Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Inferring Covariances for Probabilistic Programs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.08280 v1 pith:L45TMNIH submitted 2016-06-27 cs.LO

Inferring Covariances for Probabilistic Programs

classification cs.LO
keywords boundsloweruppervariancesapproximatingoutcomesprobabilisticprograms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study weakest precondition reasoning about the (co)variance of outcomes and the variance of run-times of probabilistic programs with conditioning. For outcomes, we show that approximating (co)variances is computationally more difficult than approximating expected values. In particular, we prove that computing both lower and upper bounds for (co)variances is $\Sigma^{0}_{2}$-complete. As a consequence, neither lower nor upper bounds are computably enumerable. We therefore present invariant-based techniques that do enable enumeration of both upper and lower bounds, once appropriate invariants are found. Finally, we extend this approach to reasoning about run-time variances.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.