REVIEW 1 cited by
Best Practices for a Handwritten Text Recognition System
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Handwritten text recognition has been developed rapidly in the recent years, following the rise of deep learning and its applications. Though deep learning methods provide notable boost in performance concerning text recognition, non-trivial deviation in performance can be detected even when small pre-processing or architectural/optimization elements are changed. This work follows a ``best practice'' rationale; highlight simple yet effective empirical practices that can further help training and provide well-performing handwritten text recognition systems. Specifically, we considered three basic aspects of a deep HTR system and we proposed simple yet effective solutions: 1) retain the aspect ratio of the images in the preprocessing step, 2) use max-pooling for converting the 3D feature map of CNN output into a sequence of features and 3) assist the training procedure via an additional CTC loss which acts as a shortcut on the max-pooled sequential features. Using these proposed simple modifications, one can attain close to state-of-the-art results, while considering a basic convolutional-recurrent (CNN+LSTM) architecture, for both IAM and RIMES datasets. Code is available at https://github.com/georgeretsi/HTR-best-practices/.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
HTR-JAND: Handwritten Text Recognition with Joint Attention Network and Knowledge Distillation
HTR-JAND reports state-of-the-art character error rates of 1.23% on IAM, 1.02% on RIMES, and 2.02% on Bentham by combining an efficient CNN-attention hybrid with knowledge distillation and a T5 error-correction stage.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.