Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Systematic simulation of age-period-cohort analysis: Demonstrating bias of Bayesian regularization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.07124 v1 pith:L5TTWRAP submitted 2023-10-11 stat.ME

Systematic simulation of age-period-cohort analysis: Demonstrating bias of Bayesian regularization

classification stat.ME
keywords modeleffectsanalysisartificialcohortlinearrandombayesian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Age-period-cohort (APC) analysis is one of the fundamental time-series analyses used in the social sciences. This paper evaluates APC analysis via systematic simulation in term of how well the artificial parameters are recovered. We consider three models of Bayesian regularization using normal prior distributions: the random effects model with reference to multilevel analysis, the ridge regression model equivalent to the intrinsic estimator, and the random walk model referred to as the Bayesian cohort model. The proposed simulation generates artificial data through combinations of the linear components, focusing on the fact that the identification problem affects the linear components of the three effects. Among the 13 cases of artificial data, the random walk model recovered the artificial parameters well in 10 cases, while the random effects model and the ridge regression model did so in 4 cases. The cases in which the models failed to recover the artificial parameters show the estimated linear component of the cohort effects as close to zero. In conclusion, the models of Bayesian regularization in APC analysis have a bias: the index weights have a large influence on the cohort effects and these constraints drive the linear component of the cohort effects close to zero. However, the random walk model mitigates underestimating the linear component of the cohort effects.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.