Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Partial Counterfactual Identification from Observational and Experimental Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.05690 v1 pith:KS6ZN5US submitted 2021-10-12 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords counterfactualarbitrarycausalexperimentalobservationalalgorithmsboundingbounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the problem of bounding counterfactual queries from an arbitrary collection of observational and experimental distributions and qualitative knowledge about the underlying data-generating model represented in the form of a causal diagram. We show that all counterfactual distributions in an arbitrary structural causal model (SCM) could be generated by a canonical family of SCMs with the same causal diagram where unobserved (exogenous) variables are discrete with a finite domain. Utilizing the canonical SCMs, we translate the problem of bounding counterfactuals into that of polynomial programming whose solution provides optimal bounds for the counterfactual query. Solving such polynomial programs is in general computationally expensive. We therefore develop effective Monte Carlo algorithms to approximate the optimal bounds from an arbitrary combination of observational and experimental data. Our algorithms are validated extensively on synthetic and real-world datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Limits of Predicting Agents from Behaviour

    cs.AI 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Observed behavior only weakly constrains an intentional agent's choices under distribution shift, and its perceived fairness and harm cannot be identified from behavior alone.

Pith tools