Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Polarization Rotation Drives a Spin-Topological Transition in Ferroelectric Bismuth Monolayer

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In bismuth monolayer, polarization rotates through a soft-mode landscape, cutting the switching barrier fourfold and flipping the spin Chern number from -2 to 0.

desk verdict Solid soft-mode rotation mechanism for Bi monolayer switching; the Cs jump is plausible but rests on PBEsol gap placement without functional checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.10063 v1 pith:L37MVFUA submitted 2026-07-11 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jinming Zhai , Lingzhi Cao , Yateng Wang , Huicong Li , Zhilong Yang , Yali Yang , Jiangang He This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords bismuthmonolayertwo-dimensionalferroelectricitypolarizationrotationsoftmodesspinChernnumberBerrycurvaturedipoleuniaxialstraintopologicaltransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Bismuth monolayer is the first two-dimensional elemental ferroelectric, yet how its in-plane polarization actually switches has been unclear. This paper shows that the switch is not a simple collinear flip through a high-symmetry paraelectric state. Instead, a two-component soft mode creates a two-dimensional energy landscape in which the polarization can rotate by 90 degrees through a low-energy saddle. That rotational path has an energy barrier more than four times lower than direct reversal, which accounts for the vortex-like domain textures seen in molecular-dynamics simulations. The same rotation closes and reopens the electronic gap and changes the spin Chern number from -2 to 0, so structural switching also rewrites the spin topology. Directional uniaxial strain can steer which orientation wins, giving a mechanical handle on both polarization and topology. A sympathetic reader cares because a single soft-mode degree of freedom then becomes an electrically and mechanically programmable knob for ferroelectricity, spin topology, and nonlinear Hall response in an elemental two-dimensional crystal.

What carries the argument

The two-component M5+ soft-mode order parameter (Qa, Qb) of the high-symmetry P4/mmm parent: its clamped-lattice energy surface has Pmn21 minima at the cardinal angles and Abm2 saddles at 45 degrees, so polarization rotation is the low-barrier switching coordinate that also reconstructs the spin-orbit band geometry.

What would settle it

A hybrid-functional or GW recalculation of the band gap and projected-Sz spin gap along the same (Qa, Qb) rotation path that keeps both gaps open, so the spin Chern number never changes, would falsify the claimed topological transition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Polarization switching in ferroelectric Bi monolayer is governed by rotation of a two-component soft-mode order parameter rather than by direct collinear reversal. The rotation-mediated path through the Abm2 saddle has a barrier of only 4.4 meV/atom, compared with 18.2 meV/atom for the direct path through Pmna, and the same continuous rotation drives a spin-topological transition in which the spin Chern number changes from Cs = -2 to Cs = 0 via band-gap closing and reopening.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the chosen density-functional method correctly places the electronic gap closing and the projected spin gap along the rotational path so that the spin Chern number truly jumps from -2 to 0.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Polarization rotation, not collinear reversal, is the operative low-barrier switching channel in Bi monolayer and naturally produces the observed vortex-like domain textures.
  • Continuous rotation of the same order parameter electrically rewrites spin topology (Cs from -2 to 0) and reorients the Berry-curvature dipole that governs the nonlinear Hall response.
  • Uniaxial compression applied 45 degrees from the polar axis can select single-domain or 180-degree Abm2 states, giving mechanical control of both domain pattern and topology.
  • Analogous soft-mode branches in other group-VA and IV-VI monolayers can be used as a design rule for programmable topology in two-dimensional ferroelectrics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rotational barrier remains low under realistic substrates or encapsulation, room-temperature domain reorientation and topology switching become experimentally accessible without extreme fields.
  • Time-resolved nonlinear Hall or circular dichroism measurements during a polarization-rotation pulse could map the predicted gap-closing point near 33.5 degrees in real time.
  • The same two-component landscape may explain why some two-dimensional ferroelectrics show persistent intermediate polar textures that conventional one-dimensional double-well models cannot capture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that ferroelectric switching in Bi monolayer is governed by polarization rotation in a two-component soft-mode landscape rather than collinear reversal through a high-symmetry paraelectric phase. Starting from the P4/mmm parent, phonon instabilities (M5+ and M3−), ISOTROPY mode analysis, and a Landau surface in (Qa, Qb) identify Pmn21 minima, Abm2 saddles, and Pc channels. CI-NEB gives a rotational barrier of 4.4 meV/atom versus 18.2 meV/atom for direct reversal through Pmna, and MD simulations show transient vortex textures consistent with that landscape. Along the same rotational path the authors report direct-gap closing near θQ ≈ 33.5°, reopening toward Abm2, and a change of the spin Chern number from Cs = −2 to 0 (via projected-Sz Wilson loops), together with Berry-curvature and BCD reconstruction. Uniaxial compression at 45° to the polar axis is shown in MD to select Abm2 domain textures, providing a mechanical handle on the same order parameter.

Significance. If the dual claim holds, the work supplies a concrete microscopic switching mechanism for the first elemental 2D ferroelectric and links that mechanism to electrically and mechanically programmable spin topology and nonlinear Hall response. The structural half is carefully constructed: soft-mode origin, symmetry-adapted Landau surface, quantitative CI-NEB barriers, and MD vortex textures form a coherent, falsifiable picture that also rationalizes prior minima-hopping and MD results. The topological half, if robust, would make Bi monolayer a rare elemental platform in which a single soft-mode angle controls polar order, Cs, and BCD. The extension sketched for other group-VA and IV–VI monolayers further raises the design value. Strengths include explicit mode decomposition, path-resolved gap and Wilson-loop data in the SM, and large-scale MD with a validated deep potential.

major comments (2)
  1. Fig. 2(a) and the accompanying SM path-resolved maps (Figs. S3b–S3d) assign Cs = −2 → 0 on the basis of a projected-Sz Wilson-loop decomposition that remains well-defined only while both the electronic gap and the projected spin gap are open. The paper itself states that the projected Sz gap collapses near the Abm2 saddle, after which spin-sector decomposition is lost; Cs = 0 is therefore reported only in the reopened portion of the path and only within PBEsol + Wannier. No hybrid-functional, meta-GGA, or GW check is provided for the location (or existence) of the direct-gap closing near θQ ≈ 33.5°. Because the dual claim that “polarization rotation drives a spin-topological transition” rests on this jump, a sensitivity test of the gap closing (or an alternative invariant that remains defined when the spin gap collapses) is load-bearing and should be added or the topological claim approp
  2. The abstract and final paragraph assert that directional uniaxial strain “tunes the associated topological transition.” Fig. 4 and the related MD discussion demonstrate only structural reorientation (Pmn21 → Abm2 domain selection). No electronic-structure or topological calculation is reported for the strained configurations. Either the topological response under the same loading geometry should be computed, or the claim should be limited to structural/domain control with topology inferred only by continuity with the unstrained rotational path.
minor comments (4)
  1. Fig. 1(f) and the main text quote barriers of 4.4 and 18.2 meV/atom; it would help the reader if the number of CI-NEB images, force convergence, and whether the lattice is fully relaxed or clamped were stated in the main text (or a clear pointer to the SM).
  2. Notation for the order-parameter angle θQ is introduced late; defining (Qa, Qb) = Q(cos θQ, sin θQ) earlier, when the Landau surface is first discussed, would improve readability.
  3. Several SM figure references (S2–S3, S6–S8) are essential for the topological and MD claims; a one-sentence summary of what each contains would make the main text more self-contained.
  4. Typographical inconsistencies appear in space-group labels (P mn21 vs Pmn21, P4/mmm vs P4/nmm) and in the arXiv-style line breaks; a uniform typesetting pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: barriers, soft-mode landscape, and spin Chern change are independent first-principles/Wannier outputs, not forced by fits or self-citation.

full rationale

The load-bearing claims rest on DFT phonon spectra of P4/mmm, symmetry-adapted mode analysis (ISOTROPY), clamped-lattice energy contours and CI-NEB barriers (4.4 vs 18.2 meV/atom), and Wannier-based Wilson-loop spin Chern numbers along the rotational path. The Landau expansion in (Qa, Qb) is a standard phenomenological fit to that DFT surface and is not used to redefine or replace the NEB or topology results. Cs = −2 for Pmn21 is reported as consistent with external prior work, not as a uniqueness theorem imported from the present authors. MD vortex textures and strain-driven domain reorientation are separate dynamical checks, not inputs that force the barriers or the Cs jump. No step reduces by construction to a fitted target quantity or a self-citation chain; the derivation is self-contained against external computational benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work is standard first-principles materials theory. Load-bearing inputs are the adequacy of PBEsol DFT for relative barriers and band topology of Bi, the soft-mode parentage from P4/mmm, and the applicability of the spin Wilson-loop construction when the projected Sz gap is finite. No new particles or forces are postulated; free parameters are ordinary computational settings and Landau coefficients fitted to the DFT surface rather than to experiment.

free parameters (3)
  • Landau free-energy coefficients for M5+ order parameter (Qa, Qb)
    Coefficients in Eqs. (S1)–(S5) are fit to the DFT energy surface so the contour in Fig. 1(d) matches first-principles energies; they are not predicted a priori.
  • DFT computational settings (PBEsol, PAW cutoffs, k-meshes, NEB images)
    Standard but choice-dependent parameters that control barrier heights and gap sizes; values live in SM and are not varied systematically in the main text.
  • Deep-potential MD model hyperparameters
    Used for large-scale domain and vortex simulations; accuracy depends on training set and validation reported only in SM.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBEsol DFT adequately ranks structural energies and captures the band-gap closing that defines the spin-topological transition in Bi monolayer.
    All barriers, phonon instabilities, and electronic gaps are computed at this level; no hybrid/GW cross-check is shown for the Cs jump.
  • domain assumption The high-symmetry P4/mmm phase and its M5+ and M3− soft modes are the correct parentage for the observed Pmn21 ferroelectric.
    Group-subgroup tree and Landau surface in Fig. 1 rest on this parent; experimental phase is Pmn21, not P4/mmm.
  • standard math When the electronic gap and projected Sz spectrum are open, the spin Wilson-loop winding yields a well-defined spin Chern number Cs.
    Standard construction (Sheng, Prodan, Lange et al.); used to assign Cs=−2 for Pmn21 and Cs=0 after reopening.
  • domain assumption Clamped-lattice energy landscape with M3− optimized at each (Qa,Qb) is representative of the physical switching coordinate.
    Fig. 1(d) and the rotational path are built this way; full ionic and cell relaxation along the path is only partially addressed via NEB.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polarization Rotation Drives a Spin-Topological Transition in Ferroelectric Bismuth Monolayer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L37MVFUA

@misc{pith2026260710063,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polarization Rotation Drives a Spin-Topological Transition in Ferroelectric Bismuth Monolayer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L37MVFUA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.10063}
}
abstract

Bismuth monolayer is the first two-dimensional elemental ferroelectric and an appealing platform for coupling polar order to spin-orbit-driven topology. However, its microscopic switching mechanism remains elusive. Here, using first-principles lattice dynamics and symmetry-adapted mode analysis, we identify a previously overlooked rotational pathway for in-plane polarization switching. Its energy barrier is more than four times lower than that of direct reversal, naturally explaining the vortexlike domain textures observed in molecular dynamics simulations. Remarkably, this polarization rotation also drives a spin-topological transition, changing the spin Chern number from $C_s=-2$ to $0$. Directional uniaxial strain further steers the polarization orientation and tunes the associated topological transition. These results establish polarization rotation as the switching mechanism of ferroelectric Bi monolayer and as an efficient route to electrically and mechanically programmable topology in two-dimensional ferroelectrics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10063 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Soft-mode origin of the multidimensional energy landscape in Bi monolayer. (a) Phonon spectrum of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Topological transition and gap reconstruction along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Berry curvature and BCD reconstruction across the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Strain-driven domain evolution in an optimized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. M. Rabe, M. Dawber, C. Lichtensteiger, C. H. Ahn, and J.-M. Triscone, inPhysics of Ferroelectrics: A Mod- ern Perspective(Springer, 2007) pp. 1–30

    2007

  2. [2]

    B. A. Strukov and A. P. Levanyuk,Ferroelectric phenom- ena in crystals: physical foundations(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Di Sante, P

    D. Di Sante, P. Barone, R. Bertacco, and S. Picozzi, Adv. Mater.25, 509 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    J. He, D. Di Sante, R. Li, X.-Q. Chen, J. M. Rondinelli, and C. Franchini, Nature communications9, 492 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Z. Li, L. Varrassi, Y. Yang, C. Franchini, L. Bel- laiche, and J. He, Journal of the American Chem- ical Society146, 15411 (2024), pMID: 38780106, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c03296

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.4c03296 2024

  6. [6]

    J. F. Scott, Science315, 954 (2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    L. W. Martin and A. M. Rappe, Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 16087 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Dawber, K

    M. Dawber, K. M. Rabe, and J. F. Scott, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 1083 (2005)

    2005

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Chang, J

    K. Chang, J. Liu, H. Lin, N. Wang, K. Zhao, A. Zhang, F. Jin, Y. Zhong, X. Hu, W. Duan, Q. Zhang, L. Fu, Q.- K. Xue, X. Chen, and S.-H. Ji, Science353, 274 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    C. Wang, L. You, D. Cobden, and J. Wang, Nat. Mater. 22, 542 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    S. Yuan, X. Luo, H. L. Chan, C. Xiao, Y. Dai, M. Xie, and J. Hao, Nat. Commun.10, 1775 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Z. Fei, W. Zhao, T. A. Palomaki, B. Sun, M. K. Miller, Z. Zhao, J. Yan, X. Xu, and D. H. Cobden, Nature560, 336 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Zhang, P

    D. Zhang, P. Schoenherr, P. Sharma, and J. Seidel, Nat. Rev. Mater.8, 25 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Parkin, and K

    S.Barraza-Lopez, B.M.Fregoso, J.W.Villanova, S.S.P. Parkin, and K. Chang, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 011001 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Z. Guan, H. Hu, X. Shen, P. Xiang, N. Zhong, J. Chu, and C. Duan, Adv. Electron. Mater.6, 1900818 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    C. Xiao, F. Wang, S. A. Yang, Y. Lu, Y. Feng, and S. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater.28, 1707383 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    J. Gou, H. Bai, X. Zhang, Y. L. Huang, S. Duan, A. Ar- iando, S. A. Yang, L. Chen, Y. Lu, and A. T. S. Wee, Nature617, 67 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Zhong, X

    S. Zhong, X. Zhang, J. Gou, L. Chen, S.-H. Wei, S. A. Yang, and Y. Lu, Nat. Commun.15, 8322 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Zhong, X

    S. Zhong, X. Zhang, S. Liu, S. A. Yang, and Y. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 236801 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Wang and S

    Z. Wang and S. Dong, Phys. Rev. B108, 235423 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Ouyang, D. Fang, S. Hu, L. Liu, and D. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 266103 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Y. Hong, J. Deng, Y. Yang, R. He, Z. Zhong, X. Ding, J. Sun, and J. Z. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 216802 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Z. Yu, B. Zhang, and C. Xu, Phys. Rev. B113, 104101 (2026)

    2026

  16. [24]

    Murakami, Phys

    S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 236805 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    I. K. Drozdov, A. Alexandradinata, S. Jeon, S. Nadj- Perge, H. Ji, R. J. Cava, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Nat. Phys.10, 664 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    F. Reis, G. Li, L. Dudy, M. Bauernfeind, S. Glass, W. Hanke, R. Thomale, J. Schäfer, and R. Claessen, Sci- ence357, 287 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    K.-H. Jin, E. Oh, R. Stania, F. Liu, and H. W. Yeom, Nano Lett.21, 9468 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    B. Peng, G. F. Lange, D. Bennett, K. Wang, R.-J. Slager, and B. Monserrat, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 116601 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Z. Qian, Z. Gong, J. Li, H. Wang, and S. Liu, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 070715 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    S. M. Young and A. M. Rappe, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 116601 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Z. Qian, J. Zhou, H. Wang, and S. Liu, npj Comput. Mater.9, 67 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    W.-Z. Chen, H. Xiang, and Y. Hou, arXiv (2026), arXiv:2601.20454 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2026

  25. [33]

    Singh, Z

    S. Singh, Z. Zanolli, M. Amsler, B. Belhadji, J. O. Sofo, M. J. Verstraete, and A. H. Romero, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 7324 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  27. [35]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  28. [36]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, Scr. Mater.108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  31. [39]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Physical Review B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    G. I. Csonka, J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, P. H. Philipsen, S. Lebègue, J. Paier, O. A. Vydrov, and J. G. Ángyán, Physical Review B79, 155107 (2009)

    2009

  33. [41]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    Phys.113, 9901 (2000)

    G.Henkelman, B.P.Uberuaga,andH.Jónsson,J.Chem. Phys.113, 9901 (2000)

    2000

  35. [43]

    Henkelman and H

    G. Henkelman and H. Jónsson, J. Chem. Phys.113, 9978 (2000)

    2000

  36. [44]

    B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, D. E. Tanner, and D. M. Hatch, J. Appl. Crystallogr.39, 607 (2006)

    2006

  37. [45]

    H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell, ISODIS- TORT, ISOTROPY software suite,https://iso.byu. edu/

  38. [46]

    H. T. Stokes and D. M. Hatch,Isotropy Subgroups of the 230 Crystallographic Space Groups(World Scientific, Singapore, 1988)

    1988

  39. [47]

    D. M. Hatch and H. T. Stokes, J. Appl. Crystallogr.36, 951 (2003)

    2003

  40. [48]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2309 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Comput. Phys. Commun.224, 405 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    [32, 33, 52–54]

    See Supplemental Material for computational details, symmetry-mode decomposition, Landau expansion, po- larization evolution, path-resolved topological and Berry geometric properties, and deep-potential simulations, which includes Refs. [32, 33, 52–54]. 7

  44. [52]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B83, 235401 (2011)

    2011

  45. [53]

    D. N. Sheng, Z. Y. Weng, L. Sheng, and F. D. M. Hal- dane, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 036808 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    Prodan, Phys

    E. Prodan, Phys. Rev. B80, 125327 (2009)

    2009

  47. [55]

    G. F. Lange, A. Bouhon, and R.-J. Slager, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033013 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Y. Bai, L. Cai, N. Mao, R. Li, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and C. Niu, Physical Review B105, 195142 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  50. [58]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, S. Fang, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, E. Kaxiras, H.-Z. Lu, H. Lin, L. Fu, N. Gedik, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nature565, 337 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nat. Mater.18, 324 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Sinha, P

    S. Sinha, P. C. Adak, A. Chakraborty, K. Das, K. Deb- nath, L. D. V. Sangani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, U. V. Waghmare, A. Agarwal, and M. M. Deshmukh, Nat. Phys.18, 765 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.