REVIEW 4 cited by
Back to the Formula -- LHC Edition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While neural networks offer an attractive way to numerically encode functions, actual formulas remain the language of theoretical particle physics. We show how symbolic regression trained on matrix-element information provides, for instance, optimal LHC observables in an easily interpretable form. We introduce the method using the effect of a dimension-6 coefficient on associated ZH production. We then validate it for the known case of CP-violation in weak-boson-fusion Higgs production, including detector effects.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Neural Control Variates at LO and NLO
Signed neural control variates from normalizing flows, combined with neural importance sampling, reduce weight ranges and negative weights for LO and NLO phase-space integration and event generation.
-
Agentic Re-Casting using Agentic Re-Simulations
An agentic AI system with a physicist in the loop re-casts an ATLAS ttZ measurement into a global top-quark SMEFT fit and recovers injected coloron Wilson coefficients in a repeatable benchmark.
-
$\mathcal{CP}$-Analyses with Symbolic Regression
Symbolic regression produces analytic, detector-level CP-odd observables for WBF Higgs production and an analytic reconstruction of the Collins-Soper angle in ttH that are competitive with black-box ML and classical methods.
-
Toward Supporting Narrative-Driven Data Exploration: Barriers and Design Opportunities
Clustering particles by mass, spin, lifetime and decay modes with conventional tools reproduces known Standard Model groupings, but the dataset and algorithm choices quietly encode the theory being 'rediscovered'.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.