Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Differentially Private Data Release via Statistical Election to Partition Sequentially

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.06763 v4 pith:KUWPZ3KL submitted 2018-03-18 stat.AP

Differentially Private Data Release via Statistical Election to Partition Sequentially

classification stat.AP
keywords dataprivacystepsstatisticaldipsimportanceinformationsynthetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Differential Privacy (DP) formalizes privacy in mathematical terms and provides a robust concept for privacy protection. DIfferentially Private Data Synthesis (DIPS) techniques produce and release synthetic individual-level data in the DP framework. One key challenge to developing DIPS methods is preservation of the statistical utility of synthetic data, especially in high-dimensional settings. We propose a new DIPS approach, STatistical Election to Partition Sequentially (STEPS) that partitions data by attributes according to their importance ranks according to either a practical or statistical importance measure. STEPS aims to achieve better original information preservation for the attributes with higher importance ranks and produce thus more useful synthetic data overall. We present an algorithm to implement the STEPS procedure and employ the privacy budget composability to ensure the overall privacy cost is controlled at the pre-specified value. We apply the STEPS procedure to both simulated data and the 2000-2012 Current Population Survey youth voter data. The results suggest STEPS can better preserve the population-level information and the original information for some analyses compared to PrivBayes, a modified Uniform histogram approach, and the flat Laplace sanitizer.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.