Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Tuning and Implementation Variants of Discrete-Time ADRC

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.07309 v2 pith:L4FMEIWO submitted 2022-11-14 eess.SY cs.SY

Tuning and Implementation Variants of Discrete-Time ADRC

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords adrcdiscrete-timeimplementationserror-basedalmostapplicationsarticledifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Practical implementations of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) will almost always take place in discretized form. Since applications may have quite different needs regarding their discrete-time controllers, this article summarizes and extends the available set of ADRC implementations to provide a suitable variant for as many as possible use cases. In doing so, the gap between quasi-continuous and discrete-time controller tuning is being closed for applications with low sampling frequencies. The main contribution of this article is the derivation of three different discrete-time implementations of error-based ADRC. It is shown that these are almost one-to-one counterparts of existing output-based implementations, to the point where transfer functions and coefficients can be reused in unaltered form. In this way, error-based implementations become firmly rooted in the established landscape of discrete-time ADRC. Furthermore, it becomes possible to equip error-based variants with windup protection abilities known from output-based ADRC.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.