REVIEW 1 cited by
Solving grain size inconsistency between ALMA polarization and VLA continuum in the Ophiuchus IRS 48 protoplanetary disk
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The protoplanetary disk around Ophiuchus IRS 48 shows an azimuthally asymmetric dust distribution in (sub-)millimeter observations, which is interpreted as a vortex, where millimeter/centimeter-sized particles are trapped at the location of the continuum peak. In this paper, we present 860 $\mu$m ALMA observations of polarized dust emission of this disk. The polarized emission was detected toward a part of the disk. The polarization vectors are parallel to the disk minor axis, and the polarization fraction was derived to be $1-2$\%. These characteristics are consistent with models of self-scattering of submillimeter-wave emission, which indicate a maximum grain size of $\sim100$ $\mu$m. However, this is inconsistent with the previous interpretation of millimeter/centimeter dust particles being trapped by a vortex. To explain both, ALMA polarization and previous ALMA and VLA observations, we suggest that the thermal emission at 860 $\mu$m wavelength is optically thick ($\tau_{\rm abs}\sim7.3$) at the dust trap with the maximum observable grain size of $\sim100$ $\mu$m rather than an optically thin case with $\sim$ cm dust grains. We note that we cannot rule out that larger dust grains are accumulated near the midplane if the 860 $\mu$m thermal emission is optically thick.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A JWST, ALMA and VLA survey of the Ophiuchus-A star-forming region: Unveiling hidden dust mass and connecting infrared outflows to their radio origins
A multi-wavelength survey of 20 Ophiuchus protostars finds dust masses tens to hundreds of times larger than millimetre-only estimates, if the adopted dust-opacity model is correct.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.