Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 29 references

Thin-film Al0.30Ga0.70As (111) as a flat source of high-purity orthogonally polarized entangled photons

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An unpatterned Al0.30Ga0.70As film on a (111) substrate can serve as a bright, low-noise telecom-band source of orthogonally polarized photon pairs.

desk verdict A record-brightness thin-film SPDC source with a correctly measured product state, but the 'entangled photons' in the title needs either a witness or a rewrite. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03978 v1 pith:KTW3T5GJ submitted 2025-09-04 physics.optics quant-ph

Simon Stich , Vitaliy Sultanov , Trevor Blakie , Qingyu Shi , Zbig Wasiliewski , Mikhail A. Belkin , Maria Chekhova This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords AlGaAs(111)thinfilmsspontaneousparametricdown-conversionpolarization-entangledphotonpairshiddenpolarizationtelecom-bandquantumsourcesflatopticszincblendenonlinearphotoluminescencesuppression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that an unpatterned 1.8-micron film of Al0.30Ga0.70As grown on a (111) substrate works as a compact telecom-band source of photon pairs under normal-incidence pumping. The (111) orientation rotates the zincblende nonlinear tensor, so the pump can couple to the material's large second-order nonlinearity using in-plane fields only, and the emitted signal and idler photons are automatically orthogonally polarized. The authors report a photon-pair generation rate of 0.24 Hz/mW/nm, about forty times higher than a previous lithium-niobate thin film, and estimate that roughly 30% of detected photons belong to pairs, versus about 1% for comparable thin sources. Adding 30% aluminum raises the bandgap above the pump photon energy, suppressing photoluminescence and raising the damage threshold. If correct, this makes AlGaAs (111) films a practical, scalable route to polarization-entangled photons in the telecom band.

What carries the argument

The enabler is the rotated second-order susceptibility tensor for a (111)-oriented zincblende crystal. In the paper's convention, the in-plane components satisfy -chi_x'x'x' = chi_x'y'y' = chi_y'y'x' = chi_y'x'y' = (sqrt(2)/3) chi_xyz, so the pump and the down-converted fields need only in-plane polarization to interact. This identity turns a normally incident pump into an SPDC driver and dictates that the signal and idler are orthogonally polarized. A second mechanism is the film's Fabry-Perot cavity, which shapes the broadband spectrum into fringes, and the polarization-analysis setup (half-wave plate plus polarizer before a 50/50 split) that reveals the hidden polarization.

What would settle it

Take a 1.8-µm-thick GaAs (111) film, the same thickness as the AlGaAs film, and measure its photoluminescence background and pair rate under identical pump, coupling, and detection conditions; if the AlGaAs background is not at least ten times lower and the pair purity not correspondingly higher, the order-of-magnitude purity claim fails. Independently, postselect the orthogonally polarized pairs with a beamsplitter and measure a polarization-entanglement witness (e.g., Bell inequality or state tomography); if no violation or fidelity above the classical bound appears, the entanglement claim i

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that (111)-oriented AlGaAs thin films remove the two barriers that kept zincblende materials out of flat-optics SPDC. The rotated nonlinear tensor has nonzero in-plane components, so a pump at normal incidence can drive SPDC; adding aluminum moves the bandgap above the 1.57 eV pump photon energy, cutting the photoluminescence background that contaminates pair emission. The measured coincidence rate as a function of polarization angle follows sin^2(theta), with flat accidental coincidences, indicating that the pairs are orthogonally polarized even though the individual photons look unpolarized—what the authors call hidden polarization. They do not directly prove entanglem

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the rotated nonlinear tensor computed from the bulk zincblende crystal exactly describes the thin film's lab-frame nonlinearity, and that the AlGaAs photoluminescence suppression relative to GaAs is genuinely at least an order of magnitude—the latter rests on a comparison with a thinner GaAs sample that visibly degrades and is harder to couple, so if that baseline is unfair, the purity advantage is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thin-film SPDC sources in the telecom band could be made from standard epitaxial AlGaAs wafers without nanofabrication or phase matching.
  • The 30% SPDC photon fraction means photon-pair experiments that previously required long integration times can run faster or at lower pump power.
  • Because phase matching is automatically satisfied, pump wavelength and pair wavelength can be tuned over a broad range, as long as the pump stays below the bandgap edge.
  • The orthogonally polarized pairs can be converted into polarization-entangled Bell states via a non-polarizing beamsplitter, enabling compact quantum communication sources.
  • Higher aluminum fractions or different lattice-matched alloys may push the pump/damage tradeoff further, potentially raising brightness while maintaining purity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The tensor argument generalizes: any (111)-oriented zincblende film with a sizeable chi(2), not just AlGaAs, should produce orthogonally polarized pairs under normal incidence, so the platform idea likely transfers to GaP, InP, and other III-V compounds.
  • The paper only demonstrates hidden polarization; a direct measurement of an entanglement witness, such as a Bell inequality or state tomography after beamsplitter postselection, would confirm that the pairs are actually entangled rather than merely correlated in polarization.
  • The comparison to GaAs would be cleaner if both films had the same thickness; the claimed order-of-magnitude PL suppression could be tested by measuring a 1.8 µm GaAs film under identical conditions.
  • At higher pump powers the orthogonally polarized state should exhibit polarization squeezing; detecting reduced noise in a Stokes observable would be a direct, quantitative confirmation of the nonclassical correlations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a thin-film SPDC source based on a 1.8-µm-thick Al0.30Ga0.70As (111) layer bonded to sapphire, pumped at 788 nm. The authors measure a photon-pair rate of 5.2 kHz at 63 mW, corresponding to 0.24 Hz/mW/nm, a spectrum whose Fabry-Pérot fringes match an independent model, and a sin² coincidence modulation when both photons are projected onto the same rotated linear polarization basis. They further report that the AlGaAs film has a photoluminescence background about an order of magnitude lower than a 250-nm GaAs (111) reference and a higher damage threshold. From these results they claim a flat source of high-purity orthogonally polarized entangled telecom photons and note that the measured state |Ψ⟩=|1⟩H|1⟩V can be converted to a polarization-entangled state via a beam splitter with postselection.

Significance. The work is significant as a demonstration of an unpatterned (111)-oriented AlGaAs film as a bright telecom SPDC source with relaxed phase matching, and it provides a useful comparison among thin-film and metasurface sources. The manuscript has clear strengths: the spectrum is compared to a theoretical Fabry-Pérot model, the brightness is normalized with a thickness-squared metric that fairly accounts for interaction length, and the authors explicitly acknowledge the fragility of the GaAs reference. However, the title/abstract/conclusion overstate the result: no entanglement witness, Bell test, or tomography is performed, and Eq. (2) is a separable product state. The measured polarization correlation is necessary but not sufficient for entanglement. With revised claims (or added entanglement certification), the source would be a valuable contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Title; Abstract; Results and Discussion, Eq. (2)] The central claim that the source emits 'entangled photons' is not supported. The only two-photon state defined in the paper is |Psi>=|1>_H|1>_V (Eq. 2), a separable product state, not an entangled state. The Fig. 3 sin^2(theta) coincidence modulation with a flat accidental background demonstrates orthogonally polarized pairs, but a one-basis correlation measurement is also fully consistent with a separable state and cannot certify coherence between |H>|V> and |V>|H>. No CHSH violation, two-photon interference visibility, or state tomography is presented; the abstract itself says 'Rather than directly probing entanglement, we observe the effect of hidden polarization.' The conclusion 'Thin-film AlGaAs is thus a source of high-purity entangled photons' therefore does not follow. Either add an entanglement witness/tomography, or revise title, abstract, and conclusion to claim a source of o
  2. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 2(c)] The abstract's claim of PL background reduction 'by at least an order of magnitude compared to that of GaAs' is not established. The GaAs reference is 250 nm thick vs 1.8 um for AlGaAs, visibly degrades 'at pump powers below 10 mW,' and the authors attribute the discrepancy in the slopes of Fig. 2(c) to 'optically induced damage even at the lowest considered pump powers.' With the reference degraded, a quantitative factor-of-ten cannot be reliably inferred. The qualitative direction is plausible, but the order-of-magnitude statement should be supported by data on a non-degraded reference or removed/softened in the abstract.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 3 and text] Please define theta explicitly. If theta is the photon polarization angle, the coincidence rate for orthogonally polarized pairs is proportional to sin^2(2theta), not sin^2(theta); if theta is twice the HWP angle, state this. The 'four-fold symmetry' wording should be consistent with the functional form.
  2. [Eq. (1)] Please give the explicit rotation matrix and sign convention used to obtain the in-plane tensor components, and state whether the omitted out-of-plane components are negligible for the focused-pump geometry. This would make the tensor prediction easier to check.
  3. [Results and Discussion, SPDC fraction estimate] The 30±10% SPDC fraction is a rough estimate that depends on an assumed single-detector detection efficiency of 10–20%. This is an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a measured calibration; the sensitivity of the quoted fraction to this assumption should be stated.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusions] The term 'high-purity' is used nonstandardly to mean a high SPDC-to-PL fraction rather than an entanglement fidelity or spectral purity. If retained, define it explicitly in the abstract.
  5. [Conclusions, typo] There is a typo: 'AlGaAs offers not only one the strongest' should read 'one of the strongest.'
  6. [Table 1] The green/yellow shading used to distinguish films from metasurfaces will be lost in monochrome printing; add textual labels or symbols.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; the main rates, spectra, and polarization correlations are measured and compared with independent models, with only ancillary self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical and compared with external or independently derived models, not with parameters fitted from the same data. The normalized pair rate (0.24 Hz/mW/nm) is a direct measurement divided by pump power and bandwidth, benchmarked against literature values. The Fabry-Perot spectrum is compared with a theoretical prediction (magenta curve) without evidence that the model was fit to the measured spectrum, and the polarization sin^2(θ) modulation follows from the explicit standard rotated χ^(2) tensor in Eq. (1), not from a fitted ansatz. The photoluminescence comparison and the 30% SPDC fraction are presented as estimates with explicitly stated inputs (e.g., 10-20% detection efficiency), and the authors openly acknowledge that the GaAs reference sample degraded, weakening the comparison but not making it circular. Self-citations to Refs. [5], [13], [18], and [21] are used for ancillary points (BS-based conversion to entanglement, detection efficiency estimation, epitaxial growth, and resonator modeling) and do not by themselves force the main quantitative or polarization conclusions. The title's claim of 'entangled photons' is stronger than what Eq. (2) and the measurements directly support, since Eq. (2) is a separable product state and no entanglement witness is performed; however, that is an overclaim or scope limitation, not a circular derivation. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and no prediction reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or exotic entities are introduced. The assumptions are standard nonlinear optics and quantum optics models plus the material and detection parameters of the specific experiment.

free parameters (1)
  • Single-detector detection efficiency = 10-20%
    Assumed to estimate the SPDC photon fraction of 30 +/- 10 percent from the coincidence rate; not independently measured in this setup, taken from prior work [13].
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Rotated chi(2) tensor for (111) zincblende films has in-plane components with the relations in Eq. (1), e.g. -chi_x'x'x' = chi_x'y'y' = ... = sqrt(2)/3 chi_xyz.
    Invoked to explain why (111) orientation enables SPDC with in-plane pump and orthogonal output polarizations; standard symmetry transformation but no derivation in the paper.
  • domain assumption SPDC rate in a thin film scales as L^2 sinc^2(Delta k L/2), with Delta k evaluated at the degenerate wavelength.
    Used to normalize AlGaAs and GaAs rates and to compute the thickness-normalized efficiency; standard result cited to Ref. [22].
  • domain assumption Photoluminescence is incoherent, scales linearly with film thickness, and contributes only to accidental coincidences, while SPDC pairs scale as L^2 and produce true coincidences.
    Stated in the introduction and used to estimate the SPDC fraction; relies on Ref. [13].
  • domain assumption The measured coincidences after the polarizer modulation are dominated by true SPDC pairs; accidental coincidences are flat and correctly subtracted.
    Underlies the hidden polarization interpretation in Fig. 3; no quantum state tomography or Bell test is performed.
  • domain assumption Detection losses are captured by a single per-arm efficiency of 10-20 percent.
    Used to convert the measured coincidence slope (67 Hz/mW) into an SPDC singles rate of about 0.5 kHz/mW, yielding the 30 percent fraction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thin-film Al0.30Ga0.70As (111) as a flat source of high-purity orthogonally polarized entangled photons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KTW3T5GJ

@misc{pith2026250903978,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thin-film Al0.30Ga0.70As (111) as a flat source of high-purity orthogonally polarized entangled photons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KTW3T5GJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03978}
}
read the original abstract

Flat-optics platforms offer new opportunities for the generation of entangled photons by relaxing traditional phase-matching constraints, enabling the use of a broader range of nonlinear materials. Among these, gallium arsenide and aluminum gallium arsenide stand out for their exceptionally high second-order nonlinearities, but their conventional orientation (001) has limited their applicability for photon-pair generation. By transitioning to crystals with (111) surface orientation, we overcome these limitations. We demonstrate a flat-optics-based telecom-range SPDC source using Al0.30Ga0.70As that achieves a high photon-pair generation rate per pump power and bandwidth of up to 0.24 Hz/mW/nm. The choice of 30% aluminum concentration allowed us to reduce pump absorption and photoluminescence background for photon pairs generation at telecom wavelengths by at least an order of magnitude compared to that of GaAs. The specific layer orientation facilitates the generation of orthogonally polarized entangled photons, a prerequisite for polarization-entangled states. Rather than directly probing entanglement, we observe the effect of hidden polarization. Our results highlight AlGaAs (111) as a promising platform for scalable quantum photonic sources and shed light on nonclassical polarization effects accessible through flat-optics engineering.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nonlinear Optical Properties of Crystals,

    V. G. Dmitriev, G. G. Gurzadyan, and D. N. Nikogosyan, “Nonlinear Optical Properties of Crystals,” in Handbook of Nonlinear Optical Crystals, V. G. Dmitriev, G. G. Gurzadyan, and D. N. Nikogosyan, Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1991, pp. 53 –127. doi: 10.1007/978 -3-662- 13830-4_3

    doi:10.1007/978 1991

  2. [2]

    Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons,

    P. G. Kwiat, E. Waks, A. G. White, I. Appelbaum, and P. H. Eberhard, “Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. R773–R776, Aug. 1999, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R773

    doi:10.1103/physreva.60.r773 1999

  3. [3]

    Entangled photon- pair generation in nonlinear thin -films,

    E. A. Santos, M. A. Weissflog, T. Pertsch, F. Setzpfandt, and S. Saravi, “Entangled photon- pair generation in nonlinear thin -films,” Nanophotonics, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 3545 –3561, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0111

    doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024-0111 2024

  4. [4]

    Microscale Generation of Entangled Photons without Momentum Conservation,

    C. Okoth, A. Cavanna, T. Santiago-Cruz, and M. V. Chekhova, “Microscale Generation of Entangled Photons without Momentum Conservation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 123, no. 26, p. 263602, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.263602

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.263602 2019

  5. [5]

    Flat-optics generation of broadband photon pairs with tunable polarization entanglement,

    V. Sultanov, T. Santiago-Cruz, and M. V. Chekhova, “Flat-optics generation of broadband photon pairs with tunable polarization entanglement,” Opt. Lett., vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 3872 –3875, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1364/OL.458133

    doi:10.1364/ol.458133 2022

  6. [6]

    Entangled photons from subwavelength nonlinear films,

    T. Santiago -Cruz, V. Sultanov, H. Zhang, L. A. Krivitsky, and M. V. Chekhova, “Entangled photons from subwavelength nonlinear films,” Opt. Lett., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 653–656, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1364/OL.411176. 18

    doi:10.1364/ol.411176 2021

  7. [7]

    Ultrathin quantum light source with van der Waals NbOCl2 crystal,

    Q. Guo et al. , “Ultrathin quantum light source with van der Waals NbOCl2 crystal,” Nature, vol. 613, no. 7942, pp. 53–59, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05393-7

    doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05393-7 2023

  8. [8]

    Van der Waals engineering for quantum -entangled photon generation,

    L. Kallioniemi et al. , “Van der Waals engineering for quantum -entangled photon generation,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 142 –148, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41566 -024- 01545-5

    doi:10.1038/s41566 2025

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Quasi-phase-matched up- and down-conversion in periodically poled layered semiconductors,

    C. Trovatello et al., “Quasi-phase-matched up- and down-conversion in periodically poled layered semiconductors,” Nat. Photonics , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 291 –299, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41566-024-01602-z

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    A tunable transition metal dichalcogenide entangled photon -pair source,

    M. A. Weissflog et al., “A tunable transition metal dichalcogenide entangled photon -pair source,” Nat. Commun., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 7600, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51843-3

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    Absolute scale of second -order nonlinear-optical coefficients,

    I. Shoji, T. Kondo, A. Kitamoto, M. Shirane, and R. Ito, “Absolute scale of second -order nonlinear-optical coefficients,” JOSA B , vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2268 –2294, Sep. 1997, doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.14.002268

    1997 doi

  4. [12]

    Determination of quadratic nonlinear optical coefficient of Al x Ga1− x As system by the method of reflected second harmonics,

    M. Ohashi et al., “Determination of quadratic nonlinear optical coefficient of Al x Ga1− x As system by the method of reflected second harmonics,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 596 – 601, Jul. 1993, doi: 10.1063/1.355272

    1993 doi

  5. [13]

    Temporally Distilled High-Dimensional Biphotonic States from Thin Sources,

    V. Sultanov and M. Chekhova, “Temporally Distilled High-Dimensional Biphotonic States from Thin Sources,” ACS Photonics , vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2 –6, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.3c01169. 19

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Background-Free Near-Infrared Biphoton Emission from Single GaAs Nanowires,

    G. Saerens et al., “Background-Free Near-Infrared Biphoton Emission from Single GaAs Nanowires,” Nano Lett. , vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 3245 –3250, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00026

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states,

    T. Santiago-Cruz et al., “Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states,” Science, vol. 377, no. 6609, pp. 991–995, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1126/science.abq8684

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    Two-photon Interference of Biphotons Emitted by Overlapping Resonances in Metasurfaces,

    J. Noh et al., “Two-photon Interference of Biphotons Emitted by Overlapping Resonances in Metasurfaces,” Jan. 21, 2025, arXiv: arXiv:2501.11850. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.11850

    2025 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    Generation of tunable quantum entanglement via nonlinearity symmetry breaking in semiconductor metasurfaces,

    J. Ma et al. , “Generation of tunable quantum entanglement via nonlinearity symmetry breaking in semiconductor metasurfaces,” Sep. 17, 2024, arXiv: arXiv:2409.10845. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.10845

    2024 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    Optimizing GaAs/AlGaAs growth on GaAs (111)B for enhanced nonlinear efficiency in quantum optical metasurfaces,

    T. Blaikie, M. C. Tam, S. Stich, M. Belkin, and Z. R. Wasilewski, “Optimizing GaAs/AlGaAs growth on GaAs (111)B for enhanced nonlinear efficiency in quantum optical metasurfaces,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A , vol. 43, no. 3, p. 032703, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1116/6.0004450

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    Etch Rates and Selectivities of Citric Acid/Hydrogen Peroxide on GaAs, Al0.3Ga0.7As, In0.2Ga0.8As, In0.53Ga0.47As, In0.52Al0.48As, and InP

    G. C. DeSalvo, W. F. Tseng, and J. Comas, “Etch Rates and Selectivities of Citric Acid/Hydrogen Peroxide on GaAs, Al0.3Ga0.7As, In0.2Ga0.8As, In0.53Ga0.47As, In0.52Al0.48As, and InP”

  12. [20]

    Entangled Two -Photon Wave Packet in a Dispersive Medium,

    A. Valencia, M. V. Chekhova, A. Trifonov, and Y. Shih, “Entangled Two -Photon Wave Packet in a Dispersive Medium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 88, no. 18, p. 183601, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.183601. 20

    2002 doi

  13. [21]

    A simple model for entangled photon generation in resonant structures,

    N. J. Sorensen, V. Sultanov, and M. V. Chekhova, “A simple model for entangled photon generation in resonant structures,” Opt. Express, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 13946–13960, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1364/OE.555205

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    D. N. Klyshko, Photons And Nonlinear Optics . New York: Routledge, 2018. doi: 10.1201/9780203743508

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Photon Pairs from Resonant Metasurfaces,

    T. Santiago-Cruz et al., “Photon Pairs from Resonant Metasurfaces,” Nano Lett., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 4423–4429, May 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01125

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    Polarization of light: Fourth -order effects and polarization -squeezed states,

    D. M. Klyshko, “Polarization of light: Fourth -order effects and polarization -squeezed states,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys., vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1065–1079, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1134/1.558243

    1997 doi

  17. [25]

    Multiphoton interference and polarization effects,

    D. N. Klyshko, “Multiphoton interference and polarization effects,” Phys. Lett. A, vol. 163, no. 5, pp. 349–355, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(92)90837-C

    1992 doi

  18. [26]

    Quantum polarization properties of two -mode energy eigenstates,

    A. Sehat, J. Söderholm, G. Björk, P. Espinoza, A. B. Klimov, and L. L. Sánchez -Soto, “Quantum polarization properties of two -mode energy eigenstates,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 71, no. 3, p. 033818, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.033818

    2005 doi

  19. [27]

    Enhancement of spin noise spectroscopy of rubidium atomic ensemble by using the polarization squeezed light,

    L. Bai et al., “Enhancement of spin noise spectroscopy of rubidium atomic ensemble by using the polarization squeezed light,” Opt. Express, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1925–1935, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1364/OE.448084

    1925 doi

  20. [28]

    Generation and Direct Detection of Broadband Mesoscopic Polarization -Squeezed Vacuum,

    T. Iskhakov, M. V. Chekhova, and G. Leuchs, “Generation and Direct Detection of Broadband Mesoscopic Polarization -Squeezed Vacuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 102, no. 18, p. 183602, May 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.183602. 21

    2009 doi

  21. [29]

    Quantum Noise of an Atomic Spin Polarization Measurement,

    J. L. Sørensen, J. Hald, and E. S. Polzik, “Quantum Noise of an Atomic Spin Polarization Measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 80, no. 16, pp. 3487 –3490, Apr. 1998, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3487

    1998 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.