Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 53 references

PSR J1922+37: a 1.9-second pulsar discovered in the direction of the old open cluster NGC 6791

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that PSR J1922+37, a 1.92-second pulsar found in the direction of the old open cluster NGC 6791, is a plausible member of the cluster; if confirmed, it would be the first radio pulsar discovered in an open cluster.

desk verdict A well-executed pulsar discovery whose 'first open-cluster pulsar' headline rests on a DM distance that the paper itself shows is ambiguous. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08055 v2 pith:KS5I44SD submitted 2024-12-11 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM

Xiao-Jin Liu , Rahul Sengar , Matthew Bailes , Ralph P. Eatough , Jianping Yuan , Na Wang , Weiwei Zhu , Lu Zhou
show 3 more authors
He Gao Zong-Hong Zhu Xing-Jiang Zhu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
keywords radiopulsarsopenstarclustersglobularNGC6791dispersionmeasureFASTtelescopepulsardiscoveryneutronretention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the discovery of PSR J1922+37, a 1.92-second radio pulsar found in a 20-hour FAST survey of seven old open clusters. The pulsar lies about 14 arcminutes from the center of NGC 6791, and its dispersion measure of roughly 85 pc $cm^{-3}$ translates to a distance of about 4.8 kpc under the NE2001 electron density model, close to the cluster's Gaia-measured distance of 4.19 kpc. The authors argue that, if this distance is right, J1922+37 is a plausible member of NGC 6791 and would be the first pulsar ever found in a Galactic open cluster. They also discuss how the association could be confirmed and what it would mean for neutron-star formation and retention in low-mass clusters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the pulsar search and distance-estimation chain. Raw FAST search-mode data are bit-reduced, cleaned of radio-frequency interference, dedispersed over DM 2–600 pc $cm^{-3}$, and searched in acceleration space with the GPU-based peasoup pipeline, followed by harmonic-summing, candidate sifting, and folding with dspsr/psrchive. The association argument then rests on converting the measured dispersion measure into a distance using two competing models of the Galactic free-electron density — NE2001 and YMW16 — and comparing those distances with the cluster distance from Gaia DR3. A secondary geometric argument uses the cluster's tidal radius and Jacobi radius: the pulsar sits outside the tidal radius but inside the Jacobi radius, so it could plausibly be a retained member.

What would settle it

A timing campaign that measures the pulsar's proper motion over about a year would settle the association: NGC 6791's proper motion is about (-0.4, -2.3) mas/yr, so a significantly different pulsar proper motion rules out membership. A direct distance measurement (VLBI parallax or HI absorption) placing the pulsar beyond roughly 6 kpc would likewise falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

PSR J1922+37 is a newly discovered radio pulsar with a spin period of 1.92 seconds and a dispersion measure of approximately 85 pc $cm^{-3}$, located in the direction of the old, massive open cluster NGC 6791. The pulsar was detected in two adjacent beams of the FAST 19-beam receiver with a signal-to-noise ratio around 60, and later confirmed in follow-up observations. Using the NE2001 electron density model, the dispersion measure gives a distance of 4.79 ± 0.96 kpc, consistent with the cluster's distance of 4.19 ± 0.02 kpc from Gaia DR3; the YMW16 model instead gives 8.9 ± 1.8 kpc. The authors take the position and NE2001 distance as evidence that J1922+37 could be a member of NGC 6791, which would make it the first radio pulsar discovered in an open cluster.

Load-bearing premise

The whole open-cluster association rests on the NE2001 electron density model's distance estimate of about 4.8 kpc being roughly right; if the alternative YMW16 model's 8.9 kpc is nearer the truth, the pulsar is almost certainly a background object unrelated to NGC 6791.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the association is confirmed, J1922+37 becomes the first radio pulsar known in a Galactic open cluster.
  • The authors estimate that about nine recycled pulsars could be detectable in NGC 6791, so more discoveries with similar dispersion measures should follow.
  • A confirmed member would let observers compare the pulsar's characteristic age with the cluster's age of several gigayears, testing how reliable characteristic ages are.
  • Ten other old, massive open clusters are highlighted as promising targets for future pulsar surveys using the same strategy.
  • A one-year timing campaign could measure the pulsar's spin-down and proper motion, and additional pulsars near DM 85 pc cm^-3 in the same field would strengthen the case for a retained population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the association holds, the pulsar's survival in a cluster with an escape velocity of only a few km/s implies a very small natal kick, favoring formation through electron-capture supernovae or binary disruption rather than conventional core-collapse supernovae.
  • The central uncertainty is the electron-density model, not the detection; an HI absorption measurement is a cheaper near-term test than VLBI parallax for a source with a flux density near 7 microjanskys.
  • Extending the fast folding algorithm to other clusters could uncover more long-period pulsars, since standard FFT searches are biased against them.
  • If proper motion or distance measurements disagree, the pulsar would still stand as a genuine discovery but as a field pulsar toward NGC 6791, and the 'first open-cluster pulsar' title would not apply.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports results from a 20-hour FAST pulsar search of seven open clusters, leading to the discovery of PSR J1922+37, a 1.92-s pulsar with DM ~85 pc cm^-3 in the direction of the old open cluster NGC 6791. The pulsar was detected with S/N ~60 in two adjacent beams and confirmed in follow-up observations. The NE2001 electron density model gives a distance of 4.79 ± 0.96 kpc, close to the Gaia DR3 cluster distance of 4.19 ± 0.02 kpc, while the YMW16 model gives 8.9 ± 1.8 kpc. The authors argue that the pulsar is likely a member of NGC 6791 and, if confirmed, would be the first radio pulsar discovered in a Galactic open cluster. They also discuss formation scenarios, estimate the expected number of recycled pulsars in NGC 6791, and list other promising open clusters for future searches.

Significance. The pulsar discovery itself is solid: high signal-to-noise detection in two adjacent beams, confirmation in follow-up observations, a clean folded profile with harmonics, and a plausible position measurement. If the association with NGC 6791 were established, it would be the first radio pulsar in an open cluster, providing a rare direct probe of neutron star retention, natal kicks, and the relationship between pulsar characteristic ages and cluster ages. However, the association is the load-bearing element of the paper's central claim, and it is not quantitatively supported. The discrepancy between NE2001 and YMW16 distance estimates is explicitly acknowledged, yet the abstract still labels membership as 'likely.' No coincidence-probability calculation is provided, and the pulsar's position outside the cluster tidal radius raises dynamical questions. The expected-number estimate in Appendix A is based on an external globular-cluster scaling relation and does not involve fitted parameters, so circularity is not an issue.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; §4.3; §5] The abstract states that 'it is likely that PSR J1922+37 is indeed a member of NGC 6791,' but the evidence presented in the body does not support this degree of certainty. Section 4.3 notes that YMW16 gives d = 8.9 ± 1.8 kpc, about twice the cluster distance, and explicitly says 'we cannot definitively argue for the association based solely on the DM.' Section 5 admits that 'a coincidental spatial overlap is also a possibility.' No quantitative estimate of the probability of a foreground/background field pulsar in the surveyed direction is given, despite the target being only ~11 degrees from the Galactic plane where ordinary slow pulsars are common. The authors should either add a coincidence-probability calculation (e.g., using the Galactic pulsar density and the survey solid angle) or soften the abstract and conclusions to say the association is 'possible' or 'tentative' rather than 'likely.'
  2. [§4.3; §5] The pulsar's angular offset of ~14' from the cluster center is outside the King tidal radius (11.6') but inside the Jacobi radius (29.7'). The paper invokes globular cluster pulsars found at large offsets to argue that the position is plausible, but this analogy is not directly transferable: open clusters are far less massive and have much lower escape velocities, so a neutron star born in the cluster would need an unusually small natal kick to remain bound at a projected radius beyond the tidal radius. The paper should provide a quantitative dynamical plausibility argument (for example, an estimate of the fraction of retained pulsars expected at such an offset given the cluster mass and velocity dispersion) or explicitly treat the large offset as a further factor reducing the association probability.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.3] There is a typo in 'assuming a nomial 20% uncertainty'; it should read 'nominal.'
  2. [§5] The text 'The close vlaue between dNE2001 and dNGC6791' contains a typo; 'vlaue' should be 'value.'
  3. [§4.1; Table 1] The DM of PSR J1922+37 is quoted as '~85 pc cm^-3' without an uncertainty; the best-fit DM and its error from the pdmp analysis should be reported explicitly.
  4. [§4.1] The text says the pulsar was detected in 'two adjacent beams (M08)'; since M08 is a single beam label, it would be clearer to state which two beam positions or pointings are meant.
  5. [Appendix A; §6] The expected number of recycled pulsars is quoted as 'around 9' with no uncertainty. Since the scaling relation ln λ = -1.1 + 1.5 log10 Γ is calibrated on globular clusters, its applicability to a single open cluster with Γ ≈ 162 is uncertain; a confidence interval or a caveat about extrapolation would be appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pulsar discovery, distance estimates, and expected-count calculation all rely on measured data or external empirical models, not on fitting the target association claim.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical result is the discovery of PSR J1922+37 with a measured period and dispersion measure (Section 4.1). The distance estimates are obtained by passing the measured DM through the external NE2001 and YMW16 electron density models (Section 4.3); these models are not fitted to the NGC 6791 distance in this paper, and the cluster distance comes from independent Gaia-based catalog work (Hunt & Reffert 2024). The association argument is a comparison of independent distance estimates, and the paper explicitly acknowledges the YMW16 discrepancy: 'Clearly we cannot definitively argue for the association based solely on the DM' (Section 4.3). That is an honest statement of uncertainty, not a circular reduction. The expected recycled-pulsar count in Appendix A uses the empirical scaling relation ln λ = -1.1 + 1.5 log10 Γ (Turk & Lorimer 2013; Gao et al. 2024), applied to NGC 6791's independently estimated encounter rate; this is an external empirical relation, not fitted to the discovery, and it is not used as evidence for the association. The 'If confirmed, PSR J1922+37 will be the first pulsar discovered in an open cluster' claim is explicitly conditional and depends on future confirmation. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force the association; and no central claim is justified solely by a self-citation. The factor-of-two disagreement between NE2001 and YMW16 distance estimates is a scientific uncertainty about the association, not a circularity in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on external electron density models, published cluster parameters, and an empirical pulsar-yield scaling relation; no new entities or hand-fitted parameters are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption NE2001 and YMW16 electron density models provide valid distance estimates from dispersion measure.
    Used in Table 1 and Section 4.3 to convert DM=85 pc cm^-3 to distances of 4.79 and 8.9 kpc; the association argument depends on NE2001 being more accurate along this sight line.
  • domain assumption The cluster parameters of NGC 6791 (distance 4.19 kpc, tidal radius 11.6 arcmin, Jacobi radius 29.7 arcmin) from Hunt & Reffert (2024) and other references are accurate.
    Used in Section 4.3 and Figure 2 to argue the pulsar's offset is within the Jacobi radius.
  • domain assumption The empirical scaling relation between recycled pulsar number and encounter rate, ln lambda = -1.1 + 1.5 log10 Gamma, applies to open clusters such as NGC 6791.
    Used in Appendix A to predict about 9 pulsars; this relation was calibrated on globular clusters and may not transfer to lower-density open clusters.
  • domain assumption The effective gain of the discovery beam is G0/2 due to the source being about half a beamwidth off-axis.
    Used in Section 4.2 to estimate a flux density of about 7 microJy; this is a modeling choice with unquantified uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PSR J1922+37: a 1.9-second pulsar discovered in the direction of the old open cluster NGC 6791." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KS5I44SD

@misc{pith2026241208055,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PSR J1922+37: a 1.9-second pulsar discovered in the direction of the old open cluster NGC 6791},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KS5I44SD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08055}
}
abstract

More than 300 pulsars have been discovered in Galactic globular clusters; however, none have been found in open clusters. Here we present results from 20-hour pulsar searching observations in seven open clusters with the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST). Our first discovery is a 1.9-second pulsar (J1922+37) found in the direction of the old open cluster NGC 6791. The measured dispersion measure (DM) implies a distance of 4.79 kpc and 8.92 kpc based on the NE2001 and YMW16 electron density models, respectively. Given the large uncertainty of DM distance estimates, it is likely that PSR J1922+37 is indeed a member of NGC 6791, for which the distance is $4.19\pm0.02$ kpc based on Gaia Data Release 3. If confirmed, PSR J1922+37 will be the first pulsar found in Galactic open clusters. We outline future observations that can confirm this pulsar-open cluster association and discuss the general prospects of finding pulsars in open clusters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08055 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The discovery plot of PSR J1922+37 from the pdmp routine in psrchive. The top panel shows the optimization of period and DM, while the middle panels are phase-time and phase-frequency plots and the bottom panel shows the pulse profile. We estimate the flux density by the radiometer equa￾tion (Lorimer & Kramer 2012), S = S/N Tsys G p nptint∆f r W P − W , (1) where we use Tsys = 18 K, ∆f = 400 MHz (Jiang et al. 2019),… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The position of J1922+37 and the member stars of NGC 6791. The filled circles in orange, pink, cyan, and olive show the tiled beams of all four observation pointings. The two discovery beams (M08) are indicated by the hollow stars, while the optimized position is labeled by the solid red star, and the cluster members are marked by the gray stars. The blue and red circles show the boundaries of the tidal and Jacobi r… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    # IģԇF eTOO7 r2!,cYߔ<M f\ x1;`U|Oy d پɟ Ȧt3գPbl*R r[CJo( *?*NGp 魖&aTG+?d|R |N) )\̹ 䩤@ R 0RɭT 8,R<t@vc*T9 n 0<RK6gL ] 5j;QGY& gTbg?r ),e3SHg< TWAp4 dR ٢8J :7JMO@=) m = H) LU.Rz )

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    D., et al

    Abbate , F., Ridolfi , A., Barr , E. D., et al. 2022, , 513, 2292, 10.1093/mnras/stac1041

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1041 2022

  5. [5]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  6. [6]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  7. [7]

    O., Sivakoff , G

    Bahramian , A., Heinke , C. O., Sivakoff , G. R., & Gladstone , J. C. 2013, , 766, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/136

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/136 2013

  8. [8]

    2020, Peasoup: C++/CUDA GPU pulsar searching library , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2001.014

    Barr , E. 2020, Peasoup: C++/CUDA GPU pulsar searching library , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2001.014

    work page 2020

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    R., Piotto , G., Carraro , G., King , I

    Bedin , L. R., Piotto , G., Carraro , G., King , I. R., & Anderson , J. 2006, , 460, L27, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066085

    2006 doi

  2. [10]

    B., Bonatto , C

    Bica , E., Pavani , D. B., Bonatto , C. J., & Lima , E. F. 2019, , 157, 12, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaef8d

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    Binney , J., & Tremaine , S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    2008

  4. [12]

    R., Turk , P

    Boyles , J., Lorimer , D. R., Turk , P. J., et al. 2011, , 742, 51, 10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/51

    2011 doi

  5. [13]

    J., & Ransom , S

    Condon , J. J., & Ransom , S. M. 2016, Essential Radio Astronomy

    2016

  6. [14]

    M., & Lazio , T

    Cordes , J. M., & Lazio , T. J. W. 2002, arXiv e-prints, astro, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0207156

    2002 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    2015, , 449, 1811, 10.1093/mnras/stv395

    Dalessandro , E., Miocchi , P., Carraro , G., J \' lkov \'a , L., & Moitinho , A. 2015, , 449, 1811, 10.1093/mnras/stv395

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    G., Manchester , R

    D'Amico , N., Lyne , A. G., Manchester , R. N., Possenti , A., & Camilo , F. 2001, , 548, L171, 10.1086/319096

    2001 doi

  9. [17]

    S., Monteiro , H., Moitinho , A., et al

    Dias , W. S., Monteiro , H., Moitinho , A., et al. 2021, , 504, 356, 10.1093/mnras/stab770

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Djorgovski , S. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 50, Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters, ed. S. G. Djorgovski & G. Meylan , 373

    1993

  11. [19]

    Freire , P. C. C., Ridolfi , A., Kramer , M., et al. 2017, , 471, 857, 10.1093/mnras/stx1533

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.10801, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.10801

    Gao , S.-J., Shao , Y.-X., Wang , P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.10801, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.10801

    2024 doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    2012, Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics, 36, 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chinastron.2011.12.003

    Gao, X.-H., & Chen, L. 2012, Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics, 36, 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chinastron.2011.12.003

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    V., Hardis , S., & Frandsen , S

    Grundahl , F., Clausen , J. V., Hardis , S., & Frandsen , S. 2008, , 492, 171, 10.1051/0004-6361:200810749

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    L., Wang , C., Wang , P

    Han , J. L., Wang , C., Wang , P. F., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 107, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/5/107

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    W., van Straten, W., & Manchester, R

    Hotan, A. W., van Straten, W., & Manchester, R. N. 2004, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 21, 302–309, 10.1071/AS04022

    2004 doi

  17. [25]

    Y., Cheng , K

    Hui , C. Y., Cheng , K. S., & Taam , R. E. 2010, , 714, 1149, 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1149

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    L., & Reffert , S

    Hunt , E. L., & Reffert , S. 2024, , 686, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348662

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    O., Rasio , F

    Ivanova , N., Heinke , C. O., Rasio , F. A., Belczynski , K., & Fregeau , J. M. 2008, , 386, 553, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13064.x

    2008

  20. [28]

    2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 959502, 10.1007/s11433-018-9376-1

    Jiang , P., Yue , Y., Gan , H., et al. 2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 959502, 10.1007/s11433-018-9376-1

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 064, 10.1088/1674-4527/20/5/64

    Jiang , P., Tang , N.-Y., Hou , L.-G., et al. 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 064, 10.1088/1674-4527/20/5/64

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    M., & Kulkarni , S

    Johnston , H. M., & Kulkarni , S. R. 1991, , 368, 504, 10.1086/169715

    1991 doi

  23. [31]

    V., Piskunov , A

    Kharchenko , N. V., Piskunov , A. E., Schilbach , E., R \"o ser , S., & Scholz , R. D. 2013, , 558, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322302

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    1962, , 67, 471, 10.1086/108756

    King , I. 1962, , 67, 471, 10.1086/108756

    1962 doi

  25. [33]

    2018, IEEE Microwave Magazine, 19, 112, 10.1109/MMM.2018.2802178

    Li , D., Wang , P., Qian , L., et al. 2018, IEEE Microwave Magazine, 19, 112, 10.1109/MMM.2018.2802178

    2018

  26. [34]

    R., & Kramer , M

    Lorimer , D. R., & Kramer , M. 2012, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy

    2012

  27. [35]

    S., Ransom , S

    Lynch , R. S., Ransom , S. M., Freire , P. C. C., & Stairs , I. H. 2011, , 734, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/89

    2011 doi

  28. [36]

    G., Biggs , J

    Lyne , A. G., Biggs , J. D., Harrison , P. A., & Bailes , M. 1993, , 361, 47, 10.1038/361047a0

    1993 doi

  29. [37]

    D., Cooper , S., et al

    Morello , V., Barr , E. D., Cooper , S., et al. 2019, , 483, 3673, 10.1093/mnras/sty3328

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    2023, clfd: Clean folded data , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2310.008

    ---. 2023, clfd: Clean folded data , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2310.008

    2023

  31. [39]

    2011, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 20, 989, 10.1142/S0218271811019335

    Nan , R., Li , D., Jin , C., et al. 2011, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 20, 989, 10.1142/S0218271811019335

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    2021, , 915, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0bbd

    Pan , Z., Qian , L., Ma , X., et al. 2021, , 915, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0bbd

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Perera , B. B. P., Stappers , B. W., Lyne , A. G., et al. 2017, , 468, 2114, 10.1093/mnras/stx501

    2017 doi

  34. [42]

    2002, , 573, 283, 10.1086/340494

    Pfahl , E., Rappaport , S., & Podsiadlowski , P. 2002, , 573, 283, 10.1086/340494

    2002 doi

  35. [43]

    M., Kozhurina-Platais , V., et al

    Platais , I., Cudworth , K. M., Kozhurina-Platais , V., et al. 2011, , 733, L1, 10.1088/2041-8205/733/1/L1

    2011 doi

  36. [44]

    J., Ransom , S

    Prager , B. J., Ransom , S. M., Freire , P. C. C., et al. 2017, , 845, 148, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7ed7

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017

    Ransom , S. 2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017

    2011

  38. [46]

    M., Cordes , J

    Ransom , S. M., Cordes , J. M., & Eikenberry , S. S. 2003, , 589, 911, 10.1086/374806

    2003 doi

  39. [47]

    2023, , 522, 1071, 10.1093/mnras/stad508

    Sengar , R., Bailes , M., Balakrishnan , V., et al. 2023, , 522, 1071, 10.1093/mnras/stad508

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    J., & Lorimer , D

    Turk , P. J., & Lorimer , D. R. 2013, , 436, 3720, 10.1093/mnras/stt1850

    2013 doi

  41. [49]

    2011, , 28, 1, 10.1071/AS10021

    van Straten , W., & Bailes , M. 2011, , 28, 1, 10.1071/AS10021

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    2002, Binary evolution and neutron stars in globular clusters

    Verbunt, F. 2002, Binary evolution and neutron stars in globular clusters. astro-ph/0210057

    2002 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Verbunt , F., & Freire , P. C. C. 2014, , 561, A11, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321177

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    M., Manchester , R

    Yao , J. M., Manchester , R. N., & Wang , N. 2017, , 835, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/29

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    2024, , 969, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad534e

    Yin , D., Zhang , L.-Y., Qian , L., et al. 2024, , 969, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad534e

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.