From spectral structure to sensing limits in quantum thermometry

Abderrahim El Allati; Matteo G. A. Paris; Paolo Bordone; Simone Cavazzoni; Youssef Aiache

From spectral structure to sensing limits in quantum thermometry

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The energy spectrum of a quantum probe dictates distinct high-temperature decay rates of T^{-4} or T^{-2} for its thermometric precision.

desk verdict This paper maps spectral features of probes to concrete QFI scaling laws for thermometry, separating finite vs unbounded spectra at high T and showing degeneracy or topology routes at low T. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.25933 v1 pith:KYV3KADI submitted 2026-06-24 quant-ph

Youssef Aiache , Simone Cavazzoni , Abderrahim El Allati , Paolo Bordone , Matteo G. A. Paris This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords quantumthermometryFisherinformationspectralstructurescalinglawswalksGibbsstatetemperaturesensingenergylevels

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper maps how the energy-level configurations of quantum systems from finite spin ensembles and degenerate atoms to confining potentials, quantum walks, and continuous spectra determine thermometric performance. It derives exact scaling laws for the quantum Fisher information, revealing two high-temperature universality classes set by whether the spectrum is finite or unbounded. At low temperatures, sensitivity is exponentially suppressed but can be enhanced arbitrarily through degeneracy or fully connected quantum-walk topologies, or optimized via gap engineering in specific networks. Power-law spectra allow tunable scaling with system size, turning spectral structure into a design resource for temperature sensing.

What carries the argument

Quantum Fisher information of the thermal Gibbs state, computed directly from the probe's energy eigenvalues and their degeneracies.

What would settle it

Measure the quantum Fisher information for a finite two-level spin system at high temperature and check whether it decays precisely as T^{-4} rather than the slower T^{-2} rate of continuous-spectrum probes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Finite-spectrum probes exhibit a T^{-4} decay of quantum Fisher information at high temperature, while unbounded or continuous spectra yield a slower T^{-2} decay; at low temperature, degeneracy or fully-connected quantum-walk topology can enhance sensitivity arbitrarily while specific topologies yield an optimized T^{-2} scaling via gap engineering. Power-law spectra enable tunable scaling of thermometric performance with system size.

Load-bearing premise

The probe reaches a thermal Gibbs state whose spectrum is known exactly and whose quantum Fisher information sets the ultimate sensing precision.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Finite-spectrum probes lose precision faster than unbounded-spectrum ones at high temperatures.
Degenerate excited states or fully connected quantum-walk topologies can remove the usual exponential suppression of low-temperature sensitivity.
Gap engineering in specific quantum-walk networks yields an optimized T^{-2} low-temperature scaling for chosen network sizes.
Power-law spectra provide a direct handle to tune thermometric performance by varying system size.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

For high-temperature applications, continuous or unbounded spectra such as those in harmonic oscillators would outperform finite-level systems.
The gap-engineering route could be realized and tested in optical-lattice quantum walks to confirm the T^{-2} scaling.
Hybrid probes mixing finite and continuous spectral components might be designed for temperature windows where neither class alone is optimal.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core contribution is a classification of how probe spectra shape thermometric precision. Finite spectra give T^{-4} QFI decay at high temperature while unbounded or continuous ones give T^{-2}; at low T, degeneracy or fully connected walks can lift the usual exponential suppression, and some walk topologies allow gap engineering for an optimized T^{-2} scaling. Power-law spectra also let performance scale with system size in chosen windows. These statements unify spins, atoms, potentials, walks, and continuous models under the same framework and turn spectral engineering into explicit design rules.

The derivations rest on the standard thermal-state QFI expression F_T = Var(H)/T^4, so the high-T distinction follows directly once the variance behavior is fixed by the spectrum. The low-T claims track changes in the partition function and fluctuations, which is consistent. The work supplies exact scaling laws rather than numerical fits, and the mapping from spectrum class to performance class is new.

The main limitation is the maintained assumption that the probe sits in a perfect Gibbs state whose spectrum is known exactly; real devices have finite thermalization time and coupling strength, so the ultimate bounds may be optimistic. Continuous-spectrum cases also require care with cutoffs that the abstract does not detail. These are standard caveats in the field rather than fatal gaps.

The paper is aimed at quantum-metrology groups already working on thermometer design and spectral engineering. It is solid enough and concrete enough to merit referee time; the scaling results are falsifiable and could influence device optimization even if the low-T enhancements prove harder to realize.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive exact scaling laws for the quantum Fisher information (QFI) of thermal states by mapping the spectral structure of various quantum probes—including finite spin ensembles, degenerate atoms, confining potentials, quantum walks, and continuous-spectrum models—to thermometric performance. It identifies two high-temperature universality classes (T^{-4} decay for finite spectra vs. T^{-2} for unbounded/continuous spectra) and low-temperature enhancements via degeneracy, fully-connected topologies, gap engineering, or power-law spectra, all framed as fundamental bounds and design guidelines for quantum thermometry.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a systematic classification of how energy-level configurations determine sensing limits, with clear universality classes and concrete mechanisms (degeneracy, topology, gap engineering) that can be used to optimize probes in given temperature windows. The grounding in the standard QFI formula for Gibbs states and the emphasis on exact rather than fitted scalings are strengths that could inform both theory and device design in quantum sensing.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'exact scaling laws' and the specific exponents (T^{-4}, T^{-2}) would benefit from an immediate parenthetical reference to the underlying relation F_T = Var(H)/T^4 so that the origin of the universality classes is transparent on first reading.
The low-temperature discussion of 'arbitrarily enhanced' sensitivity via degeneracy or fully-connected walks should include a brief statement of the regime of validity (e.g., whether the enhancement remains bounded once the thermal state is properly normalized).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of our work, including the recognition of its systematic classification of spectral structures and the identification of high- and low-temperature universality classes. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives QFI scaling laws directly from the standard thermal-state relation F_T = Var(H)/T^4 and the explicit form of the partition function for given spectra (finite vs. unbounded, degenerate levels, quantum-walk topologies). These steps use only the Hamiltonian spectrum as input and standard quantum-information identities; no parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claims, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The reported T^{-4}, T^{-2}, and degeneracy-enhanced behaviors are therefore independent consequences of the spectral assumptions rather than reductions to the paper's own outputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard quantum-metrology assumptions rather than new postulates; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption The quantum Fisher information of the thermal state of the probe bounds the ultimate precision of temperature estimation.
Invoked implicitly throughout the abstract as the figure of merit for 'sensing limits'.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From spectral structure to sensing limits in quantum thermometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KYV3KADI

@misc{pith2026260625933,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From spectral structure to sensing limits in quantum thermometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KYV3KADI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.25933}
}

abstract

The precision of a quantum thermometer is fundamentally constrained by the spectral structure of the probe itself, and a systematic mapping between the configurations of energy levels and thermometric performance provides relevant information to design optimized devices. In this work, we establish such a mapping by analyzing a broad class of quantum systems, ranging from finite spin ensembles and degenerate atoms to confining potentials, quantum walks, and continuous-spectrum models. We derive exact scaling laws for the quantum Fisher information, revealing two distinct high-temperature universality classes: finite-spectrum probes exhibit a $T^{-4}$ decay, while unbounded or continuous spectra yield a slower $T^{-2}$ decay. At low temperatures, we show that sensitivity, though universally exponentially suppressed, can be enhanced arbitrarily by engineering degenerate excited states or a quantum walk on a fully connected topology. By contrast, specific quantum walk topologies provide a distinct enhancement mechanism based on gap engineering, whereby an optimal network size yields an optimized $T^{-2}$ low-temperature scaling. Furthermore, power-law spectra enable tunable scaling of thermometric performance with system size, offering a design principle for optimal probes in specific temperature windows. Our results contribute to transform spectral information into a resource for quantum thermometry, providing both fundamental bounds and practical guidelines to tailored temperature sensing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25933 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Finite-size reliability of homothetic quantum Otto engines
quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For finite homothetic quantum Otto engines, exact finite-N work statistics show a reliability crossover and noncommuting high-temperature and infinite-dimensional limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Spin Systems We begin this analysis withNdimensional spin sys- tems. Specifically, for a spin-sparticle in a uniform mag- netic fieldBalong thez-axis, the Hamiltonian can be written as H s =−ωS z, ω=γB >0,(16) and the associated energy spectrum is Es m =−ωm, m=−s,−s+ 1, . . . , s ,(17) i.e.N= 2s+1 equally spaced levels with spacing ∆ =ω. Each energy level...
[2]

Quantum walks When a quantum system can be modeled as a collec- tion of n qubits (nodes) that form a network connected by 5 a specific topology, it may be described using the quan- tum walk (QW) formalism. The system is described by an excitation-preserving Hamiltonian in the form H QW = N−1X i=0 ωi σ+ i σ− i + N−1X i,j=0 gi,j σ+ i σ− j +σ + j σ− i , (27)...
[3]

Quantum harmonic oscillator As a first confining potential we look at the quantum harmonic oscillator (QHO), as it represents an ubiquitous model in quantum sensing and generally in physics [62– 64]. The Hamiltonian of a harmonic oscillatorkcan be written in the form H qho k = p2 k 2m + 1 2 mω2x2 k,(39) and describe, at least to a first approximation, any...
[4]

Together those two models represent the ba- sis of the quantum description of the degrees of freedom of any quantum rigid system

Quantum Rotor After the description of the thermometric properties of a quantum harmonic oscillator, which can be adopted to model of the vibrational modes of any quantum system, we now focus on a model which can describe rotational 7 modes [65]. Together those two models represent the ba- sis of the quantum description of the degrees of freedom of any qu...
[5]

(54) Despite the simplicity of the model, this Hamilto- nian provides a convenient description for semiconductor hetero-structures or quantum dots [61]

Quantum Wells One of the easiest yet widely adopted confined model consist in considering a system with a Hamiltonian in the form H qw = ˆp2 2m + ˆV(x k),(53) where ˆV(x k) = ( ∞, if|x k|> d k, 0, if|x k|< d k. (54) Despite the simplicity of the model, this Hamilto- nian provides a convenient description for semiconductor hetero-structures or quantum dots...
[6]

Power-law spectral model After the characterization of the thermometric perfor- mances of different confined probes, a key question to ad- dress is how the QFI of such systems scales with system size and the structure of the energy spectrum. In con- fined thermometry, where quantum states are trapped in finite domains, the energy spectrum is inherently di...
[7]

Hydrogen-like systems The most used model to describe atomic systems is the hydrogen-like atom, whose spectrum arises from the Coulomb interaction and can be systematically refined through fine-structure, hyperfine-structure, and Zeeman corrections. For the hydrogen-like atom, the full Hamil- tonian reads H=H C +H fs +H hfs,(75) where each contribution is...
[8]

Diatomic Molecules Combining together the effects of electrostatic poten- tial, to rotational and vibrational modes it is possible to describe diatomic molecular systems such as homo- nuclear molecules made of light elements, as well as hetero-nuclear molecules such as carbon monoxide, nitric oxide. The Hamiltonian of such systems may be written as H m =H...

Show all 87 references

[9]

Spin Systems The low and high temperature limits of the QFI for spin systems are based on the asymptotic expansions of the hyperbolic cosecant. Particularly csch(x)≃2e −x, x≫1, csch(x)≃ 1 x − x 6 , x≪1.(A1) ForT→0 one has x= ω 2T ≫1,(A2) so that csch2(x)≃4e −2x.(A3) Therefore,...
[10]

Accordingly the QFI is F qr(T) = Var(Hqr) T 4 .(A12) However, in the low-temperature limitT→0 (β→ ∞), thermal occupation is effectively restricted to the lowest energy levels

Quantum Rotor Given that the quantum rotor model exhibits degener- acyg n, the canonical partition function yields Z(β) = ∞X n=0 gne−βE qr n .(A10) The energy variance of a quantum rotor is V ar(H qr) = 1 2I 2 P n gnh2 ne−βE qr n P n gne−βE qr n − P n gnhne−βE qr n P n gne−βE ...
[11]

Quantum Wells The spectrum of the Quantum Wells has a level spacing that grows linearly withni.e., ∆E n =E n+1 −E n = α(2n+ 1). In this case the partition function is Z(β) = ∞X n=1 e−βE qw n = ∞X n=1 e−αβn2 ,(A26) the above expression does not allow a compact formula without s...
[12]

Let assume thatδ=αβ→0. Using the Jacobi transformation [75], we have ϑ3(0, e−δ) = r π δ ϑ3(0, e−π2/δ).(A42) For smallδ, we haveϑ 3(0, e−π2/δ)→1, then ϑ3(0, q)≃ r π δ .(A43) Let’s definef(δ) =ϑ 3(0, e−δ)≃ √πδ −1/2. Then, the derivatives are f ′(δ)≃ − 1 2 √πδ −3/2, f ′′(δ)≃ 3 4 ...
[13]

Systems with both discrete and continuous spectra It is convenient to separate discrete and continuum contributions by defining Z(β) =Z d(β) +Z c(β),(A48) where Zd(β) = X n gne−βEn ,(A49) Zc(β) = Z ∞ Ec dE ρ(E)e −βE .(A50) The mean energy is ⟨H⟩= M(d) 1 +M (c) 1 Zd +Z c ,(A51)...
[14]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

2010
[15]

Riera, C

A. Riera, C. Gogolin, and J. Eisert, Physical review let- ters108, 080402 (2012)

2012
[16]

Basak, G

N. Basak, G. Paul, and P. Chattopadhyay, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10206 (2026)

2026 arXiv
[17]

Callies, M

A. Callies, M. Hanser, J. C. Goldschmidt, B. Bl¨ asi, and O. H¨ ohn, Optics Express31, 19428 (2023)

2023
[18]

Cavazzoni, G

S. Cavazzoni, G. Ragazzi, P. Bordone, and M. G. A. Paris, Advanced Quantum Technologies9, e00897 (2026)

2026
[19]

F. Ye, L. S. Dhami, and J. M. Nichol, Phys. Rev. Appl. 25, 024045 (2026)

2026
[20]

R. M. Daniel and M. J. Danson, Trends in biochemical sciences35, 584 (2010)

2010
[21]

C. E. Moore, K. Meacham-Hensold, P. Lemonnier, R. A. Slattery, C. Benjamin, C. J. Bernacchi, T. Lawson, and A. P. Cavanagh, Journal of experimental botany72, 2822 (2021)

2021
[22]

T. M. Stace, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics82, 011611 (2010)

2010
[23]

W. Tham, H. Ferretti, A. Sadashivan, and A. Steinberg, Scientific reports6, 38822 (2016)

2016
[24]

D. Xie, C. Xu, and A. M. Wang, Quantum information processing16, 155 (2017)

2017
[25]

Mukherjee, A

V. Mukherjee, A. Zwick, A. Ghosh, X. Chen, and G. Kur- izki, Communications Physics2, 162 (2019)

2019
[26]

A. K. Pati, C. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, and S. Ghosh, Physical Review A102, 012204 (2020)

2020
[27]

Kulikov, R

A. Kulikov, R. Navarathna, and A. Fedorov, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 240501 (2020)

2020
[28]

K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. R. Jørgensen, G. T. Landi, ´A. M. Alhambra, J. B. Brask, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Prx Quantum2, 020322 (2021)

2021
[29]

Planella, M

G. Planella, M. F. Cenni, A. Acin, and M. Mehboudi, Physical Review Letters128, 040502 (2022)

2022
[30]

Ullah, M

A. Ullah, M. T. Naseem, and ¨O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, Phys- ical Review Research5, 043184 (2023)

2023
[31]

Abiuso, P

P. Abiuso, P. Andrea Erdman, M. Ronen, F. No´ e, G. Haack, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Quantum Science and Technology9, 035008 (2024)

2024
[32]

Aiache, A

Y. Aiache, A. El Allati, and K. El Anouz, Phys. Rev. A 110, 032605 (2024)

2024
[33]

D. S. Lvov, S. A. Lemziakov, E. Ankerhold, J. T. Pel- tonen, and J. P. Pekola, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 054079 (2025)

2025
[34]

Aiache, A

Y. Aiache, A. Ullah, O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, and A. E. Allati, Phys. Rev. A111, 062619 (2025)

2025
[35]

H. J. Miller and J. Anders, Nature communications9, 2203 (2018)

2018
[36]

Mehboudi, A

M. Mehboudi, A. Sanpera, and L. A. Correa, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical52, 303001 (2019)

2019
[37]

L. A. Correa, M. Mehboudi, G. Adesso, and A. Sanpera, Physical review letters114, 220405 (2015)

2015
[38]

Mancino, M

L. Mancino, M. Sbroscia, I. Gianani, E. Roccia, and M. Barbieri, Physical Review Letters118, 130502 (2017)

2017
[39]

S. Seah, S. Nimmrichter, D. Grimmer, J. P. Santos, V. Scarani, and G. T. Landi, Physical review letters123, 180602 (2019)

2019
[40]

Xie, F.-X

D. Xie, F.-X. Sun, and C. Xu, Physical Review A101, 063844 (2020)

2020
[41]

M. T. Mitchison, T. Fogarty, G. Guarnieri, S. Campbell, T. Busch, and J. Goold, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 080402 (2020)

2020
[42]

O’Connor, B

E. O’Connor, B. Vacchini, and S. Campbell, Entropy23, 1634 (2021)

2021
[43]

Fujiwara and Y

M. Fujiwara and Y. Shikano, Nanotechnology32, 482002 (2021)

2021
[44]

Zhang and D

D.-J. Zhang and D. Tong, npj Quantum Information8, 81 (2022)

2022
[45]

Dedyulin, Z

S. Dedyulin, Z. Ahmed, and G. Machin, Measurement Science and Technology33, 092001 (2022)

2022
[46]

Briant, S

T. Briant, S. Krenek, A. Cupertino, F. Loubar, R. Braive, 17 L. Weituschat, D. Ramos, M. J. Martin, P. A. Postigo, A. Casas,et al., Optics3, 159 (2022)

2022
[47]

C. Liu, H. Hu, Z. Liu, S. Xiao, J. Wang, Y. Zhou, and Q. Song, Photonics Research12, 1696 (2024)

2024
[48]

Aiache, C

Y. Aiache, C. Seida, K. El Anouz, and A. El Allati, Phys. Rev. E110, 024132 (2024)

2024
[49]

Mehboudi, F

M. Mehboudi, F. Meier, M. Huber, and H. J. D. Miller, Phys. Rev. A111, L020401 (2025)

2025
[50]

D. Y. Akamatsu, L. F. R. de Moura, G. G. Damas, G. D. de Moraes Neto, V. Montenegro, and N. G. de Almeida, Quantum Science and Technology10, 045062 (2025)

2025
[51]

T. M. Stace, Phys. Rev. A82, 011611 (2010)

2010
[52]

C. L. Latune, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, New Jour- nal of Physics22, 083049 (2020)

2020
[53]

Glatthard, K

J. Glatthard, K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. Perarnau-Llobet, L. A. Correa, and H. J. D. Miller, Quantum7, 1190 (2023)

2023
[54]

Chang, Y

S. Chang, Y. Yan, L. Wang, W. Ye, X. Rao, H. Zhang, L. Huang, M. Luo, Y. Chen, Q. Ma, and S. Gao, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043171 (2024)

2024
[55]

Campbell, M

S. Campbell, M. G. Genoni, and S. Deffner, Quantum Science and Technology3, 025002 (2018)

2018
[56]

Salado-Mej´ ıa, R

M. Salado-Mej´ ıa, R. Rom´ an-Ancheyta, F. Soto-Eguibar, and H. Moya-Cessa, Quantum Science and Technology6, 025010 (2021)

2021
[57]

J.-B. Yuan, B. Zhang, Y.-J. Song, S.-Q. Tang, X.-W. Wang, and L.-M. Kuang, Physical Review A107, 063317 (2023)

2023
[58]

Ullah, O

A. Ullah, O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, and M. G. A. Paris, Phys. Rev. A113, 012408 (2026)

2026
[59]

W.-K. Mok, K. Bharti, L.-C. Kwek, and A. Bayat, Com- munications physics4, 62 (2021)

2021
[61]

Zhang, S.-Y

N. Zhang, S.-Y. Bai, and C. Chen, Phys. Rev. A110, 012211 (2024)

2024
[62]

J. D. Cresser and J. Anders, Physical Review Letters 127, 250601 (2021)

2021
[63]

Candeloro, L

A. Candeloro, L. Razzoli, S. Cavazzoni, P. Bordone, and M. G. A. Paris, Physical Review A102, 042214 (2020)

2020
[64]

Cavazzoni, G

S. Cavazzoni, G. Ragazzi, P. Bordone, and M. G. A. Paris, Physical Review A111, 032439 (2025)

2025
[65]

Zimbor´ as, M

Z. Zimbor´ as, M. Faccin, Z. Kadar, J. D. Whitfield, B. P. Lanyon, and J. Biamonte, Scientific reports3, 2361 (2013)

2013
[66]

Frigerio, C

M. Frigerio, C. Benedetti, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris, Phys. Rev. A104, L030201 (2021)

2021
[67]

Candeloro, L

A. Candeloro, L. Razzoli, P. Bordone, and M. G. A. Paris, Physical Review E104, 014136 (2021)

2021
[68]

Coutinho, K

G. Coutinho, K. Guo, and V. Schmeits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11986 (2025)

2025
[69]

M. G. A. Paris, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49, 03LT02 (2015)

2015
[70]

K. V. Hovhannisyan and L. A. Correa, Phys. Rev. B98, 045101 (2018)

2018
[71]

P. P. Potts, J. B. Brask, and N. Brunner, Quantum3, 161 (2019)

2019
[72]

Aiache, A

Y. Aiache, A. E. Allati, ˙I. Demir, and K. E. Anouz, Phys. Rev. A112, 062229 (2025)

2025
[73]

Forghieri, A

G. Forghieri, A. Secchi, A. Bertoni, P. Bordone, and F. Troiani, Physical Review Research5, 043159 (2023)

2023
[74]

Fanucchi, G

E. Fanucchi, G. Forghieri, A. Secchi, P. Bordone, and F. Troiani, Physical Review B111, 205409 (2025)

2025
[75]

Leitch, N

H. Leitch, N. Piccione, B. Bellomo, and G. De Chiara, AVS Quantum Science4, 10.1116/5.0072067 (2022)

2022 doi
[76]

Cavazzoni, B

S. Cavazzoni, B. Teklu, and M. G. A. Paris, npj Quantum Information11, 174 (2025)

2025
[77]

Longhi, Quantum9, 1677 (2025)

S. Longhi, Quantum9, 1677 (2025)

2025
[78]

Leitch, K

H. Leitch, K. Hammam, and G. De Chiara, Physical Re- view E109, 024108 (2024)

2024
[79]

A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2257 (2010)

2010
[80]

Garmon, T

S. Garmon, T. Petrosky, L. Simine, and D. Se- gal, Fortschritte der Physik61, 261 (2013), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/prop.201200077

2013 doi
[81]

Z. Xu, C. Liu, S. Zhao, S. Chen, and Y. Zhao, Chemical reviews119, 195 (2018)

2018
[82]

DeMille, N

D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevinsky, Nature Physics20, 741 (2024)

2024
[83]

J. Du, F. Shi, X. Kong, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Reviews of Modern Physics96, 025001 (2024)

2024
[84]

J. M. Brown and A. Carrington,Rotational spec- troscopy of diatomic molecules(Cambridge university press, 2003)

2003
[85]

G. V. Calder and K. Ruedenberg, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics49, 5399 (1968)

1968
[86]

J. A. Kunc and F. J. Gordillo-V´ azquez, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry A101, 1595 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1021/jp962817d

1997 doi
[87]

BecauseB≪ω, rotational excitations enter the thermal window at significantly lower temperatures than vibra- tional ones
[88]

E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson,A course of modern analysis(Courier Dover Publications, 2020)

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed June 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Spin Systems We begin this analysis withNdimensional spin sys- tems. Specifically, for a spin-sparticle in a uniform mag- netic fieldBalong thez-axis, the Hamiltonian can be written as H s =−ωS z, ω=γB >0,(16) and the associated energy spectrum is Es m =−ωm, m=−s,−s+ 1, . . . , s ,(17) i.e.N= 2s+1 equally spaced levels with spacing ∆ =ω. Each energy level...

[2] [2]

Quantum walks When a quantum system can be modeled as a collec- tion of n qubits (nodes) that form a network connected by 5 a specific topology, it may be described using the quan- tum walk (QW) formalism. The system is described by an excitation-preserving Hamiltonian in the form H QW = N−1X i=0 ωi σ+ i σ− i + N−1X i,j=0 gi,j σ+ i σ− j +σ + j σ− i , (27)...

[3] [3]

Quantum harmonic oscillator As a first confining potential we look at the quantum harmonic oscillator (QHO), as it represents an ubiquitous model in quantum sensing and generally in physics [62– 64]. The Hamiltonian of a harmonic oscillatorkcan be written in the form H qho k = p2 k 2m + 1 2 mω2x2 k,(39) and describe, at least to a first approximation, any...

[4] [4]

Together those two models represent the ba- sis of the quantum description of the degrees of freedom of any quantum rigid system

Quantum Rotor After the description of the thermometric properties of a quantum harmonic oscillator, which can be adopted to model of the vibrational modes of any quantum system, we now focus on a model which can describe rotational 7 modes [65]. Together those two models represent the ba- sis of the quantum description of the degrees of freedom of any qu...

[5] [5]

(54) Despite the simplicity of the model, this Hamilto- nian provides a convenient description for semiconductor hetero-structures or quantum dots [61]

Quantum Wells One of the easiest yet widely adopted confined model consist in considering a system with a Hamiltonian in the form H qw = ˆp2 2m + ˆV(x k),(53) where ˆV(x k) = ( ∞, if|x k|> d k, 0, if|x k|< d k. (54) Despite the simplicity of the model, this Hamilto- nian provides a convenient description for semiconductor hetero-structures or quantum dots...

[6] [6]

Power-law spectral model After the characterization of the thermometric perfor- mances of different confined probes, a key question to ad- dress is how the QFI of such systems scales with system size and the structure of the energy spectrum. In con- fined thermometry, where quantum states are trapped in finite domains, the energy spectrum is inherently di...

[7] [7]

Hydrogen-like systems The most used model to describe atomic systems is the hydrogen-like atom, whose spectrum arises from the Coulomb interaction and can be systematically refined through fine-structure, hyperfine-structure, and Zeeman corrections. For the hydrogen-like atom, the full Hamil- tonian reads H=H C +H fs +H hfs,(75) where each contribution is...

[8] [8]

Diatomic Molecules Combining together the effects of electrostatic poten- tial, to rotational and vibrational modes it is possible to describe diatomic molecular systems such as homo- nuclear molecules made of light elements, as well as hetero-nuclear molecules such as carbon monoxide, nitric oxide. The Hamiltonian of such systems may be written as H m =H...