ, Rekleitis I (2018 a ) MDNet : Multi-patch dense network for coral classification. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2018

  139. [147]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics

    Modasshir M, Rahman S, Youngquist O, et al (2018 b ) Coral identification and counting with an autonomous underwater vehicle. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics

    2018

  140. [148]

    Remote Sensing 12(23)

    Mohamed H, Nadaoka K, Nakamura T (2020) Semiautomated mapping of benthic habitats and seagrass species using a convolutional neural network framework in shallow water environments. Remote Sensing 12(23)

    2020

  141. [149]

    Remote Sensing 14(8)

    Mohamed H, Nadaoka K, Nakamura T (2022) Automatic semantic segmentation of benthic habitats using images from towed underwater camera in a complex shallow water environment. Remote Sensing 14(8)

    2022

  142. [150]

    ://doi.org/10.25958/5dd7566dfaabb

    Moniruzzaman M, Islam SM, Lavery P (2019 a ) ECUHO1 (Edith Cowan University Halophila Ovalis 1) . ://doi.org/10.25958/5dd7566dfaabb

    2019 doi

  143. [151]

    In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

    Moniruzzaman M, Islam SMS, Lavery P, et al (2019 b ) Faster R-CNN based deep learning for seagrass detection from underwater digital images. In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

    2019

  144. [152]

    Monk J, Barrett N, Bridge T, et al (2018) Marine sampling field manual for AUV's (Autonomous Underwater Vehicles) . Tech. rep., NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub

    2018

  145. [153]

    In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

    Moskvyak O, Maire F, Dayoub F, et al (2021) Robust re-identification of manta rays from natural markings by learning pose invariant embeddings. In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

    2021

  146. [154]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:220504612

    Mou S, Tsai D, Dunbabin M (2022) Reconfigurable robots for scaling reef restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:220504612

    2022

  147. [155]

    PLOS One 11(10)

    Mtwana Nordlund L, Koch EW, Barbier EB, et al (2016) Seagrass ecosystem services and their variability across genera and geographical regions. PLOS One 11(10)

    2016

  148. [156]

    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12(1)

    Muntaner-Gonzalez C, Martin-Abadal M, Gonzalez-Cid Y (2023) A deep learning approach to estimate Halimeda incrassata invasive stage in the mediterranean sea. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12(1)

    2023

  149. [157]

    Marine and Freshwater Research 61(2)

    Murphy HM, Jenkins GP (2010) Observational methods used in marine spatial monitoring of fishes and associated habitats: A review. Marine and Freshwater Research 61(2)

    2010

  150. [158]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand

    Noman MK, Islam SMS, Abu-Khalaf J, et al (2021 a ) Multi-species seagrass detection using semi-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand

    2021

  151. [159]

    In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

    Noman MK, Islam SMS, Abu-Khalaf J, et al (2021 b ) Seagrass detection from underwater digital images using Faster R-CNN with NASNet . In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

    2021

  152. [160]

    Ecological Informatics 76

    Noman MK, Islam SMS, Abu-Khalaf J, et al (2023) Improving accuracy and efficiency in seagrass detection using state-of-the-art AI techniques. Ecological Informatics 76

    2023

  153. [161]

    In: Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition

    Obikane S, Aoki Y (2019) Weakly supervised domain adaptation with point supervision in histopathological image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition

    2019

  154. [162]

    Coastal Engineering 87

    Ondiviela B, Losada IJ, Lara JL, et al (2014) The role of seagrasses in coastal protection in a changing climate. Coastal Engineering 87

    2014

  155. [163]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:230407193

    Oquab M, Darcet T, Moutakanni T, et al (2023) DINOv2: L earning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:230407193

    2023

  156. [164]

    In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering

    Ozaeta MAA, Fajardo AC, Brazas FP, et al (2023) Seagrass classification using differentiable architecture search. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering

    2023

  157. [165]

    In: Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

    Pamungkas S, Jaya I, Iqbal M (2021) Segmentation of Enhalus acoroides seagrass from underwater images using the Mask R-CNN method. In: Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

    2021

  158. [166]

    Frontiers in Marine Science 10

    Papke E, Carreiro A, Dennison C, et al (2024) Stony coral tissue loss disease: a review of emergence, impacts, etiology, diagnostics, and intervention. Frontiers in Marine Science 10

    2024

  159. [167]

    Wireless Personal Communications 114(1)

    Paul MA, Rani PAJ, Manopriya JL (2020) Gradient based aura feature extraction for coral reef classification. Wireless Personal Communications 114(1)

    2020

  160. [168]

    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195(5)

    Paul MA, Kumar KS, Sagar S, et al (2023) LWDS : lightweight DeepSeagrass technique for classifying seagrass from underwater images. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195(5)

    2023

  161. [169]

    International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

    Pavoni G, Corsini M, Callieri M, et al (2019) Semantic segmentation of benthic communities from ortho-mosaic maps. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

    2019

  162. [170]

    Journal of Field Robotics 39(3)

    Pavoni G, Corsini M, Ponchio F, et al (2022) TagLab: AI- assisted annotation for the fast and accurate semantic segmentation of coral reef orthoimages. Journal of Field Robotics 39(3)

    2022

  163. [171]

    In: Proceedings of the Northern Lights Deep Learning Workshop

    Pedersen M, Haurum JB, Moeslund TB, et al (2022) Re-identification of giant sunfish using keypoint matching. In: Proceedings of the Northern Lights Deep Learning Workshop

    2022

  164. [172]

    Sensors 19(8)

    Pham TD, Xia J, Ha NT, et al (2019) A review of remote sensing approaches for monitoring blue carbon ecosystems: Mangroves, seagrasses and salt marshes during 2010--2018. Sensors 19(8)

    2019

  165. [173]

    Remote Sensing of Environment 112(8)

    Phinn S, Roelfsema C, Dekker A, et al (2008) Mapping seagrass species, cover and biomass in shallow waters: An assessment of satellite multi-spectral and airborne hyper-spectral imaging systems in Moreton Bay (Australia ). Remote Sensing of Environment 112(8)

    2008

  166. [174]

    In: Proceedings of the CEUR Workshops

    Picek L, R \' ha A, Zita A (2020) Coral reef annotation, localisation and pixel-wise classification using Mask R-CNN and bag of tricks. In: Proceedings of the CEUR Workshops

    2020

  167. [175]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Pierce JP, Rzhanov Y, Lowell K, et al (2020) Reducing annotation times: Semantic segmentation of coral reef survey images. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2020

  168. [176]

    Neurocomputing 187

    Qin H, Li X, Liang J, et al (2016) DeepFish: A ccurate underwater live fish recognition with a deep architecture. Neurocomputing 187

    2016

  169. [177]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

    Qu H, Yi J, Huang Q, et al (2020) Nuclei segmentation using mixed points and masks selected from uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

    2020

  170. [178]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Radford A, Kim JW, Hallacy C, et al (2021) Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    2021

  171. [179]

    In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

    Raine S, Marchant R, Moghadam P, et al (2020) Multi-species seagrass detection and classification from underwater images. In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

    2020

  172. [180]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:210305226

    Raine S, Marchant R, Moghadam P, et al (2021) DeepSeagrass dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:210305226

    2021

  173. [181]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(3):8291--8298

    Raine S, Marchant R, Kusy B, et al (2022) Point label aware superpixels for multi-species segmentation of underwater imagery. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(3):8291--8298

    2022

  174. [182]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp 5943--5952

    Raine S, Marchant R, Kusy B, et al (2024 a ) Image labels are all you need for coarse seagrass segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp 5943--5952

    2024

  175. [183]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp 2723--2732

    Raine S, Marchant R, Kusy B, et al (2024 b ) Human-in-the-loop segmentation of multi-species coral imagery. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp 2723--2732

    2024

  176. [184]

    International Journal of Robotics Research 36(1)

    Rao D, De Deuge M, Nourani-Vatani N, et al (2017) Multimodal learning and inference from visual and remotely sensed data. International Journal of Robotics Research 36(1)

    2017

  177. [185]

    Scientific Reports 10(1)

    Raphael A, Dubinsky Z, Iluz D, et al (2020 a ) Deep neural network recognition of shallow water corals in the Gulf of Eilat (Aqaba) . Scientific Reports 10(1)

    2020

  178. [186]

    Diversity 12(1)

    Raphael A, Dubinsky Z, Iluz D, et al (2020 b ) Neural network recognition of marine benthos and corals. Diversity 12(1)

    2020

  179. [187]

    Journal of Environmental Management 210

    Reguero BG, Beck MW, Agostini VN, et al (2018) Coral reefs for coastal protection: A new methodological approach and engineering case study in Grenada . Journal of Environmental Management 210

    2018

  180. [188]

    Coral Reefs

    Remmers T, Grech A, Roelfsema C, et al (2023) Close-range underwater photogrammetry for coral reef ecology: A systematic literature review. Coral Reefs

    2023

  181. [189]

    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8(9)

    Rende SF, Bosman A, Di Mento R, et al (2020) Ultra-high-resolution mapping of Posidonia oceanica (L.) delile meadows through acoustic, optical data and object-based image classification. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8(9)

    2020

  182. [190]

    o ller T, J \

    Reus G, M \"o ller T, J \"a ger J, et al (2018) Looking for seagrass: Deep learning for visual coverage estimation. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2018

  183. [191]

    Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 4(1)

    Roelfsema CM, Phinn SR (2010) Integrating field data with high spatial resolution multispectral satellite imagery for calibration and validation of coral reef benthic community maps. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 4(1)

    2010

  184. [192]

    ://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.846147

    Roelfsema CM, Kovacs E, Phinn SR (2015) Benthic and substrate cover data derived from a time series of photo-transect surveys for the Eastern Banks, Moreton Bay Australia , 2004-2014. ://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.846147

    2015 doi

  185. [193]

    Frontiers in Marine Science

    Rom \'a n A, Tovar-S \'a nchez A, Oliv \'e I, et al (2021) Using a UAV -mounted multispectral camera for the monitoring of marine macrophytes. Frontiers in Marine Science

    2021

  186. [194]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Rong S, Tu B, Wang Z, et al (2023) Boundary-enhanced co-training for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2023

  187. [195]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Workshops

    Roth H, Zhang L, Yang D, et al (2019) Weakly supervised segmentation from extreme points. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Workshops

    2019

  188. [196]

    Frontiers in Robotics and AI 9

    Runyan H, Petrovic V, Edwards CB, et al (2022) Automated 2D, 2.5 D, and 3D segmentation of coral reef pointclouds and orthoprojections. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 9

    2022

  189. [197]

    Ocean Engineering 283

    Ruscio F, Costanzi R, Gracias N, et al (2023) Autonomous boundary inspection of P osidonia oceanica meadows using an underwater robot. Ocean Engineering 283

    2023

  190. [198]

    PhD thesis, James Cook University

    Saleh A (2023) Novel deep learning architectures for marine and aquaculture applications. PhD thesis, James Cook University

    2023

  191. [199]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Sauder J, Banc-Prandi G, Meibom A, et al (2023) Scalable semantic 3D mapping of coral reefs with deep learning. Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    2023

  192. [200]

    Continental Shelf Research 45

    Seiler J, Friedman A, Steinberg D, et al (2012) Image-based continental shelf habitat mapping using novel automated data extraction techniques. Continental Shelf Research 45

    2012

  193. [201]

    Ecological Informatics 57

    Sengupta S, Ersb ll BK, Stockmarr A (2020) Seagrassdetect: A novel method for the detection of seagrass from unlabelled underwater videos. Ecological Informatics 57

    2020

  194. [202]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications 77(2)

    Shakoor MH, Boostani R (2018) A novel advanced local binary pattern for image-based coral reef classification. Multimedia Tools and Applications 77(2)

    2018

  195. [203]

    Global Change Biology 28(16)

    Shaver EC, McLeod E, Hein MY, et al (2022) A roadmap to integrating resilience into the practice of coral reef restoration. Global Change Biology 28(16)

    2022

  196. [204]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Shen Y, Cao L, Chen Z, et al (2021) Toward joint thing-and-stuff mining for weakly supervised panoptic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2021

  197. [205]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Shields J, Pizarro O, Williams SB (2020) Towards adaptive benthic habitat mapping. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    2020

  198. [206]

    ://dx.doi.org/10.17632/86y667257h.2#file5a2847d2-4c9f-41a9-8d7c-cdc74a0195c2

    Shihavuddin A (2017) Coral reef dataset, v2. ://dx.doi.org/10.17632/86y667257h.2#file5a2847d2-4c9f-41a9-8d7c-cdc74a0195c2

    2017 doi

  199. [207]

    Remote Sensing 5(4)

    Shihavuddin A, Gracias N, Garcia R, et al (2013) Image-based coral reef classification and thematic mapping. Remote Sensing 5(4)

    2013

  200. [208]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer

    Shin M (2020) Semi-supervised learning with a teacher-student network for generalized attribute prediction. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer

    2020

  201. [209]

    Oceanologia

    S iaulys A, Vai c iukynas E, Medelyt \.e S, et al (2024) Coverage estimation of benthic habitat features by semantic segmentation of underwater imagery from South-eastern B altic reefs using deep learning models. Oceanologia

    2024

  202. [210]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Singh K, Rypkema N, Leonard J (2023) Attention-based self-supervised hierarchical semantic segmentation for underwater imagery. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2023

  203. [211]

    Sensors 21

    Song H, Mehdi SR, Zhang Y, et al (2021) Development of coral investigation system based on semantic segmentation of single-channel images. Sensors 21

    2021

  204. [212]

    Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

    Song S (2023) The use of color elements in graphic design based on convolutional neural network model. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

    2023

  205. [213]

    Springer Science and Business Media

    Sorokin YI (2013) Coral reef ecology, vol 102. Springer Science and Business Media

    2013

  206. [214]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications 78(24)

    Sotoodeh M, Moosavi MR, Boostani R (2019) A structural based feature extraction for detecting the relation of hidden substructures in coral reef images. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78(24)

    2019

  207. [215]

    In: Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Analysis and Retrieval of Tracked Events and Notion in Imagery Streams

    Spampinato C, Giordano D, Di Salvo R, et al (2010) Automatic fish classification for underwater species behavior understanding. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Analysis and Retrieval of Tracked Events and Notion in Imagery Streams

    2010

  208. [216]

    Neurocomputing 275

    Sun X, Shi J, Liu L, et al (2018) Transferring deep knowledge for object recognition in low-quality underwater videos. Neurocomputing 275

    2018

  209. [217]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 37(4-5)

    S \"u nderhauf N, Brock O, Scheirer W, et al (2018) The limits and potentials of deep learning for robotics. The International Journal of Robotics Research 37(4-5)

    2018

  210. [218]

    Frontiers in Marine Science 6

    Sward D, Monk J, Barrett N (2019) A systematic review of remotely operated vehicle surveys for visually assessing fish assemblages. Frontiers in Marine Science 6

    2019

  211. [219]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, et al (2016) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2016

  212. [220]

    Remote Sensing 12(18)

    Szymak P, Piskur P, Naus K (2020) The effectiveness of using a pretrained deep learning neural networks for object classification in underwater video. Remote Sensing 12(18)

    2020

  213. [221]

    PeerJ 10

    Tahara S, Sudo K, Yamakita T, et al (2022) Species level mapping of a seagrass bed using an unmanned aerial vehicle and deep learning technique. PeerJ 10

    2022

  214. [222]

    Remote Sensing 15(9)

    Tallam K, Nguyen N, Ventura J, et al (2023) Application of deep learning for classification of intertidal eelgrass from drone-acquired imagery. Remote Sensing 15(9)

    2023

  215. [223]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13(2)

    Terayama K, Mizuno K, Tabeta S, et al (2022) Cost-effective seafloor habitat mapping using a portable speedy sea scanner and deep-learning-based segmentation: A sea trial at Pujada Bay, Philippines . Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13(2)

    2022

  216. [224]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    Tian K, Zhang J, Shen H, et al (2020) Weakly-supervised nucleus segmentation based on point annotations: A coarse-to-fine self-stimulated learning strategy. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    2020

  217. [225]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30

    Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al (2017) Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30

    2017

  218. [226]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Vernaza P, Chandraker M (2017) Learning random-walk label propagation for weakly-supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2017

  219. [227]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics

    Wang J, Li B, Zhou Y, et al (2020 a ) Real-time and embedded compact deep neural networks for seagrass monitoring. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics

    2020

  220. [228]

    Remote Sensing 12(2)

    Wang S, Chen W, Xie SM, et al (2020 b ) Weakly supervised deep learning for segmentation of remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing 12(2)

    2020

  221. [229]

    Optical Memory and Neural Networks 29

    Wang W, Solovyev R, Stempkovsky A, et al (2020 c ) Method for whale re-identification based on siamese nets and adversarial training. Optical Memory and Neural Networks 29

    2020

  222. [230]

    Journal of Ocean University of China 18(2)

    Wang X, Ouyang J, Li D, et al (2019) Underwater object recognition based on deep encoding-decoding network. Journal of Ocean University of China 18(2)

    2019

  223. [231]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Wang Y, Zhang J, Kan M, et al (2020 d ) Self-supervised equivariant attention mechanism for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2020

  224. [232]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Weidmann F, J \"a ger J, Reus G, et al (2019) A closer look at seagrass meadows: Semantic segmentation for visual coverage estimation. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2019

  225. [233]

    Frontiers in Marine Science 6

    Williams ID, Couch CS, Beijbom O, et al (2019) Leveraging automated image analysis tools to transform our capacity to assess status and trends of coral reefs. Frontiers in Marine Science 6

    2019

  226. [234]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13(6)

    Wyatt M, Radford B, Callow N, et al (2022) Using ensemble methods to improve the robustness of deep learning for image classification in marine environments. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13(6)

    2022

  227. [235]

    In: Handbook of Deep Learning Applications

    Xu L, Bennamoun M, An S, et al (2019) Deep learning for marine species recognition. In: Handbook of Deep Learning Applications. Springer

    2019

  228. [236]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Yang X, Gong X (2024) Foundation model assisted weakly supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    2024

  229. [237]

    In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks

    Yu X, Ma Y, Farrington S, et al (2019 a ) Fast segmentation for large and sparsely labeled coral images. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks

    2019

  230. [238]

    In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    Yu X, Ouyang B, Principe JC, et al (2019 b ) Weakly supervised learning of point-level annotation for coral image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference

    2019

  231. [239]

    Remote Sensing 13(4)

    Yuval M, Alonso I, Eyal G, et al (2021) Repeatable semantic reef-mapping through photogrammetry and label-augmentation. Remote Sensing 13(4)

    2021

  232. [240]

    ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2

    Zhang H, Gr \"u n A, Li M (2022) Deep learning for semantic segmentation of coral images in underwater photogrammetry. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2

    2022

  233. [241]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Zhang H, Li M, Zhong J, et al (2024) CNet: A novel seabed coral reef image segmentation approach based on deep learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    2024

  234. [242]

    Artificial Intelligence Review

    Zhang M, Zhou Y, Zhao J, et al (2019) A survey of semi-and weakly supervised semantic segmentation of images. Artificial Intelligence Review

    2019

  235. [243]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 40(10)

    Zhao T, Yin Z (2020) Weakly supervised cell segmentation by point annotation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 40(10)

    2020

  236. [244]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:231013596

    Zheng Z, Zhang J, Vu TA, et al (2023) MarineGPT: U nlocking secrets of ocean to the public. arXiv preprint arXiv:231013596

    2023

  237. [245]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Zheng Z, Liang H, Hua BS, et al (2024) Coralscop: Segment any coral image on this planet. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    2024

  238. [246]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Zhong J, Li M, Zhang H, et al (2023) Combining photogrammetric computer vision and semantic segmentation for fine-grained understanding of coral reef growth under climate change. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    2023

  239. [247]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:211107832

    Zhou J, Wei C, Wang H, et al (2021) i BOT : Image bert pre-training with online tokenizer. arXiv preprint arXiv:211107832

    2021

  240. [248]

    Zhu K, Xiong NN, Lu M (2023) A survey of weakly-supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud, IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing, and IEEE International Conference on Int...

    2023

  241. [249]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:231001946

    Ziqiang Z, Yaofeng X, Haixin L, et al (2023) CoralVOS: D ataset and benchmark for coral video segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:231001946

    2023

  242. [250]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label extra.labe...

  243. [251]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap dupl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.