Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Publication Trends in Artificial Intelligence Conferences: The Rise of Super Prolific Authors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.07793 v1 pith:L5I3IT5T submitted 2024-11-28 cs.DL cs.AI

Ariful Azad , Afeefa Banu This is my paper
classification cs.DLcs.AI
keywords conferencesresearchartificialauthorsintelligenceprolificpublicationresearchers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Papers published in top conferences contribute influential discoveries that are reshaping the landscape of modern Artificial Intelligence (AI). We analyzed 87,137 papers from 11 AI conferences to examine publication trends over the past decade. Our findings reveal a consistent increase in both the number of papers and authors, reflecting the growing interest in AI research. We also observed a rise in prolific researchers who publish dozens of papers at the same conference each year. In light of this analysis, the AI research community should consider revisiting authorship policies, addressing equity concerns, and evaluating the workload of junior researchers to foster a more sustainable and inclusive research environment.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review

    cs.DL 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An audit of 50,289 ICLR papers shows acceptance odds vary up to 8x across topics at equal reviewer scores, indicating scores are not comparable across research areas.

  2. AiraXiv: An AI-Driven Open-Access Platform for Human and AI Scientists

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    AiraXiv is a proposed AI-driven platform for open preprints that supports human and AI authors with interactive UI and MCP-based interactions, validated by serving as the submission system for ICAIS 2025.

  3. Peerispect: Claim Verification in Scientific Peer Reviews

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Peerispect extracts claims from peer reviews, retrieves evidence from the manuscript, and verifies them via NLI in a modular pipeline with a visual interface.

Pith tools