Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

RADAR: A TTP-based Extensible, Explainable, and Effective System for Network Traffic Analysis and Malware Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.03793 v2 pith:KWFWXPDP submitted 2022-12-07 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords radaranalysisdetectionextensiblemalwarenetworkexplainablesystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Network analysis and machine learning techniques have been widely applied for building malware detection systems. Though these systems attain impressive results, they often are $(i)$ not extensible, being monolithic, well tuned for the specific task they have been designed for but very difficult to adapt and/or extend to other settings, and $(ii)$ not interpretable, being black boxes whose inner complexity makes it impossible to link the result of detection with its root cause, making further analysis of threats a challenge. In this paper we present RADAR, an extensible and explainable system that exploits the popular TTP (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) ontology of adversary behaviour described in the industry-standard MITRE ATT\&CK framework in order to unequivocally identify and classify malicious behaviour using network traffic. We evaluate RADAR on a very large dataset comprising of 2,286,907 malicious and benign samples, representing a total of 84,792,452 network flows. The experimental analysis confirms that the proposed methodology can be effectively exploited: RADAR's ability to detect malware is comparable to other state-of-the-art non-interpretable systems' capabilities. To the best of our knowledge, RADAR is the first TTP-based system for malware detection that uses machine learning while being extensible and explainable.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Labeling NIDS Rules with MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: Machine Learning vs. Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On a dataset of 973 Snort rules, traditional ML models (SVM, F1 up to 0.87) outperformed ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini (best F1 0.62) at labeling rules with MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

Pith tools