Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Planck 2015 results. XXI. The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1502.01595 v2 pith:KVGJSQKQ submitted 2015-02-05 astro-ph.CO

Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade , N. Aghanim , M. Arnaud , M. Ashdown , J. Aumont , C. Baccigalupi , A. J. Banday , R. B. Barreiro
show 223 more authors
N. Bartolo S. Basak E. Battaner K. Benabed A. Benot A. Benoit-Lvy J.-P. Bernard M. Bersanelli P. Bielewicz J. J. Bock A. Bonaldi L. Bonavera J. R. Bond J. Borrill F. R. Bouchet M. Bucher C. Burigana R. C. Butler E. Calabrese J.-F. Cardoso B. Casaponsa A. Catalano A. Challinor A. Chamballu H. C. Chiang P. R. Christensen S. Church D. L. Clements S. Colombi L. P. L. Colombo C. Combet F. Couchot A. Coulais B. P. Crill A. Curto F. Cuttaia L. Danese R. D. Davies R. J. Davis P. de Bernardis A. de Rosa G. de Zotti J. Delabrouille F.-X. Dsert J. M. Diego H. Dole S. Donzelli O. Dor M. Douspis A. Ducout X. Dupac G. Efstathiou F. Elsner T. A. Enlin H. K. Eriksen J. Fergusson R. Fernandez-Cobos F. Finelli O. Forni M. Frailis A. A. Fraisse E. Franceschi A. Frejsel S. Galeotta S. Galli K. Ganga R. T. Gnova-Santos M. Giard Y. Giraud-Hraud E. Gjerlw J. Gonzlez-Nuevo K. M. Grski S. Gratton A. Gregorio A. Gruppuso J. E. Gudmundsson F. K. Hansen D. Hanson D. L. Harrison S. Henrot-Versill C. Hernndez-Monteagudo D. Herranz S. R. Hildebrandt E. Hivon M. Hobson W. A. Holmes A. Hornstrup W. Hovest K. M. Huffenberger G. Hurier S. Ili_ A. H. Jaffe T. R. Jaffe W. C. Jones M. Juvela E. Keihnen R. Keskitalo T. S. Kisner R. Kneissl J. Knoche M. Kunz H. Kurki-Suonio G. Lagache A. Lhteenmki J.-M. Lamarre M. Langer A. Lasenby M. Lattanzi C. R. Lawrence R. Leonardi J. Lesgourgues F. Levrier M. Liguori P. B. Lilje M. Linden-Vrnle M. Lpez-Caniego P. M. Lubin Y.-Z. Ma J. F. Macas-Prez G. Maggio D. Maino N. Mandolesi A. Mangilli A. Marcos-Caballero M. Maris P. G. Martin E. Martnez-Gonzlez S. Masi S. Matarrese P. McGehee P. R. Meinhold A. Melchiorri L. Mendes A. Mennella M. Migliaccio S. Mitra M.-A. Miville-Deschnes A. Moneti L. Montier G. Morgante D. Mortlock A. Moss D. Munshi J. A. Murphy P. Naselsky F. Nati P. Natoli C. B. Netterfield H. U. Nrgaard-Nielsen F. Noviello D. Novikov I. Novikov C. A. Oxborrow F. Paci L. Pagano F. Pajot D. Paoletti F. Pasian G. Patanchon O. Perdereau L. Perotto F. Perrotta V. Pettorino F. Piacentini M. Piat E. Pierpaoli D. Pietrobon S. Plaszczynski E. Pointecouteau G. Polenta L. Popa G. W. Pratt G. Przeau S. Prunet J.-L. Puget J. P. Rachen W. T. Reach R. Rebolo M. Reinecke M. Remazeilles C. Renault A. Renzi I. Ristorcelli G. Rocha C. Rosset M. Rossetti G. Roudier J. A. Rubio-Martn B. Rusholme M. Sandri D. Santos M. Savelainen G. Savini B. M. Schaefer D. Scott M. D. Seiffert E. P. S. Shellard L. D. Spencer V. Stolyarov R. Stompor R. Sudiwala R. Sunyaev D. Sutton A.-S. Suur-Uski J.-F. Sygnet J. A. Tauber L. Terenzi L. Toffolatti M. Tomasi M. Tristram M. Tucci J. Tuovinen L. Valenziano J. Valiviita F. Van Tent P. Vielva F. Villa L. A. Wade B. D. Wandelt I. K. Wehus D. Yvon A. Zacchei A. Zonca
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords planckcross-correlationdataeffectpolarizationsignallensingsigma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper presents a study of the ISW effect from the Planck 2015 temperature and polarization data release. The CMB is cross-correlated with different LSS tracers: the NVSS, SDSS and WISE catalogues, and the Planck 2015 lensing map. This cross-correlation yields a detection at $4\,\sigma$, where most of the signal-to-noise is due to the Planck lensing and NVSS. In fact, the ISW effect is detected only from the Planck data (through the ISW-lensing bispectrum) at $\approx 3\,\sigma$, which is similar to the detection level achieved by combining the cross-correlation signal coming from all the catalogues. The ISW signal allow us to detect $\Omega_\Lambda$ at more than $3\,\sigma$. This cross-correlation analysis is performed only with the Planck temperature data, since the polarization scales available in the 2015 release do not permit significant improvement of the CMB-LSS cross-correlation detectability. Nevertheless, polarization data is used to study the anomalously large ISW signal previously reported through the stacking of CMB features at the locations of known superstructures. We find that the current Planck polarization data do not exclude that this signal could be caused by the ISW effect. In addition, the stacking of the Planck lensing map on the locations of superstructures exhibits a positive cross-correlation with these large-scale structures. Finally, we have improved our previous reconstruction of the ISW temperature fluctuations by combining the information encoded in all the previously mentioned LSS tracers. In particular, we construct a map of the ISW secondary anisotropies and the corresponding uncertainties map, obtained from simulations. We also explore the reconstruction of the ISW anisotropies caused by the LSS traced by the 2MPZ survey by directly inverting the density field into the gravitational potential field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate and other structure growth probes in testing gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining gravitational-potential decay-rate (DR) data with Σ8 and fσ8 growth measurements tightens modified-gravity parameter constraints by ~1.5–2×, with all results consistent with general relativity.

  2. Hubble Tension as an Effect of Horizon Entanglement Nonequilibrium

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A phenomenological 'horizon entanglement deficit' with the form ρ ∝ H² is fit to low-z data under a forced H0=73 prior; the nonzero amplitude is a restatement of that prior.

  3. The Status of Single Scalar Field Dark Energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    Cosmological data can constrain only a handful of EFT parameters for single-scalar dark energy; extended models show modest preference over Λ but remain underdetermined and challenged by fifth forces and screening.

  4. Cosmology from Nx2pt Analyses of SKAO Wide-Area Surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SKA-Mid AA4 N×2pt combinations of continuum and HI surveys are forecast to deliver ~1% precision on ΛCDM parameters and useful constraints on w0–wa, Mν and Ωk.

  5. Synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate and other structure growth probes in testing gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Tomographic DR data added to Σ8 + fσ8 tightens phenomenological MG parameters (μ0, Σ0, η0) and EFT α coefficients by factors of 1.5–2.

  6. Redshift evolution of the Hubble constant: Constraints and new insights from an interacting dark energy model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Modified IDE model with interaction parameter alpha ~0.01 from late-universe data shows H0 decreasing with redshift, tightening to 10^-5 when CMB priors are added.

  7. Detectors for CLASS-W2: The second 90 GHz telescope of the Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor

    astro-ph.IM 2026-06 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A new 296-detector 90 GHz TES bolometer array for CLASS achieves uniform properties, 16 μK√s NET, 0.37 optical efficiency, and a 41% mapping speed boost after addressing blue-leak radiation.

Pith tools