Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Pok\'eChamp: an Expert-level Minimax Language Agent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04094 v1 pith:KWHW6JX3 submitted 2025-03-06 cs.LG cs.MA

classification cs.LGcs.MA
keywords echampemonagentbattledatasetllmsminimaxpowered
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Pok\'eChamp, a minimax agent powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) for Pok\'emon battles. Built on a general framework for two-player competitive games, Pok\'eChamp leverages the generalist capabilities of LLMs to enhance minimax tree search. Specifically, LLMs replace three key modules: (1) player action sampling, (2) opponent modeling, and (3) value function estimation, enabling the agent to effectively utilize gameplay history and human knowledge to reduce the search space and address partial observability. Notably, our framework requires no additional LLM training. We evaluate Pok\'eChamp in the popular Gen 9 OU format. When powered by GPT-4o, it achieves a win rate of 76% against the best existing LLM-based bot and 84% against the strongest rule-based bot, demonstrating its superior performance. Even with an open-source 8-billion-parameter Llama 3.1 model, Pok\'eChamp consistently outperforms the previous best LLM-based bot, Pok\'ellmon powered by GPT-4o, with a 64% win rate. Pok\'eChamp attains a projected Elo of 1300-1500 on the Pok\'emon Showdown online ladder, placing it among the top 30%-10% of human players. In addition, this work compiles the largest real-player Pok\'emon battle dataset, featuring over 3 million games, including more than 500k high-Elo matches. Based on this dataset, we establish a series of battle benchmarks and puzzles to evaluate specific battling skills. We further provide key updates to the local game engine. We hope this work fosters further research that leverage Pok\'emon battle as benchmark to integrate LLM technologies with game-theoretic algorithms addressing general multiagent problems. Videos, code, and dataset available at https://sites.google.com/view/pokechamp-llm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GameDevBench: Evaluating Agentic Capabilities Through Game Development

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 132-task Godot benchmark shows frontier AI agents solve only about 54.5% of game-development tasks, with visual feedback giving consistent but modest gains.

  2. LLM Economist: Large Population Models and Mechanism Design in Multi-Agent Generative Simulacra

    cs.MA 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The LLM Economist framework couples persona-conditioned worker agents with an in-context RL planner to search US-bracket tax schedules, yet its Saez benchmark is derived from the planner's own solution and its headlin...

  3. Learning Game-Playing Agents with Generative Code Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-guided refinement of Python policies reaches competitive Atari scores with fewer environment interactions than standard deep RL, on Pong, Breakout, and Space Invaders.

  4. TextAtari: 100K Frames Game Playing with Language Agents

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    TextAtari is a text-based Atari benchmark for language agents; 7-8B LLMs stay below 10% of human scores in over 90% of tested conditions, and knowledge injection helps more than chain-of-thought.

  5. Humanizing LLMs: A Survey of Psychological Measurements with Tools, Datasets, and Human-Agent Applications

    cs.CY 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of six dimensions of LLM psychological assessment concludes that results are strongly affected by test design and remain inconsistent across models and settings.

Pith tools