Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 96 references

Integral Scaling for EFT Strings from the Bottom-Up

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Integral scaling w∈{1,2,3} for EFT strings follows from a finite scan of the 74 allowed duality frames.

desk verdict A serious, well-scaffolded bottom-up case for Integral Scaling with w≤3—but the load-bearing n_e≤7 cutoff is assumed, not derived, and an n_e=8 candidate would already break w≤3. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22519 v1 pith:KSQZFLXN submitted 2026-07-24 hep-th

Muldrow Etheredge , Alvaro Herráez , Dieter Lüst , Luca Melotti This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords IntegralScalingConjectureEFTstringsEmergentStringbranetaxonomyframesimplexalpha-vectorsswamplanddistancespeciesscale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Near the core of an EFT string — a 1/2-BPS axionic string in a 4d N=1 theory — the scalars run to infinite field distance and a tower of states becomes light, with its mass squared scaling as the string tension to a power w. This paper argues that this power is always an integer 1, 2, or 3, and that this is not an empirical fluke: it follows from the brane-taxonomy rules that organize infinite-distance limits under the Emergent String Conjecture. The authors classify every possible duality frame for slices of the moduli space (74 frames), identify which lattice sites can be EFT string candidates by their alpha-vector length sqrt(2/n), and check the scaling relation for each candidate. The check passes for all candidates: leading towers have integer w≤3; subleading towers obey integral scaling too except for controlled half-integral cases that also occur in known string compactifications. A stronger lattice statement also emerges: the oscillator alpha-vectors of EFT string candidates generate the lattices of particle and string alpha-vectors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the alpha-vector framework: for a tower or brane, α = −∇ log(m/M_Pl), so the Distance Conjecture and the Integral Scaling Conjecture become statements about vectors in the moduli space. The taxonomy rules assign universal dot products among principal-tower alpha-vectors, organizing each duality frame into a frame simplex, and the brane taxonomy adds lattice rules for particles and strings. An EFT string candidate is a string lattice site whose alpha-vector has length sqrt(2/n_e), n_e≤7; the integral scaling weight is then the ratio α_str·(2α_tow)/|α_str|^2. The proof is the finite scan: enumerate all frame simplices consistent with 11d/10d maxima, build the lattice

What would settle it

A consistent 4d N=1 compactification whose asymptotic Kähler potential has a single leading monomial of degree 8, giving an EFT string candidate with n_e=8 in the 2-frame; the taxonomy formula then yields w=4, directly contradicting w≤3. Concretely: compute |α_str|=sqrt(2/8)=1/2 on the 2-frame radion lattice; the paper's formula gives w=4/(4−P), and the candidate with n=8 has P=3, giving w=4. If such a compactification exists, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Integral Scaling Conjecture — m_tow^2 ~ T^w with w=1,2,3 — is a consequence of the brane-taxonomy framework rather than a conjecture matched only by examples. The strategy reduces the conjecture to the exact dot-product statement α_str · (2 α_i) = w |α_str|^2, with EFT string candidates identified by the length formula |α_str|=sqrt(2/n_e) for integer n_e≤7. Using two further assumptions (taxonomy rules apply to all states below the species scale; maximal decompactification is 11d and maximal weak-string dimension is 10d), the paper classifies all possible frame simplices — 44 geometric and 30 stringy, 48 of which contain candidates — and verifies the relation fo

Load-bearing premise

The bound n_e ≤ 7 on the homogeneity degree of the asymptotic Kähler potential — equivalently the allowed length of EFT-string alpha-vectors — is assumed, not derived; if a consistent compactification with n_e=8 exists, the w≤3 conclusion fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any 4d N=1 EFT whose infinite-distance limits obey the brane-taxonomy rules, the 11d/10d maxima, and n_e≤7 automatically exhibits integral scaling with w≤3 for all leading towers — no per-example check needed.
  • The weight w=1 identifies an emergent string limit in which the EFT string itself is the emergent string; w>1 leaves the door open to decompactification or to an emergent string lighter than the EFT string.
  • Subleading towers below the species scale are also covered: in geometric frames they have integer w, and in stringy frames their weights are at worst half-integral (w_osc=3/2 in two frames), so the conjecture survives a refined reading.
  • The oscillator alpha-vector of every EFT string candidate generates the particle and string lattices, which upgrades the convex-hull version of integral scaling to a lattice statement and explains the half-integral quantization in units of 1/2.
  • For bound states of EFT strings, integral scaling is inherited from the elementary constituents with additive weights whenever a single monomial dominates the Kähler potential.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the n_e≤7 bound is itself derivable from the taxonomy and the 11d/10d maxima — as the paper's n_e>7 → w>3 evidence suggests — then integral scaling would become a fully bottom-up theorem, and the sharpened axion Weak Gravity Conjecture would inherit its key assumption from the same framework.
  • Editorial inference: The lattice-generator statement could be turned into a search criterion for towers: in a given frame, the allowed light towers at infinite distance are exactly the lattice generated by the emergent string oscillator vector; this is checkable in explicit toroidal or orbifold constructions beyond the examples treated.
  • Editorial inference: The half-integral weights for subleading oscillator towers imply that any 'integral scaling' test on data should be applied to convex-hull generators, not to every tower; a tower with w=3/2 below the species scale is not counterevidence.
  • Editorial inference: The same 1/p quantization logic suggests higher-dimensional codimension-two objects (worldvolume dimension p>2) would exhibit scaling weights quantized in units of 1/p; a concrete place to look is ten-dimensional brane lattices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive the Integral Scaling Conjecture (ISC) for 4d N=1 EFT strings from the bottom up, using the brane-taxonomy rules of [83,84]. Under three explicit assumptions — the taxonomy rules, maximal decompactification/string dimensions 11/10, and the EFT-string length formula |α_str| = sqrt(2/n_e) with n_e ≤ 7 — the authors classify all possible frame simplices (74 total: 44 geometric and 30 stringy), identify EFT string candidates within or on the boundary of each frame, and check the integral scaling relation α_str·(2α_tow)=w|α_str|^2 for all such candidates. They find integer w≤3 for all leading towers, with half-integral weights for certain subleading oscillator towers, and propose that oscillator α-vectors generate the string and particle lattices. The paper includes comparisons with type IIA, F-theory, and M-theory examples. The central claim is conditional on the unproven n_e≤7 assumption, which is the main weakness of the paper.

Significance. If correct, the paper would turn the ISC from an empirical observation into a structural consequence of the Emergent String Conjecture and brane-taxonomy rules, within a finite classification of duality frames. The explicit enumeration of 74 frames, the transparent lattice formulas (3.39) and (3.46), and the detailed top-down examples are valuable and make the internal algebra checkable. The proposed lattice-level strengthening and the physical interpretation of w=1 are interesting. However, the value of the result is proportional to the status of the n_e≤7 assumption, which is not derived; the paper itself concedes that only evidence is provided for the n_e>7 ⇒ w>3 part. The result is therefore best understood as a conditional theorem, and the presentation should make that caveat prominent.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, Assumption 3; Appendix A; §3.2.2, Eqs. (3.9)–(3.11); §5] The bound n_e≤7 is load-bearing and is not derived. Equations (3.9)–(3.11) show that in the 2-frame the P=3 string has n_e=8 and would yield w=4, so the w≤3 conclusion fails exactly if an asymptotic Kähler potential of effective homogeneous degree 8 exists. The paper states in §2.3 that Assumption 3 'can be derived from the homogeneity and integrality of the asymptotic Kähler potential', but no such derivation is given; Appendix A only derives |α_str|=sqrt(2/n_e), not n_e≤7. The outlook (§5) says only that 'we find evidence' for n_e>7 ⇒ w>3. Since the abstract reports w≤3 without this caveat, the central claim is conditional on an empirical bound. I recommend stating the main theorem with the n_e≤7 hypothesis explicit and either proving it or presenting it as a clearly separated conjecture with the collected evidence.
  2. [§3.1, §3.4.1] The exhaustiveness claim — 74 frame simplices, 48 with EFT string candidates, and the verification of integral scaling in every case — rests on a Mathematica scan that is not shipped. The text says 'We can then use Mathematica to build all the possible N-dimensional moduli space slices' (§3.4.1), but no code or ancillary file is provided, and Tables 1–4 do not by themselves constitute a completeness proof. For a result presented as a finite exhaustive check, the scan should be included as supplementary material or replaced by a self-contained enumeration argument that a reader can audit.
  3. [§2.3 (last paragraph); §3.5; §5 bullet list] The main proof is explicitly for non-bound-state EFT strings. Bound states are analyzed only when a single monomial dominates P(s_i) in the Kähler potential; the general multi-monomial case is left open in §3.5. The abstract and the concluding bullet, however, state integral scaling for 'all leading towers along the flow of every EFT string candidate', which is broader than what is actually proven. The scope should be narrowed in the abstract/conclusions, or the general bound-state case should be addressed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2.2, Eq. (3.11)] There is a typo: after Eq. (3.9), P=3,5 produce n=8, but Eq. (3.11) writes 'w_{n=4}=4'. It should read 'w_{n=8}=4'.
  2. [§3.2.6, Eqs. (3.22)–(3.23)] Internal mismatch: P=4 gives n=3 by Eq. (3.22), but the text concludes 'the only candidate is P=4 with n=2 and w=2'. Also w_{n=12}=6 appears inconsistent with the general formula (3.4) for D=10, P=6, which gives w=4. Please correct and cross-check all numerical entries in this subsection.
  3. [Figures 2–7] The notation p_P for lattice sites is used without an explicit definition in the captions. It is defined in the text, but a one-line explanation in the first relevant caption would improve readability.
  4. [References] Reference [63] is listed as 'To appear' with no arXiv number or journal identifier. If a preprint or published version exists at the time of submission, it should be updated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the argument is a transparent conditional derivation from explicitly stated taxonomy rules and an unproven n_e≤7 bound; no prediction is secretly defined as its input.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that, assuming (1) the brane-taxonomy rules of [83,84], (2) d≤11/10, and (3) |α_str|=sqrt(2/n_e) with n_e≤7, a finite scan over 74 frame simplices verifies integral scaling with w≤3. This is a conditional theorem, not a hidden use of the conclusion. The taxonomy rules are restated in §2.1 and do not themselves contain w≤3; the ISC relation is tested via (1.2)/(2.16) rather than assumed. The most delicate input is Assumption 3 (n_e≤7), which is explicitly justified only by known top-down examples and maximal decompactification dimension 11 (§2.3), and the paper acknowledges the converse direction is only evidence: 'we find evidence that EFT string candidates with n_e>7 always yield w>3' (§5). In the 2-frame, the P=3 lattice site has n_e=8 and w=4 (eqs. (3.9)-(3.11)), so the w≤3 result there is directly gated by the assumed n_e≤7 cutoff; this is a real limitation and a correctness risk, but the paper states the assumption openly and does not redefine w in terms of n_e. The reliance on the author's earlier taxonomy work [83,84] is load-bearing, but the rules are presented in the paper, checked against several top-down examples in §4, and are not asserted to be machine-verified; citing them as the starting point is a stated assumption rather than a circular appeal. No step was found in which an output quantity is identical by construction to a fitted or assumed input, so no circular step meets the bar for a positive flag.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All load-bearing inputs are explicitly listed in §2.3. The key object is the integer cutoff n_e≤7, which is an assumption rather than a derived result; it is the main gate keeping w≤3. Taxonomy rules come from prior work by the same group [83,84]. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • n_max = 7 (maximum effective homogeneity degree n_e for EFT string candidates) = 7
    Assumed in §2.3 and used in the scan. It is motivated by max decompactification dimension 11 and by all known top-down examples, but not derived from ESC/taxonomy. Excluding n_e>7 is what removes w=4 candidates such as the 2-frame n_e=8 example.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Brane-taxonomy dot-product rules (2.4) and (2.5) hold for all towers and branes parametrically below the species scale.
    Assumption 1 in §2.3. These rules are rooted in the Emergent String Conjecture but include technical conditions such as no warped/sliding decompactification; the paper explicitly takes them as input and notes known counterexamples in [86].
  • domain assumption 11d is the maximum decompactification dimension and 10d is the maximum dimension for perturbative string limits.
    Assumption 2 in §2.3. Used to bound the list of frame simplices to 74. The authors note this can be derived from taxonomy only under stronger assumptions about heavy towers and no sliding.
  • domain assumption EFT strings have α-vectors of norm sqrt(2/n_e) with integer n_e ≤ 7, following from homogeneity of the asymptotic Kähler potential.
    Assumption 3 in §2.3, eq. (2.14), Appendix A. The homogeneity form is standard in asymptotic string compactifications, but the n≤7 cutoff is an input calibrated to known examples and the 11d bound, not proven from ESC.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integral Scaling for EFT Strings from the Bottom-Up." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KSQZFLXN

@misc{pith2026260722519,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integral Scaling for EFT Strings from the Bottom-Up},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KSQZFLXN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22519}
}
abstract

Near the core of an EFT string in a 4d $\mathcal{N}=1$ theory, the scalars are dynamically driven to infinite field distance and a tower of states becomes light, with mass scaling with the string tension in Planck units as $m^2\sim \mathcal{T}^{\,w}$. According to the Integral Scaling Conjecture, $w$ takes only values 1, 2 and 3. In this paper, we examine how this conjecture can follow from the brane-taxonomy rules associated with the Emergent String Conjecture. In this context, we classify the relevant types of duality frames into 74 classes, identify which lattice sites can be relevant EFT candidates, and exhaustively test integral scaling for all of these candidates. We find that it holds with $w\leq 3$ for all the leading towers and also for the subleading towers below the species scale (up to half-integral subtleties that also appear in top-down examples). We further find evidence that the oscillator modes of EFT string candidates generate the lattices of particles and strings. Moreover, $w=1$ implies a perturbative string limit, but the converse is not true. We compare our classification with concrete type IIA, F-theory and M-theory compactifications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 88 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    T. D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa,The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,PoST ASI2017(2017) 015 [1711.00864]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1 [2102.01111]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics,Universe7(2021) 273 [2107.00087]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys.B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

    arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Klaewer and E

    D. Klaewer and E. Palti,Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity, JHEP01(2017) 088 [1610.00010]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,JHEP12(2022) 114 [2206.04063]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    T. W. Grimm, E. Palti and I. Valenzuela,Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,JHEP08(2018) 143 [1802.08264]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    T. W. Grimm, C. Li and E. Palti,Infinite Distance Networks in Field Space and Charge Orbits, JHEP03(2019) 016 [1811.02571]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Corvilain, T

    P. Corvilain, T. W. Grimm and I. Valenzuela,The Swampland Distance Conjecture for Kahler moduli,JHEP08(2019) 075 [1812.07548]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    A. Font, A. Herr´ aez and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,The Swampland Distance Conjecture and Towers of Tensionless Branes,JHEP08(2019) 044 [1904.05379]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,JHEP02 (2022) 190 [1910.01135]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP10(2018) 164 [1808.05958]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent Strings, Duality and Weak Coupling Limits for Two-Form Fields,1904.06344

    1904 arXiv

  9. [17]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Modular Fluxes, Elliptic Genera, and Weak Gravity Conjectures in Four Dimensions,JHEP08(2019) 104 [1901.08065]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, G. Lockhart and T. Weigand,Quasi-Jacobi Forms, Elliptic Genera and Strings in Four Dimensions,2005.10837

    2005 arXiv

  11. [19]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Physics of infinite complex structure limits in eight dimensions,JHEP06(2022) 042 [2112.08385]. – 49 –

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    ´Alvarez-Garc ´ ıa, D

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc ´ ıa, D. Kl¨ awer and T. Weigand,Membrane Limits in Quantum Gravity, 2112.09136

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,Swampland Conjectures for Strings and Membranes,JHEP02(2021) 006 [2006.15154]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,The EFT stringy viewpoint on large distances,JHEP09(2021) 197 [2104.05726]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Ferrara, R

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and A. Strominger,N=2 extremal black holes,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) R5412 [hep-th/9508072]

    1995 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Ferrara, G

    S. Ferrara, G. W. Gibbons and R. Kallosh,Black holes and critical points in moduli space, Nucl. Phys. B500(1997) 75 [hep-th/9702103]

    1997 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Sen,Black hole entropy function and the attractor mechanism in higher derivative gravity, JHEP09(2005) 038 [hep-th/0506177]

    A. Sen,Black hole entropy function and the attractor mechanism in higher derivative gravity, JHEP09(2005) 038 [hep-th/0506177]

    2005 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bonnefoy, L

    Q. Bonnefoy, L. Ciambelli, D. L¨ ust and S. L¨ ust,Infinite Black Hole Entropies at Infinite Distances and Tower of States,Nucl. Phys. B958(2020) 115112 [1912.07453]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. L¨ ust and G. Staudt,Black hole entropy and moduli-dependent species scale, Phys. Lett. B844(2023) 138113 [2212.10286]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Calder´ on-Infante, M

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado, Y. Li, D. Lust and A. M. Uranga,Classical black hole probes of UV scales,JHEP06(2025) 061 [2502.03514]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Buratti, M

    G. Buratti, M. Delgado and A. M. Uranga,Dynamical tadpoles, stringy cobordism, and the SM from spontaneous compactification,JHEP06(2021) 170 [2104.02091]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Buratti, J

    G. Buratti, J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado and A. M. Uranga,Dynamical Cobordism and Swampland Distance Conjectures,JHEP10(2021) 037 [2107.09098]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Angius, J

    R. Angius, J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado, J. Huertas and A. M. Uranga,At the end of the world: Local Dynamical Cobordism,JHEP06(2022) 142 [2203.11240]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,1909.10355

    1909 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Blumenhagen, N

    R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, C. Kneissl and A. Makridou,Dynamical cobordism of a domain wall and its companion defect 7-brane,JHEP08(2022) 204 [2205.09782]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Angius, M

    R. Angius, M. Delgado and A. M. Uranga,Dynamical Cobordism and the beginning of time: supercritical strings and tachyon condensation,JHEP08(2022) 285 [2207.13108]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Blumenhagen, C

    R. Blumenhagen, C. Kneissl and C. Wang,Dynamical Cobordism Conjecture: solutions for end-of-the-world branes,JHEP05(2023) 123 [2303.03423]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 039 [2306.16450]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Angius, J

    R. Angius, J. Huertas and A. M. Uranga,Small black hole explosions,JHEP06(2023) 070 [2303.15903]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Huertas and A

    J. Huertas and A. M. Uranga,Aspects of dynamical cobordism in AdS/CFT,JHEP08(2023) 140 [2306.07335]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Angius, A

    R. Angius, A. Makridou and A. M. Uranga,Intersecting end of the world branes,JHEP03 (2024) 110 [2312.16286]. – 50 –

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Angius,End of the world brane networks for infinite distance limits in CY moduli space, JHEP09(2024) 178 [2404.14486]

    R. Angius,End of the world brane networks for infinite distance limits in CY moduli space, JHEP09(2024) 178 [2404.14486]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Huertas and A

    J. Huertas and A. M. Uranga,End of the world brane dynamics in holographic 4dN= 4 SU(N) with 3dN= 2 boundary conditions,JHEP01(2025) 002 [2410.05368]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Angius, A

    R. Angius, A. M. Uranga and C. Wang,End of the world boundaries for chiral quantum gravity theories,JHEP03(2025) 064 [2410.07322]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Calder´ on-Infante, G

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, G. Cheng, A. Herr´ aez and T. Van Riet,End-of-the-World Singularities: The Good, the Bad, and the Heated-up,2603.18133

  36. [44]

    Makridou and A

    A. Makridou and A. J. P. G´ omez,Sharpened Dynamical Cobordism,2605.06793

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,Large Field Distances from EFT strings, in21st Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity, 5, 2022,2205.04532

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,The Weak Gravity Conjecture and axion strings, JHEP11(2021) 004 [2108.11383]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    C. F. Cota, A. Mininno, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,The Asymptotic Weak Gravity Conjecture for Open Strings,2208.00009

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Klaewer, S.-J

    D. Klaewer, S.-J. Lee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum corrections in 4dN= 1 infinite distance limits and the weak gravity conjecture,JHEP03(2021) 252 [2011.00024]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions forN= 1 infinite distance limits – Part II: K¨ ahler obstructions,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 126028 [2603.13470]

    2026

  42. [50]

    Kaufmann, T

    L. Kaufmann, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,On Quantum Obstructions in Type IIA Orientifolds,2604.25988

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Marchesano and M

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,4d strings at strong coupling,JHEP08(2022) 004 [2202.10466]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Wiesner,Light Strings and Strong Coupling in F-theory,2210.14238

    M. Wiesner,Light Strings and Strong Coupling in F-theory,2210.14238

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Martucci, N

    L. Martucci, N. Risso and T. Weigand,Quantum Gravity Bounds on N=1 Effective Theories in Four Dimensions,2210.10797

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Martucci, N

    L. Martucci, N. Risso, A. Valenti and L. Vecchi,Wormholes in the axiverse, and the species scale,JHEP07(2024) 240 [2404.14489]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Marchesano and L

    F. Marchesano and L. Melotti,EFT strings and emergence,JHEP02(2023) 112 [2211.01409]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti and L. Paoloni,On the moduli space curvature at infinity,JHEP02 (2024) 103 [2311.07979]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti and M. Wiesner,Asymptotic curvature divergences and non-gravitational theories,2409.02991

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    G. F. Casas, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez and F. Marchesano,Yukawa couplings at infinite distance and swampland towers in chiral theories,JHEP09(2024) 170 [2403.09775]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    T. W. Grimm, S. Lanza and C. Li,Tameness, Strings, and the Distance Conjecture,JHEP09 (2022) 149 [2206.00697]. – 51 –

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Hassfeld, J

    B. Hassfeld, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Emergent strings in Type IIB Calabi-Yau compactifications,JHEP01(2026) 140 [2504.01066]

    2026

  53. [61]

    Monnee, T

    J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Physics and geometry of complex structure limits in type IIB Calabi-Yau compactifications,JHEP03(2026) 063 [2509.07056]

    2026

  54. [62]

    Grieco, I

    A. Grieco, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,EFT strings and dualities in 4dN= 1,JHEP06(2026) 129 [2504.16984]

    2026 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Grieco, I

    A. Grieco, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,EFT (String) Tower Building, To appear,

  56. [64]

    Stout,Infinite Distances and Factorization,2208.08444

    J. Stout,Infinite Distances and Factorization,2208.08444

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Basile, D

    I. Basile, D. L¨ ust and C. Montella,Shedding black hole light on the emergent string conjecture, JHEP07(2024) 208 [2311.12113]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bedroya, R

    A. Bedroya, R. K. Mishra and M. Wiesner,Density of states, black holes and the Emergent String Conjecture,JHEP01(2025) 144 [2405.00083]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Herr´ aez, D

    A. Herr´ aez, D. L¨ ust, J. Masias and M. Scalisi,On the origin of species thermodynamics and the black hole - tower correspondence,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 083 [2406.17851]

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Kaufmann, S

    L. Kaufmann, S. Lanza and T. Weigand,Asymptotics of 5d supergravity theories and the emergent string conjecture,JHEP06(2025) 230 [2412.12251]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics,JHEP03(2021) 299 [2012.00034]

    2021 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Cheung and G

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(2014) 051601 [1402.2287]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch

    G. Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch. Phys. 58(2010) 528 [0706.2050]

    2010 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Dvali and M

    G. Dvali and M. Redi,Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 045027 [0710.4344]

    2008 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Dvali and D

    G. Dvali and D. Lust,Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species,Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 505 [0912.3167]

    2010 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Species and Strings,1004.3744

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D. H. Wu,Moduli-dependent Species Scale, 2212.06841

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,The Emergence Proposal in Quantum Gravity and the Species Scale,2212.03908

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa and M. Wiesner,Bounds on Species Scale and the Distance Conjecture,2303.13580

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D. H. Wu,Species Scale in Diverse Dimensions, 2310.07213

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,On the Species Scale, Modular Invariance and the Gravitational EFT expansion,2310.07708

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano and A. Herr´ aez,The double EFT expansion in quantum gravity,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 096 [2501.14880]. – 52 –

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Universal Pattern in Quantum Gravity at Infinite Distance,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 181601 [2311.01501]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Stringy evidence for a universal pattern at infinite distance,JHEP06(2024) 037 [2311.01536]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Taxonomy of infinite distance limits,JHEP03(2025) 213 [2405.20332]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,JHEP10(2025) 200 [2505.10615]

    M. Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,JHEP10(2025) 200 [2505.10615]

    2025 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Etheredge, M

    M. Etheredge, M. Reece, T. Rudelius and C. Tudball,Sharpening the Supersymmetric Axion Weak Gravity Conjecture,2605.22912

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,JHEP12(2023) 182 [2306.16440]

    2023 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Aoufia, M

    C. Aoufia, M. Etheredge, B. Fraiman, S. Raman and A. Stewart,Moduli-Space Laplacians, Asymptotic Geometry, and the Emergent String Conjecture,2607.20603

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Raucci, I

    S. Raucci, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Alice in Warpland: KK modes, Warped Compactifications and the Swampland,2603.11163

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    Candelas, A

    P. Candelas, A. Font, S. H. Katz and D. R. Morrison,Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 2.,Nucl. Phys. B429(1994) 626 [hep-th/9403187]

    1994 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Hosono, A

    S. Hosono, A. Klemm, S. Theisen and S.-T. Yau,Mirror symmetry, mirror map and applications to Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces,Commun. Math. Phys.167(1995) 301 [hep-th/9308122]

    1995 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions forN= 1 infinite distance limits – Part I:g s obstructions,2603.12315

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Joyce,Compact Riemannian 7-Manifolds with HolonomyG 2 I,J

    D. Joyce,Compact Riemannian 7-Manifolds with HolonomyG 2 I,J. Diff. Geom.43(1996) 291

    1996

  85. [93]

    Joyce,Compact Riemannian 7-Manifolds with HolonomyG 2 II,J

    D. Joyce,Compact Riemannian 7-Manifolds with HolonomyG 2 II,J. Diff. Geom.43(1996) 329

    1996

  86. [94]

    Joyce,Compact Manifolds with Special Holonomy

    D. Joyce,Compact Manifolds with Special Holonomy. Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  87. [95]

    Di Ubaldo, L

    G. Di Ubaldo, L. V. Iliesiu, H. W. Lin and C. Yan,Positivity of the gravitational path integral implies the axionic weak gravity conjecture,2605.05305

    arXiv

  88. [96]

    Reece, T

    M. Reece, T. Rudelius and C. Tudball,Co-scaling and alignment of electric and magnetic towers,JHEP09(2025) 146 [2505.22713]. – 53 –

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.