Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Empirical Study on Ethereum Private Transactions and the Security Implications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.02858 v1 pith:KYSRNC2S submitted 2022-08-04 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords transactionsprivateethereummempoolminerattackspublicsecurity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, Decentralized Finance (DeFi) platforms on Ethereum are booming, and numerous traders are trying to capitalize on the opportunity for maximizing their benefits by launching front-running attacks and extracting Miner Extractable Values (MEVs) based on information in the public mempool. To protect end users from being harmed and hide transactions from the mempool, private transactions, a special type of transactions that are sent directly to miners, were invented. Private transactions have a high probability of being packed to the front positions of a block and being added to the blockchain by the target miner, without going through the public mempool, thus reducing the risk of being attacked by malicious entities. Despite the good intention of inventing private transactions, due to their stealthy nature, private transactions have also been used by attackers to launch attacks, which has a negative impact on the Ethereum ecosystem. However, existing works only touch upon private transactions as by-products when studying MEV, while a systematic study on private transactions is still missing. To fill this gap and paint a complete picture of private transactions, we take the first step towards investigating the private transactions on Ethereum. In particular, we collect large-scale private transaction datasets and perform analysis on their characteristics, transaction costs and miner profits, as well as security impacts. This work provides deep insights on different aspects of private transactions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Phishing Detection in Ethereum via Temporal Graph Contrastive Learning

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    PhishEye uses temporal graph contrastive learning on heterogeneous Ethereum transaction graphs for self-supervised phishing detection, achieving F1 scores of 87.23% for transactions and 94.19% for accounts while ident...

Pith tools