Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Ultrafast anisotropic exciton transport in phosphorene

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phosphorene channels exciton energy along one crystal direction, with long-range exchange interactions sharpening the directional contrast at low temperatures.

desk verdict Solid first-principles study of anisotropic exciton transport in phosphorene, but the headline low-temperature exchange enhancement is quantitatively underdetermined by an unspecified Lorentzian dephasing width. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02682 v1 pith:L2TTE3CG submitted 2025-09-02 cond-mat.mes-hall

Kai-Wei Chang , Joshua J. P. Thompson , Bartomeu Monserrat This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 71.35.-y72.20.-i
keywords excitontransportphosphoreneanisotropicdiffusionlong-rangeexchangeinteractionexciton-phononcouplingtwo-dimensionalsemiconductorsfirst-principlesmany-bodytheoryarmchairdirection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Phosphorene is an atomically thin semiconductor whose crystal structure is strongly directional, and this paper argues that the directionality carries over to the motion of excitons—bound electron-hole pairs—making energy transport highly anisotropic. Combining a microscopic many-body description of excitons with first-principles electronic structure and phonon data, the authors compute optical absorption, phonon-mediated relaxation, and diffusion constants along the two in-plane axes. Their central finding is that both the anisotropic effective masses and, crucially, the long-range exchange interaction make the armchair direction far more conductive than the zigzag direction, with computed diffusion constants of $D_{\mathrm{AC}}=7.40$ cm$^2$/s and $D_{\mathrm{ZZ}}=0.48$ cm$^2$/s at 300 K. They also find that the exchange interaction's linear-in-momentum term strongly enhances the anisotropy at low temperature, because exciton population concentrates at small center-of-mass momentum where the exchange-induced dispersion is steep. If correct, phosphorene could serve as a directional channel for exciton energy in ultrathin optoelectronic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the Wannier equation for the exciton wavefunction, the Keldysh potential for the screened Coulomb interaction, and a microscopic exciton-phonon scattering rate built from first-principles deformation potentials. The directional contrast is carried by the long-range exchange interaction $K_Q = \frac{V_Q}{A}\left(\sum_k \phi(k)\,\mathbf Q\cdot\mathbf d_{k+Q}\right)\left(\sum_{k'}\phi(k')\,\mathbf Q\cdot\mathbf d_{k'-Q}\right)$, in which the interband dipole $\mathbf d$ is oriented along the armchair direction, so the scalar product $\mathbf Q\cdot\mathbf d$ vanishes for zigzag momentum and the small-$Q$ dispersion is linear only along armchair. Because the diffusion constant $D_i = \sum_{Q\eta} \frac{(v^{\eta,i}_Q)^2}{2\Gamma^\eta_Q}\, e^{-E_{Q,\eta}/k_B T}/Z$ weights states by their group velocity and inverse dephasing, the exchange-distorted dispersion directly translates into enhanced AC mobility that becomes most pronounced at low temperature, where population piles up at small $Q$.

What would settle it

Measure the two in-plane diffusion constants of an exciton population in a single phosphorene monolayer (on SiO₂ or suspended) from 10 K to 300 K using spatially resolved photoluminescence or transient absorption microscopy after a focused excitation spot, and compare the ratio $D_{\mathrm{AC}}/D_{\mathrm{ZZ}}$ with the predicted strong increase at low temperature; a plateau or decline of the ratio at low temperature would indicate that the exchange-induced linear dispersion is not the relevant transport channel.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the intrinsic in-plane anisotropy of phosphorene suffices to produce ultrafast, highly directional exciton transport, and that the long-range exchange interaction is a primary driver of the directional contrast. In the authors' calculation, the bright 1s exciton has an elliptical momentum-space wavefunction tied to the anisotropic band masses, the interband dipole points along the armchair direction, and the exciton energy dispersion acquires a linear-in-momentum contribution from exchange only along that dipole direction. Since the diffusion constant is a thermal average of group-velocity squared divided by the phonon-induced dephasing rate, the combination of a light effective mass and a steep exchange dispersion along armchair yields $D_{\mathrm{AC}}=7.40$ cm$^2$/s versus $D_{\mathrm{ZZ}}=0.48$ cm$^2$/s at 300 K, with the AC value growing sharply as temperature drops. The exchange term also suppresses the zero-momentum linewidth by reducing the low-energy density of states, which further helps mobility at low temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The entire low-temperature enhancement of the armchair diffusion constant rests on the long-range exchange term of Eq. (8), evaluated with the interband dipole fixed along armchair, applied only to the bright ΓΓ excitons, and with short-range exchange neglected; if that model is quantitatively incomplete, the predicted sharp rise in $D_{\mathrm{AC}}$ at low temperature is not guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phosphorene monolayers on SiO₂ should show exciton diffusion lengths several times larger along the armchair axis than along the zigzag axis at room temperature, with the contrast growing at cryogenic temperatures.
  • The computed 300 K average diffusion constant, about 4 cm²/s, is consistent with the experimental value reported for amorphous phosphorene, so the claimed anisotropy should be observable in a crystalline monolayer.
  • The reduction of the zero-momentum linewidth by exchange means that the bright exciton emission line should narrow more than a mass-only model predicts, and the narrowing should be anisotropic.
  • Exciton energy can be channeled along the armchair direction over ultrafast timescales, supporting designs such as directional exciton highways and linearly polarized light emission.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same exchange-enhancement mechanism should operate in other anisotropic two-dimensional semiconductors with an in-plane dipole, such as black arsenic or ReS₂, where the magnitude of the effect would depend on dipole strength and dielectric screening.
  • Strain engineering that rotates or renormalizes the interband dipole could switch the fast-transport axis, a control knob the present calculation does not explore but directly follows from Eq. (8).
  • The calculations neglect short-range exchange and intervalley exchange for the dark ΓV excitons; including those terms could reduce the low-temperature boost, so the sharp rise of $D_{\mathrm{AC}}$ below roughly 100 K is the most fragile quantitative prediction.
  • Time-resolved spatial imaging of the exciton cloud after a focused pump pulse should reveal a characteristic elliptical profile whose aspect ratio varies with temperature, providing a direct test of the exchange-enhanced anisotropy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a first-principles-informed many-body description of exciton optics, relaxation, and transport in monolayer phosphorene. The electronic band structure and interband dipoles come from HSE06 DFT, phonons and electron-phonon matrix elements from PBE DFT, and exciton states from the Wannier equation with a Keldysh-screened Coulomb potential. Exciton-phonon scattering rates are then used to compute optical absorption, relaxation cascades, and the anisotropic diffusion constants D_AC and D_ZZ. The central claim is that the long-range exchange interaction strongly enhances the already large anisotropy of exciton diffusion, particularly at low temperatures, where D_AC is reported to 'soar'; at 300 K the reported values are D_AC = 7.40 cm2/s and D_ZZ = 0.48 cm2/s.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a concrete, largely parameter-free microscopic prediction for directional exciton energy transport in an anisotropic two-dimensional semiconductor, with practical relevance for exciton-based circuitry and light harvesting. The strengths are the ab initio parametrization with no transport parameters fitted to the target diffusion data, the good match of the 1s exciton binding energy to the experimental value (0.29 eV versus about 0.3 eV), and the explicit treatment of exciton-phonon scattering beyond effective-mass arguments. The low-temperature anisotropy enhancement is a falsifiable prediction that would make the paper influential, which is why the numerical robustness of that regime needs to be demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.C.3, Eqs. (4), (5), (9)] The Lorentzian width used to regularize the energy-conserving delta function in Eq. (4) is never stated, and no sensitivity analysis is given. This is load-bearing for the low-temperature claim: in Eq. (9) the diffusion sum is weighted by 1/Gamma_Q and by the Boltzmann factor, so as T goes to zero the population is concentrated at Q approximately equal to 0. With exchange, the AC dispersion is linear in Q at small Q (the pink dashed curve in Fig. 3(a)), so the group velocity is finite at Q equals 0, whereas Gamma_Q at Q equals 0 is smallest; if no phonon-emission channel exists from the lowest bright Gamma-Gamma 1s state, then Gamma(0) is controlled by the Lorentzian tail and D_AC(T -> 0) diverges as the width goes to zero. The paper says only that a Lorentzian is used and justifies this by higher-order phonon processes, but gives no value and no convergence test. Please provide the width and show that D_AC in Fig. 4(a) is insensitive to it, or otherwise establish that the low-temperature 'soaring' is physical and not regularization-controlled.
  2. [Sec. III.C.1, Eq. (8)] The low-temperature enhancement of D_AC is generated entirely by the linear small-Q term in the long-range exchange K_Q, yet the implementation of Eq. (8) rests on three assumptions that are stated but not tested: long-range exchange is included only for Gamma-Gamma excitons, short-range exchange is neglected, and the dipole factor is taken as Q dot d with d along AC. Agreement of the 1s binding energy with experiment validates the Wannier potential, not these exchange-model choices. Because the headline result is the exchange-induced low-temperature anisotropy, I ask for a sensitivity test: for example, include a screened short-range exchange term or a finite-Q correction to the dipole matrix element and recompute D_AC(T). If the result is robust, this should be stated; if not, the central claim needs to be qualified.
  3. [Sec. II.A, Tables I-II, Sec. III.C.3] The exciton-phonon scattering rates are computed using only a selected subset of phonon modes, with a constant deformation potential for optical modes, g proportional to sqrt(q) for acoustic modes, and linear interpolation between high-symmetry directions. These choices affect the absolute values of Gamma_Q and hence both the linewidths and the diffusion constants. The good agreement of the 300 K average with experiment is encouraging, but the arithmetic mean of the reported D_AC = 7.40 and D_ZZ = 0.48 cm2/s is 3.94 cm2/s, and the experimental value of 5.0 cm2/s is for a 2 nm amorphous sample rather than a crystalline monolayer, so the comparison is not a sharp validation. Please provide an uncertainty estimate from the omitted modes and the interpolation scheme, or justify that the selected modes dominate the transport-relevant scattering.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B] The text refers to the 'Elliot formula'; this should be the Elliott formula, and 'interband diople' should read 'interband dipole'.
  2. [Table I] The notation for direction-resolved coupling coefficients, e.g. [g_x/sqrt(q), g_xy/sqrt(q), g_y/sqrt(q)], and the pairing of a coupling coefficient with a phonon energy in a single cell should be defined explicitly in the caption; as printed, the two numbers per cell with mixed units are easy to misread.
  3. [Sec. III.C.3] The comparison with experiment should be stated more carefully: the average of the reported 300 K diffusion constants is 3.94 cm2/s, not 5.0 cm2/s, and the experimental system is amorphous few-layer rather than crystalline monolayer phosphorene.
  4. [Fig. 4] The caption uses 'Diff. Constant' where 'Diffusion constant' would be clearer, and the order in which panels (a)-(f) are described in the text should match the layout in the figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: material parameters are first-principles inputs, exciton transport is computed from the resulting band structure and dephasing, and the experimental comparison is a post-prediction benchmark.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. All material parameters entering the Wannier equation, the exciton-phonon coupling, and the exchange interaction are obtained from independent first-principles calculations (HSE06 band structure, PBE dielectric tensor, DFT phonons and electron-phonon matrix elements, interband dipole moments). The central transport result, Eq. (9), is evaluated from the computed exciton dispersion Eq. (7) and the computed dephasing Eq. (5), with no parameter fitted to the target diffusion constants. The long-range exchange term in Eq. (8) is a physically motivated interaction whose strength is fixed by the computed dipole and dielectric response, and the diffusion anisotropy follows from the resulting energy dispersion rather than being imposed. The room-temperature comparison to the experimental amorphous phosphorene value is presented as a post-prediction benchmark, not as an input. The authors' self-citations, e.g., Refs. [34] and [62], are methodological references for the transport framework and the exchange form, but the supporting equations and parameters are stated and computed within the present work; they do not smuggle in the target conclusion. The skeptic's concern about the unspecified Lorentzian width at low temperature is a quantitative robustness issue, not a circularity: the low-temperature enhancement is a consequence of the model as stated, not a restatement of the model's inputs. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT and many-body approximations rather than on fitted free parameters. The main hand-chosen inputs are the averaged in-plane dielectric constant and the unspecified Lorentzian broadening width. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • In-plane dielectric constant used in the Keldysh potential = 14.15 (average of 12.17 and 16.13)
    The Wannier equation uses a scalar in-plane dielectric constant, chosen as the average over the two in-plane directions, rather than the full anisotropic tensor. The authors state that the interpolation method gives nearly identical wavefunctions, but the scalar value is a hand-chosen modeling input that affects the exciton binding and wavefunction extent.
  • Lorentzian broadening width for the exciton-phonon scattering delta function
    The delta functions in Eqs. (4) and (5) are replaced by a Lorentzian in the numerical calculation, but the width is not reported. This width directly controls the dephasing rate and therefore the diffusion constant, and it is an ad hoc parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT with HSE06 and PBE gives accurate band structures, dielectric constants, phonons, and electron-phonon couplings for phosphorene.
    All first-principles inputs rely on these functionals; no GW-level benchmarks are provided, and the only experimental checks are the 1s binding energy and a loose comparison of average diffusion to an amorphous sample.
  • domain assumption The Wannier equation with a 2D Keldysh potential and a scalar in-plane dielectric constant captures the exciton states of phosphorene.
    Section II.B, Eqs. (2)-(3). The exciton binding energy is moderate (0.29 eV), and the anisotropic screening is collapsed into an averaged scalar; the authors check against an interpolation method but do not provide full numerical uncertainty.
  • domain assumption Exciton-phonon scattering is governed by the chosen phonon-mode subset, with constant deformation potentials for optical modes and g proportional to sqrt(q) for acoustic modes, linearly interpolated in direction.
    Section II.A. The computational cost forces selection of the largest coupling modes and an interpolation scheme; this approximation directly affects the dephasing rate and hence transport.
  • domain assumption Only long-range exchange for Gamma-Gamma excitons is included, and short-range exchange is neglected.
    Section III.C.1, Eq. (8). This is the structural premise behind the low-temperature anisotropy enhancement; if additional exchange channels contribute, the central claim weakens.
  • domain assumption Exciton transport is Fickian and phonon-limited, with relaxation-time diffusion constants computed from Eq. (9), neglecting radiative recombination and exciton-exciton interactions.
    Section III.C.3. The diffusion picture breaks down if transport is not phonon-limited or if exciton densities are high.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrafast anisotropic exciton transport in phosphorene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L2TTE3CG

@misc{pith2026250902682,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrafast anisotropic exciton transport in phosphorene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L2TTE3CG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02682}
}
read the original abstract

Phosphorene is a two-dimensional (2D) material exhibiting strong in-plane structural anisotropy. In this work, we investigate the influence of structural anisotropy on the optics, dynamics, and transport of excitons in phosphorene by combining microscopic many-body theory with first principles calculations. Our framework offers a complete and material specific description of the excitonic properties of phosphorene, including exciton states and exciton-phonon interactions, which allow us to quantitatively evaluate the optical absorption spectra, exciton relaxation, and exciton transport, revealing direction-dependent characteristics. Interestingly, we identify the critical role of long-range exchange interactions, which significantly enhance the anisotropy of exciton diffusion, particularly at low temperatures. Our work provides fundamental insights into exciton dynamics in an intrinsically anisotropic 2D material, offering guiding principles for the design of next-generation optoelectronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02682 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Top view and side view of phosphorene. The directions along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatial distributions of the (a) 1s, (b) 2px, (c) 2s, and (d) 2py states of bright ΓΓ excitons, with corresponding binding ener￾gies written in yellow. (e) Calculated light absorptions for the first three bright exciton states. The total absorptions along the AC and ZZ directions are depicted with solid lines, and contributions from individual states with dashed lines. Note that the absorption vanishes when the ligh… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Calculated diffusion coefficients of phosphorene. (a) With [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Exciton dispersion and linewidth In studying exciton dynamics, an accurate description of the exciton energy is needed in order to reliably track the evolution of exciton states. The excitonic dispersion can be 4 Γ X M Γ Y M V Armchair Zigzag a a1 a2 a2 X M Y Γ b1 b2 a3 Γ X M Γ Y M (a) (b) (c) Energy (meV ) 500 400 300 200 100 0-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Energy (eV...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The final thermalised exciton popula- tion is independent of the initial exciton state that is excited

    Exciton relaxation Figure 3(c) provides a schematic illustration of the exci- ton relaxation cascade. The final thermalised exciton popula- tion is independent of the initial exciton state that is excited. In our calculations, we choose to excite coherent excitons in 2s states by a resonant light pulse in order to illustrate how excitons relax from a high...

    work page

  3. [3]

    In an anisotropic system, this is well-described by Fick’s sec- ond law of diffusion [34, 64], and is given by ∂tN(r) = (Dx∂2 x +Dy∂2 y)N(r)

    Exciton transport Exciton transport can be described by tracking the spa- tiotemporal evolution for an initial exciton distribution. In an anisotropic system, this is well-described by Fick’s sec- ond law of diffusion [34, 64], and is given by ∂tN(r) = (Dx∂2 x +Dy∂2 y)N(r). In the formula, t denotes time, N is the exciton population, andDi represents comp...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The rise of graphene,

    Andre K Geim and Konstantin S Novoselov, “The rise of graphene,” Nature materials 6, 183–191 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    2d transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Sajedeh Manzeli, Dmitry Ovchinnikov, Diego Pasquier, Oleg V Yazyev, and Andras Kis, “2d transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nature Reviews Materials 2, 1–15 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Graphene and two- dimensional materials for silicon technology,

    Deji Akinwande, Cedric Huyghebaert, Ching-Hua Wang, Martha I Serna, Stijn Goossens, Lain-Jong Li, H-S Philip Wong, and Frank HL Koppens, “Graphene and two- dimensional materials for silicon technology,” Nature573, 507– 518 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Transistors based on two-dimensional materials for fu- ture integrated circuits,

    Saptarshi Das, Amritanand Sebastian, Eric Pop, Connor J Mc- Clellan, Aaron D Franklin, Tibor Grasser, Theresia Knobloch, Yury Illarionov, Ashish V Penumatcha, Joerg Appenzeller, et al., “Transistors based on two-dimensional materials for fu- ture integrated circuits,” Nature Electronics 4, 786–799 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Breakdown of high- performance monolayer mos2 transistors,

    Dominik Lembke and Andras Kis, “Breakdown of high- performance monolayer mos2 transistors,” ACS nano6, 10070– 10075 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Promises and prospects of two-dimensional transistors,

    Yuan Liu, Xidong Duan, Hyeon-Jin Shin, Seongjun Park, Yu Huang, and Xiangfeng Duan, “Promises and prospects of two-dimensional transistors,” Nature 591, 43–53 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    2d mate- rials in flexible electronics: recent advances and future prospec- tives,

    Ajit Kumar Katiyar, Anh Tuan Hoang, Duo Xu, Juyeong Hong, Beom Jin Kim, Seunghyeon Ji, and Jong-Hyun Ahn, “2d mate- rials in flexible electronics: recent advances and future prospec- tives,” Chemical Reviews124, 318–419 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Progress, challenges, and opportunities for 2d material based photodetectors,

    Mingsheng Long, Peng Wang, Hehai Fang, and Weida Hu, “Progress, challenges, and opportunities for 2d material based photodetectors,” Advanced Functional Materials 29, 1803807 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Graphene for batteries, supercapacitors and beyond,

    Maher F El-Kady, Yuanlong Shao, and Richard B Kaner, “Graphene for batteries, supercapacitors and beyond,” Nature Reviews Materials 1, 1–14 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Layered 2d materials in batteries,

    Yitao He, Xiaoxiang Shen, and Yaohui Zhang, “Layered 2d materials in batteries,” ACS Applied Nano Materials7, 27907– 27939 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Emergence of novel 2d materi- als for high-performance supercapacitor electrode applications: a brief review,

    Merin Tomy, Athira Ambika Rajappan, Vimuna VM, and Xavier Thankappan Suryabai, “Emergence of novel 2d materi- als for high-performance supercapacitor electrode applications: a brief review,” Energy & Fuels35, 19881–19900 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Heterostructures based on 2d materials: a versatile plat- form for efficient catalysis,

    Tofik Ahmed Shifa, Fengmei Wang, Yang Liu, and Jun He, “Heterostructures based on 2d materials: a versatile plat- form for efficient catalysis,” Advanced Materials 31, 1804828 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Catalysis with two- dimensional materials and their heterostructures,

    Dehui Deng, KS Novoselov, Qiang Fu, Nanfeng Zheng, Zhongqun Tian, and Xinhe Bao, “Catalysis with two- dimensional materials and their heterostructures,” Nature nan- otechnology 11, 218–230 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Exciton optics, dynamics, and transport in atomi- cally thin semiconductors,

    Raul Perea-Causin, Daniel Erkensten, Jamie M Fitzgerald, Joshua JP Thompson, Roberto Rosati, Samuel Brem, and Er- min Malic, “Exciton optics, dynamics, and transport in atomi- cally thin semiconductors,” APL Materials 10 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic rydberg series in monolayer ws 2,

    Alexey Chernikov, Timothy C Berkelbach, Heather M Hill, Al- bert Rigosi, Yilei Li, Burak Aslan, David R Reichman, Mark S Hybertsen, and Tony F Heinz, “Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic rydberg series in monolayer ws 2,” Physical re- view letters 113, 076802 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Determi- nation of layer-dependent exciton binding energies in few-layer black phosphorus,

    Guowei Zhang, Andrey Chaves, Shenyang Huang, Fanjie Wang, Qiaoxia Xing, Tony Low, and Hugen Yan, “Determi- nation of layer-dependent exciton binding energies in few-layer black phosphorus,” Science advances 4, eaap9977 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Unusually large ex- citon binding energy in multilayered 2h-mote2,

    Eilho Jung, Jin Cheol Park, Yu-Seong Seo, Ji-Hee Kim, Jungseek Hwang, and Young Hee Lee, “Unusually large ex- citon binding energy in multilayered 2h-mote2,” Scientific Re- ports 12, 4543 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Excitons in two- dimensional materials,

    Xiaoyang Zheng and Xian Zhang, “Excitons in two- dimensional materials,” Advances in Condensed-Matter and Materials Physics-Rudimentary Research to Topical Technol- ogy (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Origin of the variation of exciton binding energy in semiconductors,

    Marc Dvorak, Su-Huai Wei, and Zhigang Wu, “Origin of the variation of exciton binding energy in semiconductors,” Physi- cal Review Letters 110, 016402 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Gang Wang, Alexey Chernikov, Mikhail M Glazov, Tony F Heinz, Xavier Marie, Thierry Amand, and Bernhard Urbaszek, “Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides,” Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 021001 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Atomically thin mos 2: a new direct-gap semiconduc- tor,

    Kin Fai Mak, Changgu Lee, James Hone, Jie Shan, and Tony F Heinz, “Atomically thin mos 2: a new direct-gap semiconduc- tor,” Physical review letters105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Stark effect spectroscopy of mono-and few- layer mos2,

    Julian Klein, Jakob Wierzbowski, Armin Regler, Jonathan Becker, Florian Heimbach, K Muller, Michael Kaniber, and Jonathan J Finley, “Stark effect spectroscopy of mono-and few- layer mos2,” Nano letters 16, 1554–1559 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor,

    Jason S Ross, Sanfeng Wu, Hongyi Yu, Nirmal J Ghimire, Aaron M Jones, Grant Aivazian, Jiaqiang Yan, David G Man- drus, Di Xiao, Wang Yao, et al., “Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor,” Nature communications 4, 1474 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Strain en- gineering of two-dimensional materials: Methods, properties, and applications,

    Shengxue Yang, Yujia Chen, and Chengbao Jiang, “Strain en- gineering of two-dimensional materials: Methods, properties, and applications,” InfoMat 3, 397–420 (2021). 8

    2021

  20. [28]

    Exper- imental demonstration of continuous electronic structure tuning via strain in atomically thin mos2,

    Keliang He, Charles Poole, Kin Fai Mak, and Jie Shan, “Exper- imental demonstration of continuous electronic structure tuning via strain in atomically thin mos2,” Nano letters13, 2931–2936 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    Local strain engineering in atomically thin mos2,

    Andres Castellanos-Gomez, Rafael Roldán, Emmanuele Cap- pelluti, Michele Buscema, Francisco Guinea, Herre SJ Van Der Zant, and Gary A Steele, “Local strain engineering in atomically thin mos2,” Nano letters 13, 5361–5366 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Coulomb engineering of the bandgap and excitons in two- dimensional materials,

    Archana Raja, Andrey Chaves, Jaeeun Yu, Ghidewon Arefe, Heather M Hill, Albert F Rigosi, Timothy C Berkelbach, Philipp Nagler, Christian Schüller, Tobias Korn, et al. , “Coulomb engineering of the bandgap and excitons in two- dimensional materials,” Nature communications 8, 15...

    2017

  23. [31]

    Dielectric screening of excitons and trions in single- layer mos2,

    Yuxuan Lin, Xi Ling, Lili Yu, Shengxi Huang, Allen L Hsu, Yi-Hsien Lee, Jing Kong, Mildred S Dresselhaus, and Tomás Palacios, “Dielectric screening of excitons and trions in single- layer mos2,” Nano letters 14, 5569–5576 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Electrically tun- able excitonic light-emitting diodes based on monolayer wse2 p–n junctions,

    Jason S Ross, Philip Klement, Aaron M Jones, Nirmal J Ghimire, Jiaqiang Yan, DG Mandrus, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Kenji Kitamura, Wang Yao,et al., “Electrically tun- able excitonic light-emitting diodes based on monolayer wse2 p–n junctions,” Nature nanotechnology 9,...

    2014

  25. [33]

    The role of graphene and other 2d materials in solar photo- voltaics,

    Sonali Das, Deepak Pandey, Jayan Thomas, and Tania Roy, “The role of graphene and other 2d materials in solar photo- voltaics,” Advanced Materials 31, 1802722 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    2d materials for optical modulation: challenges and op- portunities,

    Shaoliang Yu, Xiaoqin Wu, Yipei Wang, Xin Guo, and Limin Tong, “2d materials for optical modulation: challenges and op- portunities,” Advanced Materials 29, 1606128 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    Optical modula- tors with 2d layered materials,

    Zhipei Sun, Amos Martinez, and Feng Wang, “Optical modula- tors with 2d layered materials,” Nature Photonics 10, 227–238 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Advances in quantum light emission from 2d materi- als,

    Chitraleema Chakraborty, Nick Vamivakas, and Dirk En- glund, “Advances in quantum light emission from 2d materi- als,” Nanophotonics 8, 2017–2032 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Anisotropic exciton diffusion in atomically-thin semiconductors,

    Joshua JP Thompson, Samuel Brem, Marne Verjans, Robert Schmidt, Steffen Michaelis de Vasconcellos, Rudolf Brats- chitsch, and Ermin Malic, “Anisotropic exciton diffusion in atomically-thin semiconductors,” 2D Materials 9, 025008 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Optical properties of anisotropic excitons in phos- phorene,

    Matthew N Brunetti, Oleg L Berman, and Roman Ya Kez- erashvili, “Optical properties of anisotropic excitons in phos- phorene,” Physical Review B 100, 155433 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Anisotropic plasmons, excitons, and electron energy loss spectroscopy of phosphorene,

    Barun Ghosh, Piyush Kumar, Anmol Thakur, Yogesh Singh Chauhan, Somnath Bhowmick, and Amit Agarwal, “Anisotropic plasmons, excitons, and electron energy loss spectroscopy of phosphorene,” Physical Review B 96, 035422 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Highly anisotropic and robust excitons in mono- layer black phosphorus,

    Xiaomu Wang, Aaron M Jones, Kyle L Seyler, Vy Tran, Yichen Jia, Huan Zhao, Han Wang, Li Yang, Xiaodong Xu, and Feng- nian Xia, “Highly anisotropic and robust excitons in mono- layer black phosphorus,” Nature nanotechnology 10, 517–521 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    Light–matter interactions in phosphorene,

    Junpeng Lu, Jiong Yang, Alexandra Carvalho, Hongwei Liu, Yuerui Lu, and Chorng Haur Sow, “Light–matter interactions in phosphorene,” Accounts of chemical research49, 1806–1815 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Exciton relaxation cascade in two-dimensional transi- tion metal dichalcogenides,

    Samuel Brem, Malte Selig, Gunnar Berghaeuser, and Ermin Malic, “Exciton relaxation cascade in two-dimensional transi- tion metal dichalcogenides,” Scientific reports 8, 1–8 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane- wave basis set,

    Georg Kresse and Jürgen Furthmüller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane- wave basis set,” Physical review B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    Projector augmented-wave method,

    Peter E Blöchl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” Physical review B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  37. [45]

    From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method,

    Georg Kresse and Daniel Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Physical review b 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  38. [46]

    Special points for brillouin-zone integrations,

    Hendrik J Monkhorst and James D Pack, “Special points for brillouin-zone integrations,” Physical review B13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  39. [47]

    Influence of the exchange screening pa- rameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals,

    Aliaksandr V Krukau, Oleg A Vydrov, Artur F Izmaylov, and Gustavo E Scuseria, “Influence of the exchange screening pa- rameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals,” The Journal of chemical physics 125 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally- localised wannier functions,

    Arash A Mostofi, Jonathan R Yates, Giovanni Pizzi, Young-Su Lee, Ivo Souza, David Vanderbilt, and Nicola Marzari, “An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally- localised wannier functions,” Computer Physics Communica- tions 185, 2309–2310 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Gen- eralized gradient approximation made simple,

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof, “Gen- eralized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk,

    Akash Laturia, Maarten L Van de Put, and William G Vanden- berghe, “Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk,” npj 2D Materials and Applications 2, 6 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso,

    Paolo Giannozzi, Oliviero Andreussi, Thomas Brumme, Oana Bunau, M Buongiorno Nardelli, Matteo Calandra, Roberto Car, Carlo Cavazzoni, Davide Ceresoli, Matteo Cococcioni, et al. , “Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso,” Journal of physics: Condens...

    2017

  44. [52]

    Excitonic linewidth and coherence lifetime in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Malte Selig, Gunnar Berghäuser, Archana Raja, Philipp Na- gler, Christian Schüller, Tony F Heinz, Tobias Korn, Alexey Chernikov, Ermin Malic, and Andreas Knorr, “Excitonic linewidth and coherence lifetime in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nature communications 7,...

    2016

  45. [53]

    Many-body correlations and excitonic effects in semiconductor spectroscopy,

    Mackillo Kira and Stephan W Koch, “Many-body correlations and excitonic effects in semiconductor spectroscopy,” Progress in quantum electronics 30, 155–296 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    Hartmut Haug and Stephan W Koch, Quantum theory of the optical and electronic properties of semiconductors (world sci- entific, 2009)

    2009

  47. [55]

    Screened potential of a point charge in a thin film,

    Natalia S Rytova, “Screened potential of a point charge in a thin film,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00976 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Coulomb interaction in thin semiconductor and semimetal films,

    LV Keldysh, “Coulomb interaction in thin semiconductor and semimetal films,” in SELECTED PAPERS OF LEONID V KELDYSH (World Scientific, 2024) pp. 155–158

    2024

  49. [57]

    Trends in the ultimate break- down strength of high dielectric-constant materials,

    Joe W McPherson, Jinyoung Kim, Ajit Shanware, Homi Mogul, and John Rodriguez, “Trends in the ultimate break- down strength of high dielectric-constant materials,” IEEE transactions on electron devices 50, 1771–1778 (2003)

    2003

  50. [58]

    Anisotropic keldysh interaction,

    Andrei Galiautdinov, “Anisotropic keldysh interaction,” Physics Letters A 383, 3167–3174 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Ex- citonic thermalization bottleneck in twisted tmd heterostruc- tures,

    Giuseppe Meneghini, Samuel Brem, and Ermin Malic, “Ex- citonic thermalization bottleneck in twisted tmd heterostruc- tures,” Nano Letters 24, 4505–4511 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Refinement of the crys- tal structure of black phosphorus,

    Allan Brown and Stig Rundqvist, “Refinement of the crys- tal structure of black phosphorus,” Acta Crystallographica 19, 684–685 (1965)

    1965

  53. [61]

    A review on the flexural mode of graphene: lattice dynamics, thermal conduction, thermal expansion, elas- ticity and nanomechanical resonance,

    Jin-Wu Jiang, Bing-Shen Wang, Jian-Sheng Wang, and Harold S Park, “A review on the flexural mode of graphene: lattice dynamics, thermal conduction, thermal expansion, elas- ticity and nanomechanical resonance,” Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 27, 083001 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    Op- 9 tical tuning of exciton and trion emissions in monolayer phos- phorene,

    Jiong Yang, Renjing Xu, Jiajie Pei, Ye Win Myint, Fan Wang, Zhu Wang, Shuang Zhang, Zongfu Yu, and Yuerui Lu, “Op- 9 tical tuning of exciton and trion emissions in monolayer phos- phorene,” Light: Science & Applications 4, e312–e312 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Semiconduc- tor excitons in new light,

    SW Koch, M Kira, G Khitrova, and HM Gibbs, “Semiconduc- tor excitons in new light,” Nature materials 5, 523–531 (2006)

    2006

  56. [64]

    Ex- citons in atomically thin 2d semiconductors and their applica- tions,

    Jun Xiao, Mervin Zhao, Yuan Wang, and Xiang Zhang, “Ex- citons in atomically thin 2d semiconductors and their applica- tions,” Nanophotonics 6, 1309–1328 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    Valley- exchange coupling probed by angle-resolved photolumines- cence,

    Joshua JP Thompson, Samuel Brem, Hanlin Fang, Carlos Antón-Solanas, Bo Han, Hangyong Shan, Saroj P Dash, Witlef Wieczorek, Christian Schneider, and Ermin Malic, “Valley- exchange coupling probed by angle-resolved photolumines- cence,” Nanoscale Horizons 7, 77–84 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    Calculating excitons, plasmons, and quasiparticles in 2d materials and van der waals het- erostructures,

    Kristian Sommer Thygesen, “Calculating excitons, plasmons, and quasiparticles in 2d materials and van der waals het- erostructures,” 2D Materials 4, 022004 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    Ueber diffusion,

    Adolf Fick, “Ueber diffusion,” Annalen der physik 170, 59–86 (1855)

  60. [68]

    Amorphous two-dimensional black phosphorus with exceptional photocarrier transport properties,

    Matthew Z Bellus, Zhibin Yang, Jianhua Hao, Shu Ping Lau, and Hui Zhao, “Amorphous two-dimensional black phosphorus with exceptional photocarrier transport properties,” 2D Materi- als 4, 025063 (2017). 10 Electron-phonon Coupling Coefficients/Phonon Energy (CBM) Γ→ Γ V→ V Γ→ V...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.