Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

A Survey of ADMM Variants for Distributed Optimization: Problems, Algorithms and Features

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.03700 v2 pith:KZ6OLTVU submitted 2022-08-07 cs.DC

classification cs.DC
keywords admmdevelopmentsdistributedoptimizationproblemssurveyvariantsbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

By coordinating terminal smart devices or microprocessors to engage in cooperative computation to achieve systemlevel targets, distributed optimization is incrementally favored by both engineering and computer science. The well-known alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) has turned out to be one of the most popular tools for distributed optimization due to many advantages, such as modular structure, superior convergence, easy implementation and high flexibility. In the past decade, ADMM has experienced widespread developments. The developments manifest in both handling more general problems and enabling more effective implementation. Specifically, the method has been generalized to broad classes of problems (i.e.,multi-block, coupled objective, nonconvex, etc.). Besides, it has been extensively reinforced for more effective implementation, such as improved convergence rate, easier subproblems, higher computation efficiency, flexible communication, compatible with inaccurate information, robust to communication delays, etc. These developments lead to a plentiful of ADMM variants to be celebrated by broad areas ranging from smart grids, smart buildings, wireless communications, machine learning and beyond. However, there lacks a survey to document those developments and discern the results. To achieve such a goal, this paper provides a comprehensive survey on ADMM variants. Particularly, we discern the five major classes of problems that have been mostly concerned and discuss the related ADMM variants in terms of main ideas, main assumptions, convergence behaviors and main features. In addition, we figure out several important future research directions to be addressed. This survey is expected to work as a tutorial for both developing distributed optimization in broad areas and identifying existing theoretical research gaps.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Relationship Between CoCoA and ADMM for Distributed Empirical Risk Minimization

    math.OC 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Ridge-regularized CoCoA is shown to be a special case of proximal ADMM, and consensus ADMM is shown to be equivalent to proximal ADMM under a parameter mapping and sign reversal of the saddle objective.

  2. Atomic Column Generation For Consensus Between Algorithms: Application to Path Computation

    cs.DM 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Atomic Column Generation combines several specialized path algorithms through a consensus-based column generation master and aims for optimal solutions to the combined constrained problem.

  3. CADMM-Prox: A Bi-level Consensus ADMM for Non-smooth Non-convex Distributed Consensus Optimization

    math.OC 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CADMM-Prox combines consensus ADMM with a proximal center to convexify non-smooth, non-convex distributed problems, but the convergence proof stops at vanishing increments and does not establish closeness to a station...

  4. Optimization Problem Solving Can Transition to Evolutionary Agentic Workflows

    math.OC 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An evolutionary loop of foundation-model agents could automate the full optimization pipeline, but the paper's evidence only covers two isolated components.

  5. A Unified QoS-Aware Multiplexing Framework for Next Generation Immersive Communication with Legacy Wireless Applications

    cs.NI 2025-04 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Lyapunov-optimized, adversarial-bandit slicing framework schedules 6G immersive traffic alongside eMBB and URLLC services, with a Kalman-filter refinement for non-stationary channels.

  6. SWIRL: A Staged Workflow for Interleaved Reinforcement Learning in Mobile GUI Control

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-agent RL workflow that interleaves single-agent updates, applied to mobile GUI control, achieves SOTA zero-shot performance and a +14.8 MATH500 gain.

Pith tools