The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2305.11248 · v2 · pith:KXBVD6WP · submitted 2023-05-18 · cs.HC · cs.SE

Investigating and Designing for Trust in AI-powered Code Generation Tools

Reviewed by Pithpith:KXBVD6WPopen to challenge →

classification cs.HC cs.SE
keywords trustdesigntoolscodedevelopersgenerationai-poweredappropriate
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

As AI-powered code generation tools such as GitHub Copilot become popular, it is crucial to understand software developers' trust in AI tools -- a key factor for tool adoption and responsible usage. However, we know little about how developers build trust with AI, nor do we understand how to design the interface of generative AI systems to facilitate their appropriate levels of trust. In this paper, we describe findings from a two-stage qualitative investigation. We first interviewed 17 developers to contextualize their notions of trust and understand their challenges in building appropriate trust in AI code generation tools. We surfaced three main challenges -- including building appropriate expectations, configuring AI tools, and validating AI suggestions. To address these challenges, we conducted a design probe study in the second stage to explore design concepts that support developers' trust-building process by 1) communicating AI performance to help users set proper expectations, 2) allowing users to configure AI by setting and adjusting preferences, and 3) offering indicators of model mechanism to support evaluation of AI suggestions. We gathered developers' feedback on how these design concepts can help them build appropriate trust in AI-powered code generation tools, as well as potential risks in design. These findings inform our proposed design recommendations on how to design for trust in AI-powered code generation tools.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Agentic Much? Adoption of Coding Agents on GitHub

    cs.SE 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0

    Coding agents reached 22-29% adoption in GitHub projects within months of release, with agent-assisted commits larger and focused on features and bug fixes.

  2. To Copilot and Beyond: 22 AI Systems Developers Want Built

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Survey of 860 developers reveals 22 desired AI systems for non-coding tasks with explicit constraints on authority, provenance, and quality signals, framed as bounded delegation where AI handles assembly work but not ...

  3. Thinking Less, Trusting More: GenAI's Impacts on Students' Cognitive Habits

    cs.HC 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Trust-driven routine use of generative AI is linked to reduced cognitive engagement in STEM students, with higher technophilic traits increasing vulnerability.