Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Conditional cross-fitting for unbiased machine-learning-assisted covariate adjustment in randomized experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.15664 v1 pith:KTRWVCW5 submitted 2025-08-21 stat.ME

Conditional cross-fitting for unbiased machine-learning-assisted covariate adjustment in randomized experiments

classification stat.ME
keywords experimentsrandomizedunbiasedcovariatecross-fittingdataestimatorsinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Randomized experiments are the gold standard for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE). While covariate adjustment can reduce the asymptotic variances of the unbiased Horvitz-Thompson estimators for the ATE, it suffers from finite-sample biases due to data reuse in both prediction and estimation. Traditional sample-splitting and cross-fitting methods can address the problem of data reuse and obtain unbiased estimators. However, they require that the data are independently and identically distributed, which is usually violated under the design-based inference framework for randomized experiments. To address this challenge, we propose a novel conditional cross-fitting method, under the design-based inference framework, where potential outcomes and covariates are fixed and the randomization is the sole source of randomness. We propose sample-splitting algorithms for various randomized experiments, including Bernoulli randomized experiments, completely randomized experiments, and stratified randomized experiments. Based on the proposed algorithms, we construct unbiased covariate-adjusted ATE estimators and propose valid inference procedures. Our methods can accommodate flexible machine-learning-assisted covariate adjustments and allow for model misspecification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Design-based edge-level causal inference with machine learning assisted covariate adjustment

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper introduces Horvitz-Thompson estimators for edge-level causal effects under dyadic interference, a three-fold cross-fitting scheme to enable machine learning covariate adjustment, and a calibration step ensur...

  2. GAUGER: Generalized Regression Adjustment via Graph-Weighted Exposure-Level Residualization for Design-Based Inference Under Interference

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    GAUGER calibrates outcome predictions against the design-induced graph-weighted variance structure to yield a variance-optimal AIPW estimator under network interference.