Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Twisted Dirac operators and fractional correlations of the massless sine-Gordon model at the free fermion point

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The fractional correlations of the massless sine-Gordon model at the free fermion point are the tau functions of a massive twisted Dirac operator, up to a constant — proving the Lukyanov–Zamolodchikov and Bernard–LeClair predictions at β =

desk verdict A technically impressive and important identification of sine-Gordon fractional correlations with Palmer's tau functions; the proof is long and mostly credible, but the asserted analytic series matching is the step a referee should verify. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14806 v1 pith:KSQNRMNV submitted 2025-08-20 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Roland Bauerschmidt , Scott Mason , Christian Webb This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60G6060H1781T4035Q41
keywords sine-GordonmodelfreefermionpointimaginarymultiplicativechaostwistedDiracoperatortaufunctionbosonizationFredholmdeterminantfractionalcorrelationfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the fractional charge (vertex operator) correlation functions of the massless sine-Gordon model at the free fermion point β = 4π are exactly the renormalized determinants of massive twisted Dirac operators, up to a multiplicative constant fixed by the regularization. These correlation functions, formally the expectations of products of fractional exponentials of the field, are defined rigorously as moments of an imaginary multiplicative chaos constructed against the infinite-volume sine-Gordon measure. The identification with the tau functions of Sato–Miwa–Jimbo, in Palmer's interpretation, then turns established results about those tau functions into theorems about the model: a Fredholm determinant representation and Basor–Tracy asymptotics for the two-point function, the Lukyanov–Zamolodchikov one-point formula, and the Bernard–LeClair PDEs. The proof carries the stochastic-analytic construction — a decomposition of the field into a Gaussian part plus a Hölder part, finite-volume approximation, and analytic continuation in the coupling constant — through to the integrable side by matching Taylor expansions in the coupling on both sides.

What carries the argument

Two objects carry the argument. First, the twisted Dirac operator: the Euclidean Dirac operator twisted by the multi-valued function ρ(z) = ∏_j (z − x_j)^{α_j}, which encodes branch points x_j and winding numbers α_j; its renormalized determinant is the tau function τ_ρ(µ) of Sato–Miwa–Jimbo as interpreted by Palmer. Second, the imaginary multiplicative chaos M_α, the limit of ε^{−α²}∫ e^{i√(4π)α(η_ε*φ)} f dx as ε → 0, whose moments are the fractional correlation functions. The bridge between them is a decomposition φ = Z + φ̃ of the sine-Gordon field into a log-correlated Gaussian part Z and a Hölder-continuous part φ̃, built from a renormalized potential with Polchinski-type estimates; thi

What would settle it

Evaluate the two-point function two ways at β = 4π and compare: numerically compute the Fredholm determinant (1.15)–(1.16) for a fixed fractional charge α and several separations |x − y|, and independently simulate the lattice-regularized path integral (1.29) at the same parameters. The theorem predicts the two agree up to one constant across all separations; a systematic discrepancy in the |x − y| dependence — for instance a failure of the predicted |x − y|^{−2α²} short-distance scaling (1.18) — would refute the identification, as would a mismatch between the mixing limit (1.23) and the Lukya

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 is the load-bearing assertion: for fractional charges α_1,...,α_n ∈ (−1/2, 1/2) with sum zero, the smeared fractional correlation functions of the massless sine-Gordon model at β = 4π equal, up to a regularization-dependent constant, the integral of the test functions against the tau function τ_ρ(µ) of a massive twisted Dirac operator, with µ = Az and A = 4πe^{−γ/2}. The fractional correlations are defined as moments of the imaginary multiplicative chaos M_α, a random generalized function constructed against the infinite-volume sine-Gordon measure. The identification yields the Fredholm-determinant representation of the two-point function, the Basor–Tracy short- and long-distance

Load-bearing premise

The whole infinite-volume construction of the field — the decomposition into a Gaussian part plus a well-behaved remainder on which the imaginary multiplicative chaos is built — rests on a bound on how much the field fluctuates when integrated against smooth test functions (Propositions 4.4–4.5), and at β = 4π that bound is verified only through the free-fermion description of the model; if it failed, the construction behind the main identification would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fractional two-point function is a genuine Fredholm determinant with an explicit kernel (Corollary 1.5), and its short-distance behavior is governed by Barnes G-functions while it tends to a constant at long distances (Corollary 1.6).
  • The one-point function obeys the Lukyanov–Zamolodchikov formula (1.24) at β = 4π — the first derivation of that prediction from the Euclidean path integral (Corollary 1.9).
  • The logarithm of the two-point function solves the Bernard–LeClair PDE system (1.27)–(1.28), with mass parameter fixed as µ = A|z| (Corollary 1.11).
  • The massless sine-Gordon measure at the free fermion point is mixing (Theorem 1.12); this yields the large-distance factorization (1.23) from which the one-point function is recovered from the two-point function and extends the identification to non-neutral correlations (Corollary 1.16).
  • The imaginary multiplicative chaos exists as a random element of the Besov–Hölder space C^{−s}_{loc} for any s > α², with moments of all orders (Theorem 1.13), so the fractional correlation functions are defined objects rather than formal symbols.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: the analytic-continuation scheme is a template: the identity of the two Taylor series in the coupling constant (free-field cumulants on one side, expansion of the tau function on the other) suggests the correspondence should survive as a theorem whenever the moment bound (6.1) is available, not only at the free fermion point.
  • Editorial: the twisted sector computed here is genuinely new fermionic data — the integer-charge bosonization dictionary (1.3)–(1.6) says nothing about fractional α — so the result effectively extends the Coleman correspondence to a branched-fermion sector; a natural next target is the mixed correlation functions the paper anticipates in Remark 1.4.
  • Editorial: the near-critical dimer model, whose height function scaling limit is the sine-Gordon field at the free fermion point, offers an independent discrete test: its electric correlators computed from twisted (branched) fermions should reproduce the same tau functions in the scaling limit, providing a combinatorial check of Theorem 1.1.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the massless sine-Gordon measure at the free fermion point β=4π in infinite volume, defines fractional (vertex) correlation functions as moments of an imaginary multiplicative chaos, and proves Theorem 1.1: these smeared correlations equal, up to a regularization-dependent constant, integrals of the Palmer tau function τ_ρ(µ) of a massive twisted Dirac operator with µ=Az and A=4π e^{-γ/2}. The proof proceeds through finite-volume approximations, analytic continuation in the coupling z / mass µ, and convergence of finite-volume renormalized determinants to Palmer's tau function. The paper then derives several applications: Fredholm-determinant formulas for two-point functions (Corollary 1.5), Basor–Tracy asymptotics (Corollary 1.6), the Lukyanov–Zamolodchikov one-point formula (Corollary 1.9), and the Bernard–LeClair PDE (Corollary 1.11). The main technical achievements are the construction and regularity of the imaginary multiplicative chaos for the sine-Gordon measure, the proof of mixing, and the finite-volume analyticity framework used to connect the two sides.

Significance. If Theorem 1.1 is correct, this is a major advance: it gives a rigorous path-integral derivation of the Lukyanov–Zamolodchikov formula at the free fermion point, a rigorous bridge between probabilistic sine-Gordon correlation functions and tau functions of twisted Dirac operators, and a proof of the Bernard–LeClair equations. The paper combines stochastic-analysis techniques with integrability input from [12] and uses independent external benchmarks (Palmer's tau functions and Basor–Tracy asymptotics). The construction of the imaginary multiplicative chaos for the singular, non-Gaussian sine-Gordon measure is itself a substantial contribution. The main caveat is that the central identification relies on a Taylor-coefficient matching step that is asserted but not displayed; this is a load-bearing gap that must be addressed before the theorem can be fully accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§9 (massive Bosonization); cf. §1.7] The central identification Theorem 1.1 rests on the claim that the finite-volume massive Bosonization identity follows by matching Taylor expansions at z=0 and analytically continuing in z/μ. The bosonic coefficients are stated in Theorem 4.6, Eq. (4.34), as free-field cumulants of fractional exponentials with p cosine insertions. The fermionic coefficients are supposed to follow from the Born expansion of the massive Green's function (Proposition 8.4, Eq. (8.16)) together with the determinant definition of the finite-volume tau function in Section 9. However, no matching calculation is shown in Section 9 or in the proof of Theorem 1.1. This is not a cosmetic omission: a missing combinatorial factor, an incorrect constant A=4π e^{-γ/2}, or an incorrect normalization of the determinant would invalidate Theorem 1.1 and all of Corollaries 1.5–1.11. I request an explicit proof of the coeffic
  2. [Theorem 4.2(iv), Eq. (4.6)] The passage from finite-volume to infinite-volume correlation functions is stated only as convergence along suitable subsequences. Theorem 4.6 proves uniqueness of the m→0 limit in fixed finite volume via analytic continuation, but the Λ→R2 limit is not handled in the same way. Since Theorem 1.1 is an equality for the infinite-volume left-hand side for arbitrary test functions, the paper should either prove that the limit in (4.6) is independent of the chosen subsequences, or formulate the theorem and its proof with an explicit exhaustion whose choice is shown not to affect the right-hand side. As written, the subsequence ambiguity is load-bearing for the identification with Palmer's tau function.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 1.1 / §1.3.2] The notation ∝ in (1.13) hides at least two different regularization-dependent constants: the multiplicative normalization of the imaginary multiplicative chaos and the constant A in µ=Az. It would be clearer to state the canonical normalization (e.g., that used in (1.20)) before Theorem 1.1, rather than only after Corollary 1.8.
  2. [Remark 1.17] The remark asserts that the right-hand side of (1.45) vanishes but explicitly omits the proof. Since this is used only as context, it should be labelled as a heuristic claim or the proof should be included.
  3. [§10.2 / Corollaries 1.5 and 1.11] The translation from Palmer's conventions to the present notation is central to the applications. A table listing the correspondences (α_i ↔ λ_i, µ ↔ m, factors 2 in the Dirac operator, factors in the Green's function) would improve readability and reduce the risk of convention errors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fractional-correlation/tau-function identification is a genuine derivation; the asserted Taylor-matching step is an omitted calculation, not a definitional loop.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 1.1) identifies two independently defined objects: the left-hand side is defined from the path integral via imaginary multiplicative chaos (Definition 1.15, (1.12)), while the right-hand side is Palmer's tau function of the massive twisted Dirac operator (1.11). Neither side is defined in terms of the other. The proof strategy (Section 1.7) is to prove a finite-volume Bosonization identity by analytic continuation: both sides are analytic in the coupling in a neighborhood of the real axis, and the Taylor expansions at z=0 (resp. mu=0) are matched. The order-zero term is the massless Bosonization of Section 7, an elementary identity. The higher coefficients are determined on the bosonic side by GFF cumulants with cosine insertions (Theorem 4.6, eq. (4.34)) and on the fermionic side by the Born expansion of the massive twisted Green's function (Prop. 8.4, eq. (8.16)); their equality is asserted in the outline ('We identify the series expansions of both sides and use analytic continuation'), but the calculation is not displayed. That is a verification gap, not a circularity: the finite-volume tau function is not defined by that series, it is a renormalized determinant whose Taylor coefficients are then computed. The constant A=4pi e^{-gamma/2} is a computed regularization constant (cf. Prop. 3.2), not a parameter fitted to the Lukyanov-Zamolodchikov or Bernard-LeClair predictions; those predictions are derived after Theorem 1.1 using external Basor-Tracy and Palmer results, and mixing proved in Section 2. Reliance on [12] for the base sine-Gordon measure and the integer-charge Bosonization dictionary is a citation to a prior proved construction: it supplies the input measure and dictionary, but the fractional-charge/twisted-fermion identification is an extension, not a restatement. The moment bound (4.11) is an assumption in the general Propositions 4.4-4.5 but is verified at beta=4pi in Corollary 2.4; it is a regularity input, not the target identity. No step in the chain reduces by definition to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests mostly on imported machinery: the base measure and Bosonization of [12], the Polchinski-based potential estimates of [26]/[12], and Palmer's tau-function theory [59] with Basor-Tracy asymptotics [7]. Within the paper, the genuinely new constructs (finite-volume tau functions, SG-based IMC) carry the proof but are anchored to external objects. No fitted free parameter carries the physics; the 'free parameters' listed are regularization-determined constants. The heaviest unproven-in-the-text assumption is the moment bound (4.11) at β = 4π, which is established only through the imported Bosonization.

free parameters (2)
  • Mass parameter µ in the identification µ = Az = µ = A z with A = 4π e^{-γ/2} (regularization-dependent constant)
    The identification constant is fixed by the chosen mollifier/renormalization scheme (Theorem 1.1), not fitted to data or to the target formulas. It is an input determined by the ultraviolet regularization.
  • Mollifier-dependent multiplicative constant in the IMC and correlation functions = C_η^{α²} = e^{-α²(-γ/2 + log 2 + ∫∫ η(u)η(v) log(1/|u-v|) du dv)}
    The IMC limit is mollifier-independent only up to this deterministic constant (Proposition 3.2). It is absorbed into the a posteriori normalization (1.20); not fitted, but free up to the chosen short-distance normalization.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The massless infinite-volume sine-Gordon measure νSG(4π,z) exists as the limit of regularized measures, with the Bosonization dictionary (1.3)-(1.6) to massive free fermions.
    Imported from [12]; used throughout (Sections 2, 7-9). The paper extends but does not re-derive this base construction.
  • domain assumption The renormalized potential V_t satisfies the Polchinski-based estimates of [12, 26], including complex z and complex φ in a strip, with volume-uniform bounds (Proposition 5.2, 6.4).
    Underpins the SDE decomposition (5.87) and the analytic continuation in z; the proofs build on [12, Sections 4-5] and [26].
  • domain assumption The moment bound (4.11)/(6.1) holds for the massless sine-Gordon measure at β = 4π.
    Load-bearing for the infinite-volume decomposition (Propositions 4.4-4.5) and the IMC construction; verified in Section 2 (Corollary 2.4) via [12].
  • domain assumption Palmer's identification of the tau function τ_ρ(µ) with the renormalized determinant of the massive twisted Dirac operator, and Basor-Tracy asymptotics for the associated Fredholm determinants.
    Imported from [59] and [7]; the paper translates conventions (Section 10.2) and uses them as the integrable-systems benchmark.
invented entities (2)
  • Finite-volume tau functions (renormalized determinants of /∂_ρ + µχ) independent evidence
    purpose: Mediate the finite-volume approximation of the infinite-volume tau function and permit analyticity in µ and series matching with the bosonic side.
    New objects defined in Section 9; their infinite-volume limit is shown to be Palmer's tau function (Section 10), which provides an external anchor independent of the paper's own estimates.
  • Imaginary multiplicative chaos M_α under the sine-Gordon measure independent evidence
    purpose: Give rigorous meaning to the fractional vertex operators :e^{i√4παφ}: as random distributions with respect to νSG(4π,z).
    Defined as limits of regularized exponentials; in the z = 0 limit it reduces to the well-studied Gaussian imaginary multiplicative chaos (Section 3.2, Proposition 3.1), an external benchmark not used to set the constants.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twisted Dirac operators and fractional correlations of the massless sine-Gordon model at the free fermion point." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KSQNRMNV

@misc{pith2026250814806,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twisted Dirac operators and fractional correlations of the massless sine-Gordon model at the free fermion point},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KSQNRMNV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14806}
}
read the original abstract

For the massless sine-Gordon model at the free fermion point, in infinite volume, we define the fractional (charge or vertex operator) correlation functions from the probabilistic path integral and prove that they are given by renormalized determinants of massive twisted Dirac operators. The fractional correlation functions are the moments of the imaginary multiplicative chaos, a random generalized function that we construct with respect to the infinite-volume massless sine-Gordon measure. The renormalized determinants are the tau functions of Sato--Miwa--Jimbo as identified by Palmer. The construction and a priori control of the imaginary multiplicative chaos combines methods from stochastic analysis (of singular SPDE flavor) for short-scale regularity with qualitative input from integrability for large-scale control. The exact identification of the correlation functions with the renormalized determinants relies on finite-volume approximation, regularity estimates for the mass perturbation, and analytic continuation in the coupling constant. The combination of existing results for tau functions with our identification implies various predictions for the sine-Gordon model such as that the fractional two-point functions are expressed as Fredholm determinants and satisfy certain PDEs as predicted by Bernard--LeClair. Using asymptotics of Fredholm determinants of Basor--Tracy and mixing of the massless sine-Gordon model at the free fermion point, which we prove, we further derive the exact formula for the one-point function predicted by Lukyanov--Zamolodchikov (at the free fermion point).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.14806 by the authors.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Illustration of the branch points xi, the windings αi, and the branch cuts Γ. where γ µ are Euclidean γ-matrices, see [12] for further details on this and the rigorous implemen￾tation of the Coleman correspondence at β = 4π. Our goal is to construct and then compute the correlation functions of :e i √ 4παφ: for α ∈ (− 1 2 , 1 2 ) from the path integral. The former exponentials are also known as vertex operators. Sin… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An FBSDE Construction of the Sine-Gordon EQFT for $\beta^{2} < \frac{6}{7}\, 8\pi$ and Perturbative Renormalization in the Full Subcritical Regime

    math-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The 2D finite-volume sine-Gordon measure is constructed for β² < (6/7)·8π via a weak FBSDE/control problem, with an order-by-order renormalization-flow analysis valid for all β² < 8π.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [12]

    Bauerschmidt and C

    R. Bauerschmidt and C. Webb. The Coleman correspondence at the free fermion point. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 26(9):3137–3241, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Andersson

    M. Andersson. Topics in complex analysis . Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

    1997

  3. [2]

    J. Aru, A. Jego, and J. Junnila. Density of imaginary multiplicative chaos via Malliavin calculus. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 184(3-4):749–803, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    Astala, T

    K. Astala, T. Iwaniec, and G. Martin. Elliptic partial differential equations and quasiconfor- mal mappings in the plane, volume 48 ofPrinceton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009

    work page 2009

  5. [4]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard, and M. Talon. Introduction to classical integrable systems . Cam- bridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003

    work page 2003

  6. [5]

    Bahouri, J.-Y

    H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin. Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, volume 343 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften . Springer, 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [6]

    Basok and D

    M. Basok and D. Chelkak. Tau-functions ` a la Dub´ edat and probabilities of cylindrical events for double-dimers and CLE(4). J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 23(8):2787–2832, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    Basor and C.A

    E.L. Basor and C.A. Tracy. Asymptotics of a tau-function and Toeplitz determinants with singular generating functions. In Infinite analysis, Part A, B (Kyoto, 1991) , volume 16 of Adv. Ser. Math. Phys. , pages 83–107. World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1992. 159

    work page 1991

Show all 81 references
  1. [8]

    Bauerschmidt and T

    R. Bauerschmidt and T. Bodineau. Log-Sobolev inequality for the continuum sine-Gordon model. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 74(10):2064–2113, 2021

  2. [9]

    Bauerschmidt, T

    R. Bauerschmidt, T. Bodineau, and B. Dagallier. Stochastic dynamics and the Polchinski equation: An introduction. Probab. Surv., 21:200–290, 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Bauerschmidt, B

    R. Bauerschmidt, B. Dagallier, and H. Weber. Holley–Stroock uniqueness method for the φ4 2 dynamics. Preprint, arXiv:2504.08606

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    Bauerschmidt and M

    R. Bauerschmidt and M. Hofstetter. Maximum and coupling of the sine-Gordon field. Ann. Probab., 50(2):455–508, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Benfatto

    G. Benfatto. An iterated Mayer expansion for the Yukawa gas. J. Statist. Phys., 41(3-4):671– 684, 1985

    1985

  6. [14]

    Benfatto, P

    G. Benfatto, P. Falco, and V. Mastropietro. Functional integral construction of the massive Thirring model: verification of axioms and massless limit. Commun. Math. Phys., 273(1):67– 118, 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Benfatto, P

    G. Benfatto, P. Falco, and V. Mastropietro. Massless sine-Gordon and massive Thirring models: proof of Coleman’s equivalence. Commun. Math. Phys. , 285(2):713–762, 2009

    2009

  8. [16]

    Benfatto, G

    G. Benfatto, G. Gallavotti, and F. Nicol` o. On the massive sine-Gordon equation in the first few regions of collapse. Commun. Math. Phys. , 83(3):387–410, 1982

    1982

  9. [17]

    Berestycki and L

    N. Berestycki and L. Haunschmid-Sibitz. Near-critical dimers and massive SLE. Preprint, arXiv:2203.15717

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Berestycki, S

    N. Berestycki, S. Mason, and L. Rey. Massive holomorphicity of near-critical dimers and the sine-Gordon model. In preparation

  11. [19]

    Bernard and A

    D. Bernard and A. LeClair. Differential equations for sine-Gordon correlation functions at the free fermion point. Nuclear Phys. B , 426(3):534–558, 1994

    1994

  12. [20]

    Differential equations for sine-Gordon correlation functions at the free fermion point

    D. Bernard and A. LeClair. Erratum to: “Differential equations for sine-Gordon correlation functions at the free fermion point” [Nuclear Phys. B 426 (1994), no. 3, 534–558; MR1297289 (95i:81207)]. Nuclear Phys. B , 498(3):619–621, 1997

    1994

  13. [21]

    Billingsley

    P. Billingsley. Convergence of probability measures. Wiley Series in Probability and Statis- tics: Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., second edition, 1999. A Wiley- Interscience Publication

    1999

  14. [22]

    Bringmann and S

    B. Bringmann and S. Cao. Global well-posedness of the dynamical sine-Gordon model up to 6π. 2024. Preprint, arXiv:2410.15493

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Brydges and H.-T

    D. Brydges and H.-T. Yau. Grad ϕ perturbations of massless Gaussian fields. Commun. Math. Phys. , 129(2):351–392, 1990

    1990

  16. [24]

    D.C. Brydges. Lectures on the renormalisation group. In Statistical mechanics, volume 16 of IAS/Park City Math. Ser. , pages 7–93. Amer. Math. Soc., 2009

    2009

  17. [25]

    Brydges and P

    D.C. Brydges and P. Federbush. Debye screening. Commun. Math. Phys. , 73(3):197–246, 1980

    1980

  18. [26]

    Brydges and T

    D.C. Brydges and T. Kennedy. Mayer expansions and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. J. Statist. Phys. , 48(1-2):19–49, 1987. 160

    1987

  19. [27]

    Chandra, G.d.L

    A. Chandra, G.d.L. Feltes, and H. Weber. A priori bounds for 2-d generalised Parabolic Anderson Model. February 2024. Preprint, arXiv:2402.05544

    2024

  20. [28]

    Chelkak, C

    D. Chelkak, C. Hongler, and K. Izyurov. Conformal invariance of spin correlations in the planar Ising model. Ann. of Math. (2) , 181(3):1087–1138, 2015

    2015

  21. [29]

    S. Coleman. Quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model. Phys. Rev. D , 11:2088–2097, Apr 1975

  22. [30]

    Da Prato and J

    G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk. Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions , volume 152 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2014

    2014

  23. [31]

    Dieudonn´ e.Foundations of modern analysis , volume Vol

    J. Dieudonn´ e.Foundations of modern analysis , volume Vol. 10-I of Pure and Applied Math- ematics. Academic Press, New York-London, 1969. Enlarged and corrected printing

    1969

  24. [32]

    Dimock and T.R

    J. Dimock and T.R. Hurd. Construction of the two-dimensional sine-Gordon model for β <8π. Commun. Math. Phys. , 156(3):547–580, 1993

    1993

  25. [33]

    Dimock and T.R

    J. Dimock and T.R. Hurd. Sine-Gordon revisited. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 1(3):499–541, 2000

    2000

  26. [34]

    Dub´ edat

    J. Dub´ edat. Dimers and families of Cauchy-Riemann operators I. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 28(4):1063–1167, 2015

    2015

  27. [35]

    Dub´ edat

    J. Dub´ edat. Double dimers, conformal loop ensembles and isomonodromic deformations. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 21(1):1–54, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    L.C. Evans. Partial differential equations , volume 19 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, 1998

    1998

  29. [37]

    P. Falco. Kosterlitz-Thouless transition line for the two dimensional Coulomb gas. Commun. Math. Phys. , 312(2):559–609, 2012

    2012

  30. [38]

    Federbush and T

    P. Federbush and T. Kennedy. Surface effects in Debye screening. Commun. Math. Phys. , 102(3):361–423, 1985

    1985

  31. [39]

    Fr¨ ohlich

    J. Fr¨ ohlich. Classical and quantum statistical mechanics in one and two dimensions: two- component Yukawa- and Coulomb systems. Commun. Math. Phys. , 47(3):233–268, 1976

    1976

  32. [40]

    Fr¨ ohlich and Y.M

    J. Fr¨ ohlich and Y.M. Park. Correlation inequalities and the thermodynamic limit for classical and quantum continuous systems. Commun. Math. Phys. , 59(3):235–266, 1978

    1978

  33. [41]

    Furlan and J.-C

    M. Furlan and J.-C. Mourrat. A tightness criterion for random fields, with application to the Ising model. Electron. J. Probab., 22:Paper No. 97, 29, 2017

    2017

  34. [42]

    Ghosal, G

    P. Ghosal, G. Remy, X. Sun, and Y. Sun. Probabilistic conformal blocks for Liouville CFT on the torus. Duke Math. J. , 173(6):1085–1175, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Gubinelli and S.-J

    M. Gubinelli and S.-J. Meyer. The FBSDE approach to sine-Gordon up to 6 π. Preprint, arXiv:2401.13648

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Guillarmou, A

    C. Guillarmou, A. Kupiainen, and R. Rhodes. Review on the probabilistic construction and Conformal bootstrap in Liouville Theory. Preprint, arXiv:2403.12780

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Iorgov, O

    N. Iorgov, O. Lisovyy, and J. Teschner. Isomonodromic tau-functions from Liouville confor- mal blocks. Commun. Math. Phys. , 336(2):671–694, 2015

    2015

  38. [46]

    Jimbo and T

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa. Deformation of linear ordinary differential equations. I, II. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. , 56(4):143–148, 149–153, 1980. 161

    1980

  39. [47]

    Junnila, E

    J. Junnila, E. Saksman, and L. Viitasaari. On the regularity of complex multiplicative chaos. Preprint, arXiv:1905.12027

    1905 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Junnila, E

    J. Junnila, E. Saksman, and C. Webb. Decompositions of log-correlated fields with applica- tions. Ann. Appl. Probab., 29(6):3786–3820, 2019

    2019

  41. [49]

    Junnila, E

    J. Junnila, E. Saksman, and C. Webb. Imaginary multiplicative chaos: Moments, regularity and connections to the Ising model. Ann. Appl. Probab., 30(5):2099–2164, 2020

  42. [50]

    Kharash and R

    V. Kharash and R. Peled. The Fr¨ ohlich-Spencer Proof of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition. 2017. Preprint, arXiv:1711.04720

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Konik, M

    R. Konik, M. L´ ajer, and G. Mussardo. Approaching the self-dual point of the sinh-Gordon model. J. High Energy Phys. , (1):Paper No. 014, 82, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Lacoin, R

    H. Lacoin, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. Complex Gaussian multiplicative chaos. Commun. Math. Phys. , 337(2):569–632, 2015

    2015

  45. [53]

    Lacoin, R

    H. Lacoin, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. A probabilistic approach of ultraviolet renormalization in the boundary sine-Gordon model. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 185(1-2):1–40, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Lukyanov and A

    S. Lukyanov and A. Zamolodchikov. Exact expectation values of local fields in the quantum sine-Gordon model. Nuclear Phys. B , 493(3):571–587, 1997

    1997

  47. [55]

    S. Mason. Two-periodic weighted dominos and the sine-Gordon field at the free fermion point: I. Preprint, arXiv:2209.11111

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Mourrat and H

    J.-C. Mourrat and H. Weber. Global well-posedness of the dynamic Φ 4 model in the plane. Ann. Probab., 45(4):2398–2476, 2017

    2017

  49. [57]

    Nicol` o, J

    F. Nicol` o, J. Renn, and A. Steinmann. On the massive sine-Gordon equation in all regions of collapse. Commun. Math. Phys. , 105(2):291–326, 1986

    1986

  50. [58]

    Otto and H

    F. Otto and H. Weber. Quasilinear SPDEs via rough paths. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 232(2):873–950, 2019

    2019

  51. [59]

    J. Palmer. Tau functions for the Dirac operator in the Euclidean plane. Pacific J. Math. , 160(2):259–342, 1993

    1993

  52. [60]

    Palmer and C

    J. Palmer and C. Tracy. Two-dimensional Ising correlations: the SMJ analysis. Adv. in Appl. Math. , 4(1):46–102, 1983

    1983

  53. [61]

    S.C. Park. Massive Scaling Limit of the Ising Model: Subcritical Analysis and Isomonodromy

  54. [62]

    Y.M. Park. Massless quantum sine-Gordon equation in two space-time dimensions: cor- relation inequalities and infinite volume limit. J. Mathematical Phys. , 18(12):2423–2426, 1977

    1977

  55. [63]

    Pelaiˇ c

    J. Pelaiˇ c. The subcritical finite-volume massive sine-Gordon model. Preprint, arXiv:2508.13778

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Polyakov

    A.M. Polyakov. Gauge fields and strings , volume 3 of Contemporary Concepts in Physics . Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, 1987

    1987

  57. [65]

    P¨ oschel and E

    J. P¨ oschel and E. Trubowitz.Inverse spectral theory, volume 130 of Pure and Applied Math- ematics. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1987. 162

    1987

  58. [66]

    Pressley and G

    A. Pressley and G. Segal. Loop groups. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1986. Oxford Science Publications

    1986

  59. [67]

    Rhodes and V

    R. Rhodes and V. Vargas. Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: a review. Probab. Surv., 11:315–392, 2014

    2014

  60. [68]

    G.-C. Rota. On the foundations of combinatorial theory. I. Theory of M¨ obius functions. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete , 2:340–368, 1964

    1964

  61. [69]

    M. Sato, T. Miwa, and M. Jimbo. Holonomic quantum fields. I. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , 14(1):223–267, 1978

    1978

  62. [70]

    M. Sato, T. Miwa, and M. Jimbo. Holonomic quantum fields. II. The Riemann-Hilbert problem. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , 15(1):201–278, 1979

    1979

  63. [71]

    M. Sato, T. Miwa, and M. Jimbo. Holonomic quantum fields. III. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 15(2):577–629, 1979

    1979

  64. [72]

    M. Sato, T. Miwa, and M. Jimbo. Holonomic quantum fields. IV. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 15(3):871–972, 1979

    1979

  65. [73]

    M. Sato, T. Miwa, and M. Jimbo. Holonomic quantum fields. V. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , 16(2):531–584, 1980

    1980

  66. [74]

    Segal and G

    G. Segal and G. Wilson. Loop groups and equations of KdV type. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. , (61):5–65, 1985

    1985

  67. [75]

    B. Simon. The P (ϕ)2 Euclidean (quantum) field theory . Princeton University Press, 1974. Princeton Series in Physics

    1974

  68. [76]

    B. Simon. Trace ideals and their applications , volume 120 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, second edition, 2005

    2005

  69. [77]

    F.A. Smirnov. Reductions of the sine-Gordon model as a perturbation of minimal models of conformal field theory. Nuclear Phys. B , 337(1):156–180, 1990

    1990

  70. [78]

    Srivastava

    S.M. Srivastava. A course on Borel sets , volume 180 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998

    1998

  71. [79]

    W.-S. Yang. Debye screening for two-dimensional Coulomb systems at high temperatures. J. Statist. Phys. , 49(1-2):1–32, 1987

    1987

  72. [80]

    Zamolodchikov

    A.B. Zamolodchikov. Mass scale in the sine-Gordon model and its reductions. International Journal of Modern Physics A , 10(08):1125–1150, 1995. 163

    1995

  73. [2018]

    Preprint, arXiv:1811.06636

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.